Research Article

Relational Coordination and Organisational Social Capital Association with Characteristics of General Practice

Table 5

Associations of practice characteristics with ratings for each general practice on relational coordination and organisational social capital, respectively.

Relational coordinationOrganisational social capital
CrudeAdjustedACrudeAdjustedA
DifferenceDifference 95% CI DifferenceDifference 95% CI

Regions
 Capital region of Denmark
 Central Denmark region−0.05 0.0 −0.07; 0.07 −1.80 −1.01 −2.93; 0.91
 North Denmark region −0.03 −0.01 −0.11; 0.08 −1.75 −1.45 −4.1; 1.2
 Region Zealand−0.02 0.02 −0.06; 0.1 0.47 1.58 −0.66; 3.82
 Region of Southern Denmark−0.09*−0.03 −0.1; 0.05 −0.611.2 −0.81; 3.82
Practice type************
 Single-handed
 Cooperative−0.15***−0.15*** −0.22; −0.08 −3.83***−4.23*** −6.29; −2.18
 Partnership−0.12***−0.12*** −0.18; −0.06 −3.52***−3.59*** −5.22; −1.97
PT-physician ratioB
 Low
 Medium−0.1 0.01 −0.06; 0.09 0.96 1.98 −0.07; 4.04
 High−0.04 −0.09 −0.19; 0.01 1.99 1.43 −1.31; 4.18
PT-employee ratioB******
 Low
 Medium−0.02 0.00 −0.07; 0.08 −0.47−0.4 −2.12; 2.05
 High0.13 0.14** 0.04; 0.24 2.96*1.87 −0.90; 4.64

,   ,   .
AA fully adjusted model including all variables listed in the table.
BThe study population is split into three intervals: 0–15% = low; 16–85% = medium; and 86–100% = high.