Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes with a Hydroxyapatite and Porous Coated Cup Design

Table 1

Published data on outcomes of similar cementless primary THAs.

Manuscript	Implant; used	Number of hips	Mean age	Mean Followup; (years)	Revision; (acetabular aseptic loosening)	Revision; (all cause)	Dislocation	Osteolysis
Anseth et al. (2010) [18]	Harris-Galante I/II	113	54	17.2	2 (1.8%)	4 (3.5%)	NR	2 (1.8%)
Baker et al. (2010) [19]	ABG I	69	53	15	8 (11.6%)	8 (11.6%)	0	10 (14.5%)
Belmont et al. (2008) [12]	Trispike (DePuy)	223	71.8	20	9 (4%)	26 (11.7%)	1 (0.45%)	17 (7.6%)
Della Valle et al. (2009) [13]	Harris-Galante I	204	52	20.6	5 (4%)	10 (8.1%)	5/124	NR
Chen et al. (2006) [20]	Duraloc	145	56.2	6.7	0 (0%)	2 (1.4%)	9/148 (6.1%)	3 (2%)
Streit et al. (2012) [21]	Fitmore	89	49	12	0 (0%)	5/81, 2 liner exchange	1/81	0 (0%)
Berli et al. (2007) [22]	Morscher	112		14.7	2.5%	4.7%
Della Valle et al. (2004) [23]	Trilogy	308	64	4–7	1 (0.3%)	8 (2.4%)	NR	12 (5%)
Sugano et al. (2012) [24]	Biolox forte	93	56	12.4	1 (1.1%)	2 (2.2%) ? (cup only)	1 (1.1%)	0 (0%)
de Witte et al. (2011) [25]	CementLess Spotorno	102	55.9	11.8	9 (8.8%)	10 (cup)	NR	NR
Stefl et al. (2012) [26]	Harris-Galante I	120	NR	23.3	1 (0.8%)	22 (18.3%)	NR	8 (6.7%)
Gottliebsen et al. (2012) [27]	Mallory-Head	77 HA coated; 73 non-HA coated	57 (HA); 63 (non-HA)	11	HA coated: 0 (0%); Non-HA coated: 7 (9.6%)	HA coated: 0%; Non-HA: 9.6%	NR	NR