Review Article

The Intrauterine Device in Women with Diabetes Mellitus Type I and II: A Systematic Review

Table 1

Pregnancy rates in diabetic women using the IUD.

StudySubjects Type of IUDType of diabetes (DM1or DM2) (IDDM or NIDDM)Pregnancy rate at 1 yearFinal pregnancy rate (end of study)Comments

Wiese [5]118Antigon I, II, III, IV, FIDDM
(24 months)
High removal and expulsion rate, similar in normal subjects
Buchsenschutz [24] and Serfaty [25]56CuT200, Cu-7, MLCu250IDDM and NIDDM01.7% 
(36 months)
Noncumulative pregnancy rate, salpingitis 3.6% and expulsion 10.1%
Gosden et al. [7]30Cu-7, Saf-T-Coil, Dalkon ShieldIDDM46%46% 
(12 months)
Abnormal chloride and sulphur deposits on the copper devices
Skouby et al. [26]103CuT200IDDM
(12 months)
Corrosion surfaces of copper-no differences between diabetic and non-diabetic controls
Kimmerle et al. [27]59Cu-Safe300 (Flexi-T300)DM1
(36 months)
Same rate as controls, 78% nulliparous, average HbA1c 7%
Kimmerle et al. [28]127Copper IUDs-not specifiedDM1Not available
(60 months)
Retrospective study, 70% nulliparous, average HbA1c %, controlled
Kjos et al. [29]117TCu380ADM20.9
(36 months)
100% multiparous, open study

IDDM: insulin dependent diabetes mellitus; NIDDM: non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus; DM1: diabetes mellitus type I; DM2: diabetes mellitus type II; life table data; Pearl Index; HbA1c: glycosylated haemoglobin.