Review Article

An Integrative Review of the Methods Used to Research the Prevalence of Violence against Women in Pakistan

Table 5

Summary of overall quality of studies reviewed.

S. numberLead author (year)EPHPP [16] Quantitative studies (moderate and weak to moderate)Polit et al. [17] Quantitative studies (strong and moderate) Letts et al. [18] Qualitative studies (strong and moderate)Mixed methods Appraisal Tool [19] (strong and moderate)WHO-ethical and safety [7] recommendations Overall quality

1Ali (2011) [20]Moderate Strong 3 Strong
2Ali (2007) [26]Moderate Strong 3Strong
3Andersson (2010) [21]Moderate3 Strong
4Farid (2008) [22]Moderate Strong 2 Moderate
5Fikree (2006) [23]Moderate Strong 1Weak to moderate
6Fikree (1999) [8]Strong 2Moderate
7Hussain (2008) [28]Moderate 2 Moderate
8Karmaliani (2008) [24]Moderate Strong 3 Strong
9Naeem (2008) [25]Weak to moderate Moderate 1Weak to moderate
10Rabbani (2008) [29]Strong 2 Moderate to strong
11Shaikh (2003) [27]Weak to moderate Moderate 2Moderate

Selected studies were assigned to a group considering the number of principles covered of WHO ethical and safety recommendations for research on VAW. These groups are ranged between 3 and 1 (3: mostly considered, 2: partially considered, and 1: nonconsidered).