- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 425845, 10 pages
Microglia and Synapse: Interactions in Health and Neurodegeneration
1German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, 53175 Bonn, Germany
2Axe Neurosciences, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Département de Médecine Moléculaire, Université Laval, 2705 Boulevard Laurier, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 4G2
Received 28 May 2013; Revised 30 September 2013; Accepted 19 October 2013
Academic Editor: Beth Stevens
Copyright © 2013 Zuzana Šišková and Marie-Ève Tremblay. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
A series of discoveries spanning for the last few years has challenged our view of microglial function, the main form of immune defense in the brain. The surveillance of neuronal circuits executed by each microglial cell overseeing its territory occurs in the form of regular, dynamic interactions. Microglial contacts with individual neuronal compartments, such as dendritic spines and axonal terminals, ensure that redundant or dysfunctional elements are recognized and eliminated from the brain. Microglia take on a new shape that is large and amoeboid when a threat to brain integrity is detected. In this defensive form, they migrate to the endangered sites, where they help to minimize the extent of the brain insult. However, in neurodegenerative diseases that are associated with misfolding and aggregation of synaptic proteins, these vital defensive functions appear to be compromised. Many microglial functions, such as phagocytosis, might be overwhelmed during exposure to the abnormal levels of misfolded proteins in their proximity. This might prevent them from attending to their normal duties, such as the stripping of degenerating synaptic terminals, before neuronal function is irreparably impaired. In these conditions microglia become chronically activated and appear to take on new, destructive roles by direct or indirect inflammatory attack.
1. Physiological Conditions
Microglial cells derive from primitive myeloid progenitors (which originate from the yolk sac) invading the central nervous system (CNS) during embryonic development. As a consequence, they are the only immune cells that permanently reside in the CNS [1–3]. In the healthy CNS, microglia occupy minimally overlapping territories in which they continuously survey their environment by structurally remodeling their ramified processes on a time scale of minutes [4–8]. These surveillant microglia can respond rapidly to any pathological stimulus resulting from injury or disease by transforming their morphology and functional behavior [9–12]. Traditionally, these changes in the microglial phenotype are referred to as microglial activation. Activated microglia have the capacity to proliferate, migrate, and release reactive oxygen species, neurotoxins, and proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. These activated microglia can secrete trophic factors, present antigens to T cells, and phagocytose pathogens, degenerating cells, and inflammatory debris [9–11, 13–15]. In addition, they can separate presynaptic terminals from the postsynaptic neuronal parts in a process known as synaptic stripping [16, 17]. It has long been thought that most of these vital functions can only be performed by activated microglia.
However, in recent years, several fundamental insights into the roles of microglia have been provided with new, noninvasive approaches that have allowed the study of their function while avoiding their activation [18–21]. Surprisingly, surveillant microglia were found to (i) eliminate neuronal precursors in the cortical proliferative zones and to (ii) regulate the density of dendritic spines in the hypothalamus, with consequences on the masculinization of adult copulatory behavior; (iii) the functional maturation of glutamatergic receptors in the hippocampus; and (iv) the activity of tectal neurons in the zebrafish [22–25]. In the mature CNS, surveillant microglia were also found to (v) phagocytose newborn cells during adult hippocampal neurogenesis and (vi) regulate glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus [26, 27].
With relation to synapses, it was also recently revealed that surveillant microglia directly contact synaptic elements and eliminate particular subsets of axonal terminals and dendritic spines, depending on changes in neuronal activity and sensory experience, both in the developing and mature brain [21, 28–32]. Microglial interactions with synaptic elements are prevalent [29–32], with almost all of the microglial processes (~94%) juxtaposing axonal terminals, dendritic spines, perisynaptic astrocytic processes, or synaptic clefts and ~68% of all microglial processes contacting more than one synaptic element simultaneously  (Figure 1). Morphological specializations resembling finger-like protrusions wrapping around dendritic spines were described based on electron microscopy with three-dimensional reconstruction (Figure 2). Clathrin-coated pits are also frequently encountered among microglial processes, synaptic structures, and perisynaptic astrocytic processes, suggesting direct exchanges of molecular signals between microglia and synapses by clathrin-mediated endocytosis of membrane-bound receptors and ligands . Importantly, when microglial phagocytosis is compromised during early postnatal development, a sustained impairment of synaptic connectivity is present until adulthood . These results imply that, in addition to the immune defense of the brain, microglia-specific activity plays a crucial role in the refinement of neuronal circuits.
Microglial involvement in pruning of synapses, that is, an activity-dependent process required for the maturation of neuronal circuits, is now well-established during postnatal development. Importantly, in the past years, synaptic pruning was found to be determined by the microglial chemokine receptor CX3CR1 and the classical complement cascade, including, most notably, signaling between the microglial complement receptor 3 (CR3) and the neuronal opsonin C3 [21, 28]. A similar role was recently proposed in the mature CNS, in the experience-dependent remodeling of neuronal circuits, but the molecular cues remain largely unknown, besides ATP signaling through purinoceptors [4, 6, 18]. In the mature brain, phagocytic inclusions showing ultrastructural features of axonal terminals and dendritic spines were frequently observed inside microglial cell bodies or processes, in both the visual and auditory cortices . The engulfed synaptic elements displayed various signs of health, such as an electron-lucent cytoplasm, intact organelles, and cytoskeletal elements, in contrast to the apoptotic elements that are phagocytosed during adult neurogenesis or in contexts of disease [26, 33–36]. Importantly, microglia-synapse interactions were also found to be regulated by neuronal activity, with the phagocytic inclusions becoming more prevalent during manipulations of visual experience [30, 31], including a period of light deprivation followed or not by reexposure to light, a paradigm associated with increased neuronal circuit remodeling and dendritic spine elimination [37–39]. Other mechanisms by which microglia could eliminate synaptic elements may notably include the release of proteases, such as cathepsins, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and tissue-plasminogen activation, as these cells were found to be uniquely surrounded by pockets of extracellular spaces of various sizes and shapes, suggesting their ability to remodel the geometry of the extracellular space locally and thus the concentration of signaling molecules in the synaptic environment . These proteases have been associated in vitro with dendritic spine growth and increases in synaptic strength and in vivo with dendritic spine motility and elimination, as well as experience-dependent plasticity .
During normal aging, the microglial population may be more heterogeneous, displaying variable morphology and different distribution within the brain parenchyma . It has been revealed that ~20% of all microglia in the visual and auditory cortex are completely filled with cellular debris (including axonal terminals, dendritic spines, lysosomal vacuoles, and lipopigments) akin to fat granule cells or gitter cells (see Figure 3). Another distinct feature of the aging brain is the prevalence of microglial interactions with degenerating neurons and synapses, which are identified by their electron-dense, dark ultrastructural contents. The prevalence of phagocytic inclusions and microglial contacts with degenerating elements may be particularly exacerbated by the loss of visual or auditory function . Furthermore, numerous microglial processes protruding into the synaptic cleft have been observed, suggestive of synaptic stripping [17, 31]. In addition, enlargement and thickening of the microglial cell body, increased granulation, impairment of remodeling, and retraction of microglial processes have been described in various brain regions [12, 31, 40–42]. These compromised microglial functions might cause impaired reaction to neuronal abnormalities, in addition to impairing synaptic plasticity, thereby exacerbating the cognitive decline associated with aging [43, 44].
2. Neurodegenerative Diseases
Age is the largest risk factor for the development and progression of neurodegenerative diseases. Several of them, including Alzheimer’s and prion diseases, share a common element of pathology: the misfolding and aggregation of otherwise soluble proteins, which are normally mostly enriched at synapses . Over the past two decades, there has been some progress in our understanding of these complex pathologies with respect to the mechanisms underlying neuronal dysfunction. While neuronal death is the final, irreversible outcome in such diseases, the loss of synapses has emerged as a major correlate of cognitive decline . Within the scope of this review, the following section will examine the interactions of microglia with synapses in Alzheimer’s (AD) and prion diseases.
2.1. Alzheimer’s Disease
In AD, deposition of misfolded extracellular and intracellular proteins is correlated with neuronal dysfunction and loss leading to clinical symptoms of dementia. The principal structural unit of the extracellular deposits is a relatively small peptide, amyloid β-protein (Aβ), which is capable of forming long, insoluble amyloid fibrils that accumulate in deposits known as senile plaques during the evolution of the disease . A number of studies have implicated the oligomeric Aβ forms alone as capable of impairing synaptic function, even in the absence of amyloid fibrils or plaques [47, 48]. Furthermore, it appears that the synapses are the initial targets and their loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment [49–51].
Following amyloid plaque formation, activated microglia accumulate in its vicinity . Although their exact function remained elusive for some time, recent studies have implied a dual role for microglia in AD pathology. In vivo imaging showed that Aβ plaques can form surprisingly quickly (over 24 hours) and microglia might help to restrict their growth . In agreement with this finding, microglial depletion has been linked to increased plaque load in the brain, indicating that microglia might be neuroprotective by removing Aβ . Plaque removal is accomplished by secretion of proteolytic enzymes and via receptors, such as class A scavenger receptors, the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), and β1 integrins [55–58]. It has been suggested that Ccr2, a chemokine receptor expressed on microglia, might also facilitate the removal of Aβ in the early stages of AD . Following immunization therapy, significant amounts of Aβ within the microglial cells of AD patients were observed during postmortem analysis . Several other studies have also documented that Aβ clearance might be a crucial recovery-promoting mechanism [61–63]; however, in most cases, the precise identity of the phagocytic cells involved remains yet to be determined.
Interestingly, observations contradictory to the aforementioned findings were made by another study following ablation of microglia for up to 4 weeks. Despite a dramatic reduction in microglial numbers, no change in the amount or morphology of Aβ deposits was observed and neuronal damage appeared unaltered . It is worth considering that longer periods of microglial depletion and earlier onset might be required to better understand their role in plaque removal . Nevertheless, this might be challenging to accomplish, because a rapid, efficient repopulation resembling that of the endogenous microglial population occurs in the brain following chemical depletion of microglia .
On the other hand, microglia are activated by Aβ to produce cytokines, chemokines, and neurotoxins and may therefore exacerbate neuronal degeneration [57, 67, 68]. One of the examples is the chemokine receptor CX3CR1 for fractalkine/CX3CL1, a ligand expressed in neurons that is known for recruiting CX3CR1-expressing microglia to injured neurons . In a mouse model of AD, microglial CX3CR1 knockout prevented neuronal loss, indicating that microglia might be involved in neuronal elimination during neurodegeneration . In addition to extracellular protein deposition, intracellular neurofibrillary tangle formation is another major component of AD pathology associated with processes of microglial activation. In an animal model of tauopathy mimicking neurofibrillary tangle formation, microglial activation coincided with the elimination of synapses; however, no evidence of synaptic stripping was provided . Although some studies have shown that microglia can ingest apoptotic neurons and neuritic blebs , the precise nature of the involvement of microglia in the events underlying synaptic degeneration and elimination remains to be determined. Taken together, microglia appear to be either beneficial by removing Aβ or detrimental through their proinflammatory activities, thereby likely worsening the disease outcome (Figure 4).
2.2. Prion Diseases
Prion diseases are a group of progressive neurodegenerative conditions affecting both humans and animals. The hallmark pathological features, which are associated with accumulation of a misfolded isoform of the cellular prion protein (), are spongiform degeneration of the brain with extensive neuronal loss, dendritic and synaptic abnormalities, and astrogliosis [73–77]. The misfolded, protease-resistant protein was long implicated in the demise of neurons; however, recent evidence suggests that it might be the protein oligomers, as in AD, that precipitate the synaptic dysfunction . In animal models, the appearance of behavioral abnormalities is associated with a loss of synapses in the hippocampus [79, 80] before the loss of neurons occurs [80, 81]. The presynaptic terminal has been postulated as the initiation site of synaptic demise, followed by dendritic spine degeneration [75, 79, 81, 82]. Similar to AD, microglia undergo a functional transformation associated with a typical change of their morphology [83–85]. However, their molecular fingerprint appears to be anti-inflammatory , akin to a macrophage involved in a phagocytic process . At the present time, it is not known whether microglia become activated because of the accumulation or because of the synaptic changes , nor it is known what leads to the anti-inflammatory phenotype they appear to adopt. Taken together, it seems likely that microglia with this functional profile might be involved in synaptic stripping. While the aforementioned remains elusive in AD, a series of recent discoveries have pointed to its absence in prion disease [89, 90]. So far, no stripping of either pre- or postsynaptic elements has been observed by electron microscopy; however, engulfment and digestion of neuronal corpses have not been excluded. The density of glutamatergic synapses in the hippocampus gradually decreases, while the remaining synapses hypertrophied, similar to AD [91–93]. A striking feature of the synaptic pathology is the progressive change in the curvature of the PSD, which, as the disease evolves, gradually envelopes the presynaptic element, which appears to be internalized by the dendritic spine. Surprisingly, the loss of synapses is not associated with microglia or astrocytes; instead, it appears to be a neuron-autonomous event (Figure 5 [89, 94]). The subsequent loss of spines has been associated with the development of varicosities on dendritic shafts. Interestingly, only the persistent spines are lost, while the transient spines appear to be unaffected .
However, it appears that synaptic degeneration is not a ubiquitous early event in prion disease and that the synaptic vulnerability to toxic protein depends prominently on the structure and function of the target neurons. Brain region-specific presynaptic and postsynaptic degenerative processes independent of microglia were described by a recent study; while synaptic pathology was present in the hippocampus, virtually no synapses had been lost in the cerebellum .
Taken together, while activated microglia are thought to exacerbate chronic neurodegenerative conditions such as prion diseases , their involvement in synaptic loss via synaptic stripping appears to be unlikely given the recent findings. However, the decision between synaptic elimination and its maintenance in the degenerating brain might be regulated by a more subtle, indirect mechanism, such as extracellular signaling, the nature of which remains to be clarified.
3. Conclusion and Perspectives
Together, these recent discoveries demonstrate that microglia preserve the health of neuronal circuitry by continuous surveillance and dynamic adaptation to changes in neuronal activity and sensory experience. Upon activation, microglia may intervene by eliminating particular subsets of synaptic structures (e.g., axonal terminals and dendritic spines) if a threat to neuronal integrity arises.
In neurodegenerative conditions associated with pathological accumulation of misfolded proteins, such as AD and prion diseases, chronic activation of microglia might exacerbate ongoing degenerative processes. In AD, the activation of microglia appears to have contradictory consequences. On the one hand, microglial activation appears to be beneficial by facilitating the removal of neuronal corpses, inflammatory debris, and Aβ plaques. However, the secretion of neurotoxins and proinflammatory activities associated with microglial activation may worsen the disease outcome. In prion diseases, microglial activation occurs relatively early during the disease process and it is one of the few correlates of synaptic and behavioral abnormalities. While chronic activation of microglia likely worsens the disease outcome, microglia were not observed to engage in synaptic removal via synaptic stripping.
Taken together, all essential cognitive functions, such as learning, memory, and language, rely on the experience-dependent remodeling of neuronal circuits, a process in which microglial interactions with synapses play a role of paramount importance. It is a pressing matter to understand the exact nature of these interactions, because in neurodegenerative conditions it is at the synapse where the fate of a neuron seems to be decided.
The authors are grateful to Dr. Martin Fuhrmann (DZNE, Bonn, Germany) for his comments and helpful discussions. This work was supported by a grant from The Banting Research Foundation and a start-up fund from the Université Laval and Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec to Marie-Ève Tremblay and by Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Bonn, Germany) to Zuzana Šišková.
- F. Ginhoux, M. Greter, M. Leboeuf et al., “Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages,” Science, vol. 330, no. 6005, pp. 841–845, 2010.
- F. Ginhoux, S. Lim, G. Hoeffel, D. Low, and T. Huber, “Origin and differentiation of microglia,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 7, article 45, 2013.
- K. Kierdorf, D. Erny, T. Goldmann, V. Sander, and C. Schulz, “Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 16, pp. 273–280, 2013.
- D. Davalos, J. Grutzendler, G. Yang et al., “ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 752–758, 2005.
- A. Nimmerjahn, F. Kirchhoff, and F. Helmchen, “Neuroscience: resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo,” Science, vol. 308, no. 5726, pp. 1314–1318, 2005.
- A. M. Fontainhas, M. Wang, K. J. Liang et al., “Microglial morphology and dynamic behavior is regulated by ionotropic glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID e15973, 2011.
- U. B. Eyo and M. E. Dailey, “Microglia: key elements in neural development, plasticity, and pathology,” Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 494–509, 2013.
- P. Dibaj, F. Nadrigny, H. Steffens et al., “NO mediates microglial response to acute spinal cord injury under ATP control in vivo,” Glia, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 1133–1144, 2010.
- G. W. Kreutzberg, “Microglia: a sensor for pathological events in the CNS,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 312–318, 1996.
- U.-K. Hanisch and H. Kettenmann, “Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1387–1394, 2007.
- R. M. Ransohoff and V. H. Perry, “Microglial physiology: unique stimuli, specialized responses,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, pp. 119–145, 2009.
- K. Helmut, U.-K. Hanisch, M. Noda, and A. Verkhratsky, “Physiology of microglia,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 461–553, 2011.
- A. Bessis, C. Béchade, D. Bernard, and A. Roumier, “Microglial control of neuronal death and synaptic properties,” Glia, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 233–238, 2007.
- J. J. Neher, U. Neniskyte, and G. C. Brown, “Primary phagocytosis of neurons by inflamed microglia: potential roles in neurodegeneration,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 3, article 27, 2012.
- M. Prinz, J. Priller, S. S. Sisodia, and R. M. Ransohoff, “Heterogeneity of CNS myeloid cells and their roles in neurodegeneration,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1227–1235, 2011.
- B. D. Trapp, J. R. Wujek, G. A. Criste et al., “Evidence for synaptic stripping by cortical microglia,” Glia, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 360–368, 2007.
- K. Blinzinger and G. Kreutzberg, “Displacement of synaptic terminals from regenerating motoneurons by microglial cells,” Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 145–157, 1968.
- M.-È. Tremblay, “The role of microglia at synapses in the healthy CNS: novel insights from recent imaging studies,” Neuron Glia Biology, vol. 7, pp. 67–76, 2011.
- M.-È. Tremblay, B. Stevens, A. Sierra, H. Wake, A. Bessis, and A. Nimmerjahn, “The role of microglia in the healthy brain,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 45, pp. 16064–16069, 2011.
- S. Hellwig, A. Heinrich, and K. Biber, “The brain's best friend: microglial neurotoxicity revisited,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 2013.
- R. C. Paolicelli, G. Bolasco, F. Pagani et al., “Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development,” Science, vol. 333, no. 6048, pp. 1456–1458, 2011.
- C. L. Cunningham, V. Martinez-Cerdeno, and S. C. Noctor, “Microglia regulate the number of neural precursor cells in the developing cerebral cortex,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, pp. 4216–4233, 2013.
- M. Hoshiko, I. Arnoux, E. Avignone, N. Yamamoto, and E. Audinat, “Deficiency of the microglial receptor CX3CR1 impairs postnatal functional development of thalamocortical synapses in the barrel cortex,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, pp. 15106–15111, 2012.
- O. Pascual, S. B. Achour, P. Rostaing, A. Triller, and A. Bessis, “Microglia activation triggers astrocyte-mediated modulation of excitatory neurotransmission,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. E197–E205, 2012.
- Y. Li, X. F. Du, C. S. Liu, Z. L. Wen, and J. L. Du, “Reciprocal regulation between resting microglial dynamics and neuronal activity in vivo,” Developmental Cell, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1189–1202, 2012.
- A. Sierra, J. M. Encinas, J. J. P. Deudero et al., “Microglia shape adult hippocampal neurogenesis through apoptosis-coupled phagocytosis,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 483–495, 2010.
- C. Bechade, Y. Cantaut-Belarif, and A. Bessis, “Microglial control of neuronal activity,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 7, article 32, 2013.
- D. P. Schafer, E. K. Lehrman, A. G. Kautzman, et al., “Microglia sculpt postnatal neural circuits in an activity and complement-dependent manner,” Neuron, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 691–705, 2012.
- H. Wake, A. J. Moorhouse, S. Jinno, S. Kohsaka, and J. Nabekura, “Resting microglia directly monitor the functional state of synapses in vivo and determine the fate of ischemic terminals,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 3974–3980, 2009.
- M.-È. Tremblay, R. L. Lowery, and A. K. Majewska, “Microglial interactions with synapses are modulated by visual experience,” PLoS Biology, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e1000527, 2010.
- M.-È. Tremblay, M. L. Zettel, J. R. Ison, P. D. Allen, and A. K. Majewska, “Effects of aging and sensory loss on glial cells in mouse visual and auditory cortices,” Glia, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 541–558, 2012.
- C. J. Sogn, M. Puchades, and V. Gundersen, “Rare contacts between synapses and microglial processes containing high levels of Iba1 and actin—a postembedding immunogold study in the healthy rat brain,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 2030–2040, 2013.
- H. Neumann, M. R. Kotter, and R. J. M. Franklin, “Debris clearance by microglia: an essential link between degeneration and regeneration,” Brain, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 288–295, 2009.
- A. Sierra, O. Abiega, A. Shahraz, and H. Neumann, “Janus-faced microglia: beneficial and detrimental consequences of microglial phagocytosis,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 7, article 6, 2013.
- S.-M. Lu, M.-È. Tremblay, I. L. King et al., “HIV-1 Tat-induced microgliosis and synaptic damage via interactions between peripheral and central myeloid cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 9, Article ID e23915, 2011.
- D. F. Marker, M.-È. Tremblay, J. M. Puccini, et al., “The new small-molecule mixed-lineage kinase 3 inhibitor URMC-099 is neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory in models of human immunodeficiency virus-associated neurocognitive disorders,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 24, pp. 9998–10010, 2013.
- T. Keck, T. D. Mrsic-Flogel, M. Vaz Afonso, U. T. Eysel, T. Bonhoeffer, and M. Hübener, “Massive restructuring of neuronal circuits during functional reorganization of adult visual cortex,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1162–1167, 2008.
- A. Majewska and M. Sur, “Motility of dendritic spines in visual cortex in vivo: changes during the critical period and effects of visual deprivation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 26, pp. 16024–16029, 2003.
- D. Tropea, A. K. Majewska, R. Garcia, and M. Sur, “Structural dynamics of synapses in vivo correlate with functional changes during experience-dependent plasticity in visual cortex,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 33, pp. 11086–11095, 2010.
- M. R. Damani, L. Zhao, A. M. Fontainhas, J. Amaral, R. N. Fariss, and W. T. Wong, “Age-related alterations in the dynamic behavior of microglia,” Aging Cell, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 263–276, 2011.
- A. Sierra, A. C. Gottfried-Blackmore, B. S. Mcewen, and K. Bulloch, “Microglia derived from aging mice exhibit an altered inflammatory profile,” Glia, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 412–424, 2007.
- X.-G. Luo, J.-Q. Ding, and S.-D. Chen, “Microglia in the aging brain: relevance to neurodegeneration,” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 5, no. 1, article 12, 2010.
- H. Kettenmann, F. Kirchhoff, and A. Verkhratsky, “Microglia: new roles for the synaptic stripper,” Neuron, vol. 77, pp. 10–18, 2013.
- W. T. Wong, “Microglial aging in the healthy CNS: phenotypes, drivers, and rejuvenation,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 7, article 22, 2013.
- D. J. Selkoe, “Cell biology of protein misfolding: the examples of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1054–1061, 2004.
- C. Haass and D. J. Selkoe, “Soluble protein oligomers in neurodegeneration: lessons from the Alzheimer's amyloid β-peptide,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 101–112, 2007.
- D. M. Walsh, I. Klyubin, J. V. Fadeeva et al., “Naturally secreted oligomers of amyloid β protein potently inhibit hippocampal long-term potentiation in vivo,” Nature, vol. 416, no. 6880, pp. 535–539, 2002.
- M. Townsend, G. M. Shankar, T. Mehta, D. M. Walsh, and D. J. Selkoe, “Effects of secreted oligomers of amyloid β-protein on hippocampal synaptic plasticity: a potent role for trimers,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 572, no. 2, pp. 477–492, 2006.
- R. D. Terry, E. Masliah, D. P. Salmon et al., “Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer's disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 572–580, 1991.
- S. W. Scheff, D. A. Price, F. A. Schmitt, and E. J. Mufson, “Hippocampal synaptic loss in early Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1372–1384, 2006.
- R. Malinow, “New developments on the role of NMDA receptors in Alzheimer's disease,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 559–563, 2012.
- E. G. McGeer and P. L. McGeer, “Brain inflammation in Alzheimer disease and the therapeutic implications,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 821–836, 1999.
- M. Meyer-Luehmann, T. L. Spires-Jones, C. Prada et al., “Rapid appearance and local toxicity of amyloid-β plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Nature, vol. 451, no. 7179, pp. 720–724, 2008.
- A. R. Simard and S. Rivest, “Bone marrow stem cells have the ability to populate the entire central nervous system into fully differentiated parenchymal microglia,” FASEB Journal, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 998–1000, 2004.
- W. Q. Qiu, Z. Ye, D. Kholodenko, P. Seubert, and D. J. Selkoe, “Degradation of amyloid β-protein by a metalloprotease secreted by microglia and other neural and non-neural cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 10, pp. 6641–6646, 1997.
- D. M. Paresce, R. N. Ghosh, and F. R. Maxfield, “Microglial cells internalize aggregates of the Alzheimer's disease amyloid β-protein via a scavenger receptor,” Neuron, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 553–565, 1996.
- J. El Khoury, S. E. Hickman, C. A. Thomas, L. Cao, S. C. Silverstein, and J. D. Loike, “Scavenger receptor-mediated adhesion of microglia to β-amyloid fibrils,” Nature, vol. 382, no. 6593, pp. 716–719, 1996.
- J. Koenigsknecht and G. Landreth, “Microglial phagocytosis of fibrillar β-amyloid through a β1 integrin-dependent mechanism,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 44, pp. 9838–9846, 2004.
- J. El Khoury, M. Toft, S. E. Hickman et al., “Ccr2 deficiency impairs microglial accumulation and accelerates progression of Alzheimer-like disease,” Nature Medicine, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 432–438, 2007.
- J. A. Nicoll, E. Barton, D. Boche, et al., “Abeta species removal after Aβ42 immunization,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 65, 11, pp. 1040–1048, 2006.
- P. E. Cramer, J. R. Cirrito, D. W. Wesson et al., “ApoE-directed therapeutics rapidly clear β-amyloid and reverse deficits in AD mouse models,” Science, vol. 335, no. 6075, pp. 1503–1506, 2012.
- M. T. Heneka, M. P. Kummer, A. Stutz, et al., “NLRP3 is activated in Alzheimer's disease and contributes to pathology in APP/PS1 mice,” Nature, vol. 493, pp. 674–678, 2013.
- G. Naert and S. Rivest, “CC chemokine receptor 2 deficiency aggravates cognitive impairments and amyloid pathology in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 16, pp. 6208–6220, 2011.
- S. A. Grathwohl, R. E. Kälin, T. Bolmont et al., “Formation and maintenance of Alzheimer's disease β-amyloid plaques in the absence of microglia,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1361–1363, 2009.
- S. Hellwig, A. Heinrich, and K. Biber, “The brain's best friend: microglial neurotoxicity revisited,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 7, pp. 1–11, 2013.
- N. H. Varvel, S. A. Grathwohl, F. Baumann, et al., “Microglial repopulation model reveals a robust homeostatic process for replacing CNS myeloid cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 44, pp. 18150–18155, 2012.
- S. D. Yan, X. Chen, J. Fu et al., “RAGE and amyloid-β peptide neurotoxicity in Alzheimer's disease,” Nature, vol. 382, no. 6593, pp. 685–691, 1996.
- D. T. Weldon, S. D. Rogers, J. R. Ghilardi et al., “Fibrillar β-amyloid induces microglial phagocytosis, expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase, and loss of a select population of neurons in the rat CNS in vivo,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 2161–2173, 1998.
- J. K. Harrison, Y. Jiang, S. Chen et al., “Role for neuronally derived fractalkine in mediating interactions between neurons and CX3CR1-expressing microglia,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 18, pp. 10896–10901, 1998.
- M. Fuhrmann, T. Bittner, C. K. E. Jung et al., “Microglial Cx3cr1 knockout prevents neuron loss in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 411–413, 2010.
- Y. Yoshiyama, M. Higuchi, B. Zhang et al., “Synapse loss and microglial activation precede tangles in a P301S tauopathy mouse model,” Neuron, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 337–351, 2007.
- D. A. Fraser, K. Pisalyaput, and A. J. Tenner, “C1q enhances microglial clearance of apoptotic neurons and neuronal blebs, and modulates subsequent inflammatory cytokine production,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 733–743, 2010.
- S. B. Prusiner and S. J. DeArmond, “Prion diseases and neurodegeneration,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 17, pp. 311–339, 1994.
- A. R. Johnston, C. Black, J. Fraser, and N. MacLeod, “Scrapie infection alters the membrane and synaptic properties of mouse hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurones,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 500, part 1, pp. 1–15, 1997.
- P. V. Belichenko, D. Brown, M. Jeffrey, and J. R. Fraser, “Dendritic and synaptic alterations of hippocampal pyramidal neurones in scrapie-infected mice,” Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 143–149, 2000.
- R. N. Hogan, J. R. Baringer, and S. B. Prusiner, “Scrapie infection diminishes spines and increases varicosities of dendrites in hamsters: a quantitative Golgi analysis,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 461–473, 1987.
- D. M. D. Landis, R. S. Williams, and C. L. Masters, “Golgi and electron microscopic studies of spongiform encephalopathy,” Neurology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 538–549, 1981.
- B. Caughey and G. S. Baron, “Prions and their partners in crime,” Nature, vol. 443, no. 7113, pp. 803–810, 2006.
- M. Jeffrey, W. G. Halliday, J. Bell et al., “Synapse loss associated with abnormal PrP precedes neuronal degeneration in the scrapie-infected murine hippocampus,” Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 41–54, 2000.
- C. Cunningham, R. Deacon, H. Wells et al., “Synaptic changes characterize early behavioural signs in the ME7 model of murine prion disease,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2147–2155, 2003.
- B. C. Gray, Z. Siskova, V. H. Perry, and V. O'Connor, “Selective presynaptic degeneration in the synaptopathy associated with ME7-induced hippocampal pathology,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2009.
- T. Kitamoto, R.-W. Shin, K. Doh-ura et al., “Abnormal isoform of prion proteins accumulates in the synaptic structures of the central nervous system in patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1285–1294, 1992.
- K. Williams, E. Ulvestad, and J. Antel, “Immune regulatory and effector properties of human adult microglia studied in vitro and in situ,” Advances in Neuroimmunology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 273–281, 1994.
- L. Manuelidis, W. Fritch, and Y.-G. Xi, “Evolution of a strain of CJD that induces BSE-like plaques,” Science, vol. 277, no. 5322, pp. 94–98, 1997.
- T. A. Baker, “Protein unfolding: trapped in the act,” Nature, vol. 401, no. 6748, pp. 29–30, 1999.
- D. Boche, C. Cunningham, F. Docagne, H. Scott, and V. H. Perry, “TGFβ1 regulates the inflammatory response during chronic neurodegeneration,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 638–650, 2006.
- V. A. Fadok and G. Chimini, “The phagocytosis of apoptotic cells,” Seminars in Immunology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 365–372, 2001.
- K. Guenther, R. M. J. Deacon, V. H. Perry, and J. N. P. Rawlins, “Early behavioural changes in scrapie-affected mice and the influence of dapsone,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 401–409, 2001.
- Z. Šišková, A. Page, V. O'Connor, and V. H. Perry, “Degenerating synaptic boutons in prion disease: microglia activation without synaptic stripping,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 175, no. 4, pp. 1610–1621, 2009.
- Z. Siskova, R. A. Reynolds, V. O'Connor, and V. H. Perry, “Brain region specific pre-synaptic and post-synaptic degeneration are early components of neuropathology in prion disease,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID e55004, 2013.
- Z. Sisková, N. K. Sanyal, A. Orban, V. O'Connor, and V. H. Perry, “Reactive hypertrophy of synaptic varicosities within the hippocampus of prion-infected mice,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 471–475, 2010.
- C. Bertoni-Freddari, P. Fattoretti, T. Casoli, W. Meier-Ruge, and J. Ulrich, “Morphological adaptive response of the synaptic junctional zones in the human dentate gyrus during aging and Alzheimer's disease,” Brain Research, vol. 517, no. 1-2, pp. 69–75, 1990.
- S. T. DeKosky and S. W. Scheff, “Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer's disease: correlation with cognitive severity,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 457–464, 1990.
- L. O. Ronnevi, “Spontaneous phagocytosis of C-type synaptic terminals by spinal α-motoneurons in newborn kittens. An electron microscopic study,” Brain Research, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 189–199, 1979.
- M. Fuhrmann, G. Mitteregger, H. Kretzschmar, and J. Herms, “Dendritic pathology in prion disease starts at the synaptic spine,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 23, pp. 6224–6233, 2007.
- V. H. Perry and J. Teeling, “Microglia and macrophages of the central nervous system: the contribution of microglia priming and systemic inflammation to chronic neurodegeneration,” Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 601–612, 2013.