International Scholarly Research Notices

Research Article

Visible and Infrared Face Identification via Sparse Representation

Table 1

Main results. (a) Identification rates on the extended Yale B database. (b) Identification rates for each random space on the FERET database and a comparison between different normalization and fusion techniques (best score per column in bold). (c) Identification rates on the Notre-Dame database obtained by score fusion of visible and infrared modalities (best score per column in bold).

(a)


Extended Yale B database

Number of images	8	16	32
Identification rate %	88.39	95.74	98.04

(b)


FERET database
Random subspace dimension			50	100	150
Identification rate %			67.43	73.28	74.69

	MM	DeSc	ZS	MAD	Tanh

PROD	68.95	77.92	77.92	77.92	78.12
SUM	78.02	73.18	78.12	78.12	78.12
MAX	77.21	67.64	0.10	0.10	75.30
MIN	68.95	73.48	74.19	74.29	74.19
	78.32	64.51	78.22	78.22	78.22
	76.00	13.91	74.79	74.39	74.79
	78.42	73.08	78.42	78.42	78.42

(c)


Notre-Dame database
	MM	DeSc	ZS	MAD	Tanh

PROD	83.12	83.12	83.12	83.12	83.12
SUM	92.32	78.52	93.17	93.18	87.41
MAX	89.86	75.40	84.99	83.99	87.41
MIN	83.12	87.41	92.82	91.99	75.47
	85.86	11.19	91.80	91.15	57.77
	92.83	73.50	93.02	92.11	87.41
	93.47	51.71	94.06	93.88	87.99