- About this Journal
- Abstracting and Indexing
- Aims and Scope
- Article Processing Charges
- Articles in Press
- Author Guidelines
- Bibliographic Information
- Citations to this Journal
- Contact Information
- Editorial Board
- Editorial Workflow
- Free eTOC Alerts
- Publication Ethics
- Reviewers Acknowledgment
- Submit a Manuscript
- Subscription Information
- Table of Contents
Nursing Research and Practice
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 417010, 10 pages
Epigenetic Mechanisms Shape the Biological Response to Trauma and Risk for PTSD: A Critical Review
National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
Received 15 February 2013; Accepted 24 March 2013
Academic Editor: Debra E. Lyon
Copyright © 2013 Morgan Heinzelmann and Jessica Gill. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) develops in approximately one-quarter of trauma-exposed individuals, leading us and others to question the mechanisms underlying this heterogeneous response to trauma. We suggest that the reasons for the heterogeneity relate to a complex interaction between genes and the environment, shaping each individual’s recovery trajectory based on both historical and trauma-specific variables. Epigenetic modifications provide a unique opportunity to elucidate how preexisting risk factors may contribute to PTSD risk through changes in the methylation of DNA. Preexisting risks for PTSD, including depression, stress, and trauma, result in differential DNA methylation of endocrine genes, which may then result in a different biological responses to trauma and subsequently a greater risk for PTSD onset. Although these relationships are complex and currently inadequately described, we provide a critical review of recent studies to examine how differences in genetic and proteomic biomarkers shape an individual’s vulnerability to PTSD development, thereby contributing to a heterogeneous response to trauma.
Up to 90% of individuals experience a traumatic event at some time during their lives, yet most recover and suffer from no long-term ramifications; however, a subset of individuals develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and are at high risk for health decline [1–4]. This heterogeneous response suggests that preexisting factors might influence how people respond to traumatic situations. We suggest that a more comprehensive examination of biomarkers that approximate PTSD risk would be of great value. Biomarker discovery in PTSD has been hindered by the lack of prospective studies in traumatized individuals, resulting in an insufficient understanding of the preexisting risk factors for PTSD onset as well as the mechanistic pathways that underlie this risk. Without this knowledge, we are unable to identify traumatized individuals at risk for PTSD development and, therefore, unable to implement effective, preventive interventions. Yet, additional biological analysis methods have become available, and these new strategies will be useful in addressing this critical issue. Specifically, the use of whole-genome gene expression and epigenetic modifications (DNA methylation) provide an opportunity to explore more than candidate biomarkers, to identify novel mechanisms related to PTSD risk, and to pinpoint genetic pathways that may be implicated in both risk and resilience to trauma.
A traumatic event places individuals at high risk for developing PTSD, resulting in rates of PTSD between 18% and 36% in trauma-exposed patients [1–4]; as mentioned above, most trauma-exposed individuals recover and do not develop PTSD. PTSD is viewed as a disorder of dysregulation of fear and processing of stimuli associated with trauma, and it is characterized by three main clusters of symptoms: reexperiencing, avoidance, and hyperarousal. Reexperiencing symptoms include distressing recollections or dreams of the event, flashbacks, and intense psychological and physiological reactivity to internal and external cues; avoidance symptoms include evasion of any thoughts or feelings of people and places that remind the individual of the traumatic event, decreased interest in participating in activities, and emotional numbing; and hyperarousal symptoms include problems falling or staying asleep, irritability or anger, hypervigilance, and exaggerated startle reflex. It has become increasingly clear that environmental influences early in development remain pervasive into adulthood, a relationship that is attributed to an interaction of gene function and environment. Both genetic and environmental factors are critical to developmental processes, and even minor changes in either type of factor can result in trajectories of resilience or vulnerability ; however, it is the interaction between these factors that may provide the most vital information to understanding the heterogeneous response to trauma. Epigenetic modifications occur in response to an environmental factor and include DNA methylation, acetylation, and histone modification which alter DNA accessibility and chromatin structure, thereby regulating activity of the gene in a long-lasting manner. Because the risk for PTSD onset is influenced by environmental factors that predate trauma exposure, epigenetics may provide novel insights into the heterogeneous response to a trauma. Large epidemiological studies link pretrauma risks including previous depression, stressors, and traumatic events to a greater risk for PTSD onset following trauma exposure , suggesting that these factors may contribute to variability of individuals in response to a trauma.
The support for the mediating link of epigenetic modifications and PTSD vulnerability is reported in preclinical studies. Specifically, preclinical models illustrate these complex relationships and link epigenetic modifications in neurons to psychological vulnerability following stressors. In rats, the offspring of the high caring mothers (i.e., high licking) exhibit the reduced methylation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene  and endocrine regulation of a subsequent stressor . In contrast, in non-human primates, offspring that face early adversity exhibits endocrine dysregulation  as well as reductions in neuronal plasticity in the prefrontal cortex that persist into adulthood . Early stressors in humans have also been linked to epigenetic modifications, including increased methylation of the glucocorticoid promoter in hippocampal neurons of suicide completers with histories of early childhood maltreatment . Cord blood collected from mothers with high levels of depression and anxiety during the third trimester displays similar glucocorticoid methylation differences, which are linked to a dysregulation of the endocrine system . In studies of rats who exhibit PTSD-like behavior, there is evidence of increased methylation of stress response genes including brain-derived neurotrophic factor  and nuclear protein phosphate-1  in neurons, which result in the onset of PTSD-like behavior . These preclinical studies provide insights into the heterogeneous response to trauma and stress and suggest that epigenetic modifications in neurons result in the onset of PTSD [16, 17].
We suggest that the heterogeneous response to trauma relates to complex interactions between genes and the environment, shaping each individual’s recovery trajectory based on both historical and trauma specific variables (see Figure 1). One of the major environmental factors linked to epigenetic changes is stress, which is a critical factor in the pathogenesis of PTSD. There is robust evidence linking PTSD onset to epigenetic changes following stress; yet this evidence is only starting to accumulate from the clinical studies. Recent advances in laboratory analyses and biostatistical methods provide new opportunities to determine the mechanisms of PTSD onset; however, many of these advances are not yet applied. Additionally, current studies are limited by our inability to determine pretrauma epigenetic status as well as our restriction to peripheral blood samples in clinical samples. Here, we provide a critical review of recent studies to examine how differences in genetic and proteomic biomarkers may underlie the vulnerability of the individual to develop PTSD, and how this field of study may provide fundamental insights into the identification of individuals at risk for PTSD development following trauma and the development of novel, interventional strategies.
In order to obtain a comprehensive pool of prospective studies investigating peripheral biomarkers of PTSD following trauma, PubMed, OVID/MEDLINE, the Cochran Database, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsychInfo were systematically searched using the following National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) “posttraumatic stress disorder,” “genes,” “cytokines,” “neuropeptides,” and “inflammation.” Additionally, each key word was cross-referenced with each other in each of the various databases. The search extended to the literature published between 2000 and 2013, and studies were included in the review if they (1) were primary research articles, (2) were published in English, (3) were conducted in humans, and (4) examined epigenetic modifications (i.e., DNA methylation), gene expression, or a proteomic biomarker that was linked to PTSD risk following a trauma. The following components and variables of interest were appraised to provide an overall synthesis of the available literature: study purpose, design, methods, sample size, demographics, type of trauma, severity of injuries sustained (mild, moderate, and severe), type of biological sample collected, and times of collection following trauma. We were able to locate 6 clinical studies that examined epigenetic modifications (i.e., DNA methylation), 9 studies of gene expression, and 14 studies that used a proteomic biomarker to examine the risk for PTSD onset (3 pediatric and 9 adult studies). All studies were reviewed and are presented in Tables 1, 2, and 3.
Clinical studies are restricted to examining epigenetic modifications in samples of peripheral blood, but these studies do provide some key insights into how these molecular changes relate to PTSD risk (see Table 1). Specifically, these studies implicate insufficient regulation of inflammatory activity and reduced neurotransmitter activity in PTSD risk. In support of this, studies in chronic PTSD-affected patients report hypermethylation of inflammatory initiator genes (toll-like receptors 1 & 3, IL-8, chemokine ligand 1, and others) and demethylation of inflammatory regulatory genes (FK506 binding protein-5 [FKBP5]) . In a subsequent study, Ressler et al. (2011) linked these molecular-genetic mechanisms to higher concentrations of inflammatory cytokines in patients with chronic PTSD . Together, these association studies suggest that observations by us and others of excessive inflammation in chronic PTSD [20, 21] likely relate to these DNA methylation differences; however, their cross- sectional designs prohibit linking these molecular differences to PTSD vulnerability.
In contrast, a recent study measured DNA methylation and reported that postdeployment hypomethylation of LINE-1 was associated with PTSD onset following deployment . The authors of this report postulate that LINE-1, a regulator of stress response in the immune system, may represent an adaptive response to combat stress that protects against PTSD; yet additional studies are needed in more generalized samples that include women and various traumatic events. In addition, this study did not determine predeployment factors such as previous PTSD, depression, or trauma that contributed to precombat methylation differences, resulting in an inability to understand how the interactions between genes and environment prior to trauma underlies PTSD risk.
Other studies suggest that differential methylation of neurotransmitter genes is linked to PTSD onset. In two studies using samples of civilians from the Detroit Neighborhood Health Study, neurotransmitter genes were implicated in the risk for PTSD development. In one study that examined the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4), methylation levels were modified by the effect of the number of traumatic events on PTSD after controlling for SLC6A4 genotype, such that persons with more traumatic events were at increased risk for PTSD, but only at lower methylation levels. At higher methylation levels, individuals who reported more traumatic events were protected from this disorder, suggesting that the serotonin transporter gene may also be important in trauma-related resilience . In a study using the same patient sample, the candidate gene MAN2C1 showed a significant methylation × trauma experience interaction such that those with both higher MAN2C1 methylation and greater exposure to traumatic events showed an increase in risk of lifetime PTSD . Although these studies provide unique insights into risks for PTSD based on DNA methylation, trauma, and psychiatric-related symptoms, these studies used cross-sectional design and did not include definitive diagnoses determined through a clinical interview.
Although not epigenetic in nature, previous studies that examine genetic inheritance provide further evidence of genetic underpinnings in endocrine modulating genes in the risk for PTSD. In brief, previous studies link single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of FKBP5, a negative regulator of GCR sensitivity to a greater risk for PTSD onset [29, 49, 50]. Current findings indicate that genetic predisposition differences in another key inflammatory gene, corticotrophin- releasing hormone type 1 receptor gene (CRHR1), increase PTSD onset in children who were abused at an early age . With pediatric injury patients, a longitudinal study identified one SNP significantly related to acute PTSD symptoms as well as trajectory of symptoms over time . These findings are meaningful in terms of genetic and environmental interplay producing risk for PTSD; however, current studies do not explicate the link between baseline epigenetics in immune regulatory genes and the risk for PTSD onset following a trauma. Yet, taking these studies together with studies that examine gene function, there is evidence that a combination of genetic and environmental factors contributes to psychological vulnerability following a trauma by shaping an individual’s neuronal and biological stress response, warranting future prospective studies to determine these important temporal relationships .
2.2. Gene Expression
Nine studies have also used gene expression analysis of peripheral blood to examine the mechanisms of PTSD, providing additional insights into the complex biological processes underlying PTSD onset. Gene expression involves processes that alter the ultimate product of the gene, which is most often the production of proteins. Current studies using gene expression analysis methods also support the role of insufficient inflammatory regulation in the risk for PTSD onset, by implicating higher expression of inflammatory genes and lower expression of genes that regulate inflammatory processes (see Table 2). In a recent cross-sectional study of PTSD patients, a reduction in the transcriptional activity of genes that regulate inflammation including FKBP5 and IL18 and STAT pathways was reported in an urban sample of primarily African American participants . Reductions in gene expression of STAT5B and MHC II class receptor genes in participants who developed PTSD following the 9-11 terrorist attacks were also reported . Also, in a sample of participants who developed PTSD following 9-11, reduced FKBP5 gene expression was most related to PTSD severity in regression analysis as well as a reduction in STAT5B, a direct inhibitor of GR, and a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II gene expression; however, significant differences were related to PTSD symptom severity and not a definitive diagnosis of PTSD . Lastly, in a recent study of 12 women with PTSD related to child abuse, increased glucocorticoid receptor sensitivity in monocytes was linked to increased NF-κB activity; however, this study did not use a whole-genome analysis like the other reviewed studies, but instead a DNA binding ELISA in mononuclear cells . Thus, together, these studies suggest that reduced gene expression of immune regulatory genes is associated with PTSD but is limited to small sample sizes and cross-sectional design.
In contrast, two recent studies provide vital insights into how gene expression differences contribute to PTSD onset through the use of a prospective design in male service members who are evaluated prior to and then following deployment. In a study of 448 male soldiers, predeployment high glucocorticoid receptor numbers and low FKBP5 mRNA expression were associated with increased risk for a high level of PTSD symptoms . In a similar sample, a high level of PTSD symptoms after deployment was independently associated with a high DEX sensitivity of T-cell proliferation before deployment, but only in individuals who reported PTSD symptoms without depressive symptoms . These studies link alterations in gene expression to functional immune cell changes. Importantly, these studies also link preexisting biological differences in cell function and gene expression to the risk for PTSD onset following a trauma. These studies are limited by their use of gene expression analysis of only predetermined target genes, restricting our ability to identify novel biological targets for PTSD risk and to understand how known risks relate to less well known genes related to PTSD risk. Although these studies have some limitations, they provide fundamental information regarding the mechanisms of PTSD onset. Specifically, these studies report that it is likely an accumulation of preexisting factors that result in differential gene activity and vulnerability to develop PTSD following trauma exposure.
Studies of proteomic biomarkers of PTSD risk have been undertaken for far longer than studies that use genetic analyses; yet they have been limited by many methodological issues. These issues include an inability to control for timing of the sample collection, with most proteins exhibiting substantial circadian variation, the impact of the physical consequences of trauma, and differences in the timing between the occurrence of the trauma and the biological sample. Despite these limitations, these studies provide some vital insights into the biological mechanisms underlying PTSD vulnerability. Proteins play important roles in both intracellular processes and intercellular communication, thereby contributing to the orchestration of responses to traumatic events. Thus, proteins should be considered as possible PTSD biomarkers. Studies of acutely traumatized individuals suggest that high concentrations of inflammatory proteins are linked to PTSD onset. Here, we review 14 studies that collect a biological sample within the acute period following a trauma and use this biomarker to approximate PTSD risk (see Table 3).
In children following a motor vehicle accident (MVA), high concentrations of IL-6 twenty four hours after the MVA predicted PTSD onset at six months ; however, these elevations were no longer evident in those children who developed PTSD. Similar findings are reported in a study of adults hospitalized for orthopedic injuries, reporting that high concentrations of IL-6 as well as IL-8 related to the risk acute stress disorders symptoms; however, this study did not link these biomarkers to the risk for PTSD onset . IL-8 is a mediator of the innate immune system, with higher concentrations indicating a greater immune challenge. In contrast, low concentrations of IL-8 predicted high PTSD symptoms following the earthquakes in China, whereas high IL-6 predicted anxiety and depression symptoms but was not specific to PTSD . The Song et al.  study differs from the other two studies as biomarker collection was within months, not hours of the trauma, and many of the participants did not sustain physical injuries. A benefit of the Song study was the evaluation of cooccurring depression with PTSD, which is a limitation of the other prospective studies. In studies of chronic PTSD, cooccurring depression is associated with higher concentrations of IL-6 [20, 55]. Therefore, inflammation in the acute recovery period may be very detrimental to psychological recovery as high concentrations of inflammatory cytokines exert central effects including the induction of “sickness behavior” [56–60]. In addition, inflammatory cytokines increase blood brain barrier disruption [61–63] and alter metabolism of serotonin [64–67], all of which contributes to neuronal vulnerability despite of the excessive central inflammatory actions, including overactivation of microglia [68–70]. Together, these studies suggest that increased concentrations of inflammatory cytokines relate to the risk for PTSD onset.
There is also evidence that endocrine dysregulation relates to PTSD risk; however, this risk may relate to previous trauma. In three studies of children recruited from emergency departments, high cortisol measured in the urine predicted acute stress symptoms at six weeks following the trauma; however, in the Ostrowski et al. (2007) study high cortisol predicted PTSD onset in boys only . This is of interest as studies of adult women report that it is low cortisol concentrations that predict PTSD onset . Resnick et al. (1995) support this finding in a similar sample but reports that this relationship only relates to those women who report a trauma prior to the rape . In samples of men and women following an MVA, low cortisol concentrations are also linked to PTSD risk [40, 44]; however, the role of previous trauma is not reported in these studies. Other studies do not link cortisol concentrations to PTSD risk [39, 41, 42, 45, 46]. In a unique study of service members prior to and following deployment, concentrations of cortisol were not related to PTSD risk; however, greater glucocorticoid binding in mononuclear cells prior to deployment predicted PTSD onset, suggesting that systems that regulate cortisol activity relate to PTSD risk .
ANS dysregulation contributes to PTSD vulnerability [71, 72]; however, current biomarker studies that measure catecholamines or metabolites have not supported this relationship. Studies that examined catecholamine concentrations from blood samples did not significantly differ in studies of adults [39, 46] or children [35, 37]. Studies of concentrations of catecholamines using urine samples also did not show significant findings in adults [35, 40, 42, 46] or in children . Therefore, ANS dysregulation may relate to PTSD risk yet this is not supported in biomarkers studies; this discrepancy may be related to the high degree of turnover of catecholamines in circulation, in which current studies may not be able to capture. Future studies that are able to approximate ANS dysregulation will be important as catecholamines influence immune and endocrine function, and also neuronal circuitry required to psychologically cope with trauma .
In this review, we provide a comprehensive examination of the biomarkers that contribute to PTSD risk. We suggest that epigenetic modifications shape the resulting proteomic response of the individual through differential gene activity, thereby contributing to the heterogeneous response to trauma and differential risk for PTSD onset. Additional studies are needed to elucidate these relationships and to design technological methods to use these biomarkers to identify trauma patients at the highest risk for PTSD onset. Preventative interventions would be of great value in patients at the highest risk for PTSD to prevent chronic symptomatology. In addition, these studies may inform the development of novel interventions including pharmacological agents that are better able to prevent the onset of PTSD.
Addressing this issue is critical, as delivering effective, preventive interventions for PTSD could save the USA up to 180 million dollars each year in health care costs [74–79] and the lives of up to 9,000 individuals from suicide [80–83]. Health care providers have an opportunity to reduce the risk for PTSD onset as up to 3 million adults seek immediate medical care for traumatic injuries each year , resulting in the onset of PTSD in almost 1 million of Americans annually [1, 4, 85–87]. However, even in this group, there is a high level of interindividual response variability to traumatic injuries, suggesting that a biomarker that is able to approximate PTSD risk would be of great value in directing preventive measures. Preventing PTSD is paramount and would reduce the substantial morbidity and health-related mortality associated with this devastating disorder [2, 85].
- D. S. Davydow, W. J. Katon, and D. F. Zatzick, “Psychiatric morbidity and functional impairments in survivors of burns, traumatic injuries, and ICU stays for other critical illnesses: a review of the literature,” International Review of Psychiatry, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 531–538, 2009.
- D. Zatzick, “Posttraumatic stress, functional impairment, and service utilization after injury: a public health approach,” Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 149–157, 2003.
- J. A. Coplan, “Rotational motion of the knee: a comparison of normal and pronating subjects,” Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 366–369, 1989.
- D. F. Zatzick, D. C. Grossman, J. Russo et al., “Predicting posttraumatic stress symptoms longitudinally in a representative sample of hospitalized injured adolescents,” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1188–1195, 2006.
- R. Jaenisch and A. Bird, “Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals,” Nature Genetics, vol. 33, supplement, pp. 245–254, 2003.
- N. Breslau, “Epidemiologic studies of trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder, and other psychiatric disorders,” Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 923–929, 2002.
- I. C. G. Weaver, N. Cervoni, F. A. Champagne et al., “Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 847–854, 2004.
- D. Liu, J. Diorio, B. Tannenbaum et al., “Maternal care, hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to stress,” Science, vol. 277, no. 5332, pp. 1659–1662, 1997.
- M. M. Sanchez, “The impact of early adverse care on HPA axis development: nonhuman primate models,” Hormones and Behavior, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 623–631, 2006.
- F. Fumagalli, R. Molteni, G. Racagni, and M. A. Riva, “Stress during development: impact on neuroplasticity and relevance to psychopathology,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 197–217, 2007.
- P. O. McGowan, A. Sasaki, A. C. D'Alessio et al., “Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 342–348, 2009.
- T. F. Oberlander, J. Weinberg, M. Papsdorf, R. Grunau, S. Misri, and A. M. Devlin, “Prenatal exposure to maternal depression, neonatal methylation of human glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) and infant cortisol stress responses,” Epigenetics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 97–106, 2008.
- T. L. Roth, P. R. Zoladz, J. D. Sweatt, and D. M. Diamond, “Epigenetic modification of hippocampal Bdnf DNA in adult rats in an animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 919–926, 2011.
- K. Koshibu, J. Gräff, and I. M. Mansuy, “Nuclear protein phosphatase-1: an epigenetic regulator of fear memory and amygdala long-term potentiation,” Neuroscience, vol. 173, pp. 30–36, 2011.
- F. Tian, A. M. Marini, and R. H. Lipsky, “Effects of histone deacetylase inhibitor Trichostatin A on epigenetic changes and transcriptional activation of Bdnf promoter 1 by rat hippocampal neurons,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1199, pp. 186–193, 2010.
- E. Vanderbilt-Adriance and D. S. Shaw, “Neighborhood risk and the development of resilience,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1094, pp. 359–362, 2006.
- E. Vanderbilt-Adriance and D. S. Shaw, “Conceptualizing and re-evaluating resilience across levels of risk, time, and domains of competence,” Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, vol. 11, no. 1-2, pp. 30–58, 2008.
- M. Uddin, A. E. Aiello, D. E. Wildman, et al., “Epigenetic and immune function profiles associated with posttraumatic stress disorder,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 20, pp. 9470–9475, 2010.
- K. J. Ressler, K. B. Mercer, B. Bradley et al., “Post-traumatic stress disorder is associated with PACAP and the PAC1 receptor,” Nature, vol. 470, no. 7335, pp. 492–497, 2011.
- J. Gill, D. Luckenbaugh, D. Charney, and M. Vythilingam, “Sustained elevation of serum interleukin-6 and relative insensitivity to hydrocortisone differentiates posttraumatic stress disorder with and without depression,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 999–1006, 2010.
- C. S. de Kloet, E. Vermetten, A. R. Rademaker, E. Geuze, and H. G. M. Westenberg, “Neuroendocrine and immune responses to a cognitive stress challenge in veterans with and without PTSD,” European Journal of Psychotraumatology, vol. 2012, article 3, 2012.
- K. C. Koenen, M. Uddin, S. C. Chang et al., “SLC6A4 methylation modifies the effect of the number of traumatic events on risk for posttraumatic stress disorder,” Depression and Anxiety, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 639–647, 2011.
- A. K. Smith, K. N. Conneely, V. Kilaru et al., “Differential immune system DNA methylation and cytokine regulation in post-traumatic stress disorder,” American Journal of Medical Genetics B, vol. 156, no. 6, pp. 700–708, 2011.
- M. Uddin, S. Galea, S. C. Chang et al., “Gene expression and methylation signatures of MAN2C1 are associated with PTSD,” Disease Markers, vol. 30, no. 2-3, pp. 111–121, 2011.
- J. A. Rusiecki, L. Chen, V. Srikantan et al., “DNA methylation in repetitive elements and post-traumatic stress disorder: a case-control study of US military service members,” Epigenomics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 29–40, 2012.
- J. Zieker, D. Zieker, A. Jatzko et al., “Differential gene expression in peripheral blood of patients suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 116–118, 2007.
- R. Yehuda, G. Cai, J. A. Golier et al., “Gene expression patterns associated with posttraumatic stress disorder following exposure to the world trade center attacks,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 708–711, 2009.
- T. C. Neylan, B. Sun, H. Rempel et al., “Suppressed monocyte gene expression profile in men versus women with PTSD,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 524–531, 2011.
- C. Sarapas, G. Cai, L. M. Bierer et al., “Genetic markers for PTSD risk and resilience among survivors of the world trade center attacks,” Disease Markers, vol. 30, no. 2-3, pp. 101–110, 2011.
- D. Mehta, M. Gonik, T. Klengel et al., “Using polymorphisms in FKBP5 to define biologically distinct subtypes of posttraumatic stress disorder: evidence from endocrine and gene expression studies,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 901–910, 2011.
- T. W. Pace, K. Wingenfeld, I. Schmidt, G. Meinlschmidt, D. H. Hellhammer, and C. M. Heim, “Increased peripheral NF-B pathway activity in women with childhood abuse-related posttraumatic stress disorder,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2012.
- M. van Zuiden, E. Geuze, H. L. Willemen et al., “Glucocorticoid receptor pathway components predict posttraumatic stress disorder symptom development: a prospective study,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 309–316, 2012.
- M. van Zuiden, C. J. Heijnen, M. Maas et al., “Glucocorticoid sensitivity of leukocytes predicts PTSD, depressive and fatigue symptoms after military deployment: a prospective study,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1822–1836, 2012.
- G. Matić, D. V. Milutinović, J. Nestorov et al., “Lymphocyte glucocorticoid receptor expression level and hormone-binding properties differ between war trauma-exposed men with and without PTSD,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, vol. 43, pp. 238–245, 2013.
- D. L. Delahanty, N. R. Nugent, N. C. Christopher, and M. Walsh, “Initial urinary epinephrine and cortisol levels predict acute PTSD symptoms in child trauma victims,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 121–128, 2005.
- S. A. Ostrowski, N. C. Christopher, M. H. M. Van Dulmen, and D. L. Delahanty, “Acute child and mother psychophysiological responses and subsequent PTSD symptoms following a child's traumatic event,” Journal of Traumatic Stress, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 677–687, 2007.
- P. Pervanidou, G. Kolaitis, S. Charitaki et al., “Elevated morning serum interleukin (IL)-6 or evening salivary cortisol concentrations predict posttraumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents six months after a motor vehicle accident,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 32, no. 8–10, pp. 991–999, 2007.
- H. S. Resnick, R. Yehuda, R. K. Pitman, and D. W. Foy, “Effect of previous trauma on acute plasma cortisol level following rape,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 152, no. 11, pp. 1675–1677, 1995.
- R. Yehuda, H. S. Resnick, J. Schmeidler, R. K. Yang, and R. K. Pitman, “Predictors of cortisol and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol responses in the acute aftermath of rape,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 855–859, 1998.
- D. L. Delahanty, A. J. Raimonde, and E. Spoonster, “Initial posttraumatic urinary cortisol levels predict subsequent PTSD symptoms in motor vehicle accident victims,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 940–947, 2000.
- O. Bonne, D. Brandes, R. Segman, R. K. Pitman, R. Yehuda, and A. Y. Shalev, “Prospective evaluation of plasma cortisol in recent trauma survivors with posttraumatic stress disorder,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 119, no. 1-2, pp. 171–175, 2003.
- M. Heinrichs, D. Wagner, W. Schoch, L. M. Soravia, D. H. Hellhammer, and U. Ehlert, “Predicting posttraumatic stress symptoms from pretraumatic risk factors: a 2-year prospective follow-up study in firefighters,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 162, no. 12, pp. 2276–2286, 2005.
- A. C. McFarlane, M. Atchison, and R. Yehuda, “The acute stress response following motor vehicle accidents and its relation to PTSD,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 821, pp. 437–441, 1997.
- T. Ehring, A. Ehlers, A. J. Cleare, and E. Glucksman, “Do acute psychological and psychobiological responses to trauma predict subsequent symptom severities of PTSD and depression?” Psychiatry Research, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 67–75, 2008.
- A. Y. Shalev, E. J. Videlock, T. Peleg, R. Segman, R. K. Pitman, and R. Yehuda, “Stress hormones and post-traumatic stress disorder in civilian trauma victims: a longitudinal study—part I: HPA axis responses,” International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 365–372, 2008.
- E. J. Videlock, T. Peleg, R. Segman, R. Yehuda, R. K. Pitman, and A. Y. Shalev, “Stress hormones and post-traumatic stress disorder in civilian trauma victims: a longitudinal study—part II: the adrenergic response,” International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 373–380, 2008.
- M. Cohen, T. Meir, E. Klein, G. Volpin, M. Assaf, and S. Pollack, “Cytokine levels as potential biomarkers for predicting the development of posttraumatic stress symptoms in casualties of accidents,” International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 117–131, 2011.
- M. van Zuiden, E. Geuze, H. L. D. M. Willemen et al., “Pre-existing high glucocorticoid receptor number predicting development of posttraumatic stress symptoms after military deployment,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 2011.
- D. Mehta and E. B. Binder, “Gene x environment vulnerability factors for PTSD: the HPA-axis,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 654–662, 2012.
- J. A. Boscarino, P. M. Erlich, S. N. Hoffman, M. Rukstalis, and W. F. Stewart, “Association of FKBP5, COMT and CHRNA5 polymorphisms with PTSD among outpatients at risk for PTSD,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 173–174, 2011.
- C. F. Gillespie, J. Phifer, B. Bradley, and K. J. Ressler, “Risk and resilience: genetic and environmental influences on development of the stress response,” Depression and Anxiety, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 984–992, 2009.
- A. B. Amstadter, N. R. Nugent, B. Z. Yang et al., “Corticotrophin-releasing hormone type 1 receptor gene (CRHR1) variants predict posttraumatic stress disorder onset and course in pediatric injury patients,” Disease Markers, vol. 30, no. 2-3, pp. 89–99, 2011.
- S. L. Szanton and J. M. Gill, “Facilitating resilience using a society-to-cells framework: a theory of nursing essentials applied to research and practice,” Advances in Nursing Science, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 329–343, 2010.
- Y. Song, D. Zhou, Z. Guan, and X. Wang, “Disturbance of serum interleukin-2 and interleukin-8 levels in posttraumatic and non-posttraumatic stress disorder earthquake survivors in Northern China,” NeuroImmunoModulation, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 248–254, 2007.
- J. Gill, M. Vythilingam, and G. G. Page, “Low cortisol, high DHEA, and high levels of stimulated TNF-α, and IL-6 in women with PTSD,” Journal of Traumatic Stress, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 530–539, 2008.
- S. Bonaccorso, V. Marino, A. Puzella et al., “Increased depressive ratings in patients with hepatitis C receiving interferon-α-based immunotherapy are related to interferon-α-induced changes in the serotonergic system,” Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 86–90, 2002.
- G. A. Bonanno and A. D. Mancini, “The human capacity to thrive in the face of potential trauma,” Pediatrics, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 369–375, 2008.
- L. Capuron, J. F. Gumnick, D. L. Musselman et al., “Neurobehavioral effects of interferon-α in cancer patients: phenomenology and paroxetine responsiveness of symptom dimensions,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 643–652, 2002.
- L. Capuron, G. Neurauter, D. L. Musselman et al., “Interferon-α-induced changes in tryptophan metabolism: relationship to depression and paroxetine treatment,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 906–914, 2003.
- M. C. Wichers, G. Kenis, G. H. Koek, G. Robaeys, N. A. Nicolson, and M. Maes, “Interferon-α-induced depressive symptoms are related to changes in the cytokine network but not to cortisol,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 207–214, 2007.
- T. H. Wu and C. H. Lin, “IL-6 mediated alterations on immobile behavior of rats in the forced swim test via ERK1/2 activation in specific brain regions,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 193, no. 2, pp. 183–191, 2008.
- M. Maes, M. Kubera, and J. C. Leunis, “The gut-brain barrier in major depression: intestinal mucosal dysfunction with an increased translocation of LPS from gram negative enterobacteria (leaky gut) plays a role in the inflammatory pathophysiology of depression,” Neuro endocrinology letters, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 117–124, 2008.
- S. J. Campbell, R. M. J. Deacon, Y. Jiang, C. Ferrari, F. J. Pitossi, and D. C. Anthony, “Overexpression of IL-1β by adenoviral-mediated gene transfer in the rat brain causes a prolonged hepatic chemokine response, axonal injury and the suppression of spontaneous behaviour,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 151–163, 2007.
- A. Pierucci-Lagha, J. Covault, H. L. Bonkovsky et al., “A functional serotonin transporter gene polymorphism and depressive effects associated with interferon-α treatment,” Psychosomatics, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 137–148, 2010.
- S. Su, J. Zhao, J. D. Bremner et al., “Serotonin transporter gene, depressive symptoms,and interleukin-6,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 614–620, 2009.
- A. Schäfer, M. Scheurlen, J. Seufert et al., “Platelet serotonin (5-HT) levels in interferon-treated patients with hepatitis C and its possible association with interferon-induced depression,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2010.
- M. C. Wichers, G. H. Koek, G. Robaeys, R. Verkerk, S. Scharpé, and M. Maes, “IDO and interferon-α-induced depressive symptoms: a shift in hypothesis from tryptophan depletion to neurotoxicity,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 538–544, 2005.
- J. T. Järvelä, S. Ruohonen, T. K. Kukko-Lukjanov, A. Plysjuk, F. R. Lopez-Picon, and I. E. Holopainen, “Kainic acid-induced neurodegeneration and activation of inflammatory processes in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures: treatment with cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor does not prevent neuronal death,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 60, no. 7-8, pp. 1116–1125, 2011.
- J. T. Yu, C. H. Lee, K. Y. Yoo et al., “Maintenance of anti-inflammatory cytokines and reduction of glial activation in the ischemic hippocampal CA1 region preconditioned with lipopolysaccharide,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 296, no. 1-2, pp. 69–78, 2010.
- C. D. Munhoz, B. García-Bueno, J. L. Madrigal, L. B. Lepsch, C. Scavone, and J. C. Leza, “Stress-induced neuroinflammation: mechanisms and new pharmacological targets,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1037–1046, 2008.
- R. A. Bryant, J. E. Marosszeky, J. Crooks, and J. A. Gurka, “Elevated resting heart rate as a predictor of posttraumatic stress disorder after severe traumatic brain injury,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 760–761, 2004.
- R. A. Bryant, A. G. Harvey, R. M. Guthrie, and M. L. Moulds, “A prospective study of psychophysiological arousal, acute stress disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 341–344, 2000.
- J. H. Krystal and A. Neumeister, “Noradrenergic and serotonergic mechanisms in the neurobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder and resilience,” Brain Research, vol. 1293, pp. 13–23, 2009.
- E. A. Walker, W. Katon, J. Russo, P. Ciechanowski, E. Newman, and A. W. Wagner, “Health care costs associated with posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in women,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 369–374, 2003.
- M. D. Marciniak, M. J. Lage, E. Dunayevich et al., “The cost of treating anxiety: the medical and demographic correlates that impact total medical costs,” Depression and Anxiety, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 178–184, 2005.
- S. Priebe, J. J. Gavrilovic, A. Matanov et al., “Treatment outcomes and costs at specialized centers for the treatment of PTSD after the war in former Yugoslavia,” Psychiatric Services, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 598–604, 2010.
- M. L. O'Donnell, M. Creamer, P. Elliott, and C. Atkin, “Health costs following motor vehicle accidents: the role of posttraumatic stress disorder,” Journal of Traumatic Stress, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 557–561, 2005.
- R. Kimerling, J. Alvarez, J. Pavao, K. P. MacK, M. W. Smith, and N. Baumrind, “Unemployment among women: examining the relationship of physical and psychological intimate partner violence and posttraumatic stress disorder,” Journal of Interpersonal Violence, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 450–463, 2009.
- A. Nandi, S. Galea, M. Tracy et al., “Job loss, unemployment, work stress, job satisfaction, and the persistence of posttraumatic stress disorder one year after the september 11 attacks,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1057–1064, 2004.
- H. C. Wilcox, C. L. Storr, and N. Breslau, “Posttraumatic stress disorder and suicide attempts in a community sample of urban American young adults,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 305–311, 2009.
- D. J. Stein, W. T. Chiu, I. Hwang et al., “Cross-national analysis of the associations between traumatic events and suicidal behavior: findings from the WHO world mental health surveys,” PloS ONE, vol. 5, no. 5, Article ID e10574, 2010.
- J. L. Gradus, P. Qin, A. K. Lincoln et al., “Posttraumatic stress disorder and completed suicide,” The American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 171, no. 6, pp. 721–727, 2010.
- J. R. Cougle, H. Resnick, and D. G. Kilpatrick, “PTSD, depression, and their comorbidity in relation to suicidality: cross-sectional and prospective analyses of a national probability sample of women,” Depression and Anxiety, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1151–1157, 2009.
- S. B. Vyrostek, J. L. Annest, and G. W. Ryan, “Surveillance for fatal and nonfatal injuries—United States, 2001,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance Summaries, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 1–57, 2004.
- D. Zatzick, G. J. Jurkovich, F. P. Rivara et al., “A national US study of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and work and functional outcomes after hospitalization for traumatic injury,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 248, no. 3, pp. 429–437, 2008.
- N. Breslau, “Trauma and mental health in US inner-city populations,” General Hospital Psychiatry, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 501–502, 2009.
- D. Zatzick, J. Russo, D. C. Grossman et al., “Posttraumatic stress and depressive symptoms, alcohol use, and recurrent traumatic life events in a representative sample of hospitalized injured adolescents and their parents,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 377–387, 2006.