About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Parasitology Research
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 501328, 6 pages
Research Article

Larvicidal Activity against Aedes aegypti and Molluscicidal Activity against Biomphalaria glabrata of Brazilian Marine Algae

1Laboratório de Produtos Naturais, Instituto de Química e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus A., C. Simões, Avenida Lourival Melo Mota, s/n, Tabuleiro do Martins, 57072-970 Maceió, AL, Brazil
2Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Icbs Campus A., C. Simões, Avenida Lourival Melo Mota, s/n, Tabuleiro do Martins, 57072-970 Maceió, AL, Brazil

Received 26 September 2013; Revised 23 December 2013; Accepted 23 December 2013; Published 13 February 2014

Academic Editor: D. S. Lindsay

Copyright © 2014 Elíca Amara Cecília Guedes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


This study investigated the biological activities of five benthic marine algae collected from Northeastern Region of Brazil. The tested activities included larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti, molluscicidal activity against Biomphalaria glabrata, and toxicity against Artemia salina. Extracts of Ulva lactuca (Chlorophyta), Padina gymnospora, Sargassum vulgare (Phaeophyta), Hypnea musciformis, and Digenea simplex (Rhodophyta) were prepared using different solvents of increasing polarity, including dichloromethane, methanol, ethanol, and water. Of the extracts screened, the dichloromethane extracts of H. musciformis and P. gymnospora exhibited the highest activities and were subjected to bioassay-guided fractionation in hexane and chloroform. The chloroform fractions of the P. gymnospora and H. musciformis extracts showed molluscicidal activity at values below 40 μg·mL−1 (11.1460 μg·mL−1 and 25.8689 μg·mL−1, resp.), and the chloroform and hexane fractions of P. gymnospora showed larvicidal activity at values below 40 μg·mL−1 (29.018 μg·mL−1 and 17.230 μg·mL−1, resp.). The crude extracts were not toxic to A. salina, whereas the chloroform and hexane fractions of P. gymnospora (788.277 μg·mL−1 and 706.990 μg·mL−1) showed moderate toxicity, indicating that the toxic compounds present in these algae are nonpolar.

1. Introduction

Marine environments, particularly in the tropics, have greater species richness than tropical forests. These diverse species are capable of producing a wide variety of chemical compounds with unique structures and functions, and many of these compounds can be used for the development of novel drugs [1, 2]. As an abundant resource in Brazilian coastal waters, marine algae exhibit a great potential source of novel compounds. It is known that species of marine algae synthesize bioactive compounds with diverse activities [2]. Many studies aiming to identify representative genera of marine algae that produce bioactive substances have been conducted. In the last three decades, the rate of discovery of biologically active metabolites produced by macroalgae has increased [35].

The secondary metabolites of marine algae are analogous to those of terrestrial plants with respect to the production of terpenes, aromatic compounds, acetogenins, amino acid derivatives, and polyphenols [5]. Many of these metabolites are known to possess antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, and antitumor activities [1].

The Brazilian Northeast Region is the poorest region of Brazil and has the worst Human Development Indices in the country [6]. Most of the population in this region is at risk of contracting neglected tropical diseases. In particular, dengue fever and schistosomiasis are major public health concerns in Brazil and other developing tropical countries [7, 8]. Natural products with different biocidal activities can help fight parasite vectors at the adult or larval stages and are good alternatives to synthetic products due to their rapid biodegradation and lower costs [9], thus contributing to improved public health conditions in tropical developing countries.

The present study investigates the biological activities of five marine algae: Ulva lactuca Linnaeus, Padina gymnospora (Kutzing) Sonder, Sargassum vulgare C. Agardh, Hypnea musciformis (Wulfen in Jacque) J.V. Lamouroux, and Digenea simplex (Wulfen) C. Agardh—all collected from the coast of Alagoas State. The activities tested included larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti, molluscicidal activity against Biomphalaria glabrata, and toxicity against Artemia salina. This is the first report on the biological activity of marine algae collected from the coast of Alagoas.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Marine Algae

Algae were manually collected from the Riacho Doce beach (9°34′0′′S and 35°39′0′′W) during low tides between October 2007 and July 2009. The collected samples were immediately transported to the Phycology Laboratory of the Biological Sciences Institute (ICBS), Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL). Five species of algae from three divisions were used for this study: Chlorophyta—Ulva lactuca Linnaeus, MAC51238; Phaeophyta—Padina gymnospora (Kutzing) Sonder, MAC51235, and Sargassum vulgare C. Agardh, MAC51236; and Rhodophyta—Hypnea musciformis (Wulfen in Jacque) J.V. Lamouroux, MAC51234, and Digenea simplex (Wulfen) C. Agardh, MAC51231. A voucher specimen of each algae species was deposited in the MAC Herbarium at the Environmental Institute of the city of Maceió, Alagoas (Br), as a reference material.

2.2. Extract Preparation and Fractionation

Algae were washed with distilled water, dried in air-circulating ovens (BLUE, MOD-1401440SC, USA) at 45°C for three hours, and crushed using a MetVisa industrial blender (model type TA-2). The dried and crushed material from each collection and each alga was mixed in equal quantities. To obtain crude extracts, 500 g of dried algae was suspended in 1000 mL of dichloromethane, methanol, ethanol, or water and macerated for 72 hours; this process was repeated three times. The organic extracts were filtered and rotoevaporated (MOD Rotoevaporator with a Buchi heating bath B-490, Switzerland) at 25°C–40°C, and the aqueous extract was lyophilized (Edwards Freeze dryer Mod E2 MB of Brazil). Extracts of the respective algal species were stored at 4°C. The dichloromethane extracts of H. musciformis and P. gymnospora were selected for fractionation because they gave the best yields: 11.86 g (2.58%) and 13.96 g (3.04%), respectively. The yields of the other extracts were less than 0.5 g (0.1%) and were therefore not sufficiently large for fractionation.

For fractionation by liquid-liquid partitioning, the crude extracts of H. musciformis (2.73 g) and P. gymnospora (1.90 g) were suspended in methanol : water (3 : 1) and extracted with hexane and chloroform to yield chloroform and hexane fractions. All solvents were purchased from VERTEC Fine Chemicals of Brazil.

2.3. Mosquito Larvicidal Activity

Bioassays were run with A. aegypti larvae at the Chemistry and Biotechnology Institute of Federal University from Alagoas IQB/UFAL laboratory using the WHO protocol [10]. The bioassays used fourth instar larvae with two repetitions. Each experimental course used 10 larvae placed in a 250 mL cup containing 27 mL of test solution at 100 μg·mL−1. Extracts that led to ≤50% mortality were subjected to more precise tests. In these tests, four replicates were run using 25 larvae in each replicate. The concentrations used were defined based on the preliminary results.

Larvae were considered dead when they failed to reach the surface of the solution after the liquid was stirred. Dead larvae counts were performed at 24 hours and 48 hours after the start of the experiment, and the samples were run in quadruplicate. In parallel, control tests were performed with 1% aqueous dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution and the synthetic larvicide Temephos at 3 μg·mL−1. The activity level of extracts tested was calculated based on the average percent mortality of larvae at 48 hours (>75%: highly active, 50–75%: moderately active, 25–50%: weakly active, and <25%: inactive).

For A. aegypti larvae, treatments that result in at least 50% mortality within 48 h were selected for subsequent bioassays using different concentrations to determine the concentrations required to kill 10% (LC10), 50% (LC50), and 90% (LC90) of the larvae. Analysis was performed according to the probit method [11].

2.4. Toxicity Test with Artemia salina (Nontarget Model Organism)

Artemia salina toxicity (i.e., LC50) is largely accepted [12] as a parameter reflecting the general biological toxicity of a compound in nontarget organisms. Toxicity tests using Artemia salina Leach nauplii were carried out according to the method described by Bastos and colleagues [13], with some modifications. Artemia cysts (approximately 1 g·L−1) were added to filtered seawater and maintained at 27–30°C with aeration and under continuous light. Samples that showed ≥30% mortality at 1000 mg·mL−1 in preliminary tests were subjected to quantitative assays. After 24 hours, the nauplii hatched, were collected with a micropipette, and were concentrated in a Petri dish with seawater maintained at the same temperature and luminosity for more than 24 hours. Fifteen grams of each crude extract (dichloromethane, methanol, ethanol, and water) was diluted in 5 mL of distilled water. The control solution was prepared with seawater and 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).

Ten Artemia nauplii and 50 μL algae extract were placed in each well. Four different concentrations of each extract were tested in six replicates. A control solution was also tested in six replicates. After 24 hours, the number of dead larvae was determined with the aid of a Zoom stereomicroscope. The dead larvae counts also included larvae that remained immobile after stimulation for at least 10 seconds.

The degree of toxicity of each plant extract fraction was determined as recommended by Déciga-Campos et al. [14]. These authors consider extracts that have an LC50 ≥ 1000 μg·mL−1 to be nontoxic, an LC50 between 500 and 1000 μg·mL−1 to be weakly toxic, and LC50 < 500 μg·mL−1 to be highly toxic. The LC50 values (concentrations that cause 50% mortality) and their confidence intervals (90% IC and 95% IC) were calculated using probit analysis [11].

2.5. Molluscicidal Activity

Molluscicidal activity was tested in Biomphalaria glabrata (Say 1818) that were propagated in the laboratory and were descendants of specimens not infected by trematodes.

Snails were kept in glass tanks at room temperature in a dechlorinated water system for 8 hours with a mixture of soil, sand, and calcium carbonate. During the assay period, they were fed fresh lettuce and fish food. Molluscicidal activity was evaluated by immersing B. glabrata in an aqueous solution mixed with 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) containing the extract under investigation at different concentrations (0.10 to 100 μg·mL−1) [8].

The test solution for each algal extract was prepared at 100 μg·mL−1 for the preliminary tests with the snails. In the preliminary stage, five adult snails were used per concentration. Two sets of controls were used to verify that the snails had normal susceptibility to toxins. The positive control used was niclosamide at 3 μg·mL−1 and the negative control was dechlorinated water. The organisms were exposed to the extracts for 24 hours and observed for 72 hours, with readings and water exchanges every 24 hours. Dead specimens were removed at the time of the readings. The death of the snails was indicated by discoloration, the absence of muscle contractions, bleeding, and the deterioration of body tissues. The algal extract promoted approximately 30% mortality at 100 μg·mL−1. In parallel, control tests were performed with aqueous DMSO solution (0.1%) and the molluscicide niclosamide at 3 μg·mL−1. Probit version 1.5 [11] was used to calculate the lethal concentration values (LC90, LC50, and LC10). The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that crude extracts of plants with LC50 values <40 μg·mL−1 (i.e., 0.04% or 0.4 mg·mL−1) have some potential as molluscicidal or larvicidal compounds [10].

The results shown for the molluscicidal tests represent the average ± standard deviation of three replicates (). These results were submitted to ANOVA, followed by the Tukey test (). All tests were performed using the Microcal Origin, version 8.0, and Graph Pad Prism, version 5.0.

3. Results and Discussion

The crude dichloromethane, methanol, ethanol, and water extracts from different algal species (Ulva lactuca (Chlorophyta), Padina gymnospora, Sargassum vulgare (Phaeophyta), Hypnea musciformis, and Digenea simplex (Rhodophyta)) and the chloroform and hexane fractions of extracts from H. musciformis and P. gymnospora were screened for biological activity. Different concentrations of extracts were tested according to organism susceptibility. The initial concentrations used were 1000 μg·mL−1 for the Artemia salina toxicity test, 500 μg·mL−1 for the Aedes aegypti larvicidal test, and 100 μg·mL−1 for the Biomphalaria glabrata molluscicidal test.

The A. aegypti larvicidal tests revealed that only the hexane and chloroform fractions of P. gymnospora exhibited larvicidal activity, with LC50 values of 29.01 μg·mL−1 and 17.23 μg·mL−1, respectively (Table 1); the other extracts exhibited lower activities.

Table 1: Lethal concentrations (LC50) of the chloroform and hexane fractions (in μg·mL−1) of P. gymnospora for Aedes aegypti.

Selvin and Lipton [9] evaluated the biocidal potential of Ulva fasciata and H. musciformis isolated in India and verified their larvicidal activity against the mosquito Culex sp. at the second and fourth instars. These authors found that larvae at second instar exhibited 100% mortality when exposed to 10 mg·mL−1 methanol : dichloromethane extracts (1 : 1). Although the mosquito species used in our study was not the same as that used by those authors, both Culex sp. and A. aegypti are vectors of viral diseases, and extracts from H. musciformis showed no lethality against A. aegypti. An analysis of the larvicidal activities of methanol extracts of 20 species of seaweed collected off the coast of India against the second instar larvae of A. aegypti [2] revealed that Lobophora variegata (Phaeophyta-Dictyotaceae) had a relatively high LC50 (70.38 μg·mL−1). In our work, only the hexane and chloroform fractions of P. gymnospora (Phaeophyta) had higher larvicidal potentials (29.018 μg·mL−1 and 17.230 μg·mL−1, resp.).

The chloroform fractions from H. musciformis and P. gymnospora showed molluscicidal activity against B. glabrata, and their LC50 values were determined to be 11.1460 and 25.8689 μg·mL−1, respectively. The hexane fractions of these two algal species did not show molluscicidal activity sufficient to calculate a lethal concentration (Table 2).

Table 2: Lethal concentration (LC50) of the hexane (C6H14) and chloroform (CHCL3) fractions of extracts from marine algae species collected on the beach of Riacho Doce, AL, against B. glabrata.

Given the molluscicidal activity of the chloroform fractions of H. musciformis and P. gymnospora, and the fact that the WHO [10] recommends that plant extracts with LC50 < 40 μg·mL−1 be used directly against B. glabrata, these fractions might be promising sources of new compounds with molluscicidal activity. Patel et al. [15] evaluated the molluscicidal potential of methanolic extracts from 60 marine algae and found that only extracts from Fucus serratus, F. vesiculosus, Pelvetia canaliculata, Ascophyllum nodosum, Halidrys siliquosa, Bifurcaria bifurcata, Dictyota dichotoma, and Halopithys incurve exhibited activity against B. glabrata at 500 μg·mL−1.

A. salina toxicity upon exposure to crude dichloromethane, methanol, ethanol, and water extracts and to the chloroform and hexane fractions of algae H. musciformis and P. gymnospora was analyzed. No mortality was observed at any concentration tested for any samples, except the chloroform and hexane fractions of algae H. musciformis and P. gymnospora; thus, the LC values could not be calculated.

The LC50 value reflects the concentration necessary to cause the death of 50% of the A. salina individuals in a sample. Therefore, lower LC50 values reflect greater toxicity [16]. The results of the A. salina assay indicated that crude extracts of P. gymnospora prepared with dichloromethane, methanol, and ethanol and crude extracts of H. musciformis prepared with dichloromethane, methanol, and water had low toxicities (Table 3). The chloroform and hexane fractions of the dichloromethane extract of P. gymnospora showed low toxicity against A. salina (lower than 1000 μg·mL-1) (Table 4). For the other marine algae extracts tested, no LC could be calculated.

Table 3: Accurate toxicity test with crude extracts of marine algae collected on the beach Riacho Doce, AL, against A. salina (CH2Cl2: dichloromethane; MeOH: methanol; EtOH: ethanol; H2O: water).
Table 4: More precise toxicity test of the hexane (C6H14) and chloroform (CHCl3) fractions of the extracts of algal species collected on the beach Riacho Doce, AL, against A. salina.

Ara et al. [17] investigated the toxic activity of ethanol extracts of 22 algal species from the Karachi coast against A. salina and found that five brown algae showed values below 1000 μg·mL−1 (Spatoglossum asperum, Stokeyia indica (507 μg·mL−1), Stoechospermum marginatum (612 μg·mL−1), Sargassum swartzii (928 μg·mL−1), and S. binderi (735 μg·mL−1)), whereas only one green alga Caulerpa racemosa (929 μg·mL−1) was toxic. In the same study, these authors found that the hexane fractions of S. marginatum (349 μg·mL−1) and S. swartzii (61 μg·mL−1) were also toxic. In our study, the chloroform and hexane fractions of P. gymnospora (788.277 μg·mL−1 and 706.990 μg·mL−1, resp.) showed low activity, indicating the polar nature of the toxic compounds of this alga.

Lhuillier et al. [18] screened 26 benthic macroalgae in the state of Santa Catarina and assayed their lethality using A. salina larvae; the samples included ethanol extracts from red (Rhodophyta), brown (Phaeophyta), and green (Chlorophyta) algae. These authors found that 25 species had significant toxicity, especially Acanthophora spicifera, Galaxaura marginata, Gracilaria dominguensis, Pterocladia capillacea, Padina gymnospora, Ectocarpus breviarticulatus, Chaetomorpha antennina, and Codium decorticatum (50 μg·mL−1). In the present study, the ethanol extract of H. musciformis was not sufficiently lethal to allow the calculation of the LC50, and P. gymnospora was not lethal. Guedes et al. [19] found that fractions of H. musciformis and P. gymnospora have a selective cytotoxic activity against cancerous cells.

The generally low toxicity of algal extracts against A. salina, as reported by these authors, is consistent with the findings of this study. These results indicate that these extracts have some potential for the development of products to control vectors of neglected diseases without any important impacts on nontarget organisms, that is, organisms that could be inadvertently affected by toxic substances as a result of sharing an environment or resources with the target species.

4. Conclusions

The biological activity of two marine algae collected from the coast of Alagoas State showed larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti (based on Aedes aegypti larvae in the fourth instar) and molluscicidal activity against Biomphalaria glabrata (based on the snail). The chloroform fractions of H. musciformis and P. gymnospora might be promising sources of new compounds with molluscicidal activity, and the hexane and chloroform fractions of P. gymnospora could be sources of novel larvicides.

The primary advantage of using these extracts would be their low cost of production, as the algae from which they were obtained are an abundant resource on the Brazilian coast. These algae are easy to cultivate, and their crude extracts have low off-target toxicity, as demonstrated in the Artemia nauplii.

Therefore, we suggest the extension of studies to establish the potential of these extracts for use in natural environments, considering the potential low impact on nontarget organisms.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. T. F. Molinski, D. S. Dalisay, S. L. Lievens, and J. P. Saludes, “Drug development from marine natural products,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–85, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Manilal, N. Thajuddin, J. Selvin, A. Idhayadhulla, R. S. Kumar, and S. Sujith, “In vitro mosquito larvicidal activity of marine algae against the human vectors, Culex quinquefasciatus (say) and Aedes aegypti (linnaeus) (diptera: Culicidae),” International Journal of Zoological Research, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 272–278, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. T. Cabrita, C. Vale, and A. P. Rauter, “Halogenated compounds from marine algae,” Marine Drugs, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 2301–2317, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. A. Miyasato, T. Kawano, J. C. Freitas, R. G. S. Berlinck, E. Nakano, and L. F. Tallarico, “Molluscicidal activity of some marine substances against the snail Biomphalaria glabrata (Mollusca, Planorbidae),” Parasitology Research, vol. 110, pp. 1873–1879, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. J. Faulkner, “Marine natural products,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–48, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento, “A Verdadeira Riqueza das Nações: Vias para o Desenvolvimento Humano,” 2010, http://www.pnud.org.br/rdh.
  7. P. Hotez, “A new voice for the poor,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 1, no. 1, article e77, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. A. D. Santos, C. M. D. Carvalho, A. L. S. Costa, A. S. Conceição, F. D. B. P. Moura, and A. E. G. Santana, “Bioactivity evaluation of plant extracts used in indigenous medicine against the snail, Biomphalaria glabrata, and the larvae of Aedes aegypti,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 846583, 9 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Selvin and A. P. Lipton, “Biopotentials of Ulva fasciata and Hypnea musciformis collected from the peninsular coast of India,” Journal of Marine Science and Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. World Health Organization (WHO), “Instruction for determining the susceptibility or resistance of mosquito larvae to insecticides,” WHO/VBC/75.583, 1975.
  11. D. J. Finney, Probit Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 3rd edition, 1971.
  12. J. L. Carballo, Z. L. Hernández-Inda, P. Pérez, and M. D. García-Grávalos, “A comparison between two brine shrimp assays to detect in vitro cytotoxicity in marine natural products,” BMC Biotechnology, vol. 2, article 17, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. L. A. Bastos, M. R. F. Lima, L. M. Conserva, V. S. Andrade, E. M. M. Rocha, and R. P. L. Lemos, “Studies on the antimicrobial activity and brine shrimp toxicity of Zeyheria tuberculosa (Vell.) Bur. (Bignoniaceae) extracts and their main constituents,” Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, vol. 8, article 16, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Déciga-Campos, I. Rivero-Cruz, M. Arriaga-Alba et al., “Acute toxicity and mutagenic activity of Mexican plants used in traditional medicine,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 334–342, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. V. Patel, D. C. Wright, M. A. Romero, G. Blunden, and M. D. Guiry, “Molluscicidal polyphenols from species of fucaceae,” Natural Product Communications, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 245–249, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. M. Milhem, A. S. Al-Hiyasat, and H. Darmani, “Toxicity testing of restorative dental materials using brine shrimp larvae (Artemia salina),” Journal of Applied Oral Science, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 297–301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Ara, V. Sultana, S. Ehteshamul-Haque, R. Qasim, and V. U. Ahmad, “Cytotoxic activity of marine macro-algae on Artemia salina (Brine Shrimp),” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 13, pp. 304–307, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  18. C. Lhullier, P. A. Horta, and M. Falkenberg, “Avaliação de extratos de macroalgas bênticas do litoral catarinense utilizando o teste de letalidade para Artemia salina,” Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 158–163, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  19. E. A. C. Guedes, T. G. da Silva, J. S. Aguiar, L. D. de Barros, L. M. Pinotti, and A. E. G. Sant’Ana, “Cytotoxic activity of marine algae against cancerous cells,” Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 668–673, 2013. View at Google Scholar