Research Article

Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate and Cultivar Interaction Effects on Nitrogen Recovery, Utilization Efficiency, and Agronomic Performance of Spring Barley

Table 4

Nitrogen use efficiency traits of three spring barley cultivars grown under three rates of N fertilizer (0, 50, and 100 kg ha−1) at Lacombe, Alberta, Canada, during 1994 to 1996.

Variable CultivarN rateNUE(kg  kg−1 N)ANUE (kg  kg−1N)UtE (kg  kg−1N)BPE (kg  kg−1N)HI (%)Grain N content (%)

Manley046.7a45.1a85.2a54.3a1.69c
5032.5b22.838.7a75.9ab53.2ab1.95b
10021.8c6.630.1b60.7b50.8b2.31a

Noble046.9a46.9a81.5a58.61.71c
5032.6 b23.039.0a68.6a58.11.99b
10025.5c17.234.9b61.5b58.52.15a

Tukwa045.8a47.9a85.5a56.8b1.67c
5033.2 b29.741.1ab71.1ab59.3ab1.86b
10025.5 c21.238.0b64.1b60.9a2.03a

Mean046.5a46.6a84.1a56.61.69c
5032.8b25.239.6b71.9b56.71.93b
10024.1c15.034.3c62.1c56.92.16a

NUE, nitrogen use efficiency, grain yield per unit of available N (soil N + applied); ANUE, applied nitrogen use efficiency, increase in grain yield over unfertilized control per unit of applied N; UTE, nitrogen utilization efficiency, final grain yield per unit of N uptake; BPE, biomass production efficiency, biomass yield per unit of N taken up; and HI, harvest index, the ratio of grain yield to biomass at harvest maturity.
Means of different N rates within cultivar or overall mean followed by different letters are significantly different at 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 .