Computational Techniques for Autonomous Microgrid Load Flow Analysis

<table class="table-group" id="tab3"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="9"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left" rowspan="2">Losses</td><td align="center" colspan="2">
                Basic backward forward sweep method: distribution system with <br/>no DG</td><td align="center" colspan="2">
                Newton Raphson method applied to 33-bus autonomous microgrid</td><td align="center" colspan="2">
                Distributed slack bus based  method applied to 33-bus autonomous<br/>microgrid</td><td align="center" colspan="2">
                Modified backward forward sweep method applied to 33-bus autonomous <br/>microgrid</td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="center">Summer demand</td><td align="center">Winter demand</td><td align="center">Summer demand</td><td align="center">Winter demand</td><td align="center">Summer demand</td><td align="center">Winter demand</td><td align="center">Summer demand</td><td align="center">Winter demand</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="9"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">Real power losses in kW</td><td align="center">202.68</td><td align="center">301.45</td><td align="center">23.52</td><td align="center">45.1</td><td align="center">27.62</td><td align="center">52.27</td><td align="center">27.54</td><td align="center">51.14</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Reactive power losses in kVAr</td><td align="center">135.14</td><td align="center">201.1</td><td align="center">18.21</td><td align="center">36.3</td><td align="center">21.57</td><td align="center">42.55</td><td align="center">21.5</td><td align="center">41.54</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="9"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

Comparison of real and reactive power losses in the 33-bus microgrid.

International Scholarly Research Notices

tab3

Table 3

Table 3: Computational Techniques for Autonomous Microgrid Load Flow Analysis 