About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 520858, 8 pages
Research Article

MDM2 Amplification and PI3KCA Mutation in a Case of Sclerosing Rhabdomyosarcoma

1Pediatric Cancer Biology Program, Department of Pediatrics, Papé Family Pediatric Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L321, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA
2Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L41, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA
3Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
4Department of Radiation Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
5Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA

Received 9 March 2013; Accepted 24 April 2013

Academic Editor: Cyril Fisher

Copyright © 2013 Ken Kikuchi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


A rare sclerosing variant of rhabdomyosarcoma characterized by prominent hyalinization and pseudovascular pattern has recently been described as a subtype biologically distinct from embryonal, alveolar, and pleomorphic forms. We present cytogenetic and molecular findings as well as experimental studies of an unusual case of sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma. The primary lesion arose within the plantar subcutaneous tissue of the left foot of an otherwise healthy 23-year-old male who eventually developed pulmonary nodules despite systemic chemotherapy. Two genetic abnormalities identified in surgical and/or autopsy samples of the tumor were introduced into 10T1/2 murine fibroblasts to determine whether these genetic changes cooperatively facilitated transformation and growth. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a complex abnormal hyperdiploid clone, and MDM2 gene amplification was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer gene mutation screening using a combination of multiplexed PCR and mass spectroscopy revealed a PIK3CA exon 20 H1047R mutation in the primary tumor, lung metastasis, and liver metastasis. However, this mutation was not cooperative with MDM2 overexpression in experimental assays for transformation or growth. Nevertheless, MDM2 and PIK3CA are genes worthy of further investigation in patients with sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma and might be considered in the enrollment of these patients into clinical trials of targeted therapeutics.

1. Introduction

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is subdivided into three major variants: embryonal, alveolar, and pleomorphic. Embryonal and alveolar subtypes are commonest sarcomas of childhood and adolescence. Better clinical outcome is associated with botryoid and spindle cell variants of embryonal RMS. In particular, the spindle cell variant in childhood is considered to be of low malignant potential with excellent overall patient survival. Pleomorphic RMS is rare and highly aggressive adult sarcomas typically arising in the deep soft tissue of the extremities. Even rarer are recently described spindle cell and sclerosing variants of RMS in adults. Due to their rarity, the experience with the newer subsets is limited but appears to show poor outcome in adults. Sclerosing variant of RMS as a distinct entity was initially reported in three cases by Mentzel and Katenkamp in 2000 [1]. Histologically the tumor is characterized by polygonal to spindle-shaped neoplastic cells forming anastomosing cords in pseudovascular clefts and a highly sclerotic, hyalinized matrix. Rare rhabdomyoblasts can be seen and the skeletal muscle differentiation is evidenced by immunoreactivity for desmin, MyoD1, and myogenin. In a subsequent series of four additional cases, Folpe considered these tumors to be either highly unusual variants of adult embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma or an entirely novel subcategory of rhabdomyosarcoma [2]. In these and other reported cases, lesions arose slightly more commonly within the distal extremities, but others have been observed in the head and neck [3], retroperitoneum, and scrotum [4]. There is no particular gender predominance in patients ranging in age from young children to older adults. With fewer than 30 cases reported, genetic analysis has been limited. To date, only six karyotypes [57] and one comparative genomic hybridization [8] have been reported showing aneuploidy with numerous chromosomal gains but noregional amplifications [57]. Reciprocal translocations typical of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, either t(1;13)(p36;q14) or t(2;13)(q35;q14), have not been present. In one case, comparative genomic hybridization revealed loss of chromosome region10q22, loss of chromosome Y, and trisomy of chromosome 18 [8]. Recently, single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping of a sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma revealed amplification within the 12q13-15 region, including the genes SAS, GLI, CDK4, and MDM2 [9]. Herein we describe a case of sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma studied by karyotyping, mutational screening of 53 cancer genes, and in vitro correlative analyses.

2. Materials and Methods

Representative 5-μm thick sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from the open biopsy specimen were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. For immunohistochemistry, three to four μm unstained paraffin-sections were prepared. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on Ventana (Tucson, AZ, USA) XT stainers. Primary antibodies are as follows: smooth muscle actin (1A4, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA), desmin (DE-R-11, Ventana, Tuscon, AZ, USA), myogenin (F5D, Dako), H-Caldesmon (h-CD, Dako), CD99 (H036-1.1, Cell Marque, Roklin, CA, USA), S100 (Polyclonal, Ventana), HMB45 (HMB-45, Dako), cytokeratin cocktail (AE1/AE3/PCK26, Ventana), EMA (E29, Cell Marque), CD34 (QBEnd/10, Ventana), and CD31 (IA10, Cell Marque). Ventana’s Ultraview diaminobenzidine chromogen kit was used for secondary antibodies and detection.

2.1. Cytogenetic Analysis

Fresh tumor in RPMI tissue culture medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was sent to the Cytogenetics Laboratory within 2 hours from time of biopsy. The sample was enzymatically dissociated using Type I Collagenase (cat. no. LS004196; Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ, USA) at a final concentration of 1 unit/mL for 90 minutes. The dissociated cells were cultured in RPMI plus 15% fetal bovine serum (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA, USA) or a combination of this with Chang (Irvine Scientific) complete medium in closed tissue culture flasks for 5 and 7 days. Cell harvest and preparation of slides were performed according to standard laboratory protocol. Twenty-four G-banded (trypsin/Wright stain) metaphase cells were analyzed at approximately the 300 band level.

2.2. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed using Abbott probes for FOXO1A (13q34) and MYCN (2p24.1) with a control probe for the 2 centromere (CEP 2) (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA) and the ZytoVision MDM2 (12q14.3-15) probe with a 12 centromeric probe (CEN 12) as control (ZytoVision, Bremerhaven, Germany). Hybridization methods were per manufacturer’s instructions and using a HYBritehybridization system (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA). Interphase cells were evaluated using a Nikon Eclipse E800 (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). One hundred interphase cells were scored for the FOXO1A and MYCN/CEP2 probes. Two hundred interphase cells were scored for the MDM2/CEN12 probe set. The cells were captured on a CytoVision computer system with a digital camera (Genetix-Applied Imaging, San Jose, CA, USA).

2.3. Mass Spectrometry-Based Mutation Detection

Multiplex mutation analysis was performed on the Mass Array system (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA) using a panel that screens for 647 mutations across 53 genes, exactly as previously described [10]. A PIK3CA H1047R mutation identified by this approach was confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

2.4. Cell Culture

10T1/2 cells and 10T1/2-H1047R cells have been previously described [11]. Cells were cultured in 4.5 g/L glucose DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) in 5% CO2 in air at 37°C.

2.5. Vector Transfection

The MDM2 vector was kindly provided by Dai et al. (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University) [12]. Transient transfections were carried out using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen/Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). pcDNA3 empty vector (Dharmacon-Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used as control.

2.6. Immunoblotting

10T1/2 cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer or NP40 buffer containing both protease and phosphatase inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich). The lysates were homogenized and centrifuged at 8000 g for 10 minutes. The resulting supernatants were used for immunoblot analysis by mouse anti-β-actin (cat. A1978; Sigma), mouse anti-MDM2 (cat. sc-965; Santa CruzBiotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), rabbit anti-Akt (cat. no. 9272; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) or rabbit anti-phospho-Akt (Ser473) (cat. no. 4060; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA).

2.7. Soft-Agar Colony Formation Assay

10T1/2 cells were plated at 6 × 103 cells per well in a 6-well plate with soft-agar with DMEM and 10% fetal bovine serum (SeePlaqueAgarose; cat. 50101, Lonza, Allendale, NJ, USA). MDM2 vector or empty vector was transfected to the cells before plating the top layer. After the cells were plated 14 days, colonies were counted.

2.8. In Vitro Growth Assay

10T1/2 cells were plated at 2 × 103 cells of each cohort per well in a 96-well plate. MDM2 vector or empty vector was transfected to the cells before plating the top layer. After cell incubations, in vitro growth was assayed using CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and SpectraMax M5 luminometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Case Report, Histopathological Diagnosis, and Cytogenetics Analysis

An otherwise healthy 23 year-old man presented with a 6-month history of an enlarging mass within the plantar aspect of his left foot. MRI revealed an 8 cm mass infiltrating the plantar surface, extending through the dorsal surface, and circumferentially involving the 2nd through 4th metatarsals (Figure 1(a)). Open biopsy was performed and light microscopy revealed heavily hyalinized matrix with poorly formed alveolar spaces lined by round hyperchromatic cells (Figure 1(b)). Some cells had scant eosinophilic cytoplasm and other areas showed spindling of tumor cells. Mitotic activity was easily identified. Immunohistochemical staining highlighted skeletal muscle differentiation with strong, diffuse positivity for desmin, and patchy nuclear myogenin positivity (Figures 1(c) and 1(d), resp.). There was scattered nuclear MDM2 immunoreactivity within several cells (Figure 1(e)), whilst a CDK4 immunostain was negative (data not shown). In concert with the marked stromal sclerosis, these results were consistent with the pattern previously reported for sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma.

Figure 1: (a) MRI imaging. (b) Diagnostichistology of the tumor demonstrating round hyperchromatic to spindled cells surrounded by a densely hyalinized stroma. Hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×200. (c) Desmin immunohistochemical stain showing strong diffuse cytoplasmic expression of desmin. (d) Although sparse, individual cells demonstrated strong nuclear staining with myogenin. Myogenin immunohistochemical stain. (e) Several cells demonstrated strong nuclear staining with MDM2 immunohistochemical stain. (f) Representative G-banded karyogram demonstrating a complex abnormal hyperdiploid clone. These cells contained from 20 to 50 double minutes, shown by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to be amplification of the MDM2 gene. (g) Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with Zytovision MDM2 probe (green) and a 12 centromere probe as control (red) revealed a subset of interphase cells, as shown here, exhibiting multiple green signals confirming MDM2 amplification.

Cytogenetic analysis of tumor from the original biopsy revealed fourteen of twenty-four metaphase cells to have a complex hyperdiploid (near-triploid) karyotype. These cells contained approximately 20 to 50 double minutes, shown by FISH (below) to include amplification of the MDM2 gene. The karyotype, described according to ISCN (2009) [13], was 71~95<3n>,XX,−Y,+1,+add(1)(p?13),+2,+5,+7,+7,+8,+8, 14,+16,+17,+add(18)(q?22),add(19)(q?13.3)×2,+22,+22,+22, +20~50dmin.ish dmin(MDM2×20~50)[cp14]/46,XY (Figure 1(f)).

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed that 15.5% of 200 nuclei had amplification of MDM2. These results confirmed amplification of MDM2 in the form of the double minutes observed in the metaphase karyotype, as well as the presence of multiple copies of chromosome 12 (Figure 1(g)). FISH results for MYCN and for the FOXO1A break-apart probe were within normal limits (data not shown).

Staging studies, including operative sampling of left inguinal and iliac lymph nodes due to an abnormal PET scan, did not reveal evidence of metastatic disease. The patient underwent systemic chemotherapy with vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide as a part of a clinical trial. He was offered a below-the-knee amputation, but he declined in favor of radiation. He received a total dose of 50.4 Gy/28 fractions and had an excellent response in the foot. Unfortunately, he developed pulmonary metastases immediately upon the completion of chemotherapy. Subsequent therapies included irinotecan with temozolomide, doxorubicin with ifosfamide, and sorafenib, none of which resulted in clinical response. He also underwent surgical resection of a massive and symptomatic right lower lung metastasis and received several courses of palliative radiation therapy. The patient expired 25 months after diagnosis.

A complete autopsy was performed twenty seven hours after death. Tumor masses were present in all lung lobes, nearly replacing the right lung. There were multiple metastases in both liver lobes, adjacent to esophagus, in the right adrenal, and in the right frontal cortex of the brain, as well as invading the chest wall, diaphragm, and multiple vertebrae. Fresh tissue was obtained sterilely for culture and frozen aliquots from the right chest, left upper lobe, and liver as well as normal skin and skeletal muscle (frozen only) immediately after opening of the body. Histologically the tumor was similar to that in the prior tumor biopsy with somewhat more cytologicatypia and a range of 30 to 90% necrosis (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Disseminated disease at necropsy. (a) Cross-section of liver demonstrating metastatic nodules. (b) Histological section of lung with metastatic sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma. Hematoxylin-eosin, insert original magnifications ×200.

Genotyping performed on tumor from the autopsy revealed a PIK3CA exon 20 H1047R (catalytic domain) mutation in the primary tumor, lung metastasis, and liver metastasis. No other mutations were identified in the genes listed in Table 2.

3.2. In Vitro Growth Analysis of Combined MDM2 Amplification and PIK3CA-Activated Mutation

To investigate the effect of combined MDM2 amplification and the PIK3CA activating mutation, 10T1/2-PIK3CA H1047R fibroblasts transfected with an MDM2 overexpression construct versus empty vector control were studied. As expected, the MDM2 vector induced MDM2 protein overexpression (Figure 3(a)). Similarly, 10T1/2 cells harboring the PIK3CA H1047R mutation showed higher Akt phosphorylation compared with control 10T1/2 cell (Figure 3(a)). Next, we compared anchor-independent growth and anchorage-dependent proliferation of 10T1/2 control cells and 10T1/2-H1047R cells with or without the MDM2 vector. The PI3KCA H1047R mutation induced anchor-independent growth, but MDM2 transient transfection could not alone induce anchor-independent growth or accelerated proliferation in control 10T1/2 cells (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)). These results suggest lack of synergy between MDM2 amplification and PI3KCA mutation with respect to the tumor cell-autonomous growth characteristics tested.

Figure 3: (a) Western blotting of MDM2, Akt, phosphoAkt, and β-actin. Total cell lysates were isolated 48 h after transfection. (b) Soft-agar colony formation assay (means ± SD, ). Black line shows significant difference ( ). (c) Relative proliferation rates of 10T1/2 cells and 10T1/2-H1047R cells transfected with MDM2 vector or empty vector, as measured by MTS assay (means ± SD, ).

4. Discussion

In contrast to childhood RMS, the adult variants are believed to be highly aggressive irrespective of the morphologic subtype. The pleomorphic variant of RMS, exclusively seen in adults, has been extensively studied. Recently described variants in adults include spindle cell and sclerosing RMS. One of the limitations of understanding biology of these new entities is the overall rarity of such cases. It has also been noted that about 15–20% cases of adult spindle cell RMS show morphological overlap with the sclerosing variant [14, 15]. This observation suggests close relationship between the two subsets and raises the possibility of morphological variation of a single-tumor type. Future molecular and genetic studies will help address this issue, but for now these two variants are co-classified as a new distinct subset of adult RMSs [16].

The sclerosing variant of rhabdomyosarcoma presents a significant diagnostic challenge. From its hyalinizing pseudovascular appearance and sometimes focal and dot-like desmin and myogenin expression, these tumors could easily be mistaken for variants of angiosarcoma, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, or sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma.

Sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma is an aggressive sarcoma. Among the original three cases reported by Mentzel and Katenkamp, one exhibited progressive pulmonary metastases despite systemic chemotherapy [1]. In one of the four cases reviewed by Folpe et al., there were extensive intra-abdominal and lymph node metastases, and this patient expired within 5 years of diagnosis [2]. None of the three pediatric cases described by Zambrano et al. had metastases [7]. However, in a pediatric case of deltoid tumor recently evaluated by Bouron-Dal Soglio et al., both pulmonary and axillary nodal metastases were present [9].

Among the few karyotypes reported, no characteristic numerical alteration of the chromosomal complement has emerged (Table 1). None of the cases have shown reciprocal translocation t(1;13)(p36;q14) or t(2;13)(q35;q14), which are characteristic of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.

Table 1: Summary of reported cytogenetic abnormalities in sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma.
Table 2: Genes screened by solid tumor sequenom panel.

Bouron-Dal Soglio et al. reported a highly complex aneuploid pattern by SNP array, including whole chromosome trisomy 5, 7, 8, 11, 15, 16, 20, and 22; tetrasomy 4 and 18; and monosomy 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 13, 14 [9]. Their analysis revealed amplification at region 12q13-15 which included the HMGA2 and MDM2 genes but not CDK4/SAS/GL1. Both the initial and recurrent lesions possessed identical amplifications. Their pattern was similar to an analysis of 38 well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcomas which revealed overexpression of both HMGA2 and MDM2 in all cases, but with an inconsistent amplification of CDK4 in 13% of cases [17]. Amplification and overexpression of MDM2, CDK4, GL1 and SAS genes of the 12q13-15 region has been associated with other sarcomas such as well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and a significant subset of alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas [18] and even sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma [19].

Ours is the second reported case of sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma in which MDM2 amplification has been demonstrated [9]. The histological sections did not show areas resembling spindle cell RMS, and hence was a pure variant. Despite some clinical similarities to alveolar RMS, including age range and frequent location within the extremities, translocations involving the FOXO1A (also referred to as FOXOA10) gene have been absent. Our case further confirms sclerosing RMS as a distinct diagnostic entity and implicates MDM2 amplification in the pathogenesis of this tumor. This may aid in the diagnosis of future cases. Aside from the potential diagnostic significance of this finding, enhanced MDM2 expression or related p53 abnormalities, if present, may render sclerosing RMS vulnerable to an ever-expanding array of small molecule inhibitors. For example, nutlin specifically blocks p53-MDM2 binding, thus restoring the tumor suppressive activity of p53 [20]. Other potential clinical agents may have relevance: RO5044537 (RG7112) is a member of the nutlin family and is the first MDM2 antagonist to be assessed clinically [21]. APR-246, the analog of PRIMA-1, restores wild-type conformation to mutant p53 by binding to the core and induces apoptosis in human tumor cells [22]. Moreover, arsenic trioxide can indirectly activate p53 via Wip1 phosphatase inhibition [23].

Somatic mutations of PIK3CA have been reported in many cancer types, including liver (36%), breast (8–40%), colon (14–32%), and ovarian cancer (6–12%) [24]. Barretina et al. first described PIK3CA mutation in soft-tissue sarcomas uncovered by large-scale mutational analysis of the entire coding regions of all the major classes of PI3K [25]. Recently, PIK3CA mutations were found in 5% of embryonal RMS [26], but these mutations have not been reported in sclerosing RMS. Functionally, the H1047R mutation in the catalytic domain of p110α has transforming activity via Akt phosphorylation [27]. Akt overphosphorylation has been observed in 42-43% of alveolar RMS and 35–55% of embryonal RMS [28]. These results suggest that the PIK3CA-Akt pathway may be important for RMS and an attractive therapeutic target for cancer intervention in RMS. Downstream mediators are potentially druggable with AKT inhibitors such as MK2206 [29] or mTOR inhibitors like rapamycin, whereas dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor such as PI-103 may be of special benefit. Interestingly, PI-103 has been reported to act synergistically with Nutlin-3 to induce apoptosis in a wild-type p53-dependent fashion [30].

To investigate the effect of combination with MDM2 amplification and PIK3CA-activated mutation in proliferation in vitro, we performed soft-agar assay and proliferation assay using 10T1/2-PIK3CA H1047R cells transfected with an MDM2 overexpression construct versus empty vector control. In this fibroblast-based model we could not identify a growth advantage of combined MDM2 amplification and PIK3CA-activated mutation. Other models may be necessary to determine whether MDM2 amplification and PIK3CA H1047R mutation facilitate metastasis or tumorigenesis [31]. And other molecular changes may play a role in sclerosing RMS.

Given the discussion above that MDM2 and PIK3CA can be targeted by emerging small molecule inhibitors, mutations in these loci may warrant further investigation in larger cohorts of patients with sclerosing RMS. However, in a tumor as rare as sclerosing RMS, personalized science and accompanying tailored treatment approaches may be needed.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they do not have conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

C. Keller and A. Mansoor made the overall conception and design. C. Ryan and A. Hung made case history. G. Wettach, C. Beadling, A. Warrick, S. Olson, C. Corless, J. Hooper, and A. Mansoor wrote down the acquisition of clinical test data. C. Corless, S. Olson, C. Keller, and A. Mansoor accomplished analysis and interpretation of clinical data (e.g., cytogenetics and histopathology). K. Kikuchi and C. Keller performed development of experimental methodology. K. Kikuchi made the acquisition of experimental data (in vitro experimental procedures). K. Kikuchi and C. Keller made analysis and interpretation of experimental data (e.g., laboratory study statistical analysis). K. Kikuchi, C. Keller, C. Corless, and A. Mansoor made writing, review, and/or revision of the paper. C. Keller and A. Mansoor made study supervision.


This work was supported in part by NIH/NCI Grant 1R01CA133229 to Charles Keller as well as an anonymous donor. The authors acknowledge Mingkui Chen MD, OHSU Department of Pathology, for autopsy photomicrographs. They thank the family of the patient for their selfless contributions made possible by the autopsy for research. They also thank Jonathan Hart and Peter Vogt for wildtype and H1047R 10T1/2 cells.


  1. T. Mentzel and D. Katenkamp, “Sclerosing, pseudovascular rhabdomyosarcoma in adults. Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of three cases,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 436, no. 4, pp. 305–311, 2000. View at Scopus
  2. A. L. Folpe, J. K. McKenney, J. A. Bridge, and S. W. Weiss, “Sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma in adults: report of four cases of a hyalinizing, matrix-rich variant of rhabdomyosarcoma that may be confused with osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, or angiosarcoma,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1175–1183, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. A. Knipe, R. K. Chandra, and M. F. Bugg, “Sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma: a rare variant with predilection for the head and neck,” Laryngoscope, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 48–50, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. Vadgama, N. J. Sebire, M. Malone, and A. D. Ramsay, “Sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma in childhood: case report and review of the literature,” Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 391–396, 2004. View at Scopus
  5. M. C. Chiles, D. M. Parham, S. J. Qualman et al., “Sclerosing rhabdomyosarcomas in children and adolescents: a clinicopathologic review of 13 cases from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group and Children's Oncology Group,” Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 583–594, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Croes, M. Debiec-Rychter, K. Cokelaere, R. de Vos, A. Hagemeijer, and R. Sciot, “Adult sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma: cytogenetic link with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 446, no. 1, pp. 64–67, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. Zambrano, A. R. Pérez-Atayde, W. Ahrens, and M. Reyes-Múgica, “Pediatric sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma,” International Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 193–199, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Kuhnen, P. Herter, I. Leuschner et al., “Sclerosing pseudovascular rhabdomyosarcoma—immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and genetic findings indicating a distinct subtype of rhabdomyosarcoma,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 449, no. 5, pp. 572–578, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Bouron-Dal Soglio, A. L. Rougemont, R. Absi et al., “SNP genotyping of a sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma: reveals highly aneuploid profile and a specific MDM2/HMGA2 amplification,” Human Pathology, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1347–1352, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Dunlap, C. Beadling, A. Warrick et al., “Multiplex high-throughput gene mutation analysis in acute myeloid leukemia,” Human Pathology, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 2167–2176, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. R. Hart, L. Liao, J. R. Yates III, and P. K. Vogt, “Essential role of Stat3 in PI3K-induced oncogenic transformation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 32, pp. 13247–13252, 2011.
  12. M. S. Dai, S. X. Zeng, Y. Jin, X. X. Sun, L. David, and H. Lu, “Ribosomal protein L23 activates p53 by inhibiting MDM2 function in response to ribosomal perturbation but not to translation inhibition,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 7654–7668, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. R. Brothman, D. L. Persons, and L. G. Shaffer, “Nomenclature evolution: changes in the ISCN from the 2005 to the 2009 edition,” Cytogenetic and Genome Research, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. F. Nascimento and C. D. M. Fletcher, “Spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma in adults,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1106–1113, 2005. View at Scopus
  15. T. Mentzel and C. Kuhnen, “Spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma in adults: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of seven new cases,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 449, no. 5, pp. 554–560, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, World Health Organization Classification of Tumor, IARC, Lyon, France, 2013.
  17. A. Italiano, L. Bianchini, F. Keslair et al., “HMGA2 is the partner of MDM2 in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas whereas CDK4 belongs to a distinct inconsistent amplicon,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 122, no. 10, pp. 2233–2241, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Ragazzini, G. Gamberi, L. Pazzaglia et al., “Amplification of CDK4, MDM2, SAS and GLI genes in leiomyosarcoma, alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma,” Histology and Histopathology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 401–411, 2004.
  19. D. Gisselsson, P. Andreasson, J. M. Meis-Kindblom, L. G. Kindblom, F. Mertens, and N. Mandahl, “Amplification of 12q13 and 12q15 sequences in a sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 102–106, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. T. Vassilev, B. T. Vu, B. Graves et al., “In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2,” Science, vol. 303, no. 5659, pp. 844–848, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. I. Ray-Coquard, J. Y. Blay, A. Italiano et al., “Effect of the MDM2 antagonist RG7112 on the P53 pathway in patients with MDM2-amplified, well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma: an exploratory proof-of-mechanism study,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1133–1140, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. K. G. Wiman, “Pharmacological reactivation of mutant p53: from protein structure to the cancer patient,” Oncogene, vol. 29, no. 30, pp. 4245–4252, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Yoda, K. Toyoshima, Y. Watanabe et al., “Arsenic trioxide augments Chk2/p53-mediated apoptosis by inhibiting oncogenic Wip1 phosphatase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 27, pp. 18969–18979, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Karakas, K. E. Bachman, and B. H. Park, “Mutation of the PIK3CA oncogene in human cancers,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 455–459, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Barretina, B. S. Taylor, S. Banerji et al., “Subtype-specific genomic alterations define new targets for soft-tissue sarcoma therapy,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 715–721, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. N. Shukla, N. Ameur, I. Yilmaz et al., “Oncogene mutation profiling of pediatric solid tumors reveals significant subsets of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma and neuroblastoma with mutated genes in growth signaling pathways,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 748–757, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. T. Ikenoue, F. Kanai, Y. Hikiba et al., “Functional analysis of PIK3CA gene mutations in human colorectal cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 4562–4567, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Cen, F. C. Hsieh, H. J. Lin, C. S. Chen, S. J. Qualman, and J. Lin, “PDK-1/AKT pathway as a novel therapeutic target in rhabdomyosarcoma cells using OSU-03012 compound,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 785–791, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Hirai, H. Sootome, Y. Nakatsuru et al., “MK-2206, an allosteric akt inhibitor, enhances antitumor efficacy by standard chemotherapeutic agents or molecular targeted drugs in vitro and in vivo,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1956–1967, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. Kojima, M. Shimanuki, M. Shikami et al., “The dual PI3 kinase/mTOR inhibitor PI-103 prevents p53 induction by Mdm2 inhibition but enhances p53-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis in p53 wild-type AML,” Leukemia, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1728–1736, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. R. Adams, K. Xu, J. C. Liu et al., “Cooperation between Pik3ca and p53 mutations in mouse mammary tumor formation,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 2706–2717, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus