Review Article
An Overview on the Photocatalytic Activity of Nano-Doped- in the Degradation of Organic Pollutants
Table 5
Comparison on the photocatalytic degradation rate of different organic pollutants between pure TiO2 and doped TiO2.
| | Dopant(s) | Light source | Organic pollutant | Initial pollutant concentration (mg/L) | Irradiation time (h) | Degradation efficiency (%) | Reference | | Doped TiO2 | Pure TiO2 |
| | Fe | Visible light | Malachite green | 5.00 | 1.00 | 78 | 63 | [49] | | Visible light | Yellow XRG dye | 100.00 | 8.00 | 37 | 18 | [50] | | Visible light | Methyl orange | 20.00 | 6.00 | 70 | 50 | [53] | | UV light | Dichloromethane | | 2.00 | 88 | 82 | [54] | | Pt | UV light | Methyl orange | 20.00 | 1.50 | 98 | 90 | [58] | | Acid green 16 | 1.20 | 1.00 | 100 | 98 | [57] | | Ce | UV light | Rhodamine B | 0.50 | 2.00 | 80 | 98 | [62] | | B | Visible light | 4-chlorophenol | 50.00 | 4.00 | 78 | 20 | [63] | | UV light | Methylene blue | 19.00 | 4.00 | 98 | 78 | [66] | | Cu | Visible light | Methylene orange | 10.00 | 0.75 | 100 | 70 | [103] | | F | UV light | Methylene blue | 8.00 | 1.00 | 92 | 30 | [79] | | N | Visible light | Methylene orange | 20.00 | 1.00 | 14 | 1 | [76] | | S | Visible light | 4 chlorophenol | 0.32 | 6.00 | 88 | 5 | [70] | | UV light | Methylene orange | 20.00 | 1.67 | 98 | 70 | [69] | | S, I | Visible light | Methylene blue | 8.00 | 4.00 | 90 | 20 | [101] | | W, N | UV light | Phenol | 60.00 | 4.00 | 93 | 83 | [98] | | Sm, N | Visible light | Salicylic acid | 50.00 | 5.00 | 65 | 3 | [96] | | Fe, C | Visible light | Acid orange 7 | 50.00 | 5.00 | 90 | 8 | [106] |
|
|
