Clinical Study
Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Anorganic Bovine Bone (Bio-Oss) and Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite (Ostim) in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation
Table 1
Results of histomorphometric and radiographic findings by Bio-Oss and Ostim biomaterials.
| |
Patient number | Histomorphometric findings | Radiological findings |
Percentage of residual
materials |
Percentage of new
bone |
Percentage of
connective tissue |
New bone density
(hounsfield units) |
Augmentation height
(mm) | | Bio-Oss | Ostim | Bio-Oss | Ostim | Bio-Oss | Ostim | Bio-Oss | Ostim | Bio-Oss | Ostim |
| | 1 | 14.70 | 15.90 | 22.10 | 24.20 | 63.20 | 59.90 | 301.00 | 290.00 | 7.10 | 7.90 | | 2 | 25.00 | 28.10 | 20.23 | 32.70 | 54.77 | 39.20 | 285.00 | 322.00 | 7.10 | 10.20 | | 3 | 41.05 | 27.30 | 12.75 | 21.20 | 46.20 | 51.50 | 295.00 | 334.00 | 8.30 | 7.90 | | 4 | 36.50 | 23.30 | 12.30 | 18.20 | 51.20 | 58.50 | 229.00 | 254.00 | 7.30 | 7.60 | | 5 | 39.90 | 20.80 | 26.10 | 25.30 | 34.00 | 53.90 | 299.00 | 339.00 | 7.50 | 8.20 | | 6 | 28.40 | 16.90 | 13.16 | 21.30 | 58.44 | 61.80 | 313.00 | 292.00 | 7.20 | 6.90 | | 7 | 33.13 | 21.70 | 26.83 | 34.20 | 40.04 | 44.10 | 261.00 | 317.00 | 7.40 | 8.30 | | 8 | 28.90 | 19.20 | 21.90 | 33.50 | 49.20 | 47.30 | 279.00 | 286.00 | 7.60 | 7.90 | | 9 | 33.40 | 18.10 | 27.63 | 28.10 | 38.97 | 53.80 | 294.00 | 320.00 | 8.30 | 7.60 | | Median | 33.13 | 20.80 | 21.9 | 25.3 | 49.2 | 53.8 | 294 | 317 | 7.4 | 7.9 | | Median of differences (IQR) | −11.50 (−14.52–−11.50) | 7.37 (1.28–10.02) | 4.06 (−2.60–11.06) | 26.00 (−2.00–39.50) | 0.30 (−0.35–0.85) | | value | 0.021 | 0.015 | 0.173 | 0.038 | 0.191 |
|
|
