Research Article
Numerical Solutions for Coupled Trapezoidal Fully Fuzzy Sylvester Matrix Equations
Table 1
Comparison between FFMVM, FGI, and FLSI for Example
1.
| | | Method | Analytical solution-approximated solution | | | |
| | FMVM | | NA | 0 | NA | | FGI | | 0.01515 | | 236 | | FLSI | | 0.5 | | 213 |
| | FMVM | | NA | 0 | NA | | FGI | | 0.01515 | | 236 | | FLSI | | 0.5 | | 213 |
| | FMVM | | NA | 0 | NA | | FGI | | 0.006711 | | 333 | | FLSI | | 0.5 | | 184 | | FMVM | | NA | 0 | NA | | FGI | | 0.006711 | | 333 | | FLSI | | 0.5 | | 184 |
| | FMVM | | NA | 0 | NA | | FGI | | 0.003436 | | 269 | | FLSI | | 0.5 | | 367 |
| | FMVM | | NA | 0 | NA | | FGI | | 0.003436 | | 269 | | FLSI | | 0.5 | | 367 |
| | FMVM | | NA | 0 | NA | | FGI | | 0.001831 | | 551 | | FLSI | | 0.5 | | 502 |
| | FMVM | | NA | 0 | NA | | FGI | | 0.001831 | | 551 | | FLSI | | 0.5 | | 502 |
|
|
