International Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 247352, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/247352
Review Article

170 Years of “Lock-and-Key”: Genital Morphology and Reproductive Isolation

Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, 730 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, OK 73019, USA

Received 19 July 2011; Accepted 6 September 2011

Academic Editor: Artyom Kopp

Copyright © 2012 John P. Masly. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Dufour, “Anatomie générale des diptères,” Annales des Sciences Naturelles, vol. 1, pp. 244–264, 1844. View at Google Scholar
  2. W. G. Eberhard, Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1985.
  3. W. G. Eberhard, “Species isolation, genital mechanics, and the evolution of species-specific genitalia in three species of Macrodactylus beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabeidae, Melolonthinae),” Evolution, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1774–1783, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. A. Coyne and H. A. Orr, Speciation, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass, USA, 2004.
  5. J. De Wilde, “Reproduction,” in Physiology of Insecta, M. Rockstein, Ed., pp. 9–58, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  6. D. J. Hosken and P. Stockley, “Sexual selection and genital evolution,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 87–93, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Arnqvist and L. Rowe, Sexual Conflict, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2005.
  8. W. G. Eberhard, “Evolution of genitalia: theories, evidence, and new directions,” Genetica, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. M. Shapiro and A. H. Porter, “The lock-and-key hypothesis: evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 34, pp. 231–245, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Pérez, “De l'organe copulateur mâle des Hyménoptères et de sa valeur taxonomique,” Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, vol. 64, pp. 74–81, 1894. View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Jordan, “On mechanical selection and other problems,” Novitates Zoologicae, vol. 3, pp. 426–525, 1896. View at Google Scholar
  12. H. Boulangé, “Recherches sur l'appareil copulatur des Hymenoptères et spécialement des Chalastrogastres,” Mémoires et Travaux de la Faculté Catholique de Lille, vol. 28, pp. 1–444, 1924. View at Google Scholar
  13. O. W. Richards, “The specific characters of the British humblebees (Hymenoptera),” Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, vol. 75, pp. 233–265, 1927. View at Google Scholar
  14. G. C. Robson and O. W. Richards, The Variation of Animals in Nature, Longmans, Green and Co., London, UK, 1936.
  15. M. R. Standfuss, Handbuch der paläarktischen Gross-Schmeterling für Forscher und Sammler, Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena, Germany, 1896.
  16. H. Federley, “Die bedeutung der kreuzung für die evolution,” Jenische Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft, vol. 67, pp. 364–386, 1932. View at Google Scholar
  17. R. X. Schick, “The crab spiders of California (Araneida, Thomisidae),” Bulletin of the American Museum of Natual History, vol. 129, pp. 1–180, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  18. T. Sota and K. Kubota, “Genital lock-and-key as a selective agent against hybridization,” Evolution, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1507–1513, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Ishikawa, “Notes on the basic problems in the taxonomy and the phylogeny of the subtribe Carabina (Coleoptera, Carabinidae),” Bulletin of the Natural Science Museum of Tokyo, vol. 16, pp. 191–205, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  20. Y. Takami, N. Nagata, M. Sasabe, and T. Sota, “Asymmetry in reproductive isolation and its effect on directional mitochondrial introgression in the parapatric ground beetles Carabus yamato and C. albrechti,” Population Ecology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 337–346, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. Tanabe and T. Sota, “Complex copulatory behavior and the proximate effect of genital and body size differences on mechanical reproductive isolation in the millipede genus Parafontaria,” American Naturalist, vol. 171, no. 5, pp. 692–699, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Lachaise, M. Harry, M. Solignac, F. Lemeunier, V. Benassi, and M. L. Cariou, “Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from Saõ Tomé,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 267, no. 1452, pp. 1487–1495, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Llopart, D. Lachaise, and J. A. Coyne, “An anomalous hybrid zone in Drosophila,” Evolution, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 2602–2607, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Kamimura and H. Mitsumoto, “Lock-and-key structural isolation between sibling Drosophila species,” Entomological Science. In Press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. M. Polak and A. Rashed, “Microscale laser surgery reveals adaptive function of male intromittent genitalia,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 277, no. 1686, pp. 1371–1376, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Z. Lorkovic, “L'accouplement artificiel chez les Lepidoptères et son application dans les recherches sur la fonction de l'appareil génital des insectes,” Physiologia Comparata et Oecologia, vol. 3, pp. 313–320, 1953. View at Google Scholar
  27. Z. Lorkovic, “Some peculiarities of spatially and sexually restricted gene exchange in the Erebia tyndarus group,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, vol. 23, pp. 319–325, 1958. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. W. G. Eberhard, “Courtship before and during copulation by three species of Macrodactylus (Coleoptera, Scarabeidae, Melolonthinae),” Ethology, Ecology and Evolution, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19–63, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  29. M. A. McPeek, L. Shen, and H. Farid, “The correlated evolution of three-dimensional reproductive structures between male and female damselflies,” Evolution, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 73–83, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H. M. Robertson and H. E. H. Paterson, “Mate recognition and mechanical isolation in Enallagma damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae),” Evolution, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 243–250, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  31. E. Loibl, “Zur ethologie und biologie der deutschen lestiden (Odonata),” Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, vol. 15, pp. 54–81, 1958. View at Google Scholar
  32. F. Krieger and E. Krieger-Loibl, “Beitrage zum verhalten von Ischnura elegans und Ischnura pumilio (Odonata),” Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, vol. 15, pp. 82–93, 1958. View at Google Scholar
  33. D. R. Paulson, “Reproductive isolation in damselflies,” Systematic Zoology, vol. 23, pp. 40–49, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  34. H. M. Robertson, “Mating assymettries and phylogeny in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex,” Pacific Science, vol. 42, no. 1-2, pp. 72–80, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  35. M. Ashburner, K. G. Golic, and R. S. Hawley, Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2005.
  36. J. A. Coyne, “Genetic basis of differences in genital morphology among three sibling species of Drosophila,” Evolution, vol. 37, pp. 1101–1118, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  37. J. A. Coyne, “The genetics of an isolating mechanism between two sibling species of Drosophila,” Evolution, vol. 47, pp. 778–788, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  38. S. Jagadeeshan and R. S. Singh, “A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1058–1070, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Y. Kamimura and H. Mitsumoto, “Comparative copulation anatomy of the Drosophila melanogaster species complex (Diptera: Drosophilidae),” Entomological Science, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 399–410, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. C. S. C. Price, C. H. Kim, C. J. Gronlund, and J. A. Coyne, “Cryptic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans species complex,” Evolution, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 81–92, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. Cobb, B. Burnet, and K. Connolly, “Sexual isolation and courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans, D. mauritiana, and their interspecific hybrids,” Behavior Genetics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 211–225, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. H. M. Robertson, “Mating behavior and the evolution of Drosophila mauritiana,” Evolution, vol. 37, pp. 1283–1293, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  43. J. T. Patterson, “A new type of isolating mechanism in Drosophila,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 32, pp. 202–208, 1946. View at Google Scholar
  44. J. T. Patterson and W. S. Stone, Evolution in the Genus Drosophila, The Macmillan Company, New York, NY, USA, 1952.
  45. M. Sasabe, Y. Takami, and T. Sota, “The genetic basis of interspecific differences in genital morphology of closely related carabid beetles,” Heredity, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 385–391, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Sasabe, Y. Takami, and T. Sota, “QTL for the species-specific male and female genital morphologies in Ohomopterus ground beetles,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 19, no. 23, pp. 5231–5239, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. H. Sturtevant, “Genetic studies on Drosophila simulans: I. Introduction: hybrids with Drosophila melanogaster,” Genetics, vol. 5, pp. 488–500, 1920. View at Google Scholar
  48. F. Lemeunier, J. R. David, L. Tsacas, and M. Ashburner, “The melanogaster species group,” in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson, and J. R. Thompson, Eds., pp. 147–256, Academic Press, London, UK, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  49. D. Lachaise, J. R. David, F. Lemeunier, L. Tsacas, and M. Ashburner, “The reproductive relationships of Drosophila sechellia with D. mauritiana, D. simulans and D. melanogaster from the afrotropical region,” Evolution, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 262–271, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. Z. B. Zeng, J. Liu, L. F. Stam, C. H. Kao, J. M. Mercer, and C. C. Laurie, “Genetic architecture of a morphological shape difference between two Drosophila species,” Genetics, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 299–310, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S. J. Macdonald and D. B. Goldstein, “A quantitative genetic analysis of male sexual traits distinguishing the sibling species Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia,” Genetics, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 1683–1699, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. J. P. Masly, J. E. Dalton, S. Srivastava, L. Chen, and M. N. Arbeitman, “The genetic basis of rapidly evolving male genital morphology in Drosophila,” Genetics, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 357–374, 2011. View at Google Scholar