Comparison of Octopus Semi-Automated Kinetic Perimetry and Humphrey Peripheral Static Perimetry in Neuro-Ophthalmic Cases

<table class="table-group" id="tab2"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left">Type of pathology</td><td align="left">Type of visual field impairment</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left" rowspan="4">Posterior visual pathway (stroke, pituitary adenoma, arteriovenous malformation, and tumour metastases)</td><td align="left">Homonymous hemianopia</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Homonymous quadrantanopia</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Bitemporal hemianopia</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Bitemporal quadrantanopia</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left" rowspan="2">Anterior visual pathway (papilloedema, optic neuritis, and idiopathic intracranial hypertension)</td><td align="left">Enlarged blind spot</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Constriction</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left" rowspan="2">Functional—no pathology detected on investigation</td><td align="left">Constriction</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Spurious loss—nonspecific</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">Normal—no pathology detected on investigation</td><td align="left">No visual field loss</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="2"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

International Scholarly Research Notices

tab2

Table 2

Table 2: Comparison of Octopus Semi-Automated Kinetic Perimetry and Humphrey Peripheral Static Perimetry in Neuro-Ophthalmic Cases 