Comparative Study of M5 Model Tree and Artificial Neural Network in Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration Using MODIS Products

<div>Scatter plot of estimated <svg height="12.5481pt" id="M232" style="vertical-align:-3.42776pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.12034 23.5881 12.5481" width="23.5881pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,0,0)"><path d="M517 162C503 123 484 88 467 68C445 42 417 34 341 34C291 34 256 34 237 47C219 59 213 81 213 128V317H308C395 317 402 311 415 240H444V431H415C403 364 398 356 307 356H213V584C213 613 215 616 246 616H322C394 616 421 609 435 587C448 566 458 544 467 502L496 506C493 557 488 625 488 650H42V622C120 616 128 612 128 523V125C128 43 120 35 29 28V0H511C520 31 540 125 546 158L517 162Z" id="g190-70"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="568" vert-adv-y="568"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,7.641,0)"><path d="M592 498C586 556 582 629 581 675H560C545 656 537 650 510 650H115C87 650 74 652 60 675H40C38 620 33 555 28 495H57C69 539 77 568 89 585C102 607 122 616 205 616H267V123C267 44 259 34 168 28V0H454V28C360 34 352 44 352 123V616H422C498 616 514 608 531 584C542 568 552 543 562 495L592 498Z" id="g190-85"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="617" vert-adv-y="617"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,16.06,3.264)"><path d="M750 359C750 550 603 667 427 667C199 667 24 499 24 287C24 100 166 -17 344 -17C573 -17 750 136 750 359ZM645 356C645 196 538 24 350 24C205 24 127 136 127 285C127 471 247 626 422 626C571 626 645 521 645 356Z" id="g50-80"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="774" vert-adv-y="774"></glyph.data></g></svg> using ANN and M5 model tree against calculated <svg height="12.5481pt" id="M233" style="vertical-align:-3.42776pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.12034 23.5881 12.5481" width="23.5881pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,0,0)"><path d="M517 162C503 123 484 88 467 68C445 42 417 34 341 34C291 34 256 34 237 47C219 59 213 81 213 128V317H308C395 317 402 311 415 240H444V431H415C403 364 398 356 307 356H213V584C213 613 215 616 246 616H322C394 616 421 609 435 587C448 566 458 544 467 502L496 506C493 557 488 625 488 650H42V622C120 616 128 612 128 523V125C128 43 120 35 29 28V0H511C520 31 540 125 546 158L517 162Z" id="g190-70"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="568" vert-adv-y="568"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,7.641,0)"><path d="M592 498C586 556 582 629 581 675H560C545 656 537 650 510 650H115C87 650 74 652 60 675H40C38 620 33 555 28 495H57C69 539 77 568 89 585C102 607 122 616 205 616H267V123C267 44 259 34 168 28V0H454V28C360 34 352 44 352 123V616H422C498 616 514 608 531 584C542 568 552 543 562 495L592 498Z" id="g190-85"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="617" vert-adv-y="617"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0095,0,0,-0.0095,16.06,3.264)"><path d="M750 359C750 550 603 667 427 667C199 667 24 499 24 287C24 100 166 -17 344 -17C573 -17 750 136 750 359ZM645 356C645 196 538 24 350 24C205 24 127 136 127 285C127 471 247 626 422 626C571 626 645 521 645 356Z" id="g50-80"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="774" vert-adv-y="774"></glyph.data></g></svg> by FAO-PM method, (a) ANN method, and (b) M5 method.</div>

Journal of Climatology

fig7

Figure 7

Figure 7: Comparative Study of M5 Model Tree and Artificial Neural Network in Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration Using MODIS Products 