- About this Journal
- Abstracting and Indexing
- Aims and Scope
- Article Processing Charges
- Articles in Press
- Author Guidelines
- Bibliographic Information
- Citations to this Journal
- Contact Information
- Editorial Board
- Editorial Workflow
- Free eTOC Alerts
- Publication Ethics
- Reviewers Acknowledgment
- Submit a Manuscript
- Subscription Information
- Table of Contents
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 483170, 8 pages
Inhibited Production of iNOS by Murine J774 Macrophages Occurs via a phoP-Regulated Differential Expression of NFκB and AP-1
School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, Nottingham NG7 2NR, UK
Received 15 February 2012; Revised 10 May 2012; Accepted 21 May 2012
Academic Editor: Decio Diament
Copyright © 2012 Scott D. Hulme et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background. There are no reported data to explain how Salmonella suppress nitrite ion production in macrophages or whether this phenomenon is unique to typhoidal or non-typhoidal serovars. The aims of this study were, therefore, to investigate these phenomena. Methods. We measured survival of S. typhimurium 14028 and its phoP mutant in murine J774 macrophages, cultured with or without interferon gamma. We compared expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mRNA and protein, and nitrite ion production and also examined binding of nuclear factor B (NFB) and activator protein 1 (AP-1) to macrophage DNA. Results. S. typhimurium 14028 inhibited binding of NFB and AP-1 to DNA in murine J774. A macrophages via an intact phoP regulon. This correlated with increased survival and reduced iNOS expression. Suppression of NFB activity was ameliorated in macrophages cultured with IFN-γ and this correlated with increased expression of iNOS mRNA and nitrite ion production, although IFN-γ had no effect on AP-1/DNA interaction. We show, that with one exception, suppression of iNOS is unique to typhoidal serovars. Conclusion. S. typhimurium inhibit NFB and AP-1 interaction with macrophage DNA via the PhoP regulon, this reduces nitrite ion production and is principally associated with typhoidal serovars.
S. typhimurium infection in mice is a standard laboratory model for human typhoid, and previous studies have shown that S. typhimurium mutants which are unable to survive in murine macrophages are avirulent . Thus, survival of Salmonella in macrophages appears to be a critical step in the induction of typhoid. The Salmonella phoP/phoQ regulon regulates genes located on Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 2 (SPI-2) which encode proteins needed for survival of Salmonella inside of macrophages  and Salmonellae which have mutations in their phoP/phoQ regulon are avirulent in mice . The affect of phoP on salmonella survival is multifaceted but studies by Svensson et al.  have shown that phoP mutation induces increased nitrite ion production by macrophages compared with nitrite ion production induced by the parent strain but this study did not investigate the mechanisms behind this phenomenon. Studies using and mice indicate that reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are important in controlling Salmonella later in the infection and this is preceded by a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent control phase [5, 6] and it is also known that nitric oxide increases the sensitivity to cellular acid by phoP mutants . Taken together these studies indicate that the ability of Salmonella to down-regulate nitrite ion production by host macrophages may be due to the effect of SPI-2 proteins under the control of phoP and that this confers survival advantage to the Salmonella at some point in the infection, but the underlying inductive mechanism has not been reported.
For example, nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) and activator protein-1 (AP-1) are both known to transcribe the iNOS gene [8, 9] but nothing has been reported regarding the activity of these transcription factors in relation to iNOS and in the context of wild type or phoP mutant Salmonella. Furthermore, there are no reported comparisons between typhoidal and nontyphoidal Salmonella serovars with regard to iNOS suppression.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of wild type Salmonella and phoP mutants on NFκB and AP-1 activity and their subsequent downstream effect using iNOS as a biological readout. We also compared the effect of serovars which cause typhoid in mice with those which do not.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bacterial Culture and Strains
Bacteria were grown in Luria Bertani (LB) broth (Life Technologies Ltd, Paisley, UK) for 18 h at 37°C under agitation. The bacteria were then subcultured in fresh LB for 4 h to late log phase (established by conventional counts of cfu/mL). Prior to incubation with J774.2 cells, bacteria were adjusted to the multiplicity of infection (moi) of 10. During this study, the following strains/mutants were used: S. typhimurium 14028 (ATCC strain), S. typhimurium CS022 (phoP mutant of 14028, a gift from Dr S. I. Miller, University of Washington, USA), which does not survive in macrophages . In a separate study, the effect of other murine typhoid-inducing (S. typhimurium 4/74, S. enteritidis KMS1977, S. dublin 2229, and S. choleraesuis A50) and nontyphoid inducing strains (S. gallinarum 9, S. kedougou GP, and S. montevideo KMS) was analysed. Growth curves for each serovar were obtained as previously stated.
2.2. Cell Culture
J774.2 cells were grown to confluence in 96 well plates (Nunc, Naperville, IL, USA) containing RPMI 1640 media at 37°C in CO2 (5% v/v). The cells were then washed 3 times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), to remove media and nonadherent cells, and incubated in PBS at 22°C for 15 min prior to infection. Cell passages, between 4–16, were used throughout this study.
2.3. Measurement of Nitrite Ion Concentration
Nitrite ion concentration in J774.2 supernatants were measured by Griess reagent kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) as per manufacturer instructions. Briefly, 50 μL of supernatant were mixed with 50 μL of sulfanilic solution and incubated at 22°C in darkness for 10 min. 50 μL of napthyl ethylenediamine solution was added and incubated for a further 10 min and the reaction was read on a plate reader (Anthos Labtech Instruments, Hamburg, Germany) at 550 nm. The nitrite ion concentration was determined by comparison with a nitrite ion standard curve with a limit of 1000–5 μM.
2.4. Immunocytochemical Analysis of iNOS Expression
The activity of iNOS in infected and uninfected J774.2 cells was determined by standard immunocytochemical methods. Salmonella-infected cells, which had or had not been incubated with 100 U/mL IFN-γ, were washed free of media and permeabilised for 10 min at ambient temperature in 0.05% v/v Triton X-100 after 2, 7, 12, and 24 h postinfection. The cells were then fixed for 15 min in 5% v/v paraformaldehyde at ambient temperature and washed in PBS. Fixed cells were then incubated in the dark on an end-to-end shaker for 60 min at 4°C with mouse anti-iNOS IgG (Autogen Bioclear, UK) PBS-Tween 20 (0.02% v/v Tween, PBS-T) to give a final antibody concentration of 1/100. The cells were then washed three times in PBS-T and incubated in identical conditions but with secondary anti-mouse antibody conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, Sigma). Samples were viewed on a TCS NT confocal laser scanning microscope equipped with an argon laser (Leica, Cambridgeshire, UK). Controls included J774.2 cells which had not been infected or incubated with IFN-γ and also uninfected cells which were incubated with 100 U/mL IFN-γ.
2.5. Western Blotting
Expression of iNOS protein in Salmonella-infected J774.2 cells was assessed by western blotting. J774 cells were lysed in cold water containing protease inhibitors (pepstatin 1 μg/mL; phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride 1 mM and leupeptin 10 μM) (Sigma) and protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Pierce, Cheshire, UK). 10 μg/mL J774.2 protein was electrophoresed by standard methods on two 10% acrylamide gels ran back-to-back. To test for parity in protein loading, one gel was stained with Coomassie blue whilst proteins on the second gel were transferred to Hybond-C nitrocellulose paper (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) by a Trans-blot SD, semi-dry transfer cell (Bio-Rad, Hertfordshire, UK). The nitrocellulose was blocked at room temperature for 60 min in PBS-T containing bovine serum albumin (5% w/v, Sigma). After blocking, the nitrocellulose was washed 3 times for five min in PBS-T on an end-to-end shaker at room temperature. The nitrocellulose was then incubated for 60 min in PBS-T containing 1/200 dilution of anti-mouse iNOS (Autogenbioclear, UK), washed three times as before and incubated for 60 min at room temperature in PBS-T containing Rabbit anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma, 1/12000 dilution). The nitrocellulose was then washed and developed using an enhanced 3′, 3′ diaminobenzidine (DAB) kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA).
2.6. iNOS mRNA Expression
iNOS expression in J774.2 cells infected with Salmonella was measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using a previously reported method . Briefly, J774 cells were suspended in 3 mL TRI reagent (Sigma) and stored at –70°C until required (used within 14 days). Samples were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 min in a bench top centrifuge at 4°C. The supernatants were transferred to separate tubes, and 200 mL chloroform was added per mL TRI reagent prior to incubation for 10 min at 22°C. The sample was then centrifuged at 12,000 g and 4°C for 15 min, the aqueous phase was removed, and an equal volume of propan-2-ol was added. The sample was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 min, and the RNA pellet was washed in a mixture of 1 vol 75% ethanol : 1 vol sterile water. The mixture was then centrifuged for 10 min at 7,500 g, and, after removal of the supernatant, the pellet was allowed to air dry for further 10 min. The pellet was then resuspended in diethyl pyrocarbonate treated water. RNA purity was measured using an Ultraspec III spectrophotometer (Pharmacia, Hertfordshire, UK) and was found to have a typical 260/280 nm ratio of 1.9 to give yields of around 100 μg/mL. RNA concentration was adjusted to 1 μg/μL prior to the RT reaction. RT reactions were performed on a thermal cycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) using the following previously reported  primer sequences: Forward: 5′-GTA AAC TGC AAG AGA ACG GAG AAC-3′. Reverse: 3′-GAG CTC CTC CAG AGG GGT AG-5′.As a loading control, the following glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPdh) primer sequences were used: Forward: 5′-GTT CAG CTC TTG GAT GAC CTT GCC-3′. Reverse: 3′-TCC TGC ACC ACC AAC TGC TTA GCC-5′.
2.6.1. Preparation of Nuclear Lysates
Nuclear lysates were prepared by scraping cells into 5 mL PBS and washing once with buffer I (HEPES 10 mM, KCl 10 mM, MgCl2 1.5 mM, pH 7.9). The cells were disrupted by freeze-thawing twice in 1 mL buffer I containing Nonidet P-40 (NP-40) (5%, Sigma). All subsequent procedures were carried out at 4°C. The lysate was centrifuged for 5 min at 2000 rpm in a bench-top microfuge. The pellet was then washed twice with buffer I and NP-40 before being centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min to obtain the nuclear pellet. Nuclear proteins were extracted from the pellet for 10 min with 30–40 μL extraction buffer (HEPES 20 mM, NaCl 420 mM, MgCl2 1.5 mM, EDTA 0.2 mM, 25% glycerol, pH 7.9). After mixing, the suspension was centrifuged twice as stated above. The supernatant was then diluted in 40–60 μL dilution buffer (HEPES 20 mM, KCl 50 mM, EDTA 0.2 mM, glycerol 20%, pH 7.9). Protease inhibitors (pepstatin 1 μg/mL, phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride 1 mM, leupeptin 10 μM, Sigma) were added to the lysate which was then used immediately or stored at –70°C for up to 14 days.
2.6.2. Electromobility Shift Assay (EMSA)
EMSA was used to determine DNA binding of NFκB (p50) and activating protein (AP)-1 (c-Jun) to J774.2 DNA following infection by Salmonella and/or incubation with IFN-γ (100 U/mL). EMSA reactions were performed using a kit as per manufacturer instructions (Promega, USA) using the following oligonucleotide sequences:
AP-1 (c-Jun) 5′-CGC TTG ATG AGT CAG AAG GAA-3′ 3′-GCG AAC TAC TCA GTC GGC CTT-5′
NFκB (p50) 5′-AGT TGA GGG GAC TTT CCC AGG C-3′ 3′-TCA ACT CCC CTG AAA GGG TCC G-5′Kit controls included HeLa cell nuclear lysate with consensus oligo (positive control) and HeLa cell nuclear lysate without consensus oligo (negative control). As an additional negative control, J774.2 cells which had not been infected or incubated with IFN-γ were used.
Digital Image Analysis was performed using a Phoenix 1D analyser using a power scanner V.3 (Phoretix, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK).
2.7. Statistical Analysis
Mann-Whitney analysis (Minitab) was used to measure significant difference at the 95% confidence limit between different test groups and between the same test groups at different time points.
3.1. The Effect of Salmonella phoP on Survival and Nitrite Ion Production in Murine J774.2 Cells
Nitrite ion production by macrophages was significantly () lower when the cells were cultured with wild type S. typhimurium 14028 compared to nitrite ion production by macrophages cultured with 14028 phoP mutant. However addition of IFN-γ to culture media significantly increased () nitrite ion concentrations in supernatants recovered from both wild type and phoP-cultured macrophages (Figure 1(a)).
The numbers of wild type 14028 recovered from macrophages were also between 1-2 logs greater after 12–24 h culture compared with the numbers of 14028 phoP mutants recovered from cells over the same period (Figure 1(b)). When macrophages were cocultured with IFN-γ, the numbers of wild type 14028 recovered from cells decreased and were comparable to the numbers of 14028 phoP mutants recovered over the same time period (Figure 1(c)).
3.2. The Effect of Salmonella phoP on iNOS mRNA and iNOS Protein Expression by J774.2 Cells
Increased iNOS mRNA expression was detected in macrophages cultured with 14028 phoP mutants when compared with 14028 wild type Salmonella and in both cases the iNOS mRNA signal was increased by coculture with IFN-γ (100 U/mL) (Figure 2(a)). However, when adjusted for GADPH expression, iNOS mRNA expression, in J774 cells, induced by IFN-γ and 14028 wild type, was still slightly lower than was induced by IFN-γ alone.
Confocal microscopy data also clearly showed that a phoP mutation (Figure 2(d)) caused a more intense iNOS protein signal in the cytoplasm of J774.2 cells when compared to uninfected control macrophages (Figure 2(b)) or wild type 14028-infected cells (Figure 2(c)). The intensity of iNOS signal was increased by co-culture of macrophages with wild type 14028 and IFN-γ (Figure 2(e)) and was even more intense in macrophages which were co-cultured with 14028 phoP mutants and IFN-γ (Figure 2(f)). The results obtained by confocal were also repeated by Western blotting (Figure 2(g)) and in this case J774 cells co-cultured with 14028 wild type and IFN-γ produced a greater amount of iNOS protein when compared to J774 cells cultured only with IFN-γ.
3.3. The Effect of phoP Mutation on NFκB and AP-1 Binding to Macrophage DNA
Our results show that mutation in the Salmonella phoP regulon increased the amount of NFκB and AP-1 bound to macrophage DNA after 2 h, when compared to wild type 14028 (Figure 3(a)). When compared to a positive control, NFκB/DNA interaction following wild type 14028 infection was reduced by a mean of 68% but when infected macrophages were co-cultured with IFN-γ (100 U/mL), NFκB/DNA interaction was reduced by 42% (Figure 3(a)). In comparison, when macrophages were infected with 14028 phoP mutants, NFκB/DNA interaction was only reduced by a mean of 22% (relative to the positive control) and this remained constant following co-culture of infected cells with IFN-γ (Figure 3(a)). After macrophages were cultured with wild type 14028 for 12 h, NFκB/DNA interaction was reduced by a mean of 66% but when infected macrophages were co-cultured with IFN-γ, NFκB/DNA interaction was reduced by 76% (Figure 3(b)). when macrophages were infected for 12 h with 14028 phoP mutants, NFκB/DNA interaction was only reduced by 40% (relative to the positive control) and this also remained constant following co-culture of infected cells with IFN-γ (Figure 3(b)).
In macrophages infected for 2 h with wild type 14028, results obtained for AP-1/DNA binding was equivalent to those obtained for a negative control which contained no oligonucleotide (92% reduction in DNA binding compared to the positive control) and this was altered very little by coculture with IFN-γ (88% reduction compared to the positive control) (Figure 4(a)). However, when macrophages were infected with 14028 phoP mutants for 2 h, AP-1/DNA binding was only reduced by 39% relative to the positive control and this level was maintained following co-culture with IFN-γ (Figure 4(a)).
After macrophages were cultured with wild type 14028 for 12 h, AP-1/DNA interaction was increased with a reduction relative to the positive control of 62.9% and AP-1/DNA interaction was increased further following co-culture of infected macrophages with IFN-γ for 12 h, in which a mean reduction of 55% (relative to the positive control) was measured (Figure 4(b)). However, AP-1/DNA interaction in macrophages infected with 14028 phoP mutants for 12 h was reduced only by 53% compared to the positive control but, following co-culture with IFN-γ, AP-1/DNA interaction was increased with a mean reduction of only 21% relative to the positive control (Figure 4(b)).
3.4. Salmonella Serovars Which Induce Murine Typhoid Suppress Nitrite Ion Production
When macrophages were cultured with Salmonella serovars which are known to induce murine typhoid, nitrite ion concentrations were reduced in cell supernatants compared to supernatants isolated from macrophages cultured with nontyphoidal strains over the same time period (Figure 5). However S. Choleraesuis, which is known to induce murine typhoid, was an exception to this rule since it stimulated nitrite ion production by macrophages at similar levels to those measured in supernatants isolated from macrophages cultured with nontyphoidal serovars (Figure 5).
Eriksson et al.  have previously reported that hyper-survival mutants of S. typhimurium TT16729, obtained by multiple passage through J774 cells, induced lower nitrite ion concentrations than did the parent strains, although an attenuated Salmonella mutant was not studied for comparison. However, Svensson et al.  reported that wild type S. typhimurium 14028 induced lower nitrite ion production in murine bone marrow derived macrophages when compared with an S. typhimurium constitutive mutant but that the survival of the phoP was only marginally different (<0.5 Log) to the 14028 wild type. In contrast to this result, we show that there is a clear increase in survival rates of wild type 14028 compared to its phoP mutant in J774.2 macrophages. However, the differences we observe may conceivably be due to differences in cell type or moi, since our moi was constant at 10 : 1 whereas the previous study used 14028 at an moi of 15 : 1 and at an moi of 17 : 1 . In contrast to these studies, a study by Das et al.  has shown that in the murine macrophage cell line RAW264.7, wild type Salmonella inhibit IFN-γ-induced NO production via the virulence gene nirC and that this correlates with increased cellular survival. However our study shows that iNOS mRNA, iNOS protein, and nitrite ion production are increased when wild type 14028-infected J774 cells are co-cultured with IFN-γ but overall wild type infected cells elicit much weaker responses than do 14028 phoP-infected macrophages, and this occurs in the presence or absence of IFN-γ. We have also found that 14028 wild type and 14028 phoP have comparable sensitivity to exogenous nitrite ions, as shown by bacterial growth curves obtained at different nitrite ion concentration (data not shown). It is possible that the inhibition of NO production via iNOS suppression may have relevance later in the infection as shown by Mastroeni et al.  or it is also possible that the inhibition of iNOS per se (rather than downstream NO) may have immediate impact on other factors. For example, iNOS-dependant induction of 8-nitroguanosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (8-nitro-cGMP) has been shown to induce heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) which has both cytoprotective and antimicrobial effects in murine Salmonellosis . NO production may also enhance other antimicrobial pathways, for example, via interaction with reactive oxygen species .
Our study also attempted to relate changes in iNOS to the activity of two critical transcription factors (NFκB and AP-1) in infected J774 macrophages, with or without co-culture with IFN-γ. The iNOS gene has previously been shown to be transcribed by nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) (p50/65)  which may translocate to the cell nucleus following stimulation by interferon gamma (IFN-γ) [17, 18] and this may act synergistically with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), depending on relative concentrations .
As well as NFκB binding sites, promoter sequences on murine iNOS genes also contain binding sites for AP-1 and IFN-γ response elements (γ-IRE) ( reviewed ). However, AP-1 activation during Salmonella invasion of macrophages has not been comprehensively studied but temporal changes in the heterodimeric composition of AP-1 during culture of murine macrophages with S. typhimurium LPS or porins have been reported .
Our data was interesting for a number of reasons; firstly we show that wild type 14028 suppresses NFκB/DNA interaction within the first 2 h postinfection of J774 macrophages but this is not the case when phop mutation is induced. This suggests that the ability to suppress NFκB activity is, therefore, phoP-dependent. However, the inherent suppression of NFκB activity by wild type 14028 is overcome when the macrophages are co-cultured with IFN-γ, and this is consistent with one study which has shown that IFN-γ suppresses phoP transcription in wild type Salmonella . Interaction of NFκB with macrophage DNA was also reduced further after 12 h culture with wild type 14028 and co-culture with IFN-γ had no effect, whereas phoP mutants maintained relatively strong NFκB/DNA interaction (although this was also reduced by about half when compared to NFκB/DNA interactions measured after 2 h). These results suggest that an intact phoP regulon promotes significant changes in the ability of NFκB to interact with DNA and this probably had a significant impact on the iNOS suppression we observed in wild type-infected cells. Saura et al.  have shown that IFN-γ induces nuclear translocation of interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) which then synergises with NFκB to transcribe iNOS. Therefore, it is possible that this is an additional mechanism by which IFN-γ increases iNOS transcription in our study, as well as the increased NFκB/DNA interaction we have shown.
However, our study also indicates that there is temporal separation between the induction of NFκB/DNA interaction and AP-1/DNA interaction in 14028 wild type infected macrophages but this was not observed in macrophages infected with 14028 phoP mutants. After 2 h postinfection with wild type 14028, no discernable interaction between AP-1 and macrophage DNA was measured but after 12 h post-infection AP-1/DNA interaction was measured and this was increased when the cells were co-cultured with IFN-γ, although this was on average 55–63% lower than that measured for the positive control. In contrast, when the macrophages were cultured with 14028 phoP mutants, AP-1/DNA interaction was only about 53% lower than the positive control but when the cells were co-cultured with IFN-γ, AP-1/DNA binding was only 21% lower than the positive control. These results also indicate that an intact phoP regulon prevents long-term interaction of AP-1 with DNA and IFN-γ-induced increase in AP-1/DNA interaction (as was the case with NFκB). We, therefore propose that the affect of the phoP regulon to prevent long-term and strong interaction of macrophage DNA with NFκB and AP-1 and IFN-γ-stimulated upregulation of this interaction will have a profound effect on iNOS expression and nitrite ion production via reduced exposure of iNOS promoter sequences within macrophage DNA to these essential transcription factors.
No previously published data exists which has compared iNOS activity and nitrite ion production in murine macrophages cultured with typhoidal and non-typhoid Salmonella serovars. However, Eisenstein et al.  have shown that S. typhimurium and S. dublin both inhibit nitrite ion production by murine splenocytes, and although this study at least considered different typhoid inducing serovars, a comparison between typhoid-inducing and non-inducing serovars was not reported. The one surprising exception in our study was S. choleraesuis which failed to down- regulate nitrite ion production by macrophages. S. choleraesuis causes typhoid-like systemic disease in a much wider range of mammalian hosts than do S. typhimurium, S. Dublin, or S. enteritidis  and we cannot, as yet, explain why this serovar does not down regulate iNOS. However, all other typhoid-inducing serovars were able to down-regulate nitrite ion production by murine macrophages whereas those which do not induce typhoid were unable to do so. This may suggest that the ability of typhoid-inducing Salmonella may allow dissemination to deeper tissues, via a phoP-induced suppression of NFκB and AP-1 and subsequent suppression of iNOS.
Our data may be relevant in the future treatment of Typhoid in humans, since it suggests a possible role for the adjunctive use of IFN-γ (and antibiotic) to overcome phoP-dependent iNOS suppression. Thus, increasing nuclear translocation of essential transcription factors needed for transcription of the iNOS gene and nitrite ion production.
Conflict of Interests
The authors have no conflict of interests.
S. Hulme performed EMSA analyses and participated in all other experimental procedures. P. Barrow coconceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the final paper. N. Foster performed all analyses (with the exception of EMSA), coconceived of the study, participated in its design and helped to draft the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final paper.
The authors would like to thank Elaine Bennett for assistance with cell culture. This work was supported by a European Union grant (FAIR 98-4006) and the Department of Food, the Environment and Rural Affairs, UK.
- P. I. Fields, R. V. Swanson, C. G. Haidaris, and F. Heffron, “Mutants of Salmonella typhimurium that cannot survive within the macrophage are avirulent,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 83, no. 14, pp. 5189–5193, 1986.
- I. Hansen-Wester and M. Hensel, “Salmonella pathogenicity islands encoding type III secretion systems,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 549–559, 2001.
- J. E. Galan and R. Curtiss, “Virulence and vaccine potential of phoP mutants of Salmonella typhimurium,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 433–443, 1989.
- M. Svensson, C. Johansson, and M. J. Wick, “Salmonella typhimurium-induced cytokine production and surface molecule expression by murine macrophages,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 91–102, 2001.
- P. Mastroeni, A. Vazquez-Torres, F. C. Fang et al., “Antimicrobial actions of the nadph phagocyte oxidase and inducible nitric oxide synthase in experimental salmonellosis. II. Effects on microbial proliferation and host survival in vivo,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 237–247, 2000.
- A. Vazquez-Torres, J. Jones-Carson, P. Mastroeni, H. Ischiropoulos, and F. C. Fang, “Antimicrobial actions of the NADPH phagocyte oxidase and inducible nitric oxide synthase in experimental salmonellosis. I. Effects on microbial killing by activated peritoneal macrophages in vitro,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 227–236, 2000.
- T. J. Bourret, S. Porwollik, M. McClelland et al., “Nitric oxide antagonizes the acid tolerance response that protects Salmonella against innate gastric defenses,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 3, Article ID e1833, 2008.
- Q.-W. Xie, R. Whisnant, and C. Nathan, “Promoter of the mouse gene encoding calcium-independent nitric oxide synthase confers inducibility by interferon γ and bacterial lipopolysaccharide,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 177, no. 6, pp. 1779–1784, 1993.
- Y. M. Kim, B. S. Lee, K. Y. Yi, and S. G. Paik, “Upstream NF-(κ)B site is required for the maximal expression of mouse inducible nitric oxide synthase gene in interferon-γ plus lipopolysaccharide-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 236, no. 3, pp. 655–660, 1997.
- S. I. Miller and J. J. Mekalanos, “Constitutive expression of the phoP regulon attenuates Salmonella virulence and survival within microphages,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 172, no. 5, pp. 2485–2490, 1990.
- B. Han, D. C. Dubois, K. M. J. Boje, S. J. Free, and R. R. Almon, “Quantification of iNOS mRNA with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction directly from cell lysates,” Nitric Oxide, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 281–291, 1999.
- S. Eriksson, J. Björkman, S. Borg et al., “Salmonella typhimurium mutants that downregulate phagocyte nitric oxide production,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 239–250, 2000.
- P. Das, A. Lahiri, A. Lahiri, and D. Chakravorthy, “Novel role of the nitrite transporter NirC in Salmonella pathogenesis: SPI2-dependent suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in activated macrophages,” Microbiology, vol. 155, no. 8, pp. 2476–2489, 2009.
- T. Okamoto, S. Khan, K. Oyama, S. Fujii, T. Sawa, and T. Akaike, “A new paradigm for antimicrobial host defense mediated by a nitrated cyclic nucleotide,” Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2010.
- C. Henard and A. Vázquez-Torres, “Nitric oxide and Salmonella pathogenesis,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 2, article 84, 2011.
- J. MacMicking, Q. W. Xie, and C. Nathan, “Nitric oxide and macrophage function,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 15, pp. 323–350, 1997.
- P. Baeuerle and T. Henkel, “Function and activation of NF-κB in the immune system,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 12, pp. 141–179, 1994.
- R. Kamijo, H. Harada, T. Matsuyama et al., “Requirement for transcription factor IRF-1 in NO synthase induction in macrophages,” Science, vol. 263, no. 5153, pp. 1612–1615, 1994.
- E. Martin, C. Nathan, and Q.-W. Xie, “Role of interferon regulatory factor 1 in induction of nitric oxide synthase,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 180, no. 3, pp. 977–984, 1994.
- C. Bogdan, “Nitric oxide and the regulation of gene expression,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 66–75, 2001.
- M. Galdiero, M. Vitiello, E. Sanzari et al., “Porins from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium activate the transcription factors activating protein 1 and NF-κB through the Raf-1-mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 558–568, 2002.
- T. J. Bourret, M. Song, and A. Vázquez-Torres, “Codependent and independent effects of nitric oxide-mediated suppression of PhoPQ and Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 on intracellular Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium survival,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 77, no. 11, pp. 5107–5115, 2009.
- M. Saura, C. Zaragoza, C. Bao, A. McMillan, and C. J. Lowenstein, “Interaction of interferon regulatory factor-1 and nuclear factor kappaB during activation of inducible nitric oxide synthase transcription,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 289, no. 3, pp. 459–471, 1999.
- T. K. Eisenstein, J. J. Meissler, S. I. Miller, and B. A. Stocker, “Immunosuppression and nitric oxide production induced by parenteral live Salmonella vaccines do not correlate with protective capacity: a phoP::Tn10 mutant does not suppress but does protect,” Vaccine, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 1998.
- Old DC, “Salmonella,” in Principles of Bacteriology, Virology and Immunity, M. A. Parker and L. H. Collier, Eds., pp. 469–493, Edward Arnold Press, London, UK, 1990.