Research Article

Caregiver Preferences regarding Technology’s Role in Supporting Adolescent Weight Management

Table 4

(a) Unadjusted models of association between caregiver perception of child’s weight, covariates, and importance of components caregivers rated to be included in a technology-based weight management program. (b) Adjusted models of association between caregiver perception of child’s weight, covariates, and importance of components caregivers rated to be included in a technology-based weight management program.
(a)

Healthy recipesExercise ideasEncouragement phrasesHealthy images (photos of fruit, exercising)Electronic methods to track progressRewards (i.e., electronic badges/ stickers)Communication with others in the programDevice to measure physical activity

Caregiver perception: believes child’s weight is a problem
 No1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)
 Yes1.40 (0.61, 3.23)4.33 (1.35, 13.9)3.06 (1.26, 7.46)2.20 (1.08, 4.49)4.06 (1.75, 9.37)1.92 (0.95, 3.89)2.78 (1.37, 5.70)3.31 (1.42, 7.74)
Child’s age (years)
 11–151.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)
 16–180.65 (0.26, 1.65)0.51 (0.18, 1.43)0.61 (0.25, 1.51)0.53 (0.24, 1.18)0.66 (0.24, 1.31)0.29 (0.13, 0.66)0.47 (0.21, 1.06)0.60 (0.25, 1.43)
Gender
 Female1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)
 Male1.04 (0.46, 2.36)1.15 (0.45, 2.95)0.44 (0.19, 1.00)0.84 (0.42, 1.67)0.97 (0.46, 2.05)0.89 (0.45, 1.76)0.84 (0.42, 1.65)(0.58, 2.74)

All values are unadjusted odds ratios.
(b)

Healthy recipesExercise ideasEncouragement phrasesHealthy images (photos of fruit, exercising)Electronic methods to track progressRewards (i.e., electronic badges/ stickers)Communication with others in the programDevice to measure physical activity

Caregiver perception: believes child’s weight is a problem
 No1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)
 Yes1.35 (0.58, 3.13)4.15
2.97
2.14
3.91
1.79 (0.87, 3.65)2.64
3.19
Child’s age (years)
 11–151.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)1.0 (ref)
 16–180.68 (0.27, 1.72)0.58 (0.20, 1.67)0.68 (0.27, 1.71)0.56 (0.25, 1.26)0.64 (0.27, 1.55)0.31
0.53 (0.23, 1.19)0.68 (0.28, 1.67)

value0.020.0020.0080.008

Caregiver’s ratings of importance of intervention components were recorded in 4-level ordered Likert scale. Cumulative logistic regression models for ordered outcomes were fitted. Proportional odds assumption was checked for each model and none of them violated the assumption.
value = 0.01.
value = 0.005.