Relational Coordination and Organisational Social Capital Association with Characteristics of General Practice
Table 5
Associations of practice characteristics with ratings for each general practice on relational coordination and organisational social capital, respectively.
Relational coordination
Organisational social capital
Crude
AdjustedA
Crude
AdjustedA
Difference
Difference 95% CI
Difference
Difference 95% CI
Regions
Capital region of Denmark
—
—
—
—
Central Denmark region
−0.05
0.0 −0.07; 0.07
−1.80
−1.01 −2.93; 0.91
North Denmark region
−0.03
−0.01 −0.11; 0.08
−1.75
−1.45 −4.1; 1.2
Region Zealand
−0.02
0.02 −0.06; 0.1
0.47
1.58 −0.66; 3.82
Region of Southern Denmark
−0.09*
−0.03 −0.1; 0.05
−0.61
1.2 −0.81; 3.82
Practice type
***
***
***
***
Single-handed
—
—
—
Cooperative
−0.15***
−0.15***−0.22; −0.08
−3.83***
−4.23***−6.29; −2.18
Partnership
−0.12***
−0.12***−0.18; −0.06
−3.52***
−3.59***−5.22; −1.97
PT-physician ratioB
Low
—
—
—
—
Medium
−0.1
0.01 −0.06; 0.09
0.96
1.98 −0.07; 4.04
High
−0.04
−0.09 −0.19; 0.01
1.99
1.43 −1.31; 4.18
PT-employee ratioB
***
***
Low
—
—
—
—
Medium
−0.02
0.00 −0.07; 0.08
−0.47
−0.4 −2.12; 2.05
High
0.13
0.14**0.04; 0.24
2.96*
1.87 −0.90; 4.64
, , .
AA fully adjusted model including all variables listed in the table.
BThe study population is split into three intervals: 0–15% = low; 16–85% = medium; and 86–100% = high.