Prevalence of Hypothyroidism in Pregnant Women in India: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Yadav, Vikas; Dabar, Deepti; Goel, Akhil D.; Bairwa, Mohan; Sood, Akanksha; Prasad, Pankaj; Agarwal, Sanjay S.; Nandeshwar, Sunil

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5515831

Journal of Thyroid Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Ethical Approval Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 5515831 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5515831

Prevalence of Hypothyroidism in Pregnant Women in India: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Vikas Yadav,¹Deepti Dabar,²Akhil D. Goel,³Mohan Bairwa,⁴Akanksha Sood,⁵Pankaj Prasad,²Sanjay S. Agarwal,¹and Sunil Nandeshwar¹

Academic Editor: Brendan C. Stack Jr.

Received07 Jan 2021

Revised01 Feb 2021

Accepted03 Feb 2021

Published19 Feb 2021

Abstract

Introduction. This meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the prevalence of hypothyroidism among pregnant women in India. Methods. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Shodhganga (Indian thesis repository) for observational studies, providing prevalence of hypothyroidism among pregnant women in India. Systematic study selection and data extraction procedures were followed. Quality assessment of each study was done using JBI critical appraisal checklist. The random effects model was used for pooling the effect sizes. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot and rank correlation test. I² statistics was used to measure heterogeneity across the studies. Heterogeneity in the pooled estimates was further explored with subgroup analyses and meta-regression analysis. Results. Sixty-one studies were found eligible and included in this review. The pooled estimate of the prevalence of hypothyroidism in pregnant women was 11.07% (95% CI: 8.79–13.84, I² = 99%). Pooled prevalence estimates of subclinical and overt hypothyroidism are 9.51% (95% CI: 7.48–12.04, I² = 98%) and 2.74% (95% CI: 2.08–3.58, I² = 94%). Conclusion. We documented 11.07% pooled prevalence of hypothyroidism in pregnant women in India.

1. Introduction

Pregnancy has a significant effect on the thyroid gland and its functioning [1]. Hypothyroidism in pregnancy is defined as an increased TSH level in serum. Furthermore, based on free T4 levels, it is categorized into overt (lower free T4 levels) and subclinical hypothyroidism (normal free T4 levels) [2].

Worldwide, several studies have reported 1.5%–4% prevalence of hypothyroidism in pregnant women. Among them, 0.3% to 0.5% had overt hypothyroidism (OH), and the rest had subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) [3–5]. In India, reports on the prevalence of maternal hypothyroidism ranged between 1.2% and 67.0% in various studies [6, 7].

Globally, the leading cause of hypothyroidism in pregnancy is iodine deficiency, and in iodine sufficient areas, most common cause is autoimmune thyroiditis [4, 5, 8]. Other common causes are radio-iodine therapy, thyroidectomy, congenital hypothyroidism, drug use (i.e., rifampicin and phenytoin) and any hypothalamic-pituitary disease [4, 5, 8]. Women with lower thyroid reserves preconceptually are often unable to cope with increased metabolic demands during pregnancy period and can enter into the hypothyroid state. Maternal thyroid hormone levels are critical to the fetus, especially in the first trimester due to inability to produce iodothyronines before ten weeks of gestation. This is the period when neurodevelopment of fetus can potentially be hampered due to deficiency of iodothyronines [9].

In pregnant women, untreated overt hypothyroidism is associated with gestational hypertension, abruptio placenta, anemia, gestational diabetes, and postpartum hemorrhage [10–13]. In overt hypothyroidism, there is also an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes. Frequently associated birth outcomes are spontaneous miscarriage, low birth weight, premature birth, fetal distress, perinatal death, and stillbirth [11, 14–19]. Overt hypothyroidism also has a detrimental impact on neurocognitive development of the fetus. Subclinical hypothyroidism might also have similar adverse effects, although the evidence is inconclusive [2]. Moreover, various studies have found that children born to mother with untreated hypothyroidism are at significantly higher risk of developing neuropsychological developmental disorders, which may manifest as lower IQ scores and other learning disabilities [20–22].

Earlier studies have also proved that most of these complications can be prevented by high-risk screening pregnant women for thyroid status and providing treatment in the form of levothyroxine (LT4) [2]. To effectively start such a screening program in India, there is a need to have a national-level estimate of the prevalence of this disease.

Hence, we conducted this meta-analysis with the aim to estimate the prevalence of hypothyroidism among pregnant women in India.

2. Methods

This meta-analysis article is written in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines [23] and is registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019137955).

2.1. Eligibility Criteria

We included the studies reporting the prevalence of hypothyroidism in pregnant women in India. Inclusion criteria: (1) community or hospital-based studies; (2) studies, providing prevalence of hypothyroidism (subclinical or overt or category nonspecified); (3) studies conducted in India; (4) type of studies: cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, or data-based analysis; (5) diagnosis based on TSH level; (6) singleton pregnancy Exclusion criteria: (1) studies conducted in the special population groups like the diabetic mothers or mothers with pregnancy losses, etc.; (2) studies which have not reported screening methods; (3) diagnosis other than TSH levels; (4) case-control studies or experimental studies

2.2. Information Sources

We performed searches in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus using selected keywords. These results were supplemented by relevant studies obtained form Google Scholar and Shodhganga—Indian thesis repository (https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/). We included articles published up to December 2019. No date or language restrictions were imposed. The cross-references of the included studies were explored for additional studies. Keywords were identified with discussion among reviewers, and search query was developed separately for each database.

The main themes of search terms were thyroid (hypothyroidism OR thyroid disorder); geographic area (India); pregnancy (pregnancy OR pregnant OR antenatal OR prenatal); and prevalence (prevalence OR cross-sectional OR incidence OR cohort OR prospective OR longitudinal). To develop a robust search strategy, we used controlled descriptors (such as MeSH terms) and Boolean operators.

2.3. Study Selection

Two reviewers (ADG and DD) independently conducted searches on all information sources. Then, all search results were uploaded to Rayyan QCRI online software (https://rayyan.qcri.org). Rayyan QCRI helped in ensuring a systematic and comprehensive search and selection process. A third reviewer (VY) managed Rayyan QCRI software, who identified and removed the duplicate citations and ensured independent review of titles and abstracts by blinding the decisions of both reviewers.

The third reviewer also identified the discrepancies between the two reviewers and discussed them, for making consensus to select the articles. Full-text copies of all selected studies were obtained to find more details. Both reviewers (ADG and DD) reviewed the full text of articles and resolved the discrepancies by consensus. If needed, the arbitration was done by the third reviewer (VY).

We documented the reasons for the exclusion of studies explored as full text. If any study is reported as multiple publications, all publications were obtained, and data were extracted from all the publications to collect maximum relevant information. The study inclusion process is presented using the PRISMA flowchart (Figure 1). The reference management software Mendeley Desktop (https://www.mendeley.com) for Windows was used to store, organize, cite, and manage all the included articles.

2.4. Data Extraction

After selecting eligible studies, both reviewers (ADG and DD) independently performed data extraction of relevant information. Data were extracted regarding author, year of publication, study location, site (hospital- or community-based or data-based), study type, trimester, whether prepregnancy thyroid disorder patients were excluded, sample size, diagnostic criteria, and prevalence of hypothyroidism (overall, subclinical, and overt). We contacted authors of included articles for additional data whenever required. Inconsistencies in data were resolved by either consensus or seeking further information from the authors of the study. In case of disagreement between two reviewers, arbitration was done by the third reviewer (VY).

2.5. Quality Assessment of Studies

Two reviewers (ADG and DD) assessed each study’s methodological quality independently using JBI critical appraisal checklist [24] for cross-sectional studies. The components included in this checklist are addressing the target population, appropriateness of participant recruitment, adequacy of sample size, detailed description of study subjects, data analysis with sufficient coverage of the identified sample, use of valid methods for identification of the condition, measurement of the condition in a standardized and reliable way for all participants, use of appropriate statistical analysis, and adequacy of response rate. For any discrepancies, the third reviewer (VY) was consulted. Studies having six or more scores (out of a total of 9) were considered optimum quality studies.

2.6. Data Synthesis and Analysis

The effect sizes were calculated for each of the included studies comprising the prevalence estimates of overall hypothyroidism, OH, and SCH among pregnant women in India. Pooled estimates were calculated separately for each of them. All the analysis was done in R software using Meta and Metafor packages [25, 26].

Logit transformation (using Generalized Linear Mixed Models, GLMMs) of proportions was implemented to calculate all pooled estimates, as it is the preferred method for calculating effect size for proportions [27].

Heterogeneity between studies was examined by I squared (I²) statistic and Cochran’s Q test. Due to significant heterogeneity between the studies, we used random effects models for pooling the estimates and they were reported as a proportion with 95% confidence interval. Restricted Maximum-Likelihood Estimator (REML) method was used to calculate Tau squared. Confidence intervals for individual studies were calculated using the Clopper–Pearson method. We determined the presence of publication bias by visual inspection of funnel plots and rank correlation test. A funnel plot was made between transformed proportions and standard error of transformed proportions. Statistical significance was considered as the value of less than 0.05. Subgroup analysis of estimate of the prevalence of total hypothyroidism was done for “trimester” of participants gestational period (first/second/third/all trimester), whether participants having prepregnancy thyroid disorder were excluded (excluded/not excluded/not mentioned), and the setting of study (hospital-/community-/data-based). India is a federal union that comprises 28 states and 8 union territories. Therefore, state-wise subgroup analysis was also conducted to get state-wise estimates of the prevalence of hypothyroidism. Another subgroup analysis was conducted to analyze the difference of prevalence in studies undertaken in coastal states (Odisha, West Bengal, Gujarat, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Karnataka) as compared to noncoastal states (Assam, Chandigarh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Punjab, Sikkim, Telangana, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand). Sensitivity analysis was done to exclude studies with a lower sample size (sample size less than 200) and to exclude studies with a quality score of less than six.

3. Results

On searching PubMed (n = 96), Scopus (n = 54), Web of Science (n = 29), Google Scholar (n = 473), and Shodhganga—reservoir of Indian theses (n = 424), a total of 1076 articles were identified related to maternal hypothyroidism.

Google Scholar uses artificial intelligence algorithms to include and rank the articles. It provides only 1000 results for each search query we make. We screened titles of all the 1000 results and found 473 relevant to our purpose.

An additional 42 articles were found eligible for inclusion through search of cross-references. After removal of 305 duplicate articles, a total of 813 articles were screened for inclusion. Based on their titles and abstract, 320 articles were excluded. Thus, the full texts of 493 articles were assessed for eligibility for the systematic review and meta-analysis. The various reasons for exclusion of studies were “not a prevalence study” (n = 149), “not conducted in humans” (n = 77), “not about hypothyroidism in pregnancy” (n = 65), “not conducted in India” (n = 57), “not conducted in pregnant women” (n = 56), and “review article” (n = 28).

All included studies (n = 61) provided the prevalence of overall hypothyroidism (total population 60,066) (Figure 1) [6, 7, 28–86]. Among them, 49 studies provided the prevalence of SCH (total population 33,068), and 42 studies provided the prevalence estimates of OH (total population 30,980). Fifty-four studies were conducted in a hospital-based setting, five were secondary data analysis, and two were community-based studies. Almost half (31 studies) of the studies were conducted in coastal states, 29 studies conducted in noncoastal states, and only 1 study conducted in multiples sites involving both coastal and noncoastal states (Table 1).

The definition of overall hypothyroidism (elevated TSH), subclinical hypothyroidism (elevated TSH with normal free thyroid hormone), and overt hypothyroidism (elevated TSH with low free thyroid hormone) was similar across the selected studies, but the reference cutoffs for TSH and free thyroid hormones (FT₄ and FT₃) were varied across studies. Upper cutoff limit of TSH for defining hypothyroidism in pregnancy varied from 2.5 to 4.5 mIU/L. For OH, the lower cutoff limits for FT4 and FT3 varied extensively among selected studies (Table 1). Thirty-five studies used American Thyroid Association 2011 (ATA 2011) guidelines for defining hypothyroidism [1] and the rest (26) of the studies used nonstandardized criteria for defining hypothyroidism.

3.1. Prevalence Estimates of Hypothyroidism in Pregnant Women in India

Pooled estimate (with random effects model) of the prevalence of overall hypothyroidism in pregnant women was 11.07% (95% CI: 8.79–13.84, I² = 99%). Pooled prevalence estimates of subclinical and overt hypothyroidism were 9.51% (95% CI: 7.48–12.04, I² = 98%) and 2.74% (95% CI: 2.08–3.58, I² = 94%), respectively (Figures 2–4).

3.2. Subgroup Analysis of Overall Hypothyroidism Estimates

Studies that included only women with second-trimester pregnancy documented a higher prevalence of hypothyroidism (25.51, 95% CI: 10.41–50.24) as compared to studies with women in first trimester (10.99, 95% CI: 8.11–14.74), or any trimester of pregnancy (10.05, 95% CI: 7.33–13.65). However, these differences across various subgroups were not statistically significant ().

The estimated pooled prevalence was not statistically different among studies that excluded prepregnancy thyroid disorder patients (11.31, 95% CI: 8.57–14.79) as compared to those studies where they were included (10.89, 95% CI: 7.73–15.14) in the analysis.

Studies conducted in hospital settings reported higher pooled prevalence of hypothyroidism among pregnant women (12.32, 95% CI: 9.97–15.13) as compared to secondary data (6.24, 95% CI: 1.83–19.17) and community-based settings (1.27, 95% CI: 0.41–3.86) ().

Studies conducted in coastal states documented lower prevalence in comparison to noncoastal states though this difference was not statistically significant (coastal: 8.82, 95% CI: 6.45–11.94 vs. non-coastal:13.49, 95% CI: 9.77–18.34, ) (Table 2).

Studies conducted using ATA 2011 criteria reported higher prevalence (13.71, 95% CI: 10.52–17.67) as compared to studies used other criteria (8.10, 95% CI: 5.49–11.80) for diagnosis and this difference was statistically significant ().

State-wise pooled prevalence was also calculated and is presented in Table 3 and Figure5.

3.3. Sensitivity Analysis of Overall Hypothyroidism Estimates

The sensitivity analysis was conducted by removing lower-quality studies. Prevalence estimate was 10.23 (95% CI 7.41–13.97, I²:98.4%, 29 studies) after omitting studies with a quality score of less than six on JBI criteria. Another sensitivity analysis was executed to assess the effect of studies with lower sample-sizes on pooled prevalence. This analysis was performed by excluding smaller sample size studies (sample size <200) and pooled prevalence estimate was 11.22 (95% CI: 9.00–13.91, I²: 98.7%, 54 studies). Both small sample size and low-quality studies did not affect much the prevalence estimate.

3.4. Publication Bias

Regarding the publication bias of pooled estimate of overall hypothyroidism, funnel plot is reasonably symmetrical on visual inspection (Figure 6). Rank correlation test results (z = −1.73, value = 0.082) also confirm absence of publication bias.

4. Discussion

The sixty-one studies included in the current review have reported prevalence of maternal hypothyroidism ranging from 1.2% to 67.0% [6, 7].

This meta-analysis estimates the prevalence of hypothyroidism in pregnant women in India to be 11.07% (95% CI: 8.79–13.84) from sixty-one studies across 60,066 study subjects. Pooled prevalence estimates of subclinical and overt hypothyroidism were 9.52% (95% CI: 7.48–12.04) and 2.74% (95% CI: 2.09–3.58), respectively.

Sepasi et al. conducted a meta-analysis to report prevalence of hypothyroidism clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism in Iranian pregnant women. Prevalence estimate for hypothyroidism, clinical hypothyroidism, and subclinical hypothyroidism was 13.01% (95% CI: 9.15–18.17), 1.35% (95% CI: 0.97–1.86), and 11.90% (95% CI: 7.40–18.57), respectively, which are very similar to our study [87]. However, prevalence reported in our study is remarkably higher as compared to the reported prevalence of antenatal hypothyroidism in other countries [3–5]. The higher burden in the Indian context may be attributed to the iodine deficiency, prevalent in many regions of the country [88–90].

In this review, we found prevalence of hypothyroidism was lower among coastal areas as compared to studies conducted in noncoastal areas, though difference was nonsignificant (). Unnikrishnan et al. conducted a survey of hypothyroidism among adult population in 8 urban cities of India [91]. They reported significant lower prevalence of hypothyroidism in coastal cities as compared to noncoastal cities. This may be due to iodine deficiency, which is still more prevalent in noncoastal areas of India [88–90].

In our study, we documented higher prevalence of hypothyroidism in studies that used ATA 2011 criteria as compared to studies that used other criteria, and this difference is statistically significant (). This may be due to higher cutoffs of TSH for diagnosis, used by other stidies.

Primary maternal hypothyroidism is characterized by an increase in the serum TSH levels during pregnancy. It is further classified as subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) which has normal free T4 levels and overt hypothyroidism (OH) which has decreased free T4 levels. This differentiation is crucial as it has clinical and management implications [2]. Maternal complications reported to be associated with overt hypothyroidism include pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios, hyperemesis, gestational diabetes, premature rupture of membranes, and chronic hypertension [10–13, 92, 93]. For the fetus too, there is a high risk of fetal death, prematurity, low birth weight, congenital malformations, fetal distress, perinatal hypoxic encephalopathy, and deficit in the mental developmental coefficient [11, 14–19, 93]. Some epidemiological studies have also pointed towards the association of maternal hypothyroidism and adverse neurological outcomes in the progeny ranging from neurological cretinism, congenital hypothyroidism, to decreased intelligence quotient [20–22]. Jansen et al. observed 1981 mother-child pairs [94]. They found that both abnormal (low or high) maternal TSH values, early in pregnancy, were associated with a smaller offspring’s total grey matter and cortical volume as assessed by MRI [94].

Data pertaining to effects of early management of SCH in pregnancy are emerging in latest research. Rao et al. in 2019 identified that levothyroxine supplementation significantly decreased pregnancy loss and prematurity in women with SCH [95]. However, Casey et al. conducted a RCT on cases of SCH in pregnancy to determine benefit of SCH treatment in pregnancy on cognitive health of offspring. They did not find significantly better cognitive outcomes in children up to 5 years of age [96]. Thus, there is inconclusive evidence of benefit of treating SCH in pregnancy.

Pregnancy is a state of increased thyroid hormone requirement. The majority (50–85%) of previously hypothyroid women (on treatment) need to increase their dose of thyroid supplements post conception [5]. Pregnancy serves as a stress test for the thyroid gland, which leads to hypothyroidism in iodine deficient women or in those having limited thyroid reserve. Furthermore, risk factors such as geographical disparity (in terms of iodine-deficient regions especially across India), obesity, prior history of thyroid dysfunction, the genetic history of thyroid dysfunction, and history of autoimmune disorders also make pregnant women more susceptible to hypothyroidism [5].

TSH levels during pregnancy are lower as compared to the nonpregnant state. As per American Thyroid Association recommendations 2011 as well as endocrinology society guidelines for pregnant women, TSH levels should be within the limits of 0.1 to 2.5 mIU/L during the first, 0.2–3.0 mIU/L in second, and 0.3 to 3.0 mIU/L in the third trimester [1]. However, these guidelines were revised in 2017, and it was recommended that the first-trimester upper normal limit cutoff should be obtained by deducting “0.5 mIU/L” from prepregnancy TSH value [2]. If this value is unknown, then 4.0 mIU/L should be taken as the upper limit of normal cutoffs.

Optimal TSH cutoffs have been a topic of controversy since long and may have a bearing on prevalence estimates [97]. European Thyroid Association in 2014 recommended that, due to geographic variation in normal TSH and thyroid hormone levels, reference range should be defined for each antenatal hospital after assessment of local population data [98]. ATA 2017 guidelines also supported these recommendations [2]. These guidelines might be the reason for nonstandardized cutoff values are being used by many studies.

However, in Indian setting, the National Guidelines for Screening of Hypothyroidism during Pregnancy 2014 have considered ATA 2011 guidelines for defining cutoffs [99]. A recent article suggested that 4.0 mIU/L as a cutoff as per the revised ATA recommendations may be too high for Indian settings, and intermediate cut-off of 3.00 should be considered [97].

4.1. Limitations of the Current Study

A rigorous and comprehensive search strategy was undertaken, which minimizes the possibility of changes in inferences drawn from our study, but there are limitations too. The review exhibits heterogeneity in terms of data. The prevalence varies with the geographic locations, ethnic disparity, and the nutritional intake of the study population. Another aspect that limits our research is the use of nonstandardized TSH cutoffs for diagnosis by studies, as only 35 studies used ATA 2011 TSH cutoffs [1]. Furthermore, preanalytical factors such as gestational age, presence of thyroid antibodies, iodine status, multiple pregnancies, ethnicity, and time of collection of TSH sample may also affect the results. Different immunoassays result in different TSH values, thereby questioning the reliability and repeatability of tests in various studies. Another crucial aspect is the circadian TSH rhythm varying in the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Considering this fact, the standardized collection of samples at the correct time may alter the results and their interpretation.

5. Conclusion

This review estimated that every 1 in 10 pregnant Indian women suffers from hypothyroidism. The present study has paved the way for the acceptance of universal screening in pregnant women, especially in the Indian context. The prevalence of hypothyroidism in pregnant women varies across states in India, but data is insufficient. Moreover, there are no agreed-upon guidelines for treating subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnant women. Therefore, further research is needed to fill these gaps regarding the diagnosis and management of hypothyroidism in pregnant women in a heterogeneous country like India.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article as tables.

Ethical Approval

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of already published articles. Hence, ethical approval and consent are not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

A. Stagnaro-Green, M. Abalovich, E. Alexander et al., “Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and postpartum,” Thyroid, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1081–1125, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. K. Alexander, E. N. Pearce, G. A. Brent et al., “2017 guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and the postpartum,” Thyroid, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 315–389, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
FIGO Working Group on Good Clinical Practice in Maternal-Fetal Medicine, “Good clinical practice advice: thyroid and pregnancy,” International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 347–351, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Cignini, E. V. Cafà, C. Giorlandino, S. Capriglione, A. Spata, and N. Dugo, “Thyroid physiology and common diseases in pregnancy: review of literature,” Journal of Prenatal Medicine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 64–71, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Sahay and V. Nagesh, “Hypothyroidism in pregnancy,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 364–370, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Neeliyara and K. S. Kumari, Reproductive Health and Nutritional Profile of Women in the Coastal Areas of Alleppey District Kerala, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, India, 2015.
S. K. Pandey, H. S. Pandey, and V. Kalra, “Study of prevalence of thyroid disorders in pregnant females of a tertiary care hospital of Garhwal region of Uttarakhand,” Annals of International Medical and Dental Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 25–27, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Z. Klein, J. E. Haddow, J. D. Falx et al., “Prevalence of thyroid deficiency in pregnant women,” Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. K. Moog, S. Entringer, C. Heim, P. D. Wadhwa, N. Kathmann, and C. Buss, “Influence of maternal thyroid hormones during gestation on fetal brain development,” Neuroscience, vol. 342, pp. 68–100, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. Toulis, A. Stagnaro-Green, and R. Negro, “Maternal subclinical hypothyroidsm and gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis,” Endocrine Practice, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 703–714, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. van den Boogaard, R. Vissenberg, J. A. Land et al., “Significance of (sub)clinical thyroid dysfunction and thyroid autoimmunity before conception and in early pregnancy: a systematic review,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 605–619, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Abalovich, S. Gutierrez, G. Alcaraz, G. Maccallini, A. Garcia, and O. Levalle, “Overt and subclinical hypothyroidism complicating pregnancy,” Thyroid, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 63–68, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. E. Krassas, K. Poppe, and D. Glinoer, “Thyroid function and human reproductive health,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 702–755, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Glinoer, M. F. Soto, P. Bourdoux et al., “Pregnancy in patients with mild thyroid abnormalities: maternal and neonatal repercussions,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 421–427, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Glinoer, M. Riahi, J. P. Grün, and J. Kinthaert, “Risk of subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnant women with asymptomatic autoimmune thyroid disorders,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 197–204, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Abalovich, N. Amino, L. A. Barbour et al., “Management of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. S1–s7, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. C. Allan, J. E. Haddow, G. E. Palomaki et al., “Maternal thyroid deficiency and pregnancy complications: implications for population screening,” Journal of Medical Screening, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 127–130, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Benhadi, W. M. Wiersinga, J. B. Reitsma, T. G. M. Vrijkotte, and G. J. Bonsel, “Higher maternal TSH levels in pregnancy are associated with increased risk for miscarriage, fetal or neonatal death,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 160, no. 6, pp. 985–991, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Negro, A. Schwartz, R. Gismondi, A. Tinelli, T. Mangieri, and A. Stagnaro-Green, “Universal ScreeningVersusCase finding for detection and treatment of thyroid hormonal dysfunction during pregnancy,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 1699–1707, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. B. Man, W. S. Jones, R. H. Holden, and E. David Mellits, “Thyroid function in human pregnancy,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 111, no. 7, pp. 905–916, 1971.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Haddow, G. E. Palomaki, W. C. Allan et al., “Maternal thyroid deficiency during pregnancy and subsequent neuropsychological development of the child,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 341, no. 8, pp. 549–555, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. J. Pop, J. L. Kuijpens, A. L. van Baar et al., “Low maternal free thyroxine concentrations during early pregnancy are associated with impaired psychomotor development in infancy,” Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 149–155, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Liberati, D. G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff et al., “The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration,” BMJ, vol. 339, p. b2700, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
The Joanna Briggs Institute, Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies, The Joanna Briggs Institute, Adelaide, Australia, 2017, https://joannabriggs.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI_Critical_Appraisal-Checklist_for_Analytical_Cross_Sectional_Studies2017_0.pdf.
G. Schwarzer, “Meta: an R package for meta-analysis,” R News, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 40–45, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Viechtbauer, “Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package,” Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1–48, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Schwarzer, H. Chemaitelly, L. J. Abu‐Raddad, and G. Rücker, “Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman‐Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta‐analysis of single proportions,” Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 476–483, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Agrawal, S. Mehta, M. Gupta, and P. Khare, “Prevalence of hypothyroidism in the first trimester pregnancy in primigravida in North India,” Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 68–70, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Diyora, T. Shah, and M. K. Mishra, “Thyroid dysfunction in women during first trimester of pregnancy: correlation with anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies,” Scholars International Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 36–39, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Goel, A. Singh, P. Goel, J. Kaur, S. Singla, and M. Singla, “Evaluation of high risk screening protocol for detection of overt hypothyroidism in pregnancy,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 4581–4586, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Gupta, S. Agarwal, K. Pandey et al., “A clinical study on thyroid dysfunctions in pregnancy and its effect on maternal and neonatal outcome,” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1520–1523, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Hymavathi, M. D. Gottipati, T. Jakka, and T. C. Bhavani, “Routine screening of antenatal population for thyroid disorders-mandatory,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 2834–2839, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kalra, M. Choudhary, M. Thakral, and S. Kalra, “Prevalence of hypothyroidism in term pregnancies in North India,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 13–15, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. R. Korde, S. P. Barse, and J. S. Barla, “Prevalence of thyroid dysfunctions in pregnant women: a prospective study in a tertiary care hospital in Maharashtra, India,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 3211–3215, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kumari, R. Srivastav, and S. Mitra, “Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction and its effects on fetomaternal outcome in pregnant women of eastern Uttar Pradesh, India,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 4379–4383, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Kumari, K. Venkataramana, K. P. Leela, S. Aafreen, and A. Amrin, “Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction among antenatal women in a teaching hospital,” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 441–444, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Pahwa and S. Mangat, “Prevalence of thyroid disorders in pregnancy,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 3493–3496, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Panda, A. Maji, J. Mishra, and M. Manjareeka, “Thyroid disorders in pregnancy: an exploratory study,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 9–12, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
N. S. Pillai and J. Bennet, “Prevalence of hypothyroidism amongst pregnant women: a study done in rural set up,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1586–1591, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Rohini, S. N. Ravishankar, H. S. Madhuvan, S. Patil, and N. R. Rakshith, “A retrospective study of effect of thyroid disorders on obstetric and perinatal outcomes: a hospital based study,” Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 247–252, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
P. U. Devi and G. Vanaja, “Maternal and perinatal outcome in antenatal women with hypothyroidism,” International Archives of Integrated Medicine, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 199–207, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Dubey and A. Pradhan, “Thyroid disorder in antenatal women in sub-himalayan region: a need for universal screening,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 3445–3448, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Gedam and D. A. Rajput, “Prevalence of thyroid disorders among patients attending the antenatal clinic at tertiary care centre, Parel, Mumbai, India,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1235–1239, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gupta, P. Pandotra, M. Jindal, G. Jamwal, S. Goraya, and V. Gupta, “Comparative study of feto-maternal outcome in clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1909–1914, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. S. Sapna and Z. Mehazeena, “Prevalence and outcome of hypothyroidism in women attending antenatal clinic at J. J. M. Medical College,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 3537–3539, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Indira, T. Narasinga Rao, and Y. Premavardhini, “Prevalence of thyroid disorders in pregnancy at a teaching hospital,” Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 64–70, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Pokhanna, U. Gupta, M. Alwani, and S. P. Tiwari, “Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction and impact on maternal and fetal outcome in central Indian pregnant women,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 4666–4670, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sannaboraiah, R. Upadhyaya, S. Garag, and S. Krishnappa, “Subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy and outcomes,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1215–1221, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Thenmozhi, “Prevalence of hypothyroidism in prgnancy and pregnancy outcome,” IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 5–16, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. V. Wagh, M. R. Mundra, J. J. Upadhye, D. B. Telgote, S. N. Khillare, and P. S. Ramteke, “Thyroid screening in pregnancy,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 3956–3959, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Anitha and S. Rao, “The prevalence of hypothyroidism in low income, urban pregnant women,” IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 104–107, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Chunchaiah, N. Prasad, B. M. Murali, B. M. Rupakala, and N. Rangaiah, “A prospective observational study of thyroid dysfunctions during pregnancy in a tertiary care hospital,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 3683–3689, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Dhanwal, S. Bajaj, R. Rajput et al., “Prevalence of hypothyroidism in pregnancy: an epidemiological study from 11 cities in 9 states of India,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 387–390, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hassan, S. K. Sheema, and S. M. S. Khan, “Prevalence of hypothyroidism in pregnant females of block hazratbal, Kashmir,” International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 2841–2843, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
R. C. Mandal, D. Bhar, A. Das, S. R. Basunia, S. B. Kundu, and C. Mahapatra, “Subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy: an emerging problem in southern West Bengal: a cross-sectional study,” Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 80–84, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Faheema Farvin, “A study on the prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism among pregnant women,” Tamilnadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai, India, 2016, Master thesis.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Prasad, N. Nair, and K. Deepika., “A descriptive study of the prevalence of hypothyroidism among antenatal women and foetal outcome in treated hypothyroid women,” International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1892–1896, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Rao and A. Patibandla, “A study to find out the prevalence of hypothyroidism among pregnant women visiting ESI hospital Sanathnagar Hyderabad,” Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–3, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Saraladevi, T. N. Kumari, B. Shreen, and V. U. Rani, “Prevalence of thyroid disorder in pregnancy and pregnancy outcome,” International Archives of Integrated Medicine, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Singla, S. Kumar Juneja, P. Tandon et al., “Maternal and foetal outcome in pregnancies complicated with hypothyroidism in Punjabi women,” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 5, no. 56, pp. 3826–3829, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Stella and N. S. Minnalkodi, Prevalence of Hypothyroidism in Prgnancy and Pregnancy Outcome, The Tamilnadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai, India, 2016.
D. Tiwari, R. Ruchika, A. Anchal, R. Bharti, and M. Sharma, “Prevalence of overt and subclinical hypothyroidism among Indian pregnant women and its effect on foetomaternal outcome,” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 5, no. 51, pp. 3342–3347, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Chauhan, B. Sahu, and S. Khan, “Prevalence of hypothyroidism among pregnant women in Mahakaushal area and its impact on maternal and fetal outcome,” International Journal of Medical and Applied Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 140–147, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
M. George, S. M. George, and V. M. Jayasree Thankachi, “Hypothyroidism in pregnancy screen or not,” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 4, no. 29, pp. 4973–4978, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kishore, N. Mishra, and J. Yadav, “Hypothyroidism in pregnancy and its impact on maternal and fetal outcome,” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 4, no. 79, pp. 13849–13855, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Z. Mohammed and K. Chandrashekar, “Clinical study of pregnancy with hypothyroidism and its outcome in tertiary care hospital,” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 4, no. 94, pp. 15927–15929, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Padmavathi and C. Prasanna, “Incidence of hypothyroidism in antenatal women with maternal and perinatal outcome,” IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 14–18, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Rajput, V. Goel, S. Nanda, M. Rajput, and S. Seth, “Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction among women during the first trimester of pregnancy at a tertiary care hospital in Haryana,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 416–419, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. P. Singh, H. A. Singh, H. Kamei, and L. M. Devi, “Prevalence of hypothyroidism among pregnant women in the sub mountain state of Manipur,” International Journal of Scientific Study, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 143–146, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
S. N. Ajmani, D. Aggarwal, P. Bhatia, M. Sharma, V. Sarabhai, and M. Paul, “Prevalence of overt and subclinical thyroid dysfunction among pregnant women and its effect on maternal and fetal outcome,” The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 105–110, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Das, S. J. S. Chisty, K. Barman, B. Talukdar, and U. Talukdar, “Prevalence of hypothyroidism among 1st trimester pregnant women in lower part of Assam: a pilot study,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Barpeta, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 107–110, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Dave, L. Maru, and M. Tripathi, “Importance of universal screening for thyroid disorders in first trimester of pregnancy,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 735–738, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Jaiswal, A. Melse-Boonstra, T. Thomas et al., “High prevalence of maternal hypothyroidism despite adequate iodine status in Indian pregnant women in the first trimester,” Thyroid, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1419–1429, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. R. M. Nabhi and U. Bhashyakarla, “Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction among pregnant women in a rural teaching hospital in Telengana, south India,” Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences, vol. 2, no. 6B, pp. 2022–2025, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
P. V. Bandela, P. Havilah, M. Hindumathi, and K. D. Prasad, “Antenatal thyroid dysfunction in Rayalaseema region: a preliminary cross sectional study based on circulating serum thyrotropin levels,” International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 74–78, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Dhanwal, S. Prasad, A. Agarwal, V. Dixit, and A. Banerjee, “High prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism during first trimester of pregnancy in north India,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 281–284, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Konin and G. K. Bhinder, “Detection of thyroid functions in early pregnancy as a universal screening,” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 2, no. 49, pp. 9457–9465, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Pradhan, B. Anand, N. Singh, and M. Mehrotra, “Thyroid peroxidase antibody in hypothyroidism: it’s effect on pregnancy,” The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 581–583, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Boyapati and B. Mangshetty, Study of Prevalence of Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Autoimmune Thyroiditis in Pregnant Women Attending BTGH, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore, India, 2012.
P. Goel, J. Kaur, P. K. Saha, R. Tandon, and L. Devi, “Prevalence, associated risk factors and effects of hypothyroidism in pregnancy: a study from north India,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 89–94, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Rana, Maternal Thyroid Dysfunction and Iodine Deficiency: Its Implications on Infant Development and Impact of Double Fortified Salt Supplementation, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, India, 2012.
V. Nambiar, V. S. Jagtap, V. Sarathi et al., “Prevalence and impact of thyroid disorders on maternal outcome in asian-Indian pregnant women,” Journal of Thyroid Research, vol. 2011, Article ID 429097, 6 pages, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Sahu, V. Das, S. Mittal, A. Agarwal, and M. Sahu, “Overt and subclinical thyroid dysfunction among Indian pregnant women and its effect on maternal and fetal outcome,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 281, no. 2, pp. 215–220, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Gayathri, S. Lavanya, and K. Raghavan, “Subclinical hypothyroidism and autoimmune thyroiditis in pregnancy—a study in south Indian subjects,” The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 691–693, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Marwaha, S. Chopra, S. Gopalakrishnan et al., “Establishment of reference range for thyroid hormones in normal pregnant Indian women,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 602–606, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. J. Kharkongor and B. B. P. Gupta, “Study on prevalence of hypothyroidism in women of reproductive age in Meghalaya, north-eastern India,” Current Science, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 1390–1393, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Sepasi, T. Rashidian, M. Shokri, G. Badfar, F. Kazemi, and M. Azami, “Thyroid dysfunction in Iranian pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 405, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. S. Pandav, K. Yadav, R. Srivastava, R. Pandav, and M. G. Karmarkar, “Iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) control in India,” The Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 418–433, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
B. A. Laway and A. H. Zargar, “Iodine deficiency disorders in India,” Journal of the Indian Medical Association, vol. 104, no. 10, pp. 554–556, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Majumder, A. Jaiswal, and S. Chatterjee, “Prevalence of iodine deficiency among pregnant and lactating women: experience in Kolkata,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 486–490, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Unnikrishnan, G. Bantwal, M. John, S. Kalra, R. Sahay, and N. Tewari, “Prevalence of hypothyroidism in adults: an epidemiological study in eight cities of India,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 647–652, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kattah and V. D. Garovic, “Subclinical hypothyroidism and gestational hypertension: causal or coincidence?” Journal of the American Society of Hypertension, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 688–690, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Maraka, N. M. S. Ospina, D. T. O’Keeffe et al., “Subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Thyroid, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 580–590, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Jansen, T. I. M. Korevaar, T. A. Mulder et al., “Maternal thyroid function during pregnancy and child brain morphology: a time window-specific analysis of a prospective cohort,” The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 629–637, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Rao, Z. Zeng, F. Zhou et al., “Effect of levothyroxine supplementation on pregnancy loss and preterm birth in women with subclinical hypothyroidism and thyroid autoimmunity: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 344–361, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Casey, E. A. Thom, A. M. Peaceman et al., “Treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism or hypothyroxinemia in pregnancy,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 376, no. 9, pp. 815–825, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kalra, S. Agarwal, R. Aggarwal, and S. Ranabir, “Trimester-specific thyroid-stimulating hormone: an Indian perspective,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lazarus, R. S. Brown, C. Daumerie, A. Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, R. Negro, and B. Vaidya, “2014 European Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy and in children,” European Thyroid Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 76–94, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Maternal Health Division, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, and Government of India, National Guidelines for Screening of Hypothyroidism during Pregnancy, Government of India, New Delhi, India, 2014, http://www.nrhmorissa.gov.in/writereaddata/Upload/Documents/National_Guidelines_for_Screening_of_Hypothyroidism_during_Pregnancy.pdf.

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Vikas Yadav et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

6430

Downloads

2421

Citations