Table of Contents
Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Volume 2017, Article ID 9462457, 11 pages
Research Article

Natural Language Processing and Fuzzy Tools for Business Processes in a Geolocation Context

1CHArt Laboratory EA 4004, Paris 8 University, Saint-Denis, France
2Deveryware, Paris, France

Correspondence should be addressed to Isis Truck; rf.8sirap-vinu@kcurt.sisi

Received 11 December 2016; Accepted 23 March 2017; Published 24 May 2017

Academic Editor: António Dourado Pereira Correia

Copyright © 2017 Isis Truck and Mohammed-Amine Abchir. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Truck and M.-A. Abchir, “Towards a classification of hesitant operators in the 2-tuple linguistic model,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 560–578, 2014, special issue on “Hesitant Fuzzy Sets: An Emerging Tool in Decision Making”. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and L. Martínez, “A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 354–370, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Chomsky, Knowledge of Language, Its Nature, Origin, and Use, Praeger, New York, NY, USA, 1986.
  4. R. Kuhn and R. D. Mori, “A cache-based natural language model for speech recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 570–583, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Winograd, “Procedures as a representation for data in a computer program for understanding natural language,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–191, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Weizenbaum, “ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. K. Joshi, “Factoring recursion and dependencies: an aspect of tree adjoining grammars (Tag) and a comparison of some formal properties of Tags, GPSGs, Plgs, and LFGS,” in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL ’83), pp. 7–15, ACL, Stroudsburg, Pa, USA, 1983. View at Scopus
  8. Z. S. Harris, A Theory of Language And Information: A Mathematical Approach, Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1991.
  9. N. Chomsky, Questions de sémantique, Edition du Seuil, 1975, translated by B. Cerquiglini.
  10. A.-M. Popescu, O. Etzioni, and H. Kautz, “Towards a theory of natural language interfaces to databases,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 149–157, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2003. View at Scopus
  11. J. Berant, A. Chou, R. Frostig, and P. Liang, “Semantic parsing on freebase from question-answer pairs,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP '13), vol. 2, p. 6, 2013. View at Scopus
  12. L. Shi and R. Mihalcea, “Putting pieces together: combining FrameNet, Verbnet and WordNet for robust semantic parsing,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, pp. 100–111, Springer, 2005. View at Scopus
  13. M. Lafourcade and V. Prince, “Synonymies et vecteurs conceptuels,” in Proceedings of the 8ème conférence sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles (TALN '01), pp. 233–242, 2001.
  14. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. Herrera and L. Martínez, “A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 746–752, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Delgado, F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, M. J. Martin-Bautista, L. Martínez, and M. A. Vila, “A communication model based on the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation for a distributed intelligent agent system on Internet,” Soft Computing, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 320–328, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. R. Alcalá, J. Alcalá-Fdez, F. Herrera, and J. Otero, “Genetic learning of accurate and compact fuzzy rule based systems based on the 2-tuples linguistic representation,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 45–64, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. C. Kahraman, Fuzzy Applications in Industrial Engineering, Springer, 2007.
  19. Y. J. Xu and H. M. Wang, “Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 3988–3997, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. J. Estrella, M. Espinilla, F. Herrera, and L. Martínez, “FLINTSTONES: a fuzzy linguistic decision tools enhancement suite based on the 2-tuple linguistic model and extensions,” Information Sciences, vol. 280, pp. 152–170, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. V. C. Gerogiannis, E. Rapti, A. Karageorgos, and P. Fitsilis, “On using fuzzy linguistic 2-tuples for the evaluation of human resource suitability in software development tasks,” Advances in Software Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 695873, 15 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. L. Martínez, D. Ruan, and F. Herrera, “Computing with words in decision support systems: an overview on models and applications,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 382–395, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Martínez, R. M. Rodriguez, and F. Herrera, The 2-tuple Linguistic Model—Computing with Words in Decision Making, Springer, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M.-A. Abchir, “A jFuzzyLogic Extension to Deal With Unbalanced Linguistic Term Sets,” Book of Abstracts, pp. 53-54, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  25. M.-A. Abchir and I. Truck, “Towards a new fuzzy linguistic preference modeling approach for geolocation applications,” in Proceedings of the EUROFUSE Workshop on Fuzzy Methods for Knowledge-Based Systems (EUROFUSE '11), pp. 413–424.
  26. M. Espinilla, J. Liu, and L. Martínez, “An extended hierarchical linguistic model for decision-making problems,” Computational Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 489–512, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  27. I. Truck, “Comparison and links between two 2-tuple linguistic models for decision making,” in Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 87, pp. 61–68, Elsevier, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  28. M.-A. Abchir and I. Truck, “Towards an extension of the 2-tuple linguistic model to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets,” Kybernetika, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 164–180, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  29. M.-A. Abchir, I. Truck, and A. Pappa, “Dealing with natural language interfaces in a geolocation context,” in Proceedings of the 10th International FLINS Conference on Computational Intelligence in Decision and Control, pp. 806–811, Istanbul, Turkey, 2012. View at Scopus
  30. G. Salton and C. Buckley, “Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval,” Information Processing and Management, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 513–523, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. B. Green and G. Rubin, “Automated grammatical tagging of english,” Tech. Rep., Department of Linguistics, Brown University, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  32. S. Ploux and B. Victorri, “Construction d’espaces sémantiques à l’aide de dictionnaires informatisés des synonymes,” Traitement Automatique des Langues, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 161–182, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  33. J. François, J.-L. Manguin, F. Cordier, and R. Christine, “Le Dictionnaire Electronique des Synonymes du CRISCO: méthode dutilisation et exploitation psycholinguistique,” in DistanceS, cahier 2, pp. 165–200, Conseil Québecois de la formation à distance (CQFD), 2004. View at Google Scholar
  34. V.-M. Pho, “Génération de réponses pour un système de questions-réponses,” in Proceedings of the Conférence en Recherche d'Informations et Applications (CORIA '12), pp. 449–454, Bordeaux, France.
  35. Z. S. Harris, “Discourse analysis,” Language, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 1952. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar