Research Article

Use of Charge Transfer Complexation Reactions for the Spectrophotometric Determination of Sumatriptan in Pharmaceuticals

Table 1

Comparison of the proposed and the existing visible spectrophotometric methods.

Sl. no.Reagent/s , nmBeer’s law range, g mL−1
( in l mol−1 cm−1)
Remarks Reference

Bromate-bromide-
1 (a) methyl orange,5080.2–1.6
(1.90 × 105)
Multistep reaction, time consuming[28]
(b) indigo carmine6102.0–12.0
(2.71 × 104)

2Folin-Ciocalteu reagent7602.0–6.0
Multi step reaction [22]

3 (a) Quinone5485.0–25.0
(1.00 × 104)
Involves heating step, time consuming [29]
(b) acetaldehyde with p-chloranil66020.0–60.0
(3.19 × 104)

4Sodium nitroprusside acetaldehyde5524.0–20.0
(1.10 × 104)
Requires rigid pH control [30]

5 (a) Brucine-sodium metaperiodate,5204.0–20.0
Multi step reaction [31]
(b) citric acid-acetic anhydride5808.0–24.0

6Folin reagent455.616.0–48.0
(3.85 × 103)
Strict pH control, time consuming[32]

7Cobalt thiocyanate629.416.0–48.0
(3.97 × 103)
Involves extraction step[33]

8Tropaeolin-OOO482.52.0–10.0
(2.08 × 104)
Requires rigid pH control; involves liquid-liquid extraction[34]

9p-Chloranilic acid5209.28 × 102[37]

10 (a) 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone, 585 4.0–56.0  
(4.77 × )
Single step reaction, no heating or extraction step, or use of single reagentPresent methods
(b) iodine 375 2.0–28.0  
(9.56 × )