Research Article

Evaluating a Taxonomy for Mobility Requirements by a Controlled Experiment

Table 3

Quality analysis of requirements found by the two group participants.

VariableTreatment groupControl group Diff Effect size Sign.?
MeanSt.dev.MeanSt.dev.

QM?1.980.731.970.740.010.01No
 RM?2.350.822.150.980.200.20No
 CM?1.830.991.980.96−0.15−0.16No
 TM?1.750.801.770.82−0.02−0.03No
QX?1.080.751.190.72−0.11−0.15No
 RX?0.880.960.820.950.060.06No
 CX?1.291.031.340.94−0.05−0,05No
 TX?1.080.901.420.86−0.34−0.39No
QO?1.170.771.430.79−0.26−0.32No
 RO?0.370.580.741.00−0.37−0.37No
 CO?1.511.291.801.05−0.29−0,28No
 TO?1.631.161.741.08−0.10−0.10No
QA?1.560.851.590.82−0.03−0.04No
 RA?1.521.19.1.351.190.170.14No
 CA?1.621.091.761.01−0.14−0.14No
 TA?1.550.951.670.93−0.12−0.1No