About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 598975, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/598975
Research Article

Analysis of the Processes in Spent Fuel Pools in Case of Loss of Heat Removal due to Water Leakage

Laboratory of Nuclear Installations Safety, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos 3, 44403 Kaunas, Lithuania

Received 31 January 2013; Revised 23 April 2013; Accepted 7 May 2013

Academic Editor: Arkady Serikov

Copyright © 2013 Algirdas Kaliatka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The safe storage of spent fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pools is very important. These facilities are not covered by leaktight containment; thus, the consequences of overheating and melting of fuel in the spent fuel pools can be very severe. On the other hand, due to low decay heat of fuel assemblies, the processes in pools are slow in comparison with processes in reactor core during LOCA accident. Thus, the accident management measures play a very important role in case of some accidents in spent fuel pools. This paper presents the analysis of possible consequences of fuel overheating due to leakage of water from spent fuel pool. Also, the accident mitigation measure, the late injection of water was evaluated. The analysis was performed for the Ignalina NPP Unit 2 spent fuel pool, using system thermal hydraulic code for severe accident analysis ATHLET-CD. The phenomena, taking place during such accident, are discussed. Also, benchmarking of results of the same accident calculation using ASTEC and RELAP/SCDAPSIM codes is presented here.

1. Introduction

According to the NRC data [1], the probability of a loss of coolant from spent fuel storage pool is about 10−6 per pool per year. The consequences can be very severe and a huge amount of radioactive materials can be released to the environment because the spent fuel pools are not covered by containment as the reactor core.

As it is noted in the Operating Experience Feedback Report “Assessment of Spent Fuel Cooling” [2], during operation time, two losses of spent fuel pool coolant inventory events occurred, and decrease of water level by 1.5 m was registered. These real events were terminated by operator action, when approximately 6 m of water remained above the stored fuel. In the case without operator actions, the water loss could have continued, that could lead to the severe accident in spent fuel pool. During station blackout accident at Fukushima NPP after tsunami disaster in March 11, 2011, the water level in SFP of Unit 4 decreased more than 6.5 m, down to the 1.5 m above the top of SFA. The mitigation measures, water injection from nondesign sources, allow to prevent a severe accident (damage of fuel rods) in SFP of Fukushima NPP Unit 4.

The possible consequences of water loss due to leakage and late operator actions (water injection to the spent fuel pool after fuel heat up) are evaluated in this paper. The evaluation of this accident was performed for Ignalina NPP Unit 2 spent fuel pool, assuming the possible highest decay heat generation in SFP (such situation was at the moment of final shutdown of Ignalina NPP Unit 2). Such situation was analyzed, because it is very similar to the situation during the March 11, 2011 accident at Fukushima NPP Unit 4. The today situation at Ignalina NPP, with significantly decreased decay heat of spent fuel, is presented also. The developed models can be applied to SFP of other reactor types as well. Applying to the SFP of other reactors types, it is necessary to evaluate the real characteristics of SFP: water volume, possible leakage rate, and decay heat of fuel assemblies groups in SFP, and so forth.

The analysis of water leakage accident was performed using three computer codes designed for the severe accident analysis: ATHLET-CD, ASTEC, and RELAP/SCDAPSIM. All the thermal hydraulic models were developed as much as possible in the similar way, because the main idea of this paper was to evaluate the capability of these codes and to discuss the modelling approach.

2. Design of Spent Fuel Pools at Ignalina NPP and Developed Models

At the Ignalina NPP (Lithuania), two Russian design channel-type graphite-moderated boiling water reactors (RBMK-1500) were commissioned in 1983 and 1987. At present, both units are shut down for decommissioning (in 2004 and 2009). All assemblies of spent fuel are stored in the spent fuel pools (SFP) and in dry storage facility on site of the Ignalina NPP. Thus, the safety justification of spent fuel assemblies’ storage in the SFP of Ignalina NPP is very important.

General description of Ignalina NPP spent fuel pool design, fuel characteristics, and estimation of decay power in SFP is presented in the paper [3]. The design of the RBMK reactor fuel rods differs very little from fuel elements manufactured for standard BWR-type reactors [4]. The core height of RBMK-1500 reactor is 7 m. In order to achieve the required height, the RBMK fuel assembly consists of two fuel bundles placed one above the other. Each fuel bundle includes 18 fuel elements placed in two circles around the carrying rod. The outer diameter of fuel assembly is 79 mm. For safe disposal of spent fuel bundles into the spent fuel pools and later in the dry storage facility, the leak tight fuel assemblies should be cut, separating fuel bundles and placing them in the shipping casks.

Each reactor unit at Ignalina NPP is equipped with a system of spent fuel pools (Figure 1). All process operations related to handling of the spent fuel are performed in the central hall or in the spent storage pools hall. Spent fuel pools of Ignalina NPP are designed for the following purposes:(i)storage of non-cut spent fuel assemblies (SFAs) in deep compartments of storage pool (rooms 236/1 and 236/2);(ii)storage of spent nuclear fuel in shipping casks in shallow compartments of the storage pool after cutting SFAs (rooms 336, 337/1, 337/2, 339/1, and 339/2).

598975.fig.001
Figure 1: Layout of buildings in SFPs hall of Ignalina NPP Unit 2.

The spent fuel assemblies, prepared to be cut in the “hot” cell, are accumulated in a separate pool (Room 234). The loading of the shipping casks is performed in two pools (Rooms 338/1 and 338/2). Also, there are transport corridor (Room 235) for the transportation of SFAs and shipping casks between the pools and transport corridor (Room 157) for transportation of fuel assemblies between spent fuel hall and reactor hall. The whole complex of storage pools of the spent fuel storage and handling system comprises 12 pools (Figure 1). The reloaded fuel assemblies remain in the pool for at least a year, after which they may be removed to be cut (in “hot” cell) and then to be loaded into the 102 placed shipping casks. The shipping casks with spent fuel assemblies are stored in the storage pools until they are loaded into the protective casks CASTOR or CONSTOR to be further transported to the dry spent fuel storage facility. The detailed description of spent fuel pools in Ignalina NPP is presented in [3, 5].

The benchmarking analysis was performed using codes for analysis of severe accidents ATHLET-CD [6], ASTEC [7] and RELAP/SCDAPSIM [8]. The best estimate system thermal hydraulic code ATHLET-CD is developed for the analysis of reactor accidents with core degradation and includes modules for the simulation of core degradation, melting and relocation, release and transport of fission product and aerosol, and behaviour of debris bed. ASTEC code is a source term evaluation code with modular structure. A model developed using ICARE module of ASTEC V2.0R2 code is used in this paper. The ICARE module simulates the in-vessel core degradation: the behaviour of in-vessel structures, the formation and the evolution of liquid and solid mixtures, thermal hydraulics, and chemical reactions between materials. The RELAP/SCDAPSIM code is an integrated, mechanistic computer code, which models the progression of severe accidents in light-water-reactor nuclear power plants. The RELAP/SCDAPSIM is being developed at Innovative Systems Software as part of the international SCDAP Development and Training Program. RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.2 uses the publicly available SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.2 models. The entire spectrum of in-vessel severe accident phenomena, including reactor-coolant-system thermal-hydraulic response, core heat up, degradation and relocation, and lower-head thermal loads, are treated in this code in a unified framework for both boiling water reactors and pressurized water reactors. The feasibility of RELAP/SCDAPSIM for modelling of low-pressure transients with the presence of noncondensable gases such as those occurring in spent fuel storage facilities is justified in the code developers’ paper [8].

The ATHLET-CD and ASTEC code models of SFP and fuel bundles are based on the same philosophy: all rooms of SFP are modelled by single pool with 4 different groups of SFAs (see Figures 2 and 3). Also heat removal to the environment was evaluated through the SFP walls. However, some differences of evaluation of SFP hall and interaction with the environment in the ATHLET-CD and ASTEC model exist. In ASTEC model, the SFP and hall are modelled using single element in contradiction to the ATHLET-CD model, where SFP hall was modelled by TOPVOLUM element above the SFP and then connected to the environment, while in ASTEC model it is a direct connection of SFP to the environment. Heat removal from the outside of SFP in ATHLET-CD was modelled to the air flow, while in ASTEC model heat removal to the environment from the heat structure POOLWALL was assumed using the selected heat removal coefficient.

598975.fig.002
Figure 2: SFP and SFAs nodalization scheme in ASTEC model.
fig3
Figure 3: SFP and SFAs nodalization scheme in ATHLET-CD model.

As it was mentioned, in the ATHLET-CD and ASTEC models, for the fuel modelling in SFP, all fuel assemblies were modelled by 4 equivalent groups of fuel assemblies: ROD1, ROD2, ROD3, and ROD4 with different decay heat levels (see Table 1). These levels of decay heat are in accordance with the condition, which was before the final shutdown of Ignalina NPP unit 2. It was assumed that shipping casks with spent fuel bundles are placed in SFP in two layers one above the other, according to the real shipping casks loadings scheme in the SFP [9]. In the SFP of Ignalina NPP the noncut SFAs and the fuel assemblies with higher level of decay heat are placed deeper in the SFP. Therefore the heat structure ROD4 is placed higher, comparing to ROD1, ROD2, and ROD3 (see Figures 2 and 3).

tab1
Table 1: Parameters of SFA in SFP.

The SFP model for RELAP/SCDAPSIM code is very similar to ATHLET-CD code model; only one difference exists in fuel modelling—all fuel assemblies in RELAP/SCDAPSIM were modelled by one equivalent fuel rod “Fuel rod 1,” with total decay heat 4253 kW (see Figure 4).

598975.fig.004
Figure 4: SFP and SFAs simplified nodalization scheme in RELAP/SCDAPSIM model.

SFP models for three different codes comparison are presented in Table 2.

tab2
Table 2: Comparison of SFP models for three different codes.

3. Analysis of Spent Fuel Pool Dryout due to Water Leakage Using ATHLET-CD Code

During the modelling of loss of water from the spent fuel pool due to water leakage accident, for the evaluation of worst possible consequences, the main assumptions in the model were used: (i)the maximal amount of spent fuel assemblies is placed in the spent fuel pools; (ii)total mass of uranium in SFPs (in 7901 SFA) is equal to 752,400 kg;(iii)the residual decay heat of SFAs is the maximal possible. It was assumed that the total decay heat in SFP is equal to 4253 kW—such power level was theoretically maximal during the Ignalina NPP Unit 2 operation;(iv)initial water volume in SFP is equal to 5070 m3;(v)water level is 16.9 m from the bottom of SFP;(vi)initial water temperature is 50°C;(vii)the maximal possible water leakage through damaged drainage pipe is assumed (21.11 kg/s).

The main goal of this paper is to discuss the processes in SFP during the loss of water due to leakage in pools. Also the accident mitigation measure, the water injection to the spent fuel pool after fuel heat up, is discussed. It was assumed that after 300000 s from accident beginning SFP auxiliary water makeup system starts operation. The flow rate of injected water 27.8 kg/s was selected taking into account the capacity of SFP water makeup system in Ignalina NPP.

Water leakage leads to water level decrease in the pool (see Figure 5). The sequence of analyzed accident will be the following:(i)  s—initiation of water leakage in the SFP;(ii)  s—water level decreases down to the top of SFA (fuel uncovering and heat up in air starts);(iii)  s—water level decreases down to the bottom of SFA (all SFAs are fully uncovered);(iv)  s—water level decreases down to the bottom of SFP (stop of water leakage from SFP);(v)  s—water injection starts;(vi)  s—water level increases up to the bottom part of SFA;(vii)  s—water level increases up to the top of SFA (all SFAs and molten material are cooled down).

598975.fig.005
Figure 5: Water level in spent fuel pools.

As it is shown in Figure 5, all the SFAs are uncovered at time moment  s (~60 h), stop of water leakage assumed at time moment 235,000 s, when small amount of water is still presented in bottom part of SFP, water injection to the pool is started at time moment  s (~83 h) after the beginning of the accident.

After the beginning of fuel assembly uncovering (  s), the fuel heat up process starts. The behaviour of fuel temperatures is presented in Figure 6. As it is shown in the presented figure, the fuel temperatures of all equivalent groups of rods at the same level (in the same node) are approximately the same. It is due to very slow heatup process and due to convective heat transfer between SFAs in the pool. Temperature in the top part of SFAs (ROD4 node 17 on Figure 6) increases slowly in comparison with the central part of SFAs (ROD1 and ROD4 node 10) due to lower decay heat in ROD4 and due to cooling down by the air from the top part of SFP room (TOPVOLUM).

598975.fig.006
Figure 6: Fuel temperature in SFAs with different storage period at different elevations: node 2—at elevation 1.17 m, node 10—at elevation 5.64 m, node 17—at elevation 10.82 m (elevations from the bottom of SFA).

After temperature increase up to the 700°C ( = about 210,000 s) slow exothermic oxidation reaction of fuel cladding with air starts. The maximal heat generation due to this oxidation process reaches 1.1 MW at time moment 300,000 s (Figure 7(b)). This oxidation leads to the air suction from the top part (TOPVOLUM) and cooling down of the top part of SFA (see insignificant temperature decrease in ROD4 node 17 at time moment 210,000 s in Figure 6). After the water injection starts (  s), the decrease of temperature in the bottom part of SFP begins. This leads to air cooldown in this part and air flow increase from the top to the bottom. In turn, this leads to small decrease of fuel cladding temperature (see fuel temperature in node 2 ROD1 in time interval –315,000 s). At the same, time the sharp slowdown of oxidation in steam process and rapid decrease of heat generation occur (see Figure 7(b) at time moment  s).

fig7
Figure 7: Heat generated by oxidation: (a) heat generation due to fuel cladding oxidation in air and steam during whole period of accident, (b) slow heat generation due to fuel cladding oxidation at temperature below 1200°C heat generation due to intensive fuel cladding oxidation in steam at temperature higher than 1200°C.

Maximal temperatures in the central part of SFAs reached about 1900°C. Fast increase of temperature at  s (Figure 6) occurs in the central part of SFA due to intensive steam-zirconium reaction after the increase of the amount of available steam for oxidation. Steam in SFP starts to generate intensively at about 315,000 s when water level increases up to the bottom part of SFA (Figure 5) and contact with hot SFAs (temperature of the bottom part of SFAs is about 500°C) occur. The generated steam cools down the SFAs in the very bottom and top parts, because the amount of generated heat in these parts is relatively low (as it is shown in Figure 6, the temperatures in node 2 of ROD1 and node 10 of ROD1 are below the temperatures, when the fast exothermic steam-zirconium reaction process can start).

When the fast steam generation occurs (at time moment  s), temperature of fuel in central part reaches 1200°C, which leads to fast reaction of steam with zirconium from fuel claddings. At the same time, the significant amount of heat is generated due to the exothermic oxidation process (Figures 7(a) and 7(c)). Maximal heat generation due to oxidation of fuel rods claddings with steam reached 80 MW.

Starting from the time moment  s, due to the increase of fuel rods temperature up to 700°C, slow cladding oxidation process in steam and hydrogen generation starts (Figure 8). Up to the moment of water injection the total amount of generated hydrogen is equal to the 300 kg. Later (from the 315,000 s), after fast oxidation process due to hot cladding (temperature more than 1200°C) reaction with steam, a rapid increase of temperature begins (Figure 6) and a huge amount of hydrogen is generated (Figure 8). Sum of generated hydrogen mass reaches 1900 kg. Oxidation takes place in the central part of SFA because the fuel cladding temperature in the very bottom and top parts of SFAs is approximately 500°C. This is considerably below the temperature of fast oxidation threshold (1200°C).

598975.fig.008
Figure 8: Hydrogen generation.

After the fuel element claddings damage, release of volatile fission products to the SFP room and later to the environment starts. The calculation of released mass of fission product species and power of these species for the case of uncompensated leakage from SFP is presented in the paper [5].

4. Possible Consequences of Water Leakage Accident in SFP of Ignalina NPP at Present Days (4 Years after Final Shut Down of Reactor)

The worst possible severe accident consequences of Ignalina NPP SFP, water leakage at maximal decay heat during operation period of NPP, was presented in the section above. The consequences of severe accident presented above are more or less the same for all water cooled reactors types during operation of NPP. The decay heat of SFA in SFP decreases exponentially during the time of storage in SFP. Therefore, time factor is very important for the possible consequences of water leakage accident from SFP.

The reactor of Unit 2 of Ignalina NPP was shut down at the end of 2009; therefore, at the end of 2013 it will be 4 years of final reactor shutdown. Therefore, in this paper both cases were analysed: the possible consequences of water leakage accident during operation period of Ignalina NPP to show the severity of such accident and possible consequences of the same accident for situation after 4 years after final shutdown of Ignalina NPP Unit 2 reactor.

In this section the possible consequences of the water leakage accident at Ignalina NPP after 4 years after final shutdown was presented.

The only difference from the model described above is that the maximal possible decay heat power of fuel after 4 years is 809.6 kW (see Table 3) and empty pool (fuel is cooled by air only) as initial conditions were assumed. This was done because in case of low residual heat in SFP, water absence in the bottom part of pool becomes very important to the maximal reached temperatures of SFA especially for the bottom part of SFA. Also in contradiction with the scenario presented in the section above (water leakage and then water injection), no water injection was assumed to show that fuel in SFP can be cooled by air only.

tab3
Table 3: Parameters of SFA in SFP (today situation).

On the figures below (Figures 9 and 10), temperatures at different levels of SFA in SFP were presented. It should be noted that according to the technical data of Ignalina NPP, SFA damage of fuel elements claddings occurs if temperatures reached 700°C.

598975.fig.009
Figure 9: Temperatures of fuel in fuel assemblies ROD1.
598975.fig.0010
Figure 10: Temperatures of fuel in fuel assemblies ROD4.

As it is shown on the after mentioned figures maximal temperature of fuel in SFP in long term was at about 540°C (Figure 9) in ROD1 element, which represents fuel with highest decay heat rate in SFP (see Table 3).

The results of calculations show that in case of water leakage accident at Ignalina NPP 4 years after Final shut down of reactor fuel claddings will remain intact and release is not expected to the environment. Also generation of hydrogen does not occur and no dangerous increase of concentration of hydrogen in SFP is expected during the loss of water accident at Ignalina NPP on “today” stage. But it should be noted that structures of SFP (metals, concrete, etc.) cannot be operated safely at such temperature range; therefore, safe operation of SFP at Ignalina NPP should be ensured until the final fuel removal from SFP of both units. The same conclusion for the similar accident conditions (loss of water from SFP after 4 years of final reactor shutdown) can be done for NPPs with other types generating 2 water cooled reactors (PWR, BWR, CANDU) because the decay heat of fuel elements will be approximately the same (BWR and PWR) or less (CANDU) and fuel assemblies approximately 2 times shorter, while heat removal conditions will be similar.

5. Benchmarking of the ATHLET-CD Calculation Results with ASTEC and RELAP/SCDAPSIM

Benchmark calculation using ASTEC and RELAP/SCDAPSIM codes was done for the same accident as described in Section 3—water leakage and further water injection to the SFP. The same initial conditions, water leakages and injection times, and flow rates, as for the above described ATHLET-CD, were used for the ASTEC and RELAP/SCDAPSIM codes.

In case of spent fuel pools emptying oxidation in air is evaluated in ATHLET-CD and ASTEC models. The RELAP/SCDAPSIM Mod 3.2 does not evaluate the air oxidation phenomena. In ATHLET-CD for the oxidation Sokolov (Zr 1% Nb), oxidation correlation is used which is recommended by ATHLET-CD code developer for fuel claddings Zr 1% Nb (VVER, RBMK fuel element claddings) and Powers (NUREG1) correlation for oxidation in air. In ASTEC calculations, Urbanic-Heidrick oxidation correlation is used. To deal with Zr oxidation by air, two kinds of modifications have been done in ASTEC code: they concern fluid properties and reaction kinetics (for oxidation in air NUREG1 correlation is used).

In Figure 11 the comparison of temperatures on different levels in the spent fuel pool calculated by different codes is presented.

fig11
Figure 11: Fuel temperature in SFAs with different storage period at the different elevations calculated by using different codes (elevations from the bottom of SFA).

Figure 11 shows good agreement of calculation results of fuel temperatures in central parts of SFA, received using different computer codes. Maximal reached fuel temperature in ATHLET-CD calculations is equal to 1900°C, in ASTEC 2100°C, in RELAP/SCDAPSIM 2200°C. Only in the top part of SFAs, some disagreement between ATHLET-CD and RELAP/SCDAPSIM and ASTEC code calculation results exists. This inadequacy is due to the start of intensive oxidation (steam-zirconium reaction) in ASTEC code at lower temperature level. As a result, the highest values of fuel temperatures are reached in the bottom and central part of SFAs in ASTEC calculations. In ATHLET-CD calculations after water level decreases below the SFA bottom part (see Figure 5 at time moment ~215,000 s), no further water heats up by sources inside water while temperature is still below boiling point that leads to decrease of steam generation rate. At the same time temperature of SFA in central part reaches 600°C and slow oxidation process in steam and air already occurs. Due to these reasons, suction of air from SFP hall (TOPVOLUM element on Figure 3) occurs. This leads to a reverse of steam and air flow in SFP and to a decrease of temperature in top part of SFA (see temperature decrease in top part of SFA in ATHLET-CD calculation results in Figure 11(a) at time period from ~215,000 s up to ~225,000 s). Due to the influence of hot air and steam mixture, SFP temperature of water in bottom part increases up to the boiling point (100°C reached at time moment ~225,000 s) and the increase of steam generation in bottom part leads to change of flow direction to the previous stage (from bottom to the top) and further increase of temperature of SFA occurs approximately with the same rate as in ASTEC calculations.

After the start of water injection (  s), the node below SFA is filled with water. Later, the water level is increasing and water contacts the hot structures of SFAs in the first node. This leads to the very fast decrease of fuel rods temperature in this node. At the same time, a huge amount of steam is generated. The same process of fast fuel temperature decrease in this particular node and generation of steam will be repeated each time, after the water level reaches the next node. The generated steam is contacting with the heat structures in the nodes above. If the temperature of fuel rods in the nodes above is not enough for fast steam-zirconium reaction, the generated steam cools down this part of SFAs (see temperature decrease in ATHLET-CD calculation in Figures 11(a) and 11(c) for all three codes calculations at time moment ~315,000 s when huge amount of steam is generated). In the nodes with higher temperature (above temperature threshold for fast steam-zirconium reaction), this leads to exothermic reaction and fuel temperature significantly increases (see Figure 11(b)).

Because the height of nodes is quite big (more than 0.5 m), the amount of heat in each node is significant; thus, the increase (or decrease) of water level in the pool leads to stepwise behaviour of fuel rods temperature (Figure 11). In reality, steam will be generated gradually and behaviour of temperature should be smooth, not stepwise as it appears in the models.

In Figure 12, the comparison of generated hydrogen calculated by different codes is presented. In the ASTEC calculations total amount of hydrogen generated due to Zr oxidation after late supply of water in the SFP is about 5100 kg, in RELAP/SCDAPSIM about 3800 kg, and in ATHLET-CD calculation is about 1900 kg. Differences in results of hydrogen generation exist due to temperature changes in the top part of SFA: in ASTEC and RELAP/SCDAPSIM calculations rapid increase of temperature in top part and oxidation occurs while in ATHLET-CD calculation oxidation do not start here. As it is shown in paper [10] is the hydrogen generation in ASTEC code during fuel cladding oxidation at temperature range over 2000°C is overestimated from 10 to 30 percent; therefore, total amount of generated hydrogen could be between 3600 and 4500 kg.

598975.fig.0012
Figure 12: Hydrogen generation calculated by different codes.

Main sequence of events, in the case of water leakage from spent fuel pools in Ignalina NPP, calculated using ATHLET-CD, ASTEC, and RELAP/SCDAPSIM codes, is presented in Table 4. From the results presented in the table, we can see that the sequence of events during severe accident in SFP is modelled with good agreement, the calculated times of events are very close using ATHLET-CD, ASTEC, and RELAP/SCDAPSIM models, developed for SFP of Ignalina NPP Unit 2. The results of performed analyses can be useful for creating severe accident guidelines for the evaluation of different accident mitigation measures.

tab4
Table 4: Sequence of events, in the case of water leakage from spent fuel pools of Ignalina NPP.

6. Conclusions

This paper presents the calculation results of the most probable severe accident in spent fuel pools—loss of heat removal due to water leakage in SFP. Analysis of this event, which covers all possible phenomena in SFPs, was performed for SFP at Ignalina NPP Unit 2. For the analysis of the accident, the model of spent fuel pools was developed using different computer codes for the modelling of severe accidents in light water reactors ATHLET-CD, ASTEC, and RELAP/SCDAPSIM.

The developed models allowed to model different phenomena: uncovering and heat up of fuel rods, steam-zirconium reaction, quenching of hot fuel rods by water, and so forth. This model can be used for SFP of different reactor types analysis, taking into account the SFP real technical parameters.

Benchmarking of ATHLET-CD calculation results with calculations performed by RELAP/SCDAPSIM and ASTEC codes shows good agreement of the calculated behaviour of fuel temperatures. Some disagreement of hydrogen mass generation exists in ATHLET-CD with ASTEC and RELAP/SCDAPSIM calculation results because, in ASTEC calculation, the intensive oxidation starts at lower temperatures in comparison with ATHLET-CD. This leads to an overestimation of hydrogen generation at high temperatures in ASTEC calculation. Also the difference in hydrogen generation is due to differences in temperature behaviour in top part of SFA. The performed analyses are useful for the evaluation of different accident mitigation measures. The analyses were performed for Ignalina NPP Unit 2 spent fuel pool, but it can be applied for SFPs of other reactor types.

Nomenclature

ASTEC:Accident source term evaluation code
ATHLET-CD: Code for the analysis of thermal hydraulics of leaks and transients with core degradation
NPP: Nuclear power plant
NRC: Nuclear regulatory commission
RELAP/SCDAPSIM: Integrated, mechanistic computer code, for modelling of severe accidents in light-water-reactors
RBMK: Russian abbreviation for “Large-power channel-type reactor”
SFA: Spent fuel assembly
SFP: Spent fuel pool.

References

  1. T. E. Collins and G. Hubbard, “Technical study of spent fuel pool accident risk at decommissioning nuclear power plants,” Tech. Rep. NUREG-1738, NRC, Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Operating experience feedback report: assessment of spent fuel cooling,” Tech. Rep. NUREG-1275, NRC, Washington, DC, USA, February 1997.
  3. A. Kaliatka, V. Ognerubov, and V. Vileiniskis, “Analysis of the processes in spent fuel pools of Ignalina NPP in case of loss of heat removal,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 240, no. 5, pp. 1073–1082, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Almenas, A. Kaliatka, and E. Ušpuras, Ignalina RBMK-1500. A Source Book. Extended and Updated Version, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Kaunas, Lithuania, 1998.
  5. A. Kaliatka, V. Ognerubov, M. Vaisnoras, E. Uspuras, and K. Trambauer, “Analysis of beyond design basis accidents in spent fuel pools of the ignalina NPP,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP &08), pp. 1566–1575, Anaheim, Calif, USA, June 2008. View at Scopus
  6. K. Trambauer and H. Austregesilo, “Analysis of quenching during the TMI-2 accident with ATHLET-CD,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH '03), Seoul, Korea, 2003.
  7. J. van Dorsselaere, C. Seropian, P. Chatelard et al., “The ASTEC integral code for severe accident simulation,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 293–307, 2009. View at Scopus
  8. C. M. Allison and J. K. Hohorst, “Role of RELAP/SCDAPSIM in nuclear safety,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2010, Article ID 425658, 17 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Institute VNIPIET, “Additional to Ignalina NPP design—safe storage of uranium-erbium fuel with enrichment of 2. 8 %,” Tech. Rep. 03-02499. TASpd-1299-70796, 2003.
  10. V. Vileiniskis and A. Kaliatka, “Best estimate analysis of PHEBUS FPT1 experiment bundle phase using ASTEC code ICARE module,” Kerntechnik, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 254–260, 2011. View at Scopus