Research Article
A Comparative Study on Performance of Analysis Nudging and 3DVAR in Simulation of a Heavy Rainfall Event Using WRF Modeling System
Table 3
Comparison between station-wise observed and model simulated rainfall (cm) for day-1 valid at 0300 UTC of 26 June 2005.
| | Stations | Lat (deg N) | Lon (deg E) | Day 1 | | OBS | CNTL | NUD | 3DV |
| | Gandevi | 20.8 | 72.9 | 37 | 9 | 11 | 15 | | Valsad | 20.7 | 72.9 | 30 | 9 | 10 | 15 | | Pardi | 20.5 | 72.9 | 21 | 10 | 11 | 15 | | Chikhli | 21.5 | 73.9 | 20 | 4 | 8 | 12 | | Bansda | 20.7 | 73.3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 8 | | Kamrej | 21.3 | 72.9 | 16 | 7 | 10 | 15 | | Silvassa | 20.3 | 73.0 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 13 | | Surat | 21.2 | 72.8 | 17 | 9 | 9 | 15 | | Dhandhuka | 22.3 | 71.9 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 3 | | Mangrol | 21.1 | 70.1 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 11 | | Palsana | 21.1 | 73.0 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 15 | | Bardoli | 21.1 | 73.1 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 15 | | Valod | 21.1 | 73.2 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 12 | | Vapi | 20.4 | 72.9 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 10 | | Daman | 20.4 | 72.8 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 9 | | Rajpipla | 21.7 | 73.5 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 |
|
|
