Abstract

A model for linear and nonlinear optical properties of a composite material consisting of spheroidal metal inclusions embedded in a host medium has been formulated using an effective medium approach. Both aligned and randomly oriented spheroids have been considered, and the results obtained showed a considerable difference between the two situations. Numerical calculations for metallic Au inclusions in a glass matrix have shown that the linear absorption in the case of aligned spheroids with their symmetry axis parallel to the 𝑧-axis is largely dependent on the depolarization factor, exhibiting an absorption in the vicinity of 500 nm when the depolarization factor in the direction parallel to the rotational symmetry axis is small. This structure shifts progressively to higher wavelengths when this depolarization factor is increased. In the case of randomly oriented spheroids, contributions from the different particle depolarization factors are present and prominent structures in the linear absorption appear in the long wavelength region, beyond 700 nm. Nonlinear optical properties for both aligned and randomly oriented spheroids also show a strong dependence on the depolarization factor and significant enhancements of these properties can be observed, suggesting possible tailoring of composite properties for various applications.

1. Introduction

Nonlinear optical properties of composite optical materials consisting of metallic inclusions in a dielectric medium that exhibit large nonlinearities and fast responses are very attractive due to their great potential for various applications in the photonic and nanotechnology field [13]. As the metallic particles in many cases could be approximated by very small spheres, most of the theoretical treatments have been based on this shape assumption [46]. Sipe and Boyd [6], for example, calculated the nonlinear susceptibility of a composite comprised of spherical inclusion particles within a host material using the Maxwell Garnett model, while Agarwal and Gupta [4] adopted a 𝐓-matrix approach to the problem.

As progress in nanofabrication has made possible the production of nanoparticles of various shapes, it is highly desirable to consider the possibilities offered by the shape dependence of the nonlinear optical properties. This will effectively allow the tailoring of optical properties according to specific needs and widening the range of applications. A previous study by Wu et al. [7] examined the case of spheroidal metal particles embedded in a host medium using decoupling approximation and spectral representation. It was found that the effective nonlinear susceptibility for such composites indeed showed a strong dependence on the particle shape via the depolarization factor. For simplicity it was assumed that all spheroidal metal particles were oriented parallel to one another with the rotationally symmetric axes lying in the 𝑧-axis.

In the present work, we use rather an effective medium approach in a similar manner as in [4] and study the influence of the depolarization factor of spheroidal metal particles on the linear absorption as well as on the nonlinear optical properties. Moreover, two particle configurations are considered here. We first assume that all particles are aligned, that is, all the spheroids have the same orientation, for example, that their axis of symmetry are all parallel to the 𝑧-axis. In a second instance, we assume that the orientation of the spheroids is random: this means that the polarizations must be replaced by average polarizations, the averaging being over all possible orientations of the particles. As an illustration, numerical simulations are conducted for Au spheroidal inclusions in a glass matrix for a fill factor varying from 0.05 to 0.20 and for various values of the depolarization factor, covering the shape range of oblate and prolate spheroids. As expected, a strong dependence of the linear and nonlinear optical properties on the particle shape can be established, but we also find that there is a considerable difference between aligned and randomly oriented spheroids.

2. Effective Medium Theory

We consider the case of small inclusions in an infinite medium of dielectric constant 𝜀 and the context of quasistatic approximation when the size of the inclusions is much smaller than the wavelength of the incident light. There are various ways to establish that, if the quasistatic approximation is valid and if we assume that the inclusions are homogenously distributed, the field acting on each inclusion is given by𝐄0=𝐄+4𝜋3𝜀𝐏,(1) where 𝐄 is the macroscopic field and 𝐏 is the macroscopic polarization. Since we must have𝜀𝐏=𝑒𝜀4𝜋𝐄,(2) where 𝜀𝑒 is the effective dielectric constant of the composite medium, it results that, in the case of linear polarization,𝐄0𝜀=𝑞𝐄,𝑞=𝑒+2𝜀3𝜀.(3) If we now assume that the inclusions have a linear polarizability 𝜂(1) and nonlinear polarizabilities 𝜂𝑎(3) and 𝜂𝑏(3), we must have in first approximation that𝐏𝐿+𝐏𝑁𝐿=𝜂(1)𝑉𝐄+4𝜋3𝜀𝐏𝐿+4𝜋3𝜀𝐏𝑁𝐿+𝑞||𝑞||2𝑉𝜂𝑎(3)𝐄𝐄𝐄+𝜂𝑏(3)(𝐄𝐄)𝐄,(4) where 𝑉 is the average volume of the host material per inclusion. Thus,14𝜋𝜂(1)3𝜀𝑉𝐏𝐿=𝜂(1)𝑉𝐄,14𝜋𝜂(1)3𝜀𝑉𝐏𝑁𝐿=𝑞||𝑞||2𝑉𝜂𝑎(3)𝐄𝐄𝐄+𝜂𝑏(3)(𝐄𝐄)𝐄.(5) Since𝐏𝐿=𝑞𝜂(1)𝑉𝐄,(6) it results that14𝜋𝜂(1)3𝜀𝑉=1𝑞.(7) This leads to the Maxwell Garnett-type relation [8]11𝑞=𝜀𝑒𝜀𝜀𝑒+2𝜀=4𝜋𝜂(1)3𝜀𝑉(8) and to𝐏𝑁𝐿=𝑞2||𝑞||2𝑉𝜂𝑎(3)𝐄𝐄𝐄+𝜂𝑏(3)(𝐄𝐄)𝐄,(9) which means that the nonlinear coefficients of the effective medium will be𝐴=𝑞2||𝑞||2𝜂𝑎(3)𝑉,𝐵=2𝑞2||𝑞||2𝜂𝑏(3)𝑉.(10)

3. Aligned Spheroids

Let us now consider inclusions that are spheroids with semi-major axes 𝑎=𝑏 and 𝑐. We will first assume that all the spheroids have the same orientation, for example, that their axes of symmetry are all parallel to the 𝑧 axis. In that case𝐄𝑖=𝜀𝐈+𝑖𝜀𝜀𝐋1𝐄,(11) where 𝐈 is the identity tensor and 𝐋 is the diagonal tensor𝐿𝐋=𝑥000𝐿𝑦000𝐿𝑧,(12) with𝐿𝑧=1𝑒22𝑒3ln1+𝑒11𝑒2𝑒32𝑒152,𝑒=𝑎1𝑐2(13) for oblate spheroids and𝐿𝑧=1+𝑒2𝑒3𝑒tan1𝑒13+2𝑒152,𝑒=𝑎𝑐21(14) for prolate spheroids, while𝐿𝑥=𝐿𝑦=1𝐿𝑧2.(15) Equation (11) gives us very valuable information: the uniform polarization is𝐏𝑖=𝜀𝑖𝜀𝐄4𝜋𝑖(16) and the electric field generated by this uniform polarization is𝐄𝑖𝜀𝐄=𝑖𝜀𝜀𝐋𝐄𝑖=4𝜋𝜀𝐋𝐏𝑖.(17) This means that a constant polarization 𝐏 inside the spheroid generates a constant electric field equal to (4𝜋/𝜀)𝐋𝐏.

Let us now suppose that the medium of the spheroid has a nonlinear response characterized by parameters 𝐴𝑖 and 𝐵𝑖, that is, the field 𝐄𝑖 would induce in the bulk medium a polarization𝐏()𝑖,𝑁𝐿=𝐴𝑖𝐄𝑖𝐄𝑖𝐄𝑖+12𝐵𝑖𝐄𝑖𝐄𝑖𝐄𝑖.(18) We will then observe a total nonlinear polarization 𝐏𝑖,𝑁𝐿 and electric field 𝐄𝑖,𝑁𝐿 that must be related by𝐏𝑖,𝑁𝐿=𝐏()𝑖,𝑁𝐿+𝜀𝑖𝜀𝐄4𝜋𝑖,𝑁𝐿.(19) Since we must also have𝐄𝑖,𝑁𝐿=4𝜋𝜀𝐋𝐏𝑖,𝑁𝐿,(20) we can conclude that𝐏𝑖,𝑁𝐿=𝐏()𝑖,𝑁𝐿𝜀𝑖𝜀𝜀𝐋𝐏𝑖,𝑁𝐿,(21) that is, 𝐏𝑖,𝑁𝐿=𝜀𝐈+𝑖𝜀𝜀𝐋1𝐏()𝑖,𝑁𝐿.(22) For sake of simplicity, we will limit our considerations in this section to the special cases where 𝐄 and 𝐄 are either both pointing in the 𝑧 direction or both parallel to the 𝑥𝑦 plane. If we then define𝜀𝛼=𝜀+𝜀𝑖𝜀𝐿𝑖,(23) where 𝐿𝑖=𝐿𝑧 or 𝐿𝑖=𝐿𝑥, depending on the case, we will have𝐄𝑖=𝛼𝐄(24) so that𝐏𝑖=𝜀𝑖𝜀𝐏4𝜋𝛼𝐄,𝑖,𝑁𝐿=𝛼2|𝛼|2𝐴𝑖𝐄𝐄1𝐄+2𝐵𝑖(𝐄𝐄)𝐄.(25) This leads to the linear and nonlinear dipole moments𝑎𝐩=2𝑐3𝜀𝑖𝜀𝐩𝛼𝐄,𝑁𝐿=4𝜋𝑎2𝑐3𝛼2|𝛼|2𝐴𝑖𝐄𝐄1𝐄+2𝐵𝑖(𝐄𝐄)𝐄.(26) The linear and nonlinear polarizabilities are thus𝜂(1)=𝑎2𝑐3𝜀𝑖𝜀𝜂𝛼,𝑎(3)=4𝜋𝑎2𝑐3𝛼2|𝛼|2𝐴𝑖,𝜂𝑏(3)=2𝜋𝑎2𝑐3𝛼2|𝛼|2𝐵𝑖.(27) These values, combined with the results of Section 2, give the Maxwell Garnett-like result𝜀𝑒𝜀=𝐿𝑖𝜀𝑖+1𝐿𝑖𝜀+𝜀(2/3)𝑓𝑖𝜀𝐿𝑖𝜀𝑖+1𝐿𝑖𝜀𝜀(1/3)𝑓𝑖𝜀(28) as well as the values𝐴=𝑓(𝛼𝑞)2||||𝛼𝑞2𝐴𝑖,𝐵=𝑓(𝛼𝑞)2||||𝛼𝑞2𝐵𝑖,(29) with𝜀𝛼𝑞=𝐿𝑖𝜀𝑖+1𝐿𝑖𝜀𝜀(1/3)𝑓𝑖𝜀.(30) For spheres, these results are identical with those of Sipe and Boyd [6].

4. Enhancement of Nonlinear Properties

One would like to know how, for a given fill factor, the specific shape of inclusions influences the linear and nonlinear properties of the composite medium. For oblate spheroids, one has 0𝑒<1 and 𝐿𝑧 varies from 1/3 for a sphere (𝑒=0) to 0 when 𝑒1 and the spheroid becomes needle-like. The corresponding range for 𝐿𝑥 is from 1/3 to 1/2. For prolate spheroids, one has 𝑒0 and 𝐿𝑧 varies from 1/3 for a sphere (𝑒=0) to 1 when 𝑒 and the spheroid is almost a disk, with corresponding range for 𝐿𝑥 being from 1/3 to 0.

In order to assert how the different values of the depolarizing factor can influence the linear properties of the composite medium, we have computed the linear absorption factor 𝛼 and the ratio 𝐴/|𝐴𝑖|=𝐵/|𝐵𝑖| for gold inclusions in glass for fill-factor values 𝑓 of 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2. These latter values have been chosen because they reflected well-experimental values of gold composites and effective medium approaches were known to be widely accepted in the limit of small fill factors. Linear optical constants for Au were obtained from [9]. The results of the computations are given in Figures 1 and 2.

The results show that nonlinear optical properties can be significantly increased for oblate spheroids when the field is parallel to the rotation axis. For prolate spheroids, the increase is obtained when the field is perpendicular to the rotation axis. In both cases, however, there is also an equally significant increase in the linear absorption factor.

5. Randomly Oriented Spheroids

We will now consider the case where the orientation of the spheroids is random: this means that the polarizations must be replaced by average polarizations, with the averaging being over all possible orientations. To achieve that, we will consider two system of coordinates, one (unprimed) attached to the host medium and one (primed) attached to the spheroid, and will again assume that the axis of symmetry of the spheroid coincides with the axis 𝑂𝑧. We will use a prime to indicate the components of a vector or tensor in the primed system, so that (1) now becomes𝐄𝑖=𝜀𝐈+𝑖𝜀𝜀𝐋1𝐄,(31) where the notation 𝐋 is used for the diagonal tensor of the preceding section.

(Of course, the unit tensor has the same components in both systems, so that we do not add a prime.)

Note that if we start with the axis 𝑂𝑧 parallel to the axis 𝑂𝑧, because of the axial symmetry of the spheroid, we only need two Euler angles to give it an arbitrary orientation. Taking those angles as the polar angles of the axis 𝑂𝑧 in the unprimed system, we will have𝐄𝑖=𝐑(𝜃,𝜙)𝐄𝑖,𝐋=𝐑(𝜃,𝜙)𝐋𝐑𝑇(𝜃,𝜙),(32) where𝐑(𝜃,𝜙)=cos𝜙sin𝜙0sin𝜙cos𝜙0001cos𝜃0sin𝜃010sin𝜃0cos𝜃.(33)

6. Average Polarizabilities

In order to compute the linear and nonlinear average polarizabilities of the spheroid, we must now compute the linear and nonlinear dipole moments of the spheroid in the unprimed system of coordinates and average them over all possible orientations of the particle.

If 𝑄 is a physical quantity depending on the angles 𝜃 and , we will define its average value 𝑄 by𝑄=02𝜋𝜋0𝑄sin𝜃𝑑𝜃𝑑𝜙.(34) Note that if 𝐓 is a tensor that would be diagonal in the primed coordinate system, that is, 𝐓=𝑇𝑥000𝑇𝑦000𝑇𝑧,(35) with 𝑇𝑦=𝑇𝑥, then we can write𝐓=𝑇𝑥𝑇𝐈+𝑧𝑇𝑥𝐍,(36) where𝐍=000000001.(37) Thus,𝐓=𝑇𝑥𝑇𝐈+𝑧𝑇𝑥𝐍,(38) where𝐍=𝐑(𝜃,𝜙)𝐍𝐑𝑇(𝜃,𝜙)(39) has the property that for any vector 𝐮𝐍𝐮=(𝐧𝐮)𝐧,𝐧=(sin𝜃cos𝜙,sin𝜃sin𝜙,cos𝜃).(40) Noting that1𝐧𝐮=2𝑢1𝑖𝑢2𝑒𝑖𝜑+𝑢1+𝑖𝑢2𝑒𝑖𝜑sin𝜃+𝑢3𝑢cos𝜃,1𝑖𝑢2𝑣1+𝑖𝑣2+𝑢1+𝑖𝑢2𝑣1+𝑖𝑣2𝑢=21𝑣1+𝑢2𝑣2,(41) it is easily seen that1𝐍𝐮=31𝐮,(𝐮𝐍𝐯)𝐍𝐰=[].15(𝐮𝐯)𝐰+(𝐮𝐰)𝐯+(𝐯𝐰)𝐮(42) The linear and nonlinear polarizabilities are𝐏𝑖=𝜀𝑖𝜀4𝜋(𝛼𝐈+𝛽𝐍)𝐄,(43) where𝜀𝛼=𝜀+𝜀𝑖𝜀𝐿𝑥,𝜀𝛽=𝜀+𝜀𝑖𝜀𝐿𝑧𝜀𝜀+𝜀𝑖𝜀𝐿𝑥,𝐏𝑖,𝑁𝐿=𝐴𝑖||𝛾||||𝛿||𝐍𝐄𝐄𝐈++1(𝛾𝐈+𝛿𝐍)𝐄2𝐵𝑖[]||𝛾||||𝛿||𝐍𝐄𝐄(𝛾𝐈+𝛿𝐍)𝐄𝐈+,(44) where𝜀𝛾=𝜀+(𝜀𝑖𝜀)𝐿𝑥2,𝜀𝛿=𝜀+(𝜀𝑖𝜀)𝐿𝑧2𝜀𝜀+(𝜀𝑖𝜀)𝐿𝑥2.(45) This leads to the linear and nonlinear dipole moments𝑎𝐩=2𝑐3𝜀𝑖𝜀𝐩(𝛼𝐈+𝛽𝐍)𝐄,𝑁𝐿=4𝜋𝑎2𝑐3𝐴𝑖||𝛾||||𝛿||𝐍𝐄𝐄𝐈++1(𝛾𝐈+𝛿𝐍)𝐄2𝐵𝑖[]||𝛾||||𝛿||𝐍𝐄𝐄(𝛾𝐈+𝛿𝐍)𝐄𝐈+;(46) so that after averaging, we obtain𝜂(1)=𝑎2𝑐3𝜀𝑖𝜀𝛽𝛼+3,𝜂𝑎(3)=4𝜋𝑎2𝑐3𝛾||𝛾||+𝛾||𝛿||+||𝛾||𝛿3+||𝛿||2𝛿𝐴15𝑖+𝛿||𝛿||𝐵15𝑖,𝜂𝑏(3)=2𝜋𝑎2𝑐3𝛾||𝛾||+𝛾||𝛿||+||𝛾||𝛿3+𝛿||𝛿||𝐵15𝑖+||𝛿||2𝛿𝐴15𝑖.(47) Note again that for sphere, 𝐿𝑥=𝐿𝑦=𝐿𝑧=1/3, so that𝛼=3𝜀𝜀𝑖+2𝜀,𝛾=𝛼2,𝛽=𝛿=0.(48) Thus, in this case, our results remain identical with those of Sipe and Boyd [6].

7. Results for Randomly Oriented Spheroids

We now present results obtained similarly to those in Section 4 for aligned spheroids. Since 𝐴 is now a function of 𝐵𝑖 and 𝐵 of 𝐴𝑖, we have, for simplicity, assumed that 𝐵𝑖=𝐴𝑖. The results for randomly oriented spheroids are given in Figures 3 and 4.

Examination of the linear absorption factor for randomly oriented spheroids given in Figure 3 will reveal a drastic difference, except for the case of the spherical particles (𝐿𝑧=0.33), with the aligned spheroids (Figure 1). When 𝐿𝑧=0.25 (oblate spheroids), the random orientation of the spheroids leads to a broadening of the absorption peak with the addition of a shoulder near 530 nm. For 𝐿𝑧 at 0.5 and 0.75 (prolate spheroids), the appearance of a prominent peak at longer wavelengths can be noted. This particular peak would be attributed to the contributions from the depolarization factors 𝐿𝑥 and 𝐿𝑦 (𝐿𝑥=𝐿𝑦) that are, respectively, 0.25 and 0.125 for the two values of 𝐿𝑧 mentioned.

The nonlinear optical properties exhibit also significant enhancements (Figure 4). It is noted that when 𝐿𝑧 is equal to 0.25, the shoulder at 530 nm appears more clearly than in Figure 3.

8. Conclusion

A model for linear and nonlinear optical properties of a composite material consisting of spheroidal metal inclusions embedded in a host medium has been formulated in the present work using an effective medium approach. Both aligned and randomly oriented spheroids have been treated, showing a considerable difference between the two situations. Numerical simulations performed for Au inclusions in glass have shown that the linear absorption in the case of aligned spheroids (with symmetry axis parallel to the 𝑧-axis) is largely dependent on the depolarization factor, exhibiting an absorption in the vicinity of 500 nm when the depolarization factor 𝐿𝑧 is small (e.g., 0.25). This structure shifts progressively to higher wavelengths when 𝐿𝑧 is increased, or alternatively when 𝐿𝑥 and 𝐿𝑦 are decreased. In the case of randomly oriented spheroids, contributions from the depolarization factors 𝐿𝑥 and 𝐿𝑦 are also present and prominent structures in the linear absorption appear in the long wavelength region. Nonlinear optical properties for both aligned and randomly oriented spheroids also show a strong dependence on the depolarization factor and significant enhancements of these properties can be observed.

The model presented here can be advantageously used for predicting the behavior of metal/dielectric composites when the metallic inclusions are of the spheroidal shape. With progress in nanofabrication processes, tailoring of linear and nonlinear optical properties would be very much feasible.

In a subsequent paper, predictions of the present model will be compared to available experimental data.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), which is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also due to Professor Georges Bader of Université de Moncton who has kindly provided the authors with the optical constants for Au.