About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Molecular Imaging
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 205045, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/205045
Research Article

Cholinergic Depletion in Alzheimer’s Disease Shown by [18F]FEOBV Autoradiography

1Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada H4H 1R3
2Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montreal (UQAM), Montreal, Canada H3C 3P8
3Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada H4H 1R2
4Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), Montreal, Canada H3A 2B4

Received 5 June 2013; Revised 21 September 2013; Accepted 23 September 2013

Academic Editor: Guy Bormans

Copyright © 2013 Maxime J. Parent et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Rationale. Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative condition characterized in part by deficits in cholinergic basalocortical and septohippocampal pathways. [18F]Fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol ([18F]FEOBV), a Positron Emission Tomography ligand for the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT), is a potential molecular agent to investigate brain diseases associated with presynaptic cholinergic losses. Purpose. To demonstrate this potential, we carried out an [18F]FEOBV autoradiography study to compare postmortem brain tissues from AD patients to those of age-matched controls. Methods. [18F]FEOBV autoradiography binding, defined as the ratio between regional grey and white matter, was estimated in the hippocampus (13 controls, 8 AD) and prefrontal cortex (13 controls, 11 AD). Results. [18F]FEOBV binding was decreased by 33% in prefrontal cortex, 25% in CA3, and 20% in CA1. No changes were detected in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, possibly because of sprouting or upregulation toward the resilient glutamatergic neurons of the dentate gyrus. Conclusion. This is the first demonstration of [18F]FEOBV focal binding changes in cholinergic projections to the cortex and hippocampus in AD. Such cholinergic synaptic (and more specifically VAChT) alterations, in line with the selective basalocortical and septohippocampal cholinergic losses documented in AD, indicate that [18F]FEOBV is indeed a promising ligand to explore cholinergic abnormalities in vivo.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative condition in individuals over 65 [1]. AD neuropathology is characterized by progressive accumulation of amyloid beta peptide (brain amyloidosis), intraneuronal inclusion of hyperphosphorylated tau (neurofibrillary tangles), and degeneration of various neuronal populations. Depletion of cholinergic cell bodies located in the basal forebrain constitutes one of the earliest findings observed in postmortem AD brains [2]. This forebrain neurodegeneration depletes cholinergic projections in virtually the entire prosencephalon. Specifically, degeneration of the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert as well as the medial septum severely perturbs cholinergic neurotransmission at the level of the cortex and hippocampus, respectively [3]. In contrast, cholinergic neurotransmission remains mostly unaffected in other brain regions such as the basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum.

Quantification of presynaptic terminals provides significant information regarding numerous biochemical processes related to cholinergic neurotransmission. For example, acetylcholine synthesis and transport into vesicles occur in the presynaptic terminals by the action of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT), respectively. VAChT availability has been proposed as an excellent indicator of presynaptic integrity [4], which is decreased in AD.

The neurobiological basis of cholinergic vulnerability in AD is unknown; however, a link between amyloid pathology and cholinergic depletion has been supported in animal models of AD [5, 6]. In AD patients, reduced cholinergic presynaptic terminals are associated with amyloid burden [7]. In contrast, upregulation of ChAT in the hippocampus of populations at risk for AD suggests cholinergic sprouting or acetylcholine synthesis upregulation as a response to cholinergic cell depletion [8]. Overall, the degeneration of cholinergic basal forebrain projections has been consistently shown to strongly correlate with clinical symptoms [9, 10]. As such, efficient surrogate markers of presynaptic cholinergic integrity are potential tools for the assessment of AD, as well as other neurodegenerative diseases where cholinergic systems are compromised.

Imaging of cholinergic presynaptic innervation has been made possible by the introduction of molecular probes selective for VAChT derived from vesamicol [11] such as [18F]Fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol ([18F]FEOBV). In contrast to previous VAChT molecular agents, [18F]FEOBV has shown desirable kinetic properties, high selectivity for VAChT, and low affinity for sigma receptors [12]. Positron Emission Tomography with [18F]FEOBV has been successfully performed in primates [13] and in rodent models to quantify cholinergic declines secondary to aging or selective immunolesions [14].

Quantification of VAChT depletion in AD using [3H]vesamicol autoradiography has not been very conclusive [15, 16], most likely due to the low specificity and affinity of that ligand [4]. Given that [18F]FEOBV has a much higher specificity than [3H]vesamicol, we aimed in the current study to assess its potential as a marker of pathological cholinergic degeneration, by comparing brain tissues of AD patients to those of healthy controls using [18F]FEOBV autoradiography. Demonstration of significant differences could constitute useful postmortem evidence in support of future clinical in vivo applications of [18F]FEOBV.

Given that both neocortex and hippocampus are the main targets of cholinergic projections known to be compromised in AD, [18F]FEOBV binding in these regions was hypothesized here to be significantly lower in AD than in control tissues.

2. Materials and Methods

Frozen brain samples from healthy controls and AD-positive brains (diagnosis confirmed by neuropathological reports; CERAD criterion) were obtained from the Douglas-Bell Canada Brain Bank (Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada). Utilization of these samples was approved by both the Douglas Institute’s research ethics board and the Brain Bank’s scientific review committee. Samples were excluded in cases of psychiatric conditions, epilepsy, non-AD dementia, brain neoplasms, and traumatic brain injuries. In total, 21 samples from the hippocampus (13 controls, 8 AD) and 24 from the prefrontal cortex (PFC) (13 controls, 11 AD) were dissected from the left hemispheres. Using a freezing sliding microtome (Leica CM3050 S) at −15°C, each block of tissue was cut into serial 20 μm-thick sections, which were then thaw-mounted on coated microscope slides. Two adjacent sections from each sample were randomly selected and respectively used for [18F]FEOBV autoradiography and for histological staining, as described below, allowing to precisely localize regions of interest (ROIs).

[18F]FEOBV was synthesized based on a method described previously [17, 18]. Since only the (−)-[18F]FEOBV enantiomer shows affinity to VAChT [12], a pure levo precursor (ABX advanced biochemical compounds GmbH) was used to ensure optimal affinity. Labeling with [18F] was done using a GE TRACERlab module.

The optimal conditions for the in vitro autoradiography binding techniques such as incubation time, washing procedure, and time of exposition to the phosphor imaging plate were obtained after preliminary experiments (data not shown). On the day of synthesis, sections were warmed to room temperature, air-dried, then preincubated in a 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline solution ( ) for 20 minutes in order to remove endogenous ligands. Tissue was then air-dried once more and incubated with [18F]FEOBV at 6.97 MBq/L in the same buffer solution at room temperature for 20 minutes. After incubation, slides were dipped three times in distilled water (4°C) and dried under a stream of cool air. The sections were then exposed on a radioluminographic imaging plate (Fujifilm BAS-MS 2025) for 20 minutes (see Figure 1 for examples). Autoradiography calibration was performed using 9 concentrations of [18F]- ranging from 0.03 to 7.72 MBq/L in the same imaging plate. The concentration used correlated linearly with the measured photostimulated luminescence unit per mm2 ( , ). Corrected for time at the end of exposure, 1.32 MBq of [18F]FEOBV was used (specific activity of 22.93 TBq/mmol) in a solution of 3.77 MBq/L, for an effective concentration of 164.41 pM.

205045.fig.001
Figure 1: Example of tissues from the prefrontal cortex ((a), (b)) and hippocampus ((c), (d)) from control ((a), (c)), and AD ((b), (d)) tissues showing autoradiography binding (above) and luxol fast blue & cresyl violet staining (below). Studied regions of interest are the cortex, CA1, CA3, and Dentate Gyrus (DG). White matter (WM) was used as baseline.

For histological staining of contiguous slices, a combination of luxol fast blue and cresyl violet staining was used [19]. Stained sections were digitized, and a total of five ROIs were drawn manually by an experimenter blind to group distribution: CA1, CA3, dentate gyrus (DG), PFC, and white matter as a baseline level. The drawn ROIs were then transposed to the corresponding autoradiography images. Activity in photostimulated luminescence unit per mm2 was calculated for each ROI using ImageGauge 4.0 (Fujifilm). To correct for background noise and nonspecific activity, results were normalized by the adjacent white matter values (e.g., [20]), since immunochemistry studies do not report significant levels of VAChT in the white matter [21, 22]. Group differences were then investigated using a t-test with Welch correction for heteroscedasticity between control and AD tissues.

3. Results

There were no significant differences between control and AD groups in terms of sex distribution ( , ), age ( , ), and postmortem delay ( , ). On average, total brain mass was 12.4% lower in the AD group ( , ) (see Table 1). For [18F]FEOBV binding parameters, all investigated grey matter ROIs showed higher binding than in the white matter baseline. In controls, the ROI-to-baseline binding ratios reached in the cortex, in CA1, in CA3, and was highest in the DG at .

tab1
Table 1: Subject data for AD patients and controls. There is no significant group difference between controls and AD patients for gender distribution, age, or postmortem delay.

In AD tissues, a 33% loss was observed in the PFC ( , ). Significantly lower binding was also observed in CA1 and CA3, with respective losses of 20% ( , ) and 25% ( , ). AD tissues did not differ from controls in the DG (Figure 2). Neither age nor brain mass significantly predicted [18F]FEOBV binding in any region for either group.

205045.fig.002
Figure 2: Ratio of [18F]FEOBV binding to adjacent matter for four ROIs. Difference between AD patients and controls subjects are present in CA1, CA3, and PFC. , , ns: no significant difference.

4. Discussion

In summary, this study reports for the first time reduced VAChT availability in both the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert and medial septum projection areas in AD brain tissues. Reduced [18F]FEOBV binding observed in the AD neocortex as well as most of the hippocampus suggests a comparable degree of denervation between cortical and allocortical brain regions. Indeed, these finding mostly reflects the degeneration of these cholinergic pathways in AD [2, 23].

A property of the radioligand saturation curve is that very low (tracer) concentrations follow a linear relationship with the receptor occupancy percentage at equilibrium. Here, 164.41 pM of [18F]FEOBV was used, which is less than 5% of the of 4.1 nM for vesamicol [24] or 4.6 nM for another benzovesamicol analog [25]. Consequently, the magnitude of normalized binding differences observed here can be considered to be a direct representation of VAChT receptor density alterations in AD.

The magnitude of VAChT observed here in AD decreases (33% in PFC, 20% in CA1, and 25% in CA3) and is modest compared to previous cholinergic quantifications conducted with antibody-based techniques, such as immunohistochemistry or immunoblotting. When measured with Western blotting, VAChT levels in the PFC of AD patients have been reported to be 54% lower than those of controls [26]. Similarly, ChAT activity decreases in AD samples were described to range between 49% and 61% in various cortical and hippocampal regions [27]. Differences between autoradiography and immunohistochemistry have been frequently described and might reflect multiple factors including changes of radioligand affinity in the clinical population (e.g., [28]) or low radioligand specificity.

In contrast to CA1 and CA3, the DG of the hippocampus appeared spared by cholinergic loss. This preservation of cholinergic terminals may be to do with the observation that the DG seems resistant to the glutamatergic neurodegeneration affecting both CA1 and CA3 in preclinical AD [29]. Invariant VAChT availability in the DG could thus reflect either sprouting of presynaptic axons or VAChT upregulation (e.g., [30, 31]) following initial losses. A unique resistance to such losses could also be specific to this region.

In terms of ROI distribution, the relative concentrations of [18F]FEOBV binding in the cortex and hippocampus match those found in postmortem studies using cholinergic markers both in humans [32, 33] and rodents [34]. Interestingly, the variance of [18F]FEOBV binding is much lower in the AD tissues than in controls both for the PFC and hippocampal ROIs. For instance, the CA3 coefficient of variance reached 27% in the control group, while it was only 11% in AD tissues. This represents a floor effect in the AD tissues, where most samples have minimal concentrations of VAChT terminals left from the affected afferents. Control samples, on the other hand, presented more variance, representing a wide spectrum of VAChT integrity normal in this age range.

In these same regions, 20 to 40% of control subjects have [18F]FEOBV binding values that overlap with those of AD patients. While this may be seen as a poor [18F]FEOBV sensitivity to differentiate AD from healthy controls, it remains consistent with the observation that AD pathological hallmarks (such as subclinical amyloidosis) are found in a substantial portion of aged asymptomatic individuals. Indeed, we have previously observed a significant reduction of hippocampal [18F]FEOBV binding in a rodent model of normal aging [14]. Here, the binding variance in control individuals does not appear to be explained by age, but this is likely due to the lack of younger control subjects in the sample.

Cortical decreases in VAChT activity have been observed in vivo in AD, using Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography vesamicol analogs such as [123I]Iodobenzovesamicol [35]. Our results showed that PET radiomarker such as [18F]FEOBV might be useful also in quantifying such a VAChT reduction, while at the same time providing a better imaging resolution and faster kinetics. Additionally, while amyloid markers are currently considered the most sensitive for early detection [36], quantification of cholinergic markers tend to better describe a specific neurodegenerative event which closely correlate with clinical manifestations of AD [37, 38].

The present study must take into consideration methodological limitations. For instance, utilization of an autoradiography single-concentration protocol, as opposed to a quantitative receptor autoradiography approach, prevents the estimation of more detailed information regarding absolute kinetic properties of [18F]FEOBV. In addition, sample sizes were relatively small for drawing definitive conclusions, and the AD group was not controlled for neurofibrillary tangles accumulation (e.g., Braak stages). Other studies would be necessary to clarify the role of age in the [18F]FEOBV binding overlap between AD patients and control subject; younger control subjects would be useful in this respect. Moreover, tissues from individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment would be most useful in providing the complete picture regarding VAChT availability in populations at risk.

In conclusion, the present results support the notion that central cholinergic projections display discrete sites of specific vulnerability and resistance to AD. Furthermore, the present autoradiography study in human supports the use of [18F]FEOBV as a molecular probe to quantify selective deficits in cholinergic neurotransmission in AD.

Abbreviations

AD: Alzheimer’s disease
ChAT: Choline acetyltransferase
DG: Dentate gyrus
FEOBV: Fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol
PFC: Prefrontal cortex
ROI: Region of interest
VAChT: Vesicular acetylcholine transporter.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

The present study has been made possible thanks to grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ) to Drs. Bedard and Rosa-Neto, as well as funds from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation’s Leaders Opportunity Fund (CFI), and the Nussia & André Aisenstadt Foundation. The authors would also like to thank Antonio Aliaga and Mirjana Kovacevic from the Brain Imaging Center as well as Josée Prud’homme and Danielle Cecyre of the Brain Bank for their technical support.

References

  1. L. E. Hebert, P. A. Scherr, J. L. Bienias, D. A. Bennett, and D. A. Evans, “Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 1119–1122, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. J. Whitehouse, D. L. Price, R. G. Struble, A. W. Clark, J. T. Coyle, and M. R. Delon, “Alzheimer's disease and senile dementia: loss of neurons in the basal forebrain,” Science, vol. 215, no. 4537, pp. 1237–1239, 1982. View at Scopus
  3. J. T. Coyle, D. L. Price, and M. R. DeLong, “Alzheimer's disease: a disorder of cortical cholinergic innervation,” Science, vol. 219, no. 4589, pp. 1184–1190, 1983. View at Scopus
  4. S. M. Efange, “In vivo imaging of the vesicular acetylcholine transporter and the vesicular monoamine transporter,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 2401–2413, 2000. View at Scopus
  5. G. N. Nikolajsen, M. S. Jensen, and M. J. West, “Cholinergic axon length reduced by 300 meters in the brain of an Alzheimer mouse model,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1927–1931, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Hartmann, C. Erb, U. Ebert et al., “Central cholinergic functions in human amyloid precursor protein knock-in/presenilin-1 transgenic mice,” Neuroscience, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 1009–1017, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Prior, I. G. Marshall, and S. M. Parsons, “The pharmacology of vesamicol: an inhibitor of the vesicular acetylcholine transporter,” General Pharmacology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1017–1022, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. T. Dekosky, M. D. Ikonomovic, S. D. Styren et al., “Upregulation of choline acetyltransferase activity in hippocampus and frontal cortex of elderly subjects with mild cognitive impairment,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 145–155, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Kendziorra, H. Wolf, P. M. Meyer et al., “Decreased cerebral α4β2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptor availability in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease assessed with positron emission tomography,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 515–525, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Shinotoh, H. Namba, K. Fukushi, et al., “Progressive loss of cortical acetylcholinesterase activity in association with cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: a positron emission tomography study,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 194–200, 2000.
  11. S. M. Parsons, B. A. Bahr, G. A. Rogers, E. D. Clarkson, K. Noremberg, and B. W. Hicks, “Acetylcholine transporter—vesamicol receptor pharmacology and structure,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 98, pp. 175–181, 1993. View at Scopus
  12. G. K. Mulholland, D. M. Wieland, M. R. Kilbourn, et al., “[18F]fluoroethoxy-benzovesamicol, a PET radiotracer for the vesicular acetylcholine transporter and cholinergic synapses,” Synapse, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 263–274, 1998.
  13. M. R. Kilbourn, B. Hockley, L. Lee et al., “Positron emission tomography imaging of (2R,3R)-5-[18F]fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol in rat and monkey brain: a radioligand for the vesicular acetylcholine transporter,” Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 489–493, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Parent, M. A. Bedard, A. Aliaga, et al., “PET imaging of cholinergic deficits in rats using [18F]fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol ([18F]FEOBV),” Neuroimage, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 555–561, 2012.
  15. M. Ruberg, W. Mayo, A. Brice et al., “Choline acetyltransferase activity and [3H]vesamicol binding in the temporal cortex of patients with Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and rats with basal forebrain lesions,” Neuroscience, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 327–333, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. J. Kish, L. M. Distefano, S. Dozic et al., “[3H]Vesamicol binding in human brain cholinergic deficiency disorders,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 347–352, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. K. Mulholland, D. M. Wieland, M. R. Kilbourn, D. E. Kuhl, and Y.-W. Jung, “Synthesis of [18F]fluoroethoxy-benzovesamicol, a radiotracer for cholinergic neurons,” Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 583–591, 1993. View at Scopus
  18. S. Mzengeza, G. Massarweh, P. Rosa Neto, J.-P. Soucy, and M. A. Bedard, “Radiosynthesis of [18F]FEOV and in vivo PET imaging of acetylcholine vesicular transporter in the rat,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 27, supplement 1, pp. 10U–17U, 2007.
  19. H. Kluver and E. Barrera, “A method for the combined staining of cells and fibers in the nervous system,” Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 400–403, 1953.
  20. M. Jahan, S. Nag, R. Krasikova et al., “Fluorine-18 labeling of three novel d-peptides by conjugation with N-succinimidyl-4-[18F]fluorobenzoate and preliminary examination by postmortem whole-hemisphere human brain autoradiography,” Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 315–323, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. L. Gilmor, N. R. Nash, A. Roghani et al., “Expression of the putative vesicular acetylcholine transporter in rat brain and localization in cholinergic synaptic vesicles,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 2179–2190, 1996. View at Scopus
  22. U. Arvidsson, M. Riedl, R. Elde, and B. Meister, “Vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) protein: a novel and unique marker for cholinergic neurons in the central and peripheral nervous systems,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 378, no. 4, pp. 454–467, 1997.
  23. T. Gómez-Isla, J. L. Price, D. W. McKeel Jr., J. C. Morris, J. H. Growdon, and B. T. Hyman, “Profound loss of layer II entorhinal cortex neurons occurs in very mild Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 14, pp. 4491–4500, 1996. View at Scopus
  24. H. Varoqui and J. D. Erickson, “Active transport of acetylcholine by the human vesicular acetylcholine transporter,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 44, pp. 27229–27232, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. K. Staley, D. C. Mash, S. M. Parsons, A. B. Khare, and S. M. Efange, “Pharmacological characterization of the vesamicol analogue (+)-[125I]MIBT in primate brain,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 338, no. 2, pp. 159–169, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. H. Chen, E. A. Reese, H. W. Kim, S. I. Rapoport, and J. S. Rao, “Disturbed neurotransmitter transporter expression in Alzheimer's disease brain,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 755–766, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Descarries and N. Mechawar, “Ultrastructural evidence for diffuse transmission by monoamine and acetylcholine neurons of the central nervous system,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 125, pp. 27–47, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. A. Koeppe, M. Petrou, P. Scott, N. Bohnen, M. R. Kilbourn, and K. A. Frey, “Kinetic analysis of [18F]FEOBV, a PET radiotracer for imaging the vesicular acetylcholine transporter,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 32, supplemnet 1, p. S181, 2012.
  29. M. J. West, C. H. Kawas, W. F. Stewart, G. L. Rudow, and J. C. Troncoso, “Hippocampal neurons in pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1205–1212, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. D. Ikonomovic, E. J. Mufson, J. Wuu, E. J. Cochran, D. A. Bennett, and S. T. DeKosky, “Cholinergic plasticity in hippocampus of individuals with mild cognitive impairment: correlation with Alzheimer's neuropathology,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2003. View at Scopus
  31. B. Stanfield and W. M. Cowan, “Evidence for the sprouting of entorhinal afferents into the “hippocampal zone” of the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus,” Anatomy and Embryology, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 37–52, 1979. View at Scopus
  32. E. J. Mufson, M. Bothwell, L. B. Hersh, and J. H. Kordower, “Nerve growth factor receptor immunoreactive profiles in the normal, aged human basal forebrain: colocalization with cholinergic neurons,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 285, no. 2, pp. 196–217, 1989. View at Scopus
  33. E. J. Mufson, S. D. Ginsberg, M. D. Ikonomovic, and S. T. DeKosky, “Human cholinergic basal forebrain: chemoanatomy and neurologic dysfunction,” Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 233–242, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. Fuhrmann, T. Durkin, G. Thiriet, E. Kempf, and A. Ebel, “Cholinergic neurotransmission in the central nervous system of the Snell dwarf mouse,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 417–430, 1985. View at Scopus
  35. D. E. Kuhl, S. Minoshima, J. A. Fessler et al., “In vivo mapping of cholinergic terminals in normal aging, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 399–410, 1996. View at Scopus
  36. R. A. Sperling, P. S. Aisen, L. A. Beckett et al., “Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease,” Alzheimer's and Dementia, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 280–292, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. I. Prohovnik, D. P. Perl, K. L. Davis, L. Libow, G. Lesser, and V. Haroutunian, “Dissociation of neuropathology from severity of dementia in late-onset Alzheimer disease,” Neurology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. P. Dournaud, P. Deleare, J. J. Hauw, and J. Epelbaum, “Differential correlation between neurochemical deficits, neuropathology, and cognitive status in Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 817–823, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus