About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Mediators of Inflammation

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 547480, 8 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/547480
Research Article

Ticlopidine in Its Prodrug Form Is a Selective Inhibitor of Human NTPDase1

1Département de Microbiologie-Infectiologie et d’Immunologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6

2Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, 2705 Boulevard Laurier, Local T1-49, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 4G2

3Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany

Received 12 May 2014; Accepted 21 July 2014; Published 11 August 2014

Academic Editor: Mireia Martín-Satué

Copyright © 2014 Joanna Lecka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1 (NTPDase1), like other ectonucleotidases, controls extracellular nucleotide levels and consequently their (patho)physiological responses such as in thrombosis, inflammation, and cancer. Selective NTPDase1 inhibitors would therefore be very useful. We previously observed that ticlopidine in its prodrug form, which does not affect P2 receptor activity, inhibited the recombinant form of human NTPDase1 (μM). Here we tested whether ticlopidine can be used as a selective inhibitor of NTPDase1. We confirmed that ticlopidine inhibits NTPDase1 in different forms and in different assays. The ADPase activity of intact HUVEC as well as of COS-7 cells transfected with human NTPDase1 was strongly inhibited by 100 µM ticlopidine, 99 and 86%, respectively. Ticlopidine (100 µM) completely inhibited the ATPase activity of NTPDase1 in situ as shown by enzyme histochemistry with human liver and pancreas sections. Ticlopidine also inhibited the activity of rat and mouse NTPDase1 and of potato apyrase. At 100 µM ticlopidine did not affect the activity of human NTPDase2, NTPDase3, and NTPDase8, nor of NPP1 and NPP3. Weak inhibition (10–20%) of NTPDase3 and -8 was observed at 1 mM ticlopidine. These results show that ticlopidine is a specific inhibitor of NTPDase1 that can be used in enzymatic and histochemistry assays.

1. Introduction

Extracellular nucleotides are released during different processes including exocytosis (e.g., platelets), shear stress (e.g., red blood cells), cell activation (e.g., platelets, endothelial cells), and cell lysis [1, 2]. Once released the effect of nucleotides is exerted via the activation of several specific receptors, namely, P2X1-7 and , and perhaps also via cysLT1R, cysLT2R, and/or GPR17 [3, 4].

The action of nucleotides (ATP, ADP, UTP, and UDP) on P2 receptors is regulated by ectonucleotidases [5, 6]. Nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1 (NTPDase1) is the main ectonucleotidase at the surfaces of vascular endothelial cells, blood cells, and smooth muscle cells [7, 8]. NTPDase1 is present all along the cell surface and it was also observed in caveolae, a specialized structure of the plasma membrane [9, 10]. Similar to other ectonucleotidases, NTPDase1 catabolizes extracellular nucleotides [11].

By controlling extracellular nucleotides’ levels, NTPDase1 affects various biological processes such as haemostasis [12, 13], vascular smooth muscle cell contraction [14, 15], pain perception [3, 16], angiogenesis, vascular permeability [17, 18], airway epithelial transport [19], endocrine secretion [20], neurotransmission and neuromodulation [21], inflammation, and immune reactions [11, 2225]. An imbalanced ATP/ADP hydrolysis ratio was observed in patients with coronary artery disease and abdominal aortic aneurysm [26, 27] where NTPDase1 would be expected to be involved. The product of NTPDase1 activity, AMP, can be further catabolized by ecto-5′-nucleotidase to adenosine, the agonist of P1 receptors [28]. Adenosine is also involved in various functions regulated by ATP and most often exerts an opposite effect to ATP such as in the regulation of the vascular tone, cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation [29]. NTPDase1 inhibitors may therefore represent a valuable tool to potentiate various physiological actions of nucleotides and could also serve as potential drug candidates for the treatment of some diseases associated with functions of NTPDase1 such as in cardiovascular [11, 22, 27] and immune diseases [23, 30] and cancer [31, 32].

We previously observed that, by blocking endothelial cell NTPDase1 activity, the thienopyridines ticlopidine (Tyklid) and clopidogrel (Plavix) impaired platelet aggregation [33]. While clopidogrel is solubilized poorly in polar solvents, ticlopidine is easier to solubilize, making it a more convenient candidate for inhibition assays. It is noteworthy that ticlopidine (Tyklid) and clopidogrel (Plavix) are widely prescribed after heart attacks. As prodrugs they must be metabolically activated to the forms that irreversibly block platelet P2Y12 receptors [34, 35]. Although ticlopidine cannot obviously be used in a long-term basis as a therapeutic agent to block NTPDase1 in human (due to its catabolism by the liver to a P2Y12 antagonist) it can have several other advantages such as studying NTPDase1 functions. As several NTPDases have distinct functions, specific NTPDase inhibitors would be greatly valuable. For example, while NTPDase1 abrogates platelet aggregation and their recruitment in intact vessels via the hydrolysis of ADP, NTPDase2, by the hydrolysis of ATP to ADP, has the ability to facilitate platelet activation at sites of extravasation [7]. Indeed, while NTPDase1 is expressed by vascular endothelial cells, in touch with blood components, NTPDase2 is expressed in the subendothelium of veins and in the adventitial cells of arteries [36] which are exposed to platelets only after blood vessel breakage. In this study, we demonstrate that ticlopidine in its prodrug form can be used as a selective NTPDase1 inhibitor.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Aprotinin, nucleotides, apyrase grade VII, phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), ticlopidine, and malachite green were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada). Tris was obtained from VWR (Montreal, QC, Canada). DMEM was obtained from Invitrogen (Burlington, ON, Canada). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics-antimycotics solution were from Wisent (St-Bruno, QC, Canada). Formalin and acetone were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Ottawa, ON, Canada). OCT freezing medium was purchased from Tissue-Tek, Sakura Finetk (Torrance, CA).

2.2. Plasmids

The plasmids used in this study have all been described in published reports: human NTPDase1 (GenBank accession number U87967) [37], human NTPDase2 (NM_203468) [38], human NTPDase3 (AF034840) [39], human NTPDase8 (AY430414) [40], mouse NTPDase1 (NM_009848) [12], rat NTPDase1 (NM_022587) [41], human NPP1 (NM_006208) [42], and human NPP3 (NM_005021) [43].

2.3. Cell Transfection and Protein Preparation

COS-7 cells were transfected with an expression vector (pcDNA3) containing the cDNA encoding for each ectonucleotidase using Lipofectamine (Invritrogen) and harvested 72 h later, as previously described [33]. For the preparation of protein extracts, transfected cells were washed three times with Tris-saline buffer at 4°C, collected by scraping in harvesting buffer (95 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM PMSF, and 45 mM Tris, pH 7.5), and washed twice by centrifugation (300 g, 10 min, 4°C). The cells were then resuspended in the harvesting buffer supplemented with 10 μg/mL aprotinin to block proteinases and sonicated. Nucleus and large cellular debris were discarded by centrifugation (300 ×g, 10 min, 4°C) and the supernatant (thereafter called lysate) was aliquoted and stored at −80°C until used. Protein concentration in the lysates was estimated by Bradford microplate assay using bovine serum albumin as a standard [44].

2.4. Enzymatic Activity Assays
2.4.1. NTPDases and Apyrase (EC 3.6.1.5.)

Activity was measured as described previously [5] in 0.2 mL of incubation medium (5 mM CaCl2 and 80 mM Tris, pH 7.4) or Tris-Ringer buffer (in mM, 120 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.2 MgSO4, 25 NaHCO3, 5 mM glucose, and 80 Tris, pH 7.4) at 37°C with or without ticlopidine. Ectonucleotidase lysates were added to the incubation mixture and preincubated at 37°C for 3 min. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 100 μM ATP or ADP for NTPDases, with or without ticlopidine (100 μM or 1 mM) and stopped after 15 min with 50 μL malachite green reagent. The activity of either enzyme at the surface of intact Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC, passage 2) or NTPDase1 transfected cells was measured in 24 well plates with the buffers indicated above supplemented with 125 mM NaCl. The reaction was initiated as above and stopped by transferring a 200 μL aliquot of the reaction mixture to a tube containing 50 μL malachite green reagent. The liberated inorganic phosphate (Pi) was measured at 630 nm according to Baykov et al. [45]. The increase of phosphate concentration due to enzyme activity was calculated by subtracting the phosphate concentration of the control reaction mixture, where the substrate was added after the malachite green reagent, from that of the respective reaction mixture. All experiments were performed in triplicate. One unit of enzymatic activity corresponded to the release of 1 μmol Pi/min·mg of protein or 1 μmol Pi/min/well at 37°C for protein extracts and intact cells, respectively. The lysates from nontransfected COS-7 cells exhibited less than 5% of the ATP or ADP hydrolysis generated by lysates from COS-7 cells transfected with either NTPDases’ expressing plasmid and as such the activity of the contaminating nucleotidases was considered negligible.

2.4.2. NPPs (EC 3.1.4.1)

Activity assays of human NPP1 and human NPP3 were carried out with paranitrophenyl thymidine 5′-monophosphate (pNP-TMP) as the substrate [42]. pNP-TMP hydrolysis was carried out at 37°C in 0.2 mL of the following incubation mixture: in mM, 1 CaCl2, 130 NaCl, 5 KCl, and 50 Tris, pH 8.5, with or without 100 μM ticlopidine. Recombinant human NPP1 or human NPP3 cell lysates were added to the incubation mixture and were preincubated at 37°C for 3 min. The reaction was initiated by the addition of the substrate pNP-TMP (100 μM), with or without 100 μM ticlopidine. The production of p-nitrophenol in the reaction medium was measured at 310 nm, 15 min after the initiation of the reaction. The protein extracts from nontransfected COS-7 cells exhibited less than 5% of the pNP-TMP hydrolysis obtained with lysates from either NPP1 or NPP3 transfected cells, and as such was considered negligible.

2.4.3. Enzyme Histochemistry Assays

For histochemical studies, 5 μm sections of freshly dissected tissues were embedded in OCT freezing medium and snap-frozen in isopentane in dry ice and stored at −80°C until use. Sections of 6 μm were obtained and fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin mixed with cold acetone as before [46]. Localization of ectonucleotidase activities was determined using the Wachstein/Meisel lead phosphate method [47]. Fixed slices were preincubated for 30 min at RT in 50 mM Tris-maleate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 2 mM CaCl2, 250 mM sucrose, and 2.5 mM levamisole as an inhibitor of alkaline phosphatases. Enzymatic reaction was performed for 1 h at 37°C in the same buffer supplemented with 5 mM MnCl2 to inhibit intracellular staining [48], 2 mM Pb(NO3)2, 3% Dextran T-250 and in the presence of 200 μM ATP with or without 100 μM ticlopidine. For the control experiment, substrate was either omitted or added in the absence of divalent cations, which are essential for NTPDases’ activity. The reaction was revealed by incubation with 1% (NH4)2S v/v for exactly 1 min. Samples were counterstained with aqueous haematoxylin, mounted with Mowiol mounting medium, and visualized and photographed with a BX51 Olympus microscope.

2.5. Statistic

Statistical analysis was done with the two-way ANOVA test. values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Influence of Ticlopidine on NTPDase Activity

We previously observed that ticlopidine inhibited recombinant human NTPDase1 [46]. In this work we verified if this compound can be used as a specific inhibitor of the enzyme. We first confirmed that ticlopidine was an inhibitor of NTPDase1 from different sources. The ADPase activity of NTPDase1 expressing cells, namely, intact COS-7 cells transfected with human NTPDase1 or HUVEC, was strongly inhibited by 100 μM ticlopidine, 99 and 75% inhibition, respectively (Figure 1). ATPase activity was inhibited by about 25% in both cell types (Figure 1). The same ticlopidine concentration inhibited the ADPase activity of lysates from COS-7 cell transfected with an NTPDase1 expression vector by about 58% (Figure 2(a)), while the ATPase activity was decreased more modestly than the ADPase activity by about 32%, showing a similar tendency than what was observed for intact cells (Figures 1 and 2(a)). One mM ticlopidine further increased the inhibition of ADPase up to 73% and that of ATPase up to 64% (Figure 2(a)). At 100 μM ticlopidine did not impair ATPase or ADPase activities of lysates from COS-7 cells transfected with NTPDase2, NTPDase-3, or NTPDase-8 (Figures 2(b)2(d)). At 1 mM concentration, ticlopidine inhibited only weakly the ADPase activity (32%) of NTPDase3 as well as its ATPase activity (14%, Figure 2(c)) and the ATPase activity (19%) of NTPDase8 (Figure 2(d)).

547480.fig.001
Figure 1: Influence of ticlopidine on intact HUVEC and COS-7 cells transfected with an expression vector encoding human NTPDase1. The substrate (ATP or ADP) was added together with ticlopidine, both at 100 μM. Relative activities are expressed as the mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments with confluent cells (HUVEC from three different donors at passage 2), each performed in triplicate; mean cell number in one well was in the order of 250,000. The activity (without ticlopidine, which was set at 100%) with the substrate ATP corresponded to and  nmol min−1· for HUVEC and transfected COS-7 cells, respectively, and with ADP to and  nmol min−1· for HUVEC and transfected COS-7, respectively. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of 3 experiments carried out in triplicate. ; ; .
fig2
Figure 2: Influence of ticlopidine on recombinant human NTPDase activities. Enzymatic assays were carried out with lysates from COS-7 cells transfected with an expression vector encoding the indicated enzyme. The substrate (ATP or ADP at the concentration of 100 μM) was added alone or together with ticlopidine at the concentration of either 100 μM or 1 mM. The 100% activity in the absence of ticlopidine corresponded to the following: for human NTPDase1 to and  nmol min−1· for ATP and ADP as substrates, respectively (a), for human NTPDase2 to  nmol min−1 for ATP as substrate (b), for human NTPDase3 to and  nmol min−1 for ATP and ADP as substrates, respectively (c), and for human NTPDase8 to and  nmol min−1 for ATP and ADP as substrates, respectively (d). Data are presented as the mean ± SD of 3 experiments carried out in triplicate. ; .
3.2. Influence of Ticlopidine on Murine NTPDase1 Activity

We next investigated whether ticlopidine could also inhibit NTPDase1 from other species. At 100 μM, ticlopidine inhibited the ATPase activity of both, mouse and rat NTPDase1, 23 and 36%, respectively (Figure 3), and ADPase activity by about 30 and 41%, respectively. The inhibition level was similar for all tested species at 1 mM ticlopidine, about 60–70% of ATPase and ~75% of ADPase activity (Figures 2(a) and 3).

fig3
Figure 3: Comparative effect of ticlopidine on recombinant murine NTPDase1. ATPase and ADPase activity of mouse (a) or rat (b) NTPDase1 without and with either 100 μM or 1 mM ticlopidine are presented. The 100% activity with ATP as the substrate in the absence of ticlopidine was and  nmol min−1 for mouse and rat NTPDase1, respectively, and with ADP and  nmol min−1 for mouse and rat NTPDase1, respectively. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of 3 experiments carried out in triplicate. ; .
3.3. Influence of Ticlopidine on Other Ectonucleotidases

In our previous work we observed that 60 μM ticlopidine, the calculated concentration of the compound after its administration to human patient [46], slightly inhibited rat ecto-5′-nucleotidase but not human ecto-5′-nucleotidase. Here we tested the effect of ticlopidine on other ectonucleotidases, including NTPDase from plant that is commercially available and widely used, namely, potato apyrase. The ADPase activity of this plant NTPDase1 was also slightly more affected than its ATPase activity; the inhibition of ADPase activity by ticlopidine was 80 and 98% at 100 μM and 1 mM ticlopidine, respectively, and its ATPase activity, 75 and 95% for 100 μM and 1 mM ticlopidine, respectively (Figure 4(a)).

fig4
Figure 4: Influence of ticlopidine (100 μM or 1 mM) on the ATPase and ADPase activity of apyrase (a) and (100 μM) on human NPP1 and human NPP3 (b). The activity of apyrase without ticlopidine was and μmoles Pi/min·mg protein for ATP and ADP, respectively. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of 3 experiments carried out in triplicate. The 100% activities without ticlopidine with pNP-TMP as the substrate were and  nmol p-nitrophenol/min·mg protein for NPP1 and NPP3, respectively. ; .

There are also 2 other ectonucleotidases, NPPs, that efficiently hydrolyse ATP and ADP: NPP1 and NPP3. For these enzymes we used the synthetic substrate pNP-TMP in our assay. Ticlopidine (100 μM) did not affect the activity of either enzyme (Figure 4(b)). As the NPP activity was tested at a pH (slightly alkaline) that decreases the solubility of ticlopidine, we did not test higher concentrations of ticlopidine.

3.4. Ticlopidine Inhibits NTPDase1 Activity in Human Tissues

We then tested whether ticlopidine can also inhibit NTPDase1 in situ. Enzyme histochemistry assays were performed with liver and pancreas tissue sections where NTPDase1 is highly expressed in blood vessels (arteries, veins, capillaries, and sinusoids) as well as in the exocrine cells of the pancreas. Here we have used 200 μM of ATP and 100 μM ticlopidine. Under these conditions ticlopidine abolished the ATPase activity of NTPDase1 (Figure 5). The inhibition observed was even more potent than in assays with cell lysates, similar to what we measured with the experiments with intact cells (Figures 1, 2(a), and 5).

547480.fig.005
Figure 5: Inhibition of NTPDase1 ATPase activity in human tissues by ticlopidine. Enzyme histochemistry was performed on serial sections with the substrate ATP at a final concentration of 200 μM in the presence or absence of 100 μM ticlopidine. In both tissues (liver and pancreas) NTPDase1 ATPase activity is located in endothelial cells of all blood vessels including capillaries and sinusoids as well as in smooth muscle cells of arteries and in resident macrophages (Küpffer cells in the liver). In addition, in the pancreas NTPDase1 is also expressed at the luminal surface of acinar cells and in zymogen granules. The ATPase activity is seen as a brown precipitate and is completely absent in presence of ticlopidine. Nuclei were counterstained with haematoxylin. Scale bar = 50 μm. V = vein; = Langerhans islet; arrows = Küpffer cells.

4. Discussion

By regulating extracellular nucleotide levels, NTPDase1 affects haemostasis [12, 13, 37], leukocyte migration [24, 25], immune responses [6, 49], angiogenesis, vascular permeability [17, 50], and vasoconstriction [8, 15]. Therefore the identification of selective NTPDase1 inhibitors would be valuable tools to study the function and pathological consequence of dysregulation of NTPDase1 activity. Additionally, changes in ATP and ADP levels, potent ecto-5′-nucleotidase inhibitors, change the level of adenosine and modulate the physiological responses of P1 receptor activation for which adenosine is the agonist [33, 51].

Some inhibitors of NTPDase1 have been described and characterized. Unfortunately most of them are not specific as they also inhibit other ectonucleotidases or affect purinoceptor activity. ,-diethyl-D-β-γ-dibromomethylene-ATP, also named ARL 67156, was found to be a weak and nonselective NPP1, NTPDase1, and NTPDase3 inhibitor [52, 53]. Polyoxometalate (POM-1) inhibits NTPDase1 but its action is limited by off-target actions on synaptic transmission [53, 54]. 1-amino-2-sulfo-4-(2-naphthylamino) anthraquinone was shown as a potent inhibitor of NTPDase1 but it inhibited at a similar level NTPDase3 [55]; suramin and sulfonate dyes such as reactive blue and pyridoxal phosphate-6-azophenyl-2′,4′-disulfonic acid (PPADS) are also nonspecific inhibitors of NTPDase1 activity [31, 5659]. Recently we have synthesized and characterized potent and selective inhibitors of NTPDase1 that are analogues of adenine nucleotides, namely, 8-BuS-ADP and 8-BuS-AMP [46]. Here we report that ticlopidine is also a potent and selective inhibitor of NTPDase1 and as such can be used as a tool to study this ectonucleotidase function and pathophysiological consequences of abnormal activity. Ticlopidine is routinely administered to patients as a part of an antithrombotic therapy [60], but before it is activated by the liver it does not activate nor antagonize P2 receptors [61]. In a previous work we showed that thienopyridines, in their respective prodrug forms, prevent NTPDase1 antiplatelet activity, due to the inhibition of its ADPase activity [33]. 100 μM ticlopidine inhibited the hydrolysis of ADP by about 80% [33]. Kinetic assays of the recombinant NTPDase1 showed a mixed type inhibition by ticlopidine with a of 14 [33]. Here we further showed that ticlopidine can be used as a specific inhibitor of NTPDase1 from various species, human, mouse, and rat (Figures 2(a) and 3). At 100 μM concentration, ticlopidine inhibited the murine forms of NTPDase1 less efficiently than human NTPDase1, but at 1 mM we observed the same level of inhibition for all tested species (Figures 2(a) and 3). The most important value of this molecule is its selectivity in its prodrug form. Indeed at 100 μM, ticlopidine did not affect the activity of the other major ectonucleotidases, namely, NTPDase2, NTPDase3, NTPDase8, NPP1, and NPP3 (Figures 2(b)2(d) and 4), whereas at 1 mM, ticlopidine weakly impeded the activities of NTPDase3 and the ATPase of NTPDase8 (10–20% inhibition, Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). In our previous study, we saw that ticlopidine had no effects on the human ecto-5′-nucleotidase activity and decreased the activity of rat ecto-5′-nucleotidase by about 25% at the concentration of 300 μM [33].

An interesting aspect in the actual study was the observation that the inhibition of NTPDase1 was more striking with a near complete inhibition when the enzyme was tested in its intact natural form, at the surface of cells such as in HUVEC or in tissues compared to the recombinant enzyme from a cell lysate (Figures 1 and 5). This characteristic, which needs to be further investigated, makes ticlopidine a good candidate for inhibition assays with cells that express NTPDase1.

In summary, we identified ticlopidine as a new specific inhibitor of NTPDase1 that is specifically efficient with cell expressed NTPDase1.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a joint grant from The Canadian Hypertension Society and Pfizer and by grants from the Heart & Stroke Foundation (HSF) of Quebec and from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to Jean Sévigny. Jean Sévigny was also a recipient of a “Chercheur National” award from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS). The authors thank Dr. Manjit Singh Rana for editing this paper.

References

  1. H. L. Goldsmith, D. N. Bell, S. Braovac, A. Steinberg, and F. McIntosh, “Physical and chemical effects of red cells in the shear-induced aggregation of human platelets,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1584–1595, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. N. Morrell, “Regulation of platelet granule exocytosis by S-nitrosylation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 10, pp. 3782–3787, 2005.
  3. G. Burnstock, “Purinergic signalling,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 147, supplement 1, pp. S172–S181, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Ciana, M. Fumagalli, M. L. Trincavelli et al., “The orphan receptor GPR17 identified as a new dual uracil nucleotides/cysteinyl-leukotrienes receptor,” EMBO Journal, vol. 25, no. 19, pp. 4615–4627, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Kukulski, S. A. Lévesque, É. G. Lavoie et al., “Comparative hydrolysis of P2 receptor agonists by NTPDases 1, 2, 3 and 8,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 193–204, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. Kukulski, S. A. Lévesque, and J. Sévigny, “Impact of ectoenzymes on P2 and P1 receptor signaling,” Advances in Pharmacology, vol. 61, pp. 263–299, 2011.
  7. J. Sévigny, C. Sundberg, N. Braun et al., “Differential catalytic properties and vascular topography of murine nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 (NTPDase1) and NTPDase2 have implications for thromboregulation,” Blood, vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 2801–2809, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Kauffenstein, A. Drouin, N. Thorin-Trescases et al., “NTPDase1 (CD39) controls nucleotide-dependent vasoconstriction in mouse,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 204–213, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Kittel, E. Kaczmarek, J. Sevigny, K. Lengyel, E. Csizmadia, and S. C. Robson, “CD39 as a caveolar-associated ectonucleotidase,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 262, no. 3, pp. 596–599, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Koziak, E. Kaczmarek, A. Kittel et al., “Palmitoylation targets CD39/endothelial ATP diphosphohydrolase to caveolae,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 3, pp. 2057–2062, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. C. Robson, J. Sévigny, and H. Zimmermann, “The E-NTPDase family of ectonucleotidases: structure function relationships and pathophysiological significance,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 409–430, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Enjyoji, J. Sévigny, Y. Lin et al., “Targeted disruption of cd39/ATP diphosphohydrolase results in disordered hemostasis and thromboregulation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1010–1017, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. J. Marcus, L. B. Safier, K. A. Hajjar et al., “Inhibition of platelet function by an aspirin-insensitive endothelial cell ADPase: thromboregulation by endothelial cells,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1690–1696, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Kauffenstein, C. R. Fürstenau, P. D'Orléans-Juste, and J. Sévigny, “The ecto-nucleotidase NTPDase1 differentially regulates P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptor-dependent vasorelaxation,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 576–585, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. Li, Z. Jia, C. Chen et al., “Physiological significance of P2X receptor-mediated vasoconstriction in five different types of arteries in rats,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 221–229, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. J. Zylka, “Pain-relieving prospects for adenosine receptors and ectonucleotidases,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 188–196, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. O. Guckelberger, X. F. Sun, J. Sévigny et al., “Beneficial effects of CD39/ecto-nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1 in murine intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Thrombosis & Haemostasis, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 576–586, 2004. View at Scopus
  18. G. G. Yegutkin, F. Marttila-Ichihara, M. Karikoski et al., “Altered purinergic signaling in CD73-deficient mice inhibits tumor progression,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1231–1241, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Fausther, J. Pelletier, C. M. Ribeiro, J. Sévigny, and M. Picher, “Cystic fibrosis remodels the regulation of purinergic signaling by NTPDase1 (CD39) and NTPDase3,” The American Journal of Physiology: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 298, no. 6, pp. L804–L818, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. S. Stojilkovic and T. Koshimizu, “Signaling by extracellular nucleotides in anterior pituitary cells,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 218–225, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Burnstock, “Physiology and pathophysiology of purinergic neurotransmission,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 659–797, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. Atkinson, K. Dwyer, K. Enjyoji, and S. C. Robson, “Ecto-nucleotidases of the CD39/NTPDase family modulate platelet activation and thrombus formation: potential as therapeutic targets,” Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 217–222, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Borsellino, M. Kleinewietfeld, D. Di Mitri et al., “Expression of ectonucleotidase CD39 by Foxp3+ Treg cells: hydrolysis of extracellular ATP and immune suppression,” Blood, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 1225–1232, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Corriden, Y. Chen, Y. Inoue et al., “Ecto-nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 (E-NTPDase1/CD39) regulates neutrophil chemotaxis by hydrolyzing released ATP to adenosine,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 42, pp. 28480–28486, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. Kukulski, F. Bahrami, F. Ben Yebdri et al., “NTPDase1 controls IL-8 production by human neutrophils,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 644–653, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. M. El-Omar, N. Islam, M. J. Broekman et al., “The ratio of ADP- to ATP-ectonucleotidase activity is reduced in patients with coronary artery disease,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 199–206, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Lecka, E. Bloch-Boguslawska, S. Molski, and M. Komoszynski, “Extracellular purine metabolism in blood vessels (part II): activity of ecto-enzymes in blood vessels of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 650–657, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. Zimmermann, M. Zebisch, and N. Sträter, “Cellular function and molecular structure of ecto-nucleotidases,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 437–502, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. Koszalka, B. Özüyaman, Y. Huo et al., “Targeted disruption of cd73/ecto-5′-nucleotidase alters thromboregulation and augments vascular inflammatory response,” Circulation Research, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 814–821, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H. Moncrieffe, K. Nistala, Y. Kamhieh et al., “High expression of the ectonucleotidase CD39 on T cells from the inflamed site identifies two distinct populations, one regulatory and one memory T cell population,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 134–143, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. E. Müller, J. Iqbal, Y. Baqi, H. Zimmermann, A. Röllich, and H. Stephan, “Polyoxometalates-a new class of potent ecto-nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase (NTPDase) inhibitors,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 16, no. 23, pp. 5943–5947, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Mandapathil, M. J. Szczepanski, M. Szajnik et al., “Increased ectonucleotidase expression and activity in regulatory T cells of patients with head and neck cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 20, pp. 6348–6357, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. Lecka, M. S. Rana, and J. Sévigny, “Inhibition of vascular ectonucleotidase activities by the pro-drugs ticlopidine and clopidogrel favours platelet aggregation,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 161, no. 5, pp. 1150–1160, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Cattaneo, “ADP receptors: inhibitory strategies for antiplatelet therapy,” Timely Topics in Medicine: Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 10, article E22, 2006.
  35. O. Ö. Braun, S. Amisten, A. Wihlborg, K. Hunting, D. Nilsson, and D. Erlinge, “Residual platelet ADP reactivity after clopidogrel treatment is dependent on activation of both the unblocked P2Y1 and the P2Y12 receptor and is correlated with protein expression of P2Y12,” Purinergic Signalling, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 195–201, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. A. Dranoff, E. A. Kruglov, S. C. Robson, N. Braun, H. Zimmermann, and J. Sévigny, “The ecto-nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase NTPDase2/CD39l1 is expressed in a novel functional compartment within the liver,” Hepatology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1135–1144, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. E. Kaczmarek, K. Koziak, J. Sévigny et al., “Identification and characterization of CD39/vascular ATP diphosphohydrolase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 51, pp. 33116–33122, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. F. Knowles and W. Chiang, “Enzymatic and transcriptional regulation of human ecto-ATPase/E-NTPDase 2,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 418, no. 2, pp. 217–227, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. T. M. Smith and T. L. Kirley, “Cloning, sequencing, and expression of a human brain ecto-apyrase related to both the ecto-ATPases and CD39 ecto-apyrases,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, vol. 1386, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. F. Bigonnesse, S. A. Lévesque, F. Kukulski et al., “Cloning and characterization of mouse nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-8,” Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 18, pp. 5511–5519, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. B. Kegel, N. Braun, P. Heine, C. R. Maliszewski, and H. Zimmermann, “An ecto-ATPase and an ecto-ATP diphosphohydrolase are expressed in rat brain,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1189–1200, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. I. Belli and J. W. Goding, “Biochemical characterization of human PC-1, an enzyme possessing alkaline phosphodiesterase I and nucleotide pyrophosphatase activities,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 226, no. 2, pp. 433–443, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. Jin-Hua, J. W. Goding, H. Nakamura, and K. Sano, “Molecular cloning and chromosomal localization of PD-Iβ (PDNP3), a new member of the human phosphodiesterase I genes,” Genomics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 412–415, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. A. Baykov, O. A. Evtushenko, and S. M. Avaeva, “A malachite green procedure for orthophosphate determination and its use in alkaline phosphatase-based enzyme immunoassay,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 266–270, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Lecka, I. Gillerman, M. Fausther et al., “8-BuS-ATP derivatives as specific NTPDase1 inhibitors,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 179–196, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. N. Braun, J. Sévigny, S. K. Mishra et al., “Expression of the ecto-ATPase NTPDase2 in the germinal zones of the developing and adult rat brain,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1355–1364, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. R. H. Dahl and J. N. Pratley, “The effects of magnesium on nucleoside phosphatase activity in frog skin,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 411–418, 1967. View at Scopus
  49. S. Deaglio and S. C. Robson, “Ectonucleotidases as regulators of purinergic signaling in thrombosis, inflammation, and immunity,” Advances in Pharmacology, vol. 61, pp. 301–332, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. G. G. Yegutkin, M. Helenius, E. Kaczmarek et al., “Chronic hypoxia impairs extracellular nucleotide metabolism and barrier function in pulmonary artery vasa vasorum endothelial cells,” Angiogenesis, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 503–513, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. H. Zimmermann, “5′-Nucleotidase: molecular structure and functional aspects,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 285, no. 2, pp. 345–365, 1992. View at Scopus
  52. B. E. Crack, C. E. Pollard, M. W. Beukers et al., “Pharmacological and biochemical analysis of FPL 67156, a novel, selective inhibitor of ecto-ATPase,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 475–481, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. S. A. Lévesque, É. G. Lavoie, J. Lecka, F. Bigonnesse, and J. Sévigny, “Specificity of the ecto-ATPase inhibitor ARL 67156 on human and mouse ectonucleotidases,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 141–150, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. J. Wall, J. Chen, S. Meegalla, et al., “Synthesis and evaluation of novel 3,4,6-substituted 2-quinolones as FMS kinase inhibitors,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 2097–2102, 2008.
  55. Y. Baqi, K. Atzler, M. Köse, M. Glänzel, and C. E. Müller, “High-affinity, non-nucleotide-derived competitive antagonists of platelet P2Y12 receptors,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 3784–3793, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. R. Bültmann, H. Wittenburg, B. Pause, G. Kurz, P. Nickel, and K. Starke, “P2-purinoceptor antagonists: III. Blockade of P2-purinoceptor subtypes and ecto-nucleotidases by compounds related to suramin,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 354, no. 4, pp. 498–504, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. B. C. Chen, C. Lee, and W. Lin, “Inhibition of ecto-ATPase by PPADS, suramin and reactive blue in endothelial cells, C6 glioma cells and RAW 264.7 macrophages,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 119, no. 8, pp. 1628–1634, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. H. Wittenburg, R. Bültmann, B. Pause, C. Ganter, G. Kurz, and K. Starke, “P2-purinoceptor antagonists: II. Blockade of P2-purinoceptor subtypes and ecto-nucleotidases by compounds related to Evans blue and trypan blue,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 354, no. 4, pp. 491–497, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. N. Munkonda, G. Kauffenstein, F. Kukulski et al., “Inhibition of human and mouse plasma membrane bound NTPDases by P2 receptor antagonists,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 1524–1534, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. S. W. Lee, S. Park, M. Hong et al., “Triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting: impact on stent thrombosis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1833–1837, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. P. Savi and J. M. Herbert, “Clopidogrel and ticlopidine: P2Y 12 adenosine diphosphate-receptor antagonists for the prevention of atherothrombosis,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 174–183, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus