Table of Contents
Advances in Botany
Volume 2014, Article ID 538946, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/538946
Review Article

Towards Understanding Extracellular ROS Sensory and Signaling Systems in Plants

1Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
2Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
3Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

Received 23 February 2014; Revised 11 May 2014; Accepted 14 May 2014; Published 1 June 2014

Academic Editor: Scott Finlayson

Copyright © 2014 Saijaliisa Kangasjärvi and Jaakko Kangasjärvi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Mittler, S. Vanderauwera, M. Gollery, and F. van Breusegem, “Reactive oxygen gene network of plants,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 490–498, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. H. Foyer and G. Noctor, “Redox regulation in photosynthetic organisms: signaling, acclimation, and practical implications,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 861–905, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Suzuki, S. Koussevitzky, R. Mittler, and G. Miller, “ROS and redox signalling in the response of plants to abiotic stress,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 259–270, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Mittler, S. Vanderauwera, N. Suzuki et al., “ROS signaling: the new wave?” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 300–309, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Sierla, M. Rahikainen, J. Salojärvi, J. Kangasjärvi, and S. Kangasjärvi, “Apoplastic and chloroplastic redox signaling networks in plant stress responses,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 2220–2239, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Kangasjarvi, J. Talvinen, M. Utriainen, and R. Karjalainen, “Plant defence systems induced by ozone,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 783–794, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Miller, V. Shulaev, and R. Mittler, “Reactive oxygen signaling and abiotic stress,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 481–489, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Vaahtera, M. Brosché, M. Wrzaczek, and J. Kangasjärvi, “Specificity in ROS signaling and transcript signatures,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Shapiguzov, J. P. Vainonen, M. Wrzaczek, and J. Kangasjärvi, “ROS-talk—how the apoplast, the chloroplast, and the nucleus get the message through,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 3, article 292, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  10. S. Karpiński, M. Szechyńska-Hebda, W. Wituszyńska, and P. Burdiak, “Light acclimation, retrograde signalling, cell death and immune defences in plants,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 736–744, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. J. Considine and C. Foyer, “Redox regulation of plant development,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Dowdle, T. Ishikawa, S. Gatzek, S. Rolinski, and N. Smirnoff, “Two genes in Arabidopsis thaliana encoding GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase are required for ascorbate biosynthesis and seedling viability,” Plant Journal, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 673–689, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Kangasjärvi, A. Lepistö, K. Hännikäinen et al., “Diverse roles for chloroplast stromal and thylakoid-bound ascorbate peroxidases in plant stress responses,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 412, no. 2, pp. 275–285, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Fahnenstich, T. E. Scarpeci, E. M. Valle, U.-I. Flügge, and V. G. Maurino, “Generation of hydrogen peroxide in chloroplasts of arabidopsis overexpressing glycolate oxidase as an inducible system to study oxidative stress,” Plant Physiology, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 719–729, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Mhamdi, G. Queval, S. Chaouch, S. Vanderauwera, F. van Breusegem, and G. Noctor, “Catalase function in plants: a focus on Arabidopsis mutants as stress-mimic models,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 61, no. 15, pp. 4197–4220, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Kangasjärvi, P. Jaspers, and H. Kollist, “Signalling and cell death in ozone-exposed plants,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1021–1036, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. P. Vainonen and J. Kangasjärvi, “Plant signaling in acute ozone exposure,” Plant Cell and Environment, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. S. V. Krupa, “Joint effects of elevated levels of ultraviolet-B radiation, carbon dioxide and ozone on plants,” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 535–542, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  19. E. A. Ainsworth, C. R. Yendrek, S. Sitch, W. J. Collins, and L. D. Emberson, “The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, vol. 63, pp. 637–661, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. V. Rao, J. R. Koch, and K. R. Davis, “Ozone: a tool for probing programmed cell death in plants,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 345–358, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Pasqualini, C. Piccioni, L. Reale, L. Ederli, G. D. Della Torre, and F. Ferranti, “Ozone-induced cell death in tobacco cultivar Bel W3 plants. The role of programmed cell death in lesion formation,” Plant Physiology, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 1122–1134, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. Overmyer, M. Brosché, and J. Kangasjärvi, “Reactive oxygen species and hormonal control of cell death,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 335–342, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Ahlfors, S. Lång, K. Overmyer et al., “Arabidopsis RADICAL-INDUCED CELL DEATH1 belongs to the WWE protein-protein interaction domain protein family and modulates abscisic acid, ethylene, and methyl jasmonate responses,” The Plant Cell, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1925–1937, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. Vahisalu, H. Kollist, Y.-F. Wang et al., “SLAC1 is required for plant guard cell S-type anion channel function in stomatal signalling,” Nature, vol. 452, no. 7186, pp. 487–491, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. Overmyer, H. Kollist, H. Tuominen et al., “Complex phenotypic profiles leading to ozone sensitivity in Arabidopsis thaliana mutants,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1237–1249, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Wrzaczek, M. Brosché, H. Kollist, and J. Kangasjärvi, “Arabidopsis GRI is involved in the regulation of cell death induced by extracellular ROS,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 13, pp. 5412–5417, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. L. Conklin, S. A. Saracco, S. R. Norris, and R. L. Last, “Identification of ascorbic acid-deficient Arabidopsis thaliana mutants,” Genetics, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 847–856, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. L. Conklin, E. H. Williams, and R. L. Last, “Environmental stress sensitivity of an ascorbic acid-deficient arabidopsis mutant,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 18, pp. 9970–9974, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Negi, O. Matsuda, T. Nagasawa et al., “CO2 regulator SLAC1 and its homologues are essential for anion homeostasis in plant cells,” Nature, vol. 452, no. 7186, pp. 483–486, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Saji, S. Bathula, A. Kubo et al., “Disruption of a gene encoding C4-dicarboxylate transporter-like protein increases ozone sensitivity through deregulation of the stomatal response in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Brosché, E. Merilo, F. Mayer et al., “Natural variation in ozone sensitivity among Arabidopsis thaliana accessions and its relation to stomatal conductance,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 914–925, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. L. Wheeler and C. Brownlee, “Ca2+ signalling in plants and green algae—changing channels,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 506–514, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Wrzaczek, J. P. Vainonen, H. Help et al., “Arabidopsis GRIM REAPER functions through metacaspase processing and receptor-ligand interaction,” submitted. In press.
  34. J. P. Vainonen, P. Jaspers, M. Wrzaczek et al., “RCD1-DREB2A interaction in leaf senescence and stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 442, no. 3, pp. 573–581, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. Jaspers, K. Overmyer, M. Wrzaczek et al., “The RST and PARP-like domain containing SRO protein family: analysis of protein structure, function and conservation in land plants,” BMC Genomics, vol. 11, article 170, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Miller, K. Schlauch, R. Tam et al., “The plant NADPH oxidase RBOHD mediates rapid systemic signaling in response to diverse stimuli,” Science Signaling, vol. 2, no. 84, Article ID ra45, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Wrzaczek, M. Brosché, J. Salojärvi et al., “Transcriptional regulation of the CRK/DUF26 group of receptor-like protein kinases by ozone and plant hormones in Arabidopsis,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 10, article 95, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. N. Idänheimo, A. Gauthier, J. Salojärvi et al., “The Arabidopsis thaliana cysteine-rich receptor-like Kinases CRK6 and CRK7 protect against apoplastic oxidative stress,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 445, pp. 457–462, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. C. Garcia-Mata, J. Wang, P. Gajdanowicz et al., “A minimal cysteine motif required to activate the SKOR K+ channel of arabidopsis by the reactive oxygen species H2O2,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 38, pp. 29286–29294, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H. Clayton, M. R. Knight, H. Knight, M. R. McAinsh, and A. M. Hetherington, “Dissection of the ozone-induced calcium signature,” Plant Journal, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 575–579, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. N. H. Evans, M. R. McAinsh, A. M. Hetherington, and M. R. Knight, “ROS perception in Arabidopsis thaliana: the ozone-induced calcium response,” Plant Journal, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 615–626, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. T. Vahisalu, I. Puzõrjova, M. Brosché et al., “Ozone-triggered rapid stomatal response involves the production of reactive oxygen species, and is controlled by SLAC1 and OST1,” Plant Journal, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 442–453, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Melotto, W. Underwood, J. Koczan, K. Nomura, and S. Y. He, “Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 969–980, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S.-H. Shiu and A. B. Bleecker, “Expansion of the receptor-like kinase/Pelle gene family and receptor-like proteins in Arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 530–543, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. S.-H. Shiu, W. M. Karlowski, R. Pan, Y.-H. Tzeng, K. F. X. Mayer, and W.-H. Li, “Comparative analysis of the receptor-like kinase family in Arabidopsis and rice,” The Plant Cell, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1220–1234, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. D. Lehti-Shiu, C. Zou, K. Hanada, and S.-H. Shiu, “Evolutionary history and stress regulation of plant receptor-like kinase/pelle genes,” Plant Physiology, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 12–26, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. Wrzaczek, M. Brosché, and J. Kangasjärvi, “ROS signaling loops—production, perception, regulation,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 575–582, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. P. Czernic, B. Visser, W. Sun et al., “Characterization of an versus Arabidopsis thaliana receptor-like protein kinase gene activated by oxidative stress and pathogen attack,” Plant Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 321–327, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. K. Chen, B. Fan, L. Du, and Z. Chen, “Activation of hypersensitive cell death by pathogen-induced receptor-like protein kinases from Arabidopsis,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 271–283, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. S. Munné-Bosch, G. Queval, and C. H. Foyer, “The impact of global change factors on redox signaling underpinning stress tolerance,” Plant Physiology, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 5–19, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. K. Overmyer, H. Tuominen, R. Kettunen et al., “Ozone-sensitive Arabidopsis rcd1 mutant reveals opposite roles for ethylene and jasmonate signaling pathways in regulating superoxide-dependent cell death,” The Plant Cell, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1849–1862, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. P. Jaspers, T. Blomster, M. Brosché et al., “Unequally redundant RCD1 and SRO1 mediate stress and developmental responses and interact with transcription factors,” Plant Journal, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 268–279, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. Brosché, T. Blomster, J. Salojärvi et al., “Transcriptomics and functional genomics of ROS-induced cell death regulation by RADICAL-INDUCED CELL DEATH1,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 10, Article ID e1004112, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. O. Borsani, J. Zhu, P. E. Verslues, R. Sunkar, and J.-K. Zhu, “Endogenous siRNAs derived from a pair of natural cis-antisense transcripts regulate salt tolerance in Arabidopsis,” Cell, vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 1279–1291, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. S. Katiyar-Agrwal, J. Zhu, K. Kim et al., “A pathogen-inducible endogenous siRNA in plant immunity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, vol. 103, no. 49, pp. 18816–18821, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. S. Liu, S. Liu, M. Wang et al., “A Wheat SIMILAR TO RCD-ONE gene enhances seedling growth and abiotic stress resistance by modulating redox homeostasis and maintaining genomic integrity,” The Plant Cell, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 164–180, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. Y. Zhu, B. Du, J. Qian, B. Zou, and J. Hua, “Disease resistance gene-induced growth inhibition is enhanced by rcd1 independent of defense activation in Arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 161, no. 4, pp. 2005–2013, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. E. Pesquet, B. Zhang, A. Gorzsás et al., “Non-cell-autonomous postmortem lignification of tracheary elements in Zinnia elegans,” The Plant Cell, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1314–1328, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. Teotia and R. S. Lamb, “The paralogous genes RADICAL-INDUCED CELL DEATH1 and SIMILAR TO RCD ONE1 have partially redundant functions during arabidopsis development,” Plant Physiology, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 180–198, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. Z. Wang, G. A. Michaud, Z. Cheng et al., “Recognition of the iso-ADP-ribose moiety in poly(ADP-ribose) by WWE domains suggests a general mechanism for poly (ADP-ribosyl)ation-dependent ubiquitination,” Genes & Development, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 235–240, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. Y. Sakuma, K. Maruyama, Y. Osakabe et al., “Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis transcription factor, DREB2A, involved in drought-responsive gene expression,” The Plant Cell, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1292–1309, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. K. J. Wright and R. Tjian, “Wnt signaling targets ETO coactivation domain of TAF4/TFIID in vivo,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 55–60, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. H. Nomura, T. Komori, S. Uemura et al., “Chloroplast-mediated activation of plant immune signalling in Arabidopsis,” Nature Communications, vol. 3, article 926, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. S. Han, R. Tang, L. K. Anderson, T. E. Woerner, and Z.-M. Pei, “A cell surface receptor mediates extracellular Ca2+ sensing in guard cells,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6954, pp. 196–200, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. R.-H. Tang, S. Han, H. Zheng et al., “Coupling diurnal cytosolic Ca2+ oscillations to the CAS-IP 3 pathway in Arabidopsis,” Science, vol. 315, no. 5817, pp. 1423–1426, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. J. P. Vainonen, Y. Sakuragi, S. Stael et al., “Light regulation of CaS, a novel phosphoprotein in the thylakoid membrane of Arabidopsis thaliana,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 275, no. 8, pp. 1767–1777, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. S. Weinl, K. Held, K. Schlücking et al., “A plastid protein crucial for Ca2+-regulated stomatal responses,” New Phytologist, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 675–686, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. C. Kim, R. Meskauskiene, K. Apel, and C. Laloi, “No single way to understand singlet oxygen signalling in plants,” The EMBO Reports, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 435–439, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. V. Göhre, A. M. E. Jones, J. Sklenář, S. Robatzek, and A. P. M. Weber, “Molecular crosstalk between PAMP-triggered immunity and photosynthesis,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1083–1092, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. M. Tikkanen, N. R. Mekala, and E. M. Aro, “Photosystem II photoinhibition-repair cycle protects Photosystem I from irreversible damage,” Biochimia et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1837, no. 1, pp. 210–215, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. C. Barth and P. L. Conklin, “The lower cell density of leaf parenchyma in the Arabidopsis thaliana mutant lcd1-1 is associated with increased sensitivity to ozone and virulent Pseudomonas syringae,” The Plant Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 206–218, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. R. González-Bayón, E. A. Kinsman, V. Quesada et al., “Mutations in the RETICULATA gene dramatically alter internal architecture but have little effect on overall organ shape in Arabidopsis leaves,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 3019–3031, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. J. M. Pérez-Pérez, D. Esteve-Bruna, R. González-Bayón et al., “Functional redundancy and divergence within the Arabidopsis RETICULATA-RELATED gene family,” Plant Physiology, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 589–603, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. S. Karpinski, H. Reynolds, B. Karpinska, G. Wingsle, G. Creissen, and P. Mullineaux, “Systemic signaling and acclimation in response to excess excitation energy in Arabidopsis,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5414, pp. 654–657, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. M. Suorsa, S. Järvi, M. Grieco et al., “PROTON GRADIENT REGULATION5 is essential for proper acclimation of Arabidopsis photosystem I to naturally and artificially fluctuating light conditions,” The Plant Cell, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 2934–2948, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. T. Blomster, J. Salojärvi, N. Sipari et al., “Apoplastic reactive oxygen species transiently decrease auxin signaling and cause stress-induced morphogenic response in Arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 1866–1883, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. S. Kangasjärvi, J. Neukermans, S. Li, E.-M. Aro, and G. Noctor, “Photosynthesis, photorespiration, and light signalling in defence responses,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1619–1636, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. S. Li, A. Mhamdi, A. Trotta et al., “The protein phosphatase subunit PP2A-B′γ is required to suppress day length-dependent pathogenesis responses triggered by intracellular oxidative stress,” New Phytologist, vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 145–160, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. G. Queval, E. Issakidis-Bourguet, F. A. Hoeberichts et al., “Conditional oxidative stress responses in the Arabidopsis photorespiratory mutant cat2 demonstrate that redox state is a key modulator of daylength-dependent gene expression, and define photoperiod as a crucial factor in the regulation of H2O2-induced cell death,” Plant Journal, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 640–657, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. S. Chaouch, G. Queval, S. Vanderauwera et al., “Peroxisomal hydrogen peroxide is coupled to biotic defense responses by ISOCHORISMATE SYNTHASE1 in a daylength-related manner,” Plant Physiology, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 1692–1705, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. A. Trotta, M. Wrzaczek, J. Scharte et al., “Regulatory subunit B′γ of protein phosphatase 2A prevents unnecessary defense reactions under low light in arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 1464–1480, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. M. Coca and B. San Segundo, “AtCPK1 calcium-dependent protein kinase mediates pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis,” Plant Journal, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 526–540, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. P. Schulz, M. Herde, and T. Romeis, “Calcium-dependent protein kinases: hubs in plant stress signaling and development,” Plant Physiology, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 523–530, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. D. Geiger, S. Scherzer, P. Mumm et al., “Activity of guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is controlled by drought-stress signaling kinase-phosphatase pair,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 50, pp. 21425–21430, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. S. C. Lee, W. Lan, B. B. Buchanan, and S. Luan, “A protein kinase-phosphatase pair interacts with an ion channel to regulate ABA signaling in plant guard cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 50, pp. 21419–21424, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. D. Geiger, S. Scherzer, P. Mumm et al., “Guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is regulated by CDPK protein kinases with distinct Ca2+ affinities,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 17, pp. 8023–8028, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. B. Brandt, D. E. Brodsky, S. Xue et al., “Reconstitution of abscisic acid activation of SLAC1 anion channel by CPK6 and OST1 kinases and branched ABI1 PP2C phosphatase action,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 26, pp. 10593–10598, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus