Table of Contents
Advances in Biology
Volume 2014, Article ID 145465, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/145465
Research Article

Codon Usage Bias in Two Hemipteran Insect Species: Bemisia tabaci and Homalodisca coagulata

Department of Biotechnology, Assam University, Silchar, Assam 788011, India

Received 23 May 2014; Accepted 9 September 2014; Published 13 October 2014

Academic Editor: Volodymyr Dvornyk

Copyright © 2014 Jyotika Sharma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Bulmer, “Are codon usage patterns in unicellular organisms determined by selection—mutation balance?” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  2. P. M. Sharp, M. Stenico, J. F. Peden, and A. T. Lloyd, “Codon usage: mutational bias, translational selection, or both?” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 835–841, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. M. Kliman and J. Hey, “Hill-Robertson interference in Drosophila melanogaster: reply to Marais, Mouchiroud and Duret,” Genetical Research, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 89–90, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Akashi, “Codon bias evolution in Drosophila. Population genetics of mutation-selection drift,” Gene, vol. 205, no. 1-2, pp. 269–278, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Ikemura, “Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 389–409, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Ikemura, “Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 389–409, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Ikemura, “Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–34, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Bulmer, “Coevolution of codon usage and transfer RNA abundance,” Nature, vol. 325, no. 6106, pp. 728–730, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. Akashi, “Gene expression and molecular evolution,” Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 660–666, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. G. Kurland, “Translational accuracy and the fitness of bacteria,” Annual Review of Genetics, vol. 26, pp. 29–50, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Eyre-Walker, “Synonymous codon bias is related to gene length in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy?” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 864–872, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. M. Sharp and W.-H. Li, “An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 24, no. 1-2, pp. 28–38, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. C. Shields and P. M. Sharp, “Synonymous codon usage in Bacillus subtilis reflects both translational selection and mutational biases,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 15, no. 19, pp. 8023–8040, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. L. Hartl, E. N. Moriyama, and S. A. Sawyer, “Selection intensity for codon bias,” Genetics, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 227–234, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. N. Moriyama and J. R. Powell, “Codon usage bias and tRNA abundance in Drosophila,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 514–523, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. B. Carlini and W. Stephan, “In vivo introduction of unpreferred synonymous codons into the Drosophila Adh gene results in reduced levels of ADH protein,” Genetics, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 239–243, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. B. Plotkin and G. Kudla, “Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. M. Sharp and G. Matassi, “Codon usage and genome evolution,” Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 851–860, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Vicario, E. N. Moriyama, and J. R. Powell, “Codon usage in twelve species of Drosophila,” BMC Evolutionary Biology, vol. 7, no. 1, article 226, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Heger and C. P. Ponting, “Variable strength of translational selection among 12 Drosophila species,” Genetics, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 1337–1348, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. G. Jørgensen, M. H. Schierup, and A. G. Clark, “Heterogeneity in regional GC content and differential usage of codons and amino acids in GC-poor and GC-rich regions of the genome of Apis mellifera,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 611–619, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. K. Brown, D. R. Frohlich, and R. C. Rosell, “The sweetpotato or silverleaf whiteflies: biotypes of Bemisia tabaci or a species complex?” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 511–534, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. C Goheen, G. Nyland, and S. K. Lowe, “Association of a rickettsia-like organism with Pierce's disease of grapevines and alfalfa dwarf and heat therapy of the disease in grapevines,” Phytopathology, vol. 63, pp. 41–45, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  24. D. L. Hopkins and H. H. Mollenhauer, “Rickettsia-like bacterium associated with Pierce's disease of grapes,” Science, vol. 179, no. 4070, pp. 298–300, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. J. Davis, A. H. Purcell, and S. V. Thomson, “Pierce's disease of grapevines: Isolation of the causal bacterium,” Science, vol. 199, no. 4324, pp. 75–77, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. E. P. Rocha, “Codon usage bias from tRNA’s point of view: redundancy, specialization, and efficient decoding for translation optimization,” Genome Research, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 2279–2286, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. R. Hershberg and D. A. Petrov, “Selection on codon bias,” Annual Review of Genetics, vol. 42, pp. 287–299, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. M. Sharp, L. R. Emery, and K. Zeng, “Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 365, no. 1544, pp. 1203–1212, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. R. Powell and E. N. Moriyama, “Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 15, pp. 7784–7790, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. E. N. Moriyama and J. R. Powell, “Gene length and codon usage bias in Drosophila melanogaster, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 3188–3193, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. R. Powell, E. Sezzi, E. N. Moriyama, J. M. Gleason, and A. Caccone, “Analysis of a shift in codon usage in drosophila,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. S214–S225, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. F. Wright, “The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene,” Gene, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. M. Sharp and W.-H. Li, “The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1281–1295, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Eyre-Walker and M. Bulmer, “Reduced synonymous substitution rate at the start of enterobacterial genes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 4599–4603, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. Gutiérrez, J. Casadesús, J. L. Oliver, and A. Marin, “Compositional heterogeneity of the Escherichia coli genome: a role for VSP repair?” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 340–346, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Perrière, M. Gouy, and T. Gojobori, “NRSub: a non-redundant data base for the Bacillus subtilis genome,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 22, no. 25, pp. 5525–5529, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. H. Akashi, “Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy,” Genetics, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 927–935, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. R. Frohlich and M. A. Wells, “Codon usage patterns among genes for lepidopteran hemolymph proteins,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 476–481, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. B. R. Morton, “Codon use and the rate of divergence of land plant chloroplast genes,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 231–238, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. K. Behura and D. W. Severson, “Comparative analysis of codon usage bias and codon context patterns between dipteran and hymenopteran sequenced genomes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 8, Article ID e43111, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus