Research Article

Economic Analysis of Biomass Supply Chains: A Case Study of Four Competing Bioenergy Power Plants in Northwestern Ontario

Table 4

The number of forest cells selected in different scenarios for supplying woody biomass to four power plants.

Scenario Cells for ABFF (no.) Cells for ABTB (no.) Cells for DDPP (no.) Cells for AGS (no.) Total cells for 4 plants (no.)
FHRUWFHRUWFHRUWFHRUWFHRUWTotal

BASE32041320397210043507404110726311790299114781
INTC31271338361210933213473103428310986318714173
INPC3239131241529503695355114224912228286615094
DEPC31781327377510563349442105527611357310114458
INBA3138113938168603388316113519711477251213989
IHR W13138113938168603388316113519711477251213989
IHR W2309098136807483285242114315111198212213320
IHFR3164115538158533334279112019311433248013913
DEDP3133112038088443373307113819011452246113913
DEBA32571555415711623655513109732812166355815724
DHR W32571555415711623655513109732812166355815724
DHFR32191501414211523729536108632512176351415690
IHOR67266197372818491850018500
INDP32541531413211483642502109832012126350115627

ABFF: Abitibi-Bowater Fort Frances Power Plant, ABTB: Abitibi-Bowater Thunder Bay Power Plant, DDPP: Domtar Dryden Power Plant, AGS: Atikokan Generating Station, FHR: forest harvest residue, UW: underutilized wood.