Econometric Analysis of Landscape Preferences in Canterbury, New Zealand
Table 6
Visual assessment study with shelterbelt types.
Variable
Unit
Rural
Urban
Estimate
Std. err.
Estimate
Std. err.
Poplar shelterbelt
Dummy
1.11***
(0.089)
1.08***
(0.061)
Gum shelterbelt
Dummy
1.26***
(0.089)
1.14***
(0.061)
Gorse shelterbelt
Dummy
−0.53***
(0.10)
−0.35***
(0.065)
Pine shelterbelt
Dummy
0.35***
(0.066)
0.27***
(0.045)
macrocarpa shelterbelt
Dummy
0.88***
(0.089)
0.69***
(0.061)
Pittosporum shelterbelt
Dummy
0.71***
(0.089)
0.42***
(0.061)
Flax shelterbelt
Dummy
0.62***
(0.089)
0.64***
(0.061)
Mixed native shelterbelt
Dummy
1.21***
(0.075)
1.07***
(0.051)
Number of groups
244
494
Obs. per group
38
38
Notes: maximum likelihood model estimated using cross-classified random effects. Standard errors reported in parentheses. ***Significant at the 1% level; **significant at the 5% level; *significant at the 10% level.
