About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Education Research International
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 964052, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/964052
Research Article

Small Number Discrimination in Early Human Development: The Case of One versus Three

1Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Developmental Disorders, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium
2Department of Data-Analysis, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium
3Department of Youth Health Care, Catholic University of Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
4Centre for Parenting, Child Welfare and Disabilities, Catholic University of Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
5Artevelde University College, 9000 Gent, Belgium

Received 13 March 2012; Revised 25 June 2012; Accepted 25 June 2012

Academic Editor: Jan Elen

Copyright © 2012 Annelies Ceulemans et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Feigenson, S. Dehaene, and E. Spelke, “Core systems of number,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 307–314, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. Xu, “Numerosity discrimination in infants: evidence for two systems of representations,” Cognition, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. B15–B25, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Kahneman and A. Treisman, “Changing views of attention of automaticity,” in Varieties of Attention, R. Parasuraman and D. R. Davies, Eds., pp. 29–61, Adacemic Press, Orlando, Fla, USA, 1984.
  4. A. M. Leslie, F. Xu, P. D. Tremoulet, and B. J. Scholl, “Indexing and the object concept: developing “what” and “where” systems,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Kahneman, A. Treisman, and B. J. Gibbs, “The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 175–219, 1992. View at Scopus
  6. L. M. Trick and Z. W. Pylyshyn, “Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision,” Psychological Review, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 80–102, 1994. View at Scopus
  7. H. Barth, N. Kanwisher, and E. Spelke, “The construction of large number representations in adults,” Cognition, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 201–221, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. M. Brannon and H. S. Terrace, “Representation of the numerosities 1–9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta),” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 31–49, 2000. View at Scopus
  9. V. Izard and S. Dehaene, “Calibrating the mental number line,” Cognition, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 1221–1247, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Whalen, C. R. Gallistel, and R. Gelman, “Nonverbal counting in humans: the psychophysics of number representation,” Psychological Science, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 130–137, 1999. View at Scopus
  11. L. Feigenson, S. Carey, and E. Spelke, “Infants' discrimination of number versus continuous extent,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 33–66, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Cordes and E. M. Brannon, “The difficulties of representing continuous extent in infancy: using number is just easier,” Child Development, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 476–489, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. Xu, E. S. Spelke, and S. Goddard, “Number sense in human infants,” Developmental Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 88–101, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. W. Clearfield and K. S. Mix, “Number versus contour length in infants' discrimination of small visual sets,” Psychological Science, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 408–411, 1999. View at Scopus
  15. L. Rousselle, E. Palmers, and M. P. Noël, “Magnitude comparison in preschoolers: what counts? Influence of perceptual variables,” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 57–84, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. E. Berk, Development Through Lifespan, Pearson, 4th edition, 2007.
  17. F. Xu and E. S. Spelke, “Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants,” Cognition, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. B1–B11, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. N. Wood and E. S. Spelke, “Chronometric studies of numerical cognition in five-month-old infants,” Cognition, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 23–39, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. S. Lipton and E. S. Spelke, “Origins of number sense: large-number discrimination in human,” Psychological Science, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 396–401, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. E. Antell and D. P. Keating, “Perception of numerical invariance in neonates,” Child development, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 695–701, 1983. View at Scopus
  21. S. Cordes and E. M. Brannon, “The relative salience of discrete and continuous quantity in young infants,” Developmental Science, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 453–463, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Starkey, “Perception of numbers by human infants,” Science, vol. 210, no. 4473, pp. 1033–1035, 1980. View at Scopus
  23. F. Xu and R. I. Arriaga, “Number discrimination in 10-month-old infants,” British Journal of Developmental Psychology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 103–108, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Cordes and E. M. Brannon, “Crossing the divide: infants discriminate small from large numerosities,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1583–1594, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Franklin, N. Pitchford, L. Hart, I. R. L. Davies, S. Clausse, and S. Jennings, “Salience of primary and secondary colours in infancy,” British Journal of Developmental Psychology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 471–483, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. A. Maier, P. Barchfeld, A. J. Elliot, and R. Pekrun, “Context specificity of implicit preferences: the case of human preference for red,” Emotion, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 734–738, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. I. K. Zemach and D. Y. Teller, “Infant color vision: infants' spontaneous color preferences are well behaved,” Vision Research, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1362–1367, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Dehaene, V. Izard, and M. Piazza, “Control over non-numerical parameters in numerosity experiments 2005,” http://www.unicog.org/.
  29. Tobii Technology Product Description, Tobii T/X Series Eye Trackers, Tobii Technology, Falls Church, Va, USA, 2007.
  30. L. B. Cohen, D. J. Atkinson, and H. H. Chaput, A New Program for Obtaining and Organizing Data in Infant Perception and Cognition Studies (Version 1.0), University of Texas, Austin, Tex, USA, 2004.