Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Bioinformatics
Volume 2016, Article ID 6040124, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6040124
Research Article

FullSSR: Microsatellite Finder and Primer Designer

1Laboratorio de Genética, CONICET, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina
2Cátedra de Genética, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos, 3100 Oro Verde, Argentina
3Instituto Nacional de Limnología (INALI), UNL-CONICET, 3100 Santa Fe, Argentina

Received 25 November 2015; Revised 2 May 2016; Accepted 16 May 2016

Academic Editor: Rita Casadio

Copyright © 2016 Sebastián Metz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Microsatellites are genomic sequences comprised of tandem repeats of short nucleotide motifs widely used as molecular markers in population genetics. FullSSR is a new bioinformatic tool for microsatellite (SSR) loci detection and primer design using genomic data from NGS assay. The software was tested with 2000 sequences of Oryza sativa shotgun sequencing project from the National Center of Biotechnology Information Trace Archive and with partial genome sequencing with ROCHE 454® from Caiman latirostris, Salvator merianae, Aegla platensis, and Zilchiopsis collastinensis. FullSSR performance was compared against other similar SSR search programs. The results of the use of this kind of approach depend on the parameters set by the user. In addition, results can be affected by the analyzed sequences because of differences among the genomes. FullSSR simplifies the detection of SSRs and primer design on a big data set. The command line interface of FullSSR was intended to be used as part of genomic analysis tools pipeline; however, it can be used as a stand-alone program because the results are easily interpreted for a nonexpert user.

1. Introduction

Microsatellites (also known as “Short Sequence Repeats” (SSRs)) are genomic sequences comprised of tandem repeats of short nucleotide motifs (1 to 6 bp). SSRs have been widely used as molecular markers in population biology because they have high mutation rates with high levels of polymorphism between organisms of the same population [1, 2]. Traditional methods to isolate SSRs included the construction of enriched genomic libraries, cloning, and sequencing; however this approach is time-consuming and very expensive. An alternative method is using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to obtain a great number of sequences reducing the costs at the same time. On each side of the SSR there are flanking regions that are critical to develop locus-specific primers to amplify the microsatellites by PCR. The design of a high number of primers is a challenge logistically both in terms of achieving good coverage of target regions and in terms of cost [3].

Nowadays there are many informatics tools to detect SSR (PHOBOS [4], MISA [5], and Tandem Repeats Finder [2]) and for specific primer design (Primer3 [6] or FastPCR [7]). In this work, we developed an informatics tool that combines SSR detection and primer design. FullSSR can detect all SSRs within a group of sequences and design primers for each SSR detected.

2. Materials and Methods

FullSSR was programmed in Perl. It consists in two main modules: SSRs search and primer design (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Flowchart of FullSSR. Multi-FASTA file is used as input; in the gray box are the different processing modules of the core program. There are three kinds of outputs: easy-to-interpret HTML report, Primer3 native outputs, and text files for each SSR found.
2.1. SSR Search

The most used algorithms for detection of microsatellites are based on three main approaches. The first approach consists in scanning genomic sequences linearly to detect tandem repeats as subsequences following several specifications [3, 8]. The second approach uses statistical rules to detect subsequences that may be microsatellites. These regions are then submitted to validation tests that sieve out desired sequences. Although this approach is time efficient, it needs appropriate statistical criteria to ensure relevant results [9, 10]. In the third approach, algorithms align a given DNA motif, or library of motifs, along genomic sequences. Regions detected as microsatellites are those whose alignment score is higher than a given threshold [11, 12].

FullSSR utilizes an algorithm that combines the first and third approach. It begins with the creation of a list of all possible combinations between two and five nucleotides (adenine, guanine, thymine, and cytosine). Then it analyzes the group of sequences searching for all the elements of the motif list. All the matches are filtered using predefined rules (e.g., in case of two overlapped SSRs it will only report the longer one).

The results show the ID of the analyzed sequence, the repeated sequence (motif), the number of tandem repeats, the length of the SSR, and the position of it within the sequence (start, end). Imperfect microsatellites are generally excluded from studies; this provide a biased view of reality, because imperfections result from the evolutionary process and influence the evolutionary dynamics by restricting the slippage rate [13, 14].

Previous experience at lab-work has shown that imperfect microsatellites are nonuseful because they are difficult to optimize and not easily amplified by PCR. FullSSR discards imperfect microsatellites.

2.2. Primer Design

For primer design FullSSR uses a BioPerl package modification [15] (Bio::Tools::Run::Primer3) in order to create an interface to run Primer3 using previously detected SSRs. Primer3 native output is stored and used to create an easy-to-read report where primers are shown alongside the respective SSR. The parameters that Primer3 uses for the oligonucleotides design, such as melting temperature (), optimum GC content, and product and primer size, can be modified with a configuration file.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Execution

This tool runs under UNIX command line interface. It requires the installation of Perl, BioPerl, and Primer3.

3.2. Data Entry

This software was tested with 2000 sequences of Oryza sativa shotgun sequencing projects from the NCBI (National Center of Biotechnology Information) Trace Archive [16]. The results were compared with other SSR search tools. We also perform an analysis on partial genome sequencing with ROCHE 454 from reptiles as Caiman latirostris and Salvator merianae and freshwater crabs Aegla platensis and Zilchiopsis collastinensis, in order to evaluate the software with different kinds of taxa. All of them are species that inhabit Argentine wetlands, with unknown genomes. We purified DNA from muscle tissue (500 ng/μL final concentration) of the four species.

3.3. Microsatellite Search

A total of 908 microsatellites were found in 2000 O. sativa sequences. The software filtrate repeated very short and imperfect SSRs. We compare these results with MISA and PHOBOS results using similar configuration (Table 1).

Table 1: Algorithm comparison: results comparison among FullSSR, MISA, and PHOBOS using O. sativa sequences.

Even though the amount of microsatellites found by MISA and PHOBOS is much higher than the amount found by the search algorithm used in FullSSR, most of them are not suitable for primer design, since they are located near the beginning or the end of the sequence, making it impossible to design primers for both sides of the microsatellite.

Data, from partial genome sequencing of reptiles and crabs, shows that results may vary depending the sequence under consideration because of differences among the genomes, for example, structure, GC content, and gene composition (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2: SSR classification. SSR types obtained with sequences from different partial sequencing projects. The 1-mer SSRs found are greater than 8 bp long.
Table 3: Results for different data set. bp read: base pairs read; % GC: guanine-cytosine percentage; SSRs and primers: number of SSRs found and number of primers designed.
3.4. Primer Design

Primer design involved default parameters of Primer3. From 428 SSRs of O. sativa, 343 primer pairs were designed. The primers are shown in an HTML report with global statistics and the primer sequence and its characteristics (, % GC, stability, product size, etc.).

Primers obtained from 8 SSRs of Caiman latirostris sequences were wet-lab tested and proved to be suitable for molecular genetic studies. The results were reported in a previous work [17].

4. Conclusions

FullSSR simplifies the detection of SSRs and primer design on a big data set. The command line interface of FullSSR was intended to be used as part of genomic analysis tools pipeline (command line interfaces are generally easier to automate via scripting); however, it can be used as a stand-alone program because the results are easily interpreted for nonexpert user (Figure 2). Other tools as Msatcommander [18] and QDD [19] have a user interface that makes them not available for automated use. Pal finder [20] shares functions with FullSSR but it uses an old version of Primer3.

Figure 2: Screenshot of the HTML report of the program. SSR distribution and primers for each SSR are shown (if any). Additional data is displayed (execution time, number of sequences, etc.).

5. Availability and Requirements

(i)Project name: FullSSR.(ii)Project home page: https://sourceforge.net/projects/fullssr/.(iii)Operating system(s): Linux OS.(iv)Programming language: Perl.(v)Other requirements: BioPerl and Primer3 ver. 2.3.7.(vi)License: GNU General Public License (GNU-GPL).(vii)Any restrictions to use by nonacademics: none.

6. Availability of Supporting Data

We obtained O. sativa data set supporting the results of this paper performing a query in the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Trace Archive database http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/trace.cgi. The submitted query was SPECIES CODE = “ORYZA SATIVA (INDICA CULTIVAR-GROUP)” AND TRACE TYPE CODE = “SHOTGUN” and we retrieve the first 2000 sequences.

The sequences of Caiman latirostris primers are included in GenBank (Accession numbers: KP849485–KP849492) and have been recently published [17].

Abbreviations

SSRs:Short Sequence Repeats
PCR:Polymerase Chain Reaction
NGS:Next Generation Sequencing.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Sebastián Metz and Juan Manuel Cabrera are equal contributors.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2010-0469; PICT 2010-2532), Argentina. The authors thank Dr. Amadio for his contribution in the programming area.

References

  1. D. Goldstein and C. Schlotterer, Microsatellites Evolution and Applications, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1999.
  2. G. Benson, “Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 573–580, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. L. Kitchen, J. D. Moore, S. A. Palmer, and R. G. Allaby, “MCMC-ODPR: primer design optimization using Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 13, no. 1, article 287, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Mayer, Phobos, a tandem repeat search tool for complete genomes, Version 3.3.12, 2008.
  5. T. Thiel, W. Michalek, R. K. Varshney, and A. Graner, “Exploiting EST databases for the development of cDNA derived microsatellite markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.),” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 106, pp. 411–422, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Untergasser, I. Cutcutache, T. Koressaar et al., “Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. 15, article e115, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Kalendar, D. Lee, and A. H. Schulman, “FastPCR software for PCR primer and probe design and repeat search,” Genes, Genomes and Genomics, vol. 3, pp. 1–14, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. Kolpakov, G. Bana, and G. Kucherov, “mreps: efficient and flexible detection of tandem repeats in DNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, no. 13, pp. 3672–3678, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Coward and F. Drabløs, “Detecting periodic patterns in biological sequences,” Bioinformatics, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 498–507, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Wexler, Z. Yakhini, Y. Kashi, and D. Geiger, “Finding approximate tandem repeats in genomic sequences,” Journal of Computational Biology, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 928–942, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. F. A. Smit, R. Hubley, and P. Green, RepeatMasker Open-4.0, 2013–2015, http://www.repeatmasker.org.
  12. O. Delgrange and E. Rivals, “STAR: an algorithm to search for tandem approximate repeats,” Bioinformatics, vol. 20, no. 16, pp. 2812–2820, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Jin, C. Macaubas, J. Hallmayer, A. Kimura, and E. Mignot, “Mutation rate varies among alleles at a microsatellite locus: phylogenetic evidence,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 26, pp. 15285–15288, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. S. Taylor, J. M. H. Durkin, and F. Breden, “The death of a microsatellite: a phylogenetic perspective on microsatellite interruptions,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 567–572, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. E. Stajich, D. Block, K. Boulez et al., “The Bioperl toolkit: perl modules for the life sciences,” Genome Research, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1611–1618, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. National Center of Biotechnology Information: Trace Archive, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/home/.
  17. P. S. Amavet, E. C. Rueda, P. A. Siroski, A. Larriera, and B. O. Saidman, “Isolation and characterization of new microsatellite markers for application in population genetic studies of Caiman latirostris and related species,” Amphibia Reptilia, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 175–180, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. C. Faircloth, “Msatcommander: detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design,” Molecular Ecology Resources, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 92–94, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Meglécz, C. Costedoat, V. Dubut et al., “QDD: a user-friendly program to select microsatellite markers and design primers from large sequencing projects,” Bioinformatics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 403–404, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. A. Castoe, A. W. Poole, A. P. J. de Koning et al., “Rapid microsatellite identification from illumina paired-end genomic sequencing in two birds and a snake,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 2, Article ID e30953, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus