Ali A. Mirzaei, Samaneh Vahid, Mostafa Feyzi, "Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis over Iron Manganese Catalysts: Effect of Preparation and Operating Conditions on Catalyst Performance", Advances in Physical Chemistry, vol. 2009, Article ID 151489, 12 pages, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/151489
Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis over Iron Manganese Catalysts: Effect of Preparation and Operating Conditions on Catalyst Performance
Ali A. Mirzaei,1Samaneh Vahid,1 and Mostafa Feyzi1
1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan 98135-674, Iran
Academic Editor: Hiroshi Onishi
Received24 Apr 2008
Revised24 Jun 2008
Accepted20 Jul 2008
Published19 Nov 2008
Abstract
Iron manganese oxides are prepared using a coprecipitation procedure and studied for the conversion of synthesis gas to light olefins and hydrocarbons. In particular, the effect of a range of preparation variables such
as [Fe]/[Mn] molar ratios of the precipitation solution, pH of precipitation, temperature of precipitation,
and precipitate aging times was investigated in detail. The results are interpreted in terms of the structure of
the active catalyst and it has been generally concluded that the calcined catalyst
(at 650 for 6 hours) containing 50%Fe/50%Mn-on
molar basis which is the most active catalyst for the conversion of synthesis gas to light olefins.
The effects of different promoters and supports with loading of optimum support on the catalytic performance of catalysts are also studied. It was found that the catalyst containing 50%Fe/50%Mn/5 wt.% is an optimum-modified catalyst. The catalytic performance of optimal catalyst has been studied in operation conditions such as a range of reaction temperatures, /CO molar feed ratios and a range of total pressures. Characterization of both precursors and calcined catalysts is carried out by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), BET specific surface area and thermal analysis methods such as TGA and DSC.
1. Introduction
Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis is of
great industrial importance due to the great variety of products obtained such
as paraffins, olefins and alcohols. An
approach to improve the selectivity of the classical Fischer-Tropsch (FT)
process for conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbons involves the use of a
bifunctional catalyst system containing a metal catalyst (FT catalyst) combined
with a support. There has been renewed interest in recent years in FT
synthesis, especially for the selective production of petrochemical feedstocks
such as ethylene, propylene, and buthylene ( olefins) directly from synthesis gas [1–7]. Compared to other metal catalysts for
Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis, an iron-based catalyst is distinguished by
higher conversion, selectivity to the lower olefins, and flexibility to the
process parameters [8, 9]. However, the use of iron catalyst does not solve the
problem of insufficient selectivity, which represents a general limitation of FT synthesis. Manganese
has been widely used as one of the promoters for FTS on iron catalyst,
particularly in producing low olefins [10–13]. Large
efforts have also been exerted on the individual effect of manganese
promotion on supported or unsupported iron catalysts [13, 14].
Fe–Mn and Co–Mn catalysts
favor olefins [15, 16]. High selectivity for the iron-rich Fe–Mn solid has been
correlated with the iron manganese oxides phase and two carbide phases, while
the manganese-rich solid has been correlated with two spinel phases and
different carbide phases [11, 17]. The Fe–Mn catalyst, as one of the most important
catalyst systems, has received extensive attention in recent years because of
the higher olefin and middle distillation cut
selectivities which allow their products to be used as a feedstock for the
chemical industry. Therefore, the Fe–Mn catalyst has a promising industrial
application [18–22], and it is well known that higher selectivity
of alkenes can be obtained on Fe/Mn catalysts than on other iron-based
catalysts [23, 24]. The aim of this research work was to investigate the effect
of a range of preparation variables including the precipitate aging time, pH,
temperature of precipitation, and the [Fe]/[Mn] molar ratio of the
precipitation solution of mixed iron manganese oxide catalysts. We also report
further results concerning the effects of different promoters and supports
along with loadings of as an optimum support on
catalytic performance of this catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. In
addition, the catalyst structural and morphological was investigated by XRD,
SEM, BET, and thermal analysis methods such as TGA and DSC. Also, the effects
of operation conditions such as /CO molar feed ratios, a range of
reaction temperatures and total pressures for
conversion of synthesis gas to light olefins have been studied.
2. Experimental
2.1. Catalyst Preparation
All the catalysts were prepared using the coprecipitation
procedure. Aqueous solutions of
(0.5 M) (99%, Merck, Germany) and (0.5 M)
(99.5%, Merck, Germany) with
different molar ratios were premixed and the resulting solution heated to 70ºC
in a round-bottomed flask fitted with a condenser. Aqueous (0.5 M) (99.8%, May & Baker, France) was added dropwise to the mixed nitrate
solution, which was continuously stirred whilst the temperature was maintained
isothermally in the range of . The final
pH achieved was varied between 6.3 and 10.3. This procedure took approximately
10 minutes to complete. The resulting precipitate was then left in this medium
at the required pH and temperature used for the precipitation for times ranging
from 0 to 5 hours. The precipitate was first filtered and then washed several
times with warm distilled water until no further was observed in
the washings tested by flam atomic absorption. The precipitate was then dried
at for 16 hours to give a material denoted as the catalyst precursor
which was subsequently calcined in static air in the furnace (, 6 hours)
to give the final catalyst. For preparation of the supported catalysts, the
same amount (20 wt%) of each support such as (98%, May &
Baker), (98%, Merck), (98%, Merck), MgO (98%, Merck),
and ZSM-5 zeolite (99%, Aldrich, UK) has been added separately to the
mixed solution of iron and manganese nitrates with nominal ratio of .
After the test of all these supported catalysts, it was found that is the best support than the others, so the loading
of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 wt% based on the total catalyst weight, were used to
obtain the best loading of support. The supported
catalyst was then promoted with different promoters (Li, K, Rb, and Mg) by
adding a small amount (1.5 wt%) of (99.5%, Prolabo, France), (99%,
Merck), RbCl (99%, Prolabo), and (99%,
May & Baker) as separately to the suspension containing
50%Fe/50%Mn/5 wt.%.
2.2. Catalyst Characterization
2.2.1. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD)
measurements were performed using a Bruker Axs Company,
D8 Advance diffractometer (Germany).
Scans were taken with a stepsize of 0.02 and a counting time
of 1 second using radiation source generated at 40 kV
and 30 mA. Specimens for XRD were prepared by compaction into a glass-backed
aluminum sample holder. Data was collected over a 2θ
range from to and
phases were identified by matching experimental patterns to entries in the Version 6.0 indexing software.
2.2.2. BET Measurements
Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area BET measurements were conducted using a micrometrics
adsorption equipment (Quantachrome instrument, model Nova 2000, USA)
determining nitrogen (99.99% purity) as the analysis gas and the catalyst
samples were slowly heated to 300 for 3 hours under nitrogen atmospheric. Prior
to analysis each precursors and catalyst and after reaction catalysts
measurements specific surface area was evacuated at for 66 minutes.
2.2.3. Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) and Differential Scanning Calorimetriy (DSC)
The TGA and DSC were carried out using
simultaneous thermal analyzer apparatus of Rheometric Scientific Company (STA
1500+ Model, England)
under a flow of dry air. The temperature was raised from to using a
linear programmer at a heating rate of /min. The sample weight was between
10 and 20 mg.
2.2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
The morphology
of catalysts and their precursors was observed by means of an S-360 Oxford Eng
scanning electron microscopy (made in USA). All of the SEM images in this
study are taken at the same magnification of .
2.3. Catalyst Testing
The catalyst tests were carried out in a fixed bed
stainless steel microreactor at different operation conditions (Figure 1). All
gas lines to the reactor bed were made from stainless steel tubing.
Three mass flow controllers (Brooks, Model 5850E) equipped with a four-channel
control panel (Brooks 0154) were used to adjust automatically the flow rate of
the inlet gases (CO, , and with purity of 99.999%).
The mixed gases passed into the reactor tube, which was placed inside a tubular
furnace (Atbin, Model ATU 150-15) capable of producing temperature up to
and controlled by a digital programmable controller (DPC). The reactor tube was
constructed from stainless steel tubing; internal diameter of 9 mm,
with the catalyst bed situated in the middle of the reactor. The reaction
temperature was controlled by a thermocouple inserted into catalyst bed and
visually monitored by a computer equipped with software. The meshed catalyst
(1.0 g) was held in the middle of the reactor with 110 cm length using quartz
wool. It consists of an electronic back pressure regulator which can control
the total pressure of the desired process using a remote control via the TESCOM
software package integration that improve or modify its efficiency that capable
of working on pressure ranging from atmospheric pressure to 100 bar. The
catalyst was pre-reduced in situ atmospheric pressure in a flowing stream (, flow rate of each ) at
for 6 hours before synthesis gas exposure. The FT reactions was carried
out at (, ,
). Reactant and product streams were
analyzed online using a gas chromatograph (Varian, Model 3400 Series) equipped
with a 10-port sampling valve (Supelco company, USA, Visi Model), a sample loop,
and thermal conductivity detector (TCD). The contents of sample loop were
injected automatically into a packed column (Hayesep DB, Altech Company, USA, OD,
10 meters long, and particle mesh 100/120). Helium was employed as a carrier
gas for optimum sensitivity (). The calibration was carried
out using various calibration mixtures and pure compounds obtained from American
Matheson Gas Company (USA). GC controlling and collection of all chromatograms
was done via an IF-2000 single channel data interface (TG Co, Tehran, Iran) at windows environment. The results in terms of CO conversion,
selectivity, and yield of products are given at each space velocity. The CO conversion (%) is calculated
according to the normalization method [25]:
The
selectivities (%) toward the individual components on carbon basis are
calculated according to the same principle [26]:
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Effect of Preparation Conditions
In this part of
study, we have investigated the effect of a range of iron manganese oxide
catalysts preparation variables at the precursor stage upon the structure of
these materials, and the subsequent influence these structural effects have on
the activity of the final calcined catalysts. The optimum preparation
conditions were identified with respect to the catalytic activity for the
conversion of synthesis gas to light olefins.
3.1.1. Effect of Aging Time
Aging time is
one of the most important factors on the catalytic performance of the catalyst
and it was defined as the time between the formation of precipitate and the
removal of solvent. In our previous study, we demonstrated the importance of
aging time with respect to catalyst activity for oxidation of CO by mixed
copper manganese oxide and mixed copper zinc oxide catalysts [27–35] and for
hydrogenation of CO by mixed of cobalt-iron oxide, cobalt-manganese oxide, and
cobalt-cerium oxide catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis [36–40]. In all of
these investigations, our results have shown that the aging of the precipitates
obtained by coprecipitation leads to phase changes toward the forms, which are
more stable thermodynamically. In this study, to examine the effect of aging on
the performance of iron manganese oxide catalysts for the hydrogenation of CO,
a series of mixed iron manganese oxide catalysts were prepared by
coprecipitation method (, , ) with a range of aging
times between 0 minute (unaged) and 300 minutes for the precipitate. The
catalysts were prepared by calcination at for 6 hours and then were
tested for hydrogenation of CO. The effect of aging time on catalytic
performance is shown in Table 1. These results show that there is a
considerable variation in the catalyst performance with respect to aging time
and the sample aged for 3 hours gave the optimal catalytic performance for CO
conversion in FTS. Thus aging time is a parameter of crucial importance in the
preparation of active mixed iron manganese oxide catalysts for the
hydrogenation of CO. Characterization studies were carried out using various
techniques for both the precursors and calcined catalysts. Characterization of
precursors was studied to establish the importance of the structure of the
catalyst precursor in controlling the structure of the final catalyst and
consequently activity. The catalyst precursors which were prepared using
coprecipitation method in different aging times were characterized by thermal
gravimetric analysis (TGA) and the TGA curves of these precursors are displayed
in Figure 2. For these precursors, the thermogravimetric curves seem to
indicate three-stage decomposition. The first stage is considered to be due to
the removal of adsorbed water () and the
second stage is due to the decomposition of hydroxyl bimetallic or nitrate
precursor (),
respectively. The peak around is due to
the decomposition of or to oxides. The TGA curves are involved with total overall weight loss of
ca. 18–23 wt.%. The
catalyst precursors were also characterized by XRD and similar phases were
identified for these catalyst precursors with preparation ratios ( (rhombohedral). The X-ray diffraction patterns for their calcined samples were
similar together, although the relative diffracted intensities from the phases
were slightly different and their patterns are illustrated in Figure 3. The
actual phases identified in these calcined catalysts under the specified
preparation conditions were (cubic) and (rhombohedral). Note that during the calcination of the precursors, the
carbonate phases disappeared and oxide phases were formed. Some of these
calcined catalysts were characterized by DSC method and their DSC curves are
presented in Figure 4. These curves show that the
catalysts have high-heat conductivity; this important case for the FTS
catalysts is necessary to conduct the produced heat of reaction. Also, the
absence of peaks on the DSC curves showed that the calcined catalysts have high-heat
stability and it might be a reason why has been chosen for calcination of
catalysts. In order to identify the changes in the tested catalysts
during the reaction and to detect the phases formed; these catalysts were
characterized by XRD after the test. The actual phases identified in these catalysts
are presented in Table 2. As it shown, all of these tested catalysts have the
MnO and FeO and iron carbide phases, which all of these phases are active in
FTS. MnO is the active phase for production of olefins and iron carbide is the
active phase for hydrogenation of CO. Characterization of both precursors and
calcined catalysts for the series of differently aged samples (before and after
reaction) was carried out using BET surface area and the results are listed in
Table 3. These results illustrated that
increasing the aging time produced higher surface area materials. The 50%Fe/50%Mn calcined catalyst
aged for 180 minutes was the most active for conversion of synthesis gas to
light olefins. This catalyst has almost a high-specific surface area; it is,
therefore, considered that the higher activity of 50%Fe/50%Mn catalyst may be attributed to its high BET
surface area.
MnO (cubic), FeO (cubic), (monoclinic), Fe (cubic)
300
(monoclinic), MnO (cubic), FeO (cubic)
Specific surface area (/g)
Aging time (minute)
Precursor
Calcined catalyst (before reaction)
Calcined catalyst (after reaction)
0
85.0
82.3
79.1
30
89.3
84.2
80.5
60
93.2
86.6
82.7
120
107.9
98.6
95.6
180
115.8
113.1
109.5
300
119.0
115.6
112.9
3.1.2. Effect of Precipitation pH
A series of iron manganese oxide catalysts were prepared
by coprecipitation method (, , 3 hours aging time) with a
range of precipitation pH from 6.3 to 10.3. The catalysts precursors, prepared
using coprecipitation procedure in different pH, were characterized by XRD and
showed the phase as rhombohedral structure. The catalytic
activity for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis was investigated for the materials
following calcination (, 6 hours) and the effect of precipitation pH on
the catalytic performance is shown in Table 4. It is apparent that during
precursor calcination, carbonate phase leads to the oxide phases and the sample
prepared at gives the highest activity. These calcined catalysts were
characterized by XRD and their patterns are shown in Figure 5. The actual
phases identified in these catalysts were (cubic)
and (rhombohedral). The calcined tested catalysts
prepared at also were characterized by XRD and different phases
including MnO (cubic), FeO (cubic), and (monoclinic) were
identified in this catalyst. Note that in the tested catalyst, the oxidic and
carbide phases are formed which both of them are active in FTS [41, 42].
pH
CO conversion (%)
Selectivity (%)
6.3
84.0
43.0
19.6
8.4
1.5
5.3
7.3
79.6
27.9
19.0
9.0
2.7
7.2
8.3
86.3
22.5
32.1
10.8
4.1
6.8
9.3
81.2
20.0
24.1
10.0
4.0
5.9
10.3
80.0
19.0
22.9
10.9
3.2
6.1
3.1.3. Effect of Solution [Fe]/[Mn] Ratio
Iron manganese
oxide catalysts were prepared by coprecipitation method (, , 3 hours
aging time) with a range of [Fe]/[Mn] solution ratios varying from 100%Fe to
100%Mn and the catalytic performance for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis was
investigated for the materials following calcination (, 6 hours). The CO
conversion and hydrocarbons selectivity percent present on steady-state
catalytic performance under comparable reaction conditions for the iron-manganese oxide catalysts with different [Fe]/[Mn] molar ratios are shown in Table 5. The
catalyst precursors prepared using coprecipitation method in different
[Fe]/[Mn] ratios and their calcined catalysts were characterized by XRD. The
catalyst precursor containing 100%Fe-0%Mn was found to be amorphous and the
other precursors showed the phase as rhombohedral structure.
The XRD patterns of the different calcined catalysts with different [Fe]/[Mn]
molar ratios are presented in Figure 6. In the calcined catalyst containing
100%Fe-0%Mn, the (rhombohedral) phase was observed
and in the calcined catalyst containing 0%Fe-100%Mn, the (cubic) phase was identified. For the other calcined catalysts, different
phases including (cubic) and (rhombohedral) were identified. In order to
identify the changes in the catalyst containing 50%Fe/50%Mn during the reaction
and to detect the phases formed, this catalyst was characterized by XRD after
the test. Its phases were found to be MnO (cubic), FeO (cubic), and (monoclinic). Characterization of these calcined catalysts was carried out
using the BET surface area measurements and obtained results are presented in
Table 6. The BET results show that the calcined catalysts prepared with a range
of [Fe]/[Mn] solution ratios varying from 100%Fe to 100%Mn have different
specific surface areas. The catalyst with 1/1 [Fe]/[Mn] ratio has a higher
specific surface area than the other catalysts (Table 6), which is one reason
for the enhanced performance of this catalyst [43]. According
to the obtained results (Table 5), since the
catalyst with preparation ratio of 1/1 [Fe]/[Mn] showed the highest selectivity
toward both ethylene and propylene, so the catalyst prepared with this molar
ratio was chosen as the best catalyst for the conversion of synthesis gas to
ethylene and propylene under reaction conditions (, , ).
The specific surface areas (BET) results of the precursors and calcined
catalysts (before and after reaction) for different Fe/Mn molar ratio are given
in Table 6. Monometallic 100%Fe is used as the basis for comparing the
physical characteristics and CO hydrogenation performance and selectivity for
the bimetallic Fe–Mn catalysts. As shown
in Table 6, the BET surface areas for the catalysts prepared from different
iron/manganese molar ratios are dependent on the Fe/Mn solution ratios.
However, the specific surface area of catalyst precursor and calcined catalysts
before reaction for each molar ratio were found to be nearly similar, the BET
specific surface areas of the catalysts before and after reaction are different
and the specific surface areas of all the calcined catalysts after reaction
were decreased. The BET data for the catalysts containing 50%Fe/50%Mn showed the high-specific
surface area (/g for calcined catalyst) this might be a
reason why the 50%Fe/50%Mn
catalyst shows a better catalytic performance than the other catalysts.
Fe/Mn
CO conversion (%)
Selectivity (%)
1/0
44.3
33.0
18.6
7.4
2.9
4
4/1
59.1
32.2
20.1
8.6
3.7
4.9
2/1
66.1
25.5
31.2
8.8
3.9
4.5
1/1
81.2
20.0
24.1
10.0
4.0
6.3
1/2
80.7
20.4
22.6
9.6
3.3
5.7
1/4
79.2
21.3
21.8
9.2
3.7
7.1
0/1
72.0
23.4
22.7
9.6
4.0
8.9
Fe/Mn
Specific surface area (/g)
Precursor
Calcined catalyst (before reaction)
Calcined catalyst (after reaction)
1/0
65.1
62.7
59.3
4/1
71.2
68.2
66.4
2/1
98.1
96.7
84.3
1/1
107.9
98.6
95.6
1/2
109.8
104.7
102.1
1/4
111.3
108.9
106.1
0/1
110.8
107.9
105.6
3.1.4. Effect of Precipitation Temperature
Iron manganese
oxide catalysts were prepared by coprecipitation (, , 3 hours
aging time) with a range of solution temperature from 40 to . The
catalytic performance of these series catalysts for the conversion of synthesis
gas to light olefins was investigated for the materials following calcination
(, 6 hours). The CO conversion and hydrocarbons selectivity percent
present on steady-state catalytic performance for the iron manganese oxide
catalysts with different solution temperature in reaction conditions (, , ) are shown in Table 7. According to the obtained
results, the percent of CO conversion was partially changed with the change of
precipitation temperature and is
considered to be practical maximum precipitation temperature and in this study,
it was chosen as the optimum temperature for the catalysts preparation. The XRD
patterns of catalyst precursors prepared by varying the temperature of the
aging solution all showed similar diffraction patterns, the materials were
poorly crystalline and comprised the phase with rhombohedral
structure. The calcined catalysts were characterized by XRD and their patterns
are presented in Figure 7. The XRD patterns of the calcined samples were
similar to each other, although the relative diffracted intensities from the
phases were slightly different. The actual phases identified in these catalysts
under the specified preparation conditions were (cubic), (rhombohedral), and (tetragonal).
CO conversion (%)
Selectivity (%)
40
52.3
29.7
18.5
8.5
2.8
5.4
50
61.5
29.5
22.8
10.1
3.5
6.1
60
71.0
32.5
27.5
10.0
4.1
5.9
70
81.2
20.0
24.1
10.0
4.0
6.3
80
78.1
25.9
30.3
11.1
4.0
7.2
3.1.5. Effect of Different Supports and Support Loadings
Hydrogenation of carbon monoxide is
susceptible to metal support effects, and both specific activity and
selectivity can be markedly influenced by both the metal and the support [44, 45]. In order to study the effect of some supports such as , ,
, MgO, and zeolite into the iron manganese oxide
catalysts (), the same amount (10 wt.%) from each support has been
added separately to a solution containing iron and manganese with above molar
ratio. All of the different supported catalysts were tested for the selectivity
of hydrogenation of CO. The CO conversion and hydrocarbons selectivity of the
catalysts containing different supports are shown in Table 8. As it can be
observed, the catalyst supported by is more active
than the other supported catalysts and shows a high selectivity toward
hydrocarbons. To understand the influence of loading of on the catalytic activity of mixed iron manganese oxide catalysts, a series of
different 50%Fe/50%Mn/wt.% catalysts were prepared by coprecipitation procedure outlined above. The loadings were 5, 10, 20, 25, and 30 wt% based on the total catalyst weight and the catalytic performance results are shown in Table 9. According to these
results, the catalysts loaded with 5 wt.% showed the
optimal catalytic performance for conversion of synthesis gas to light olefins.
This catalyst was characterized by XRD and its patterns on different stages are
shown in Figure 8. The actual phases identified in this catalyst were (monoclinic), (rhombohedral), and (cubic) and its precursors comprised the phase with rhombohedral structure. In the tested
catalyst, different phases including FeO (cubic), MnO (cubic), , and (orthorombic) were identified. Characterization of both precursors and calcined-supported catalysts was
carried out using BET surface area measurement and obtained results are
presented in Table 14. In general, the BET results show that the catalyst
precursors containing different supports and the calcined catalysts derived
from these precursors have different specific surface area. However, as shown
in Table 14, the catalyst precursors have higher specific surface areas than
their calcined catalysts. Furthermore, the -supported
catalyst has a higher specific surface area than the other supported catalysts
(Table 14), which is one reason for the better catalytic performance of this
catalyst [38]. A detailed SEM study of the precursor calcined and tested
catalysts for the sample containing optimum amount of 5 wt% was also carried out. The SEM images of these catalysts are presented in
Figure 9, and have shown the major differences in their morphology. By addition
of as a support to the catalyst, the particle size
of some grains has slightly increased and the supported catalyst revealed
structural differences, which are probably due to the presence of .
This catalyst is comprised of large grains which are embedded in a mixture
consisting of small grains (Figure 9(b)). However, the size of these grains
grew larger by agglomeration in the tested catalyst (Figure 9(c)), which may be
due to sintering after reactions. This result is in agreement with Galarraga [46], who indicate that high temperature could cause agglomeration of these
small grains, which leads to catalyst deactivation under high temperature. The
agglomeration is also caused by the imhomogenity distribution of metal
precursor (Figure 9(a)).
Support
CO conversion (%)
Selectivity (%)
61.3
21.5
23.6
8.2
2.4
5.8
Zeolite
70.5
27.6
22.3
9.3
3.1
6.3
MgO
67.8
36.5
20.9
8.4
2.3
4.7
80.9
30.5
34.7
12.5
5.4
7.1
Silica
73.2
29.9
30.1
10.4
4.5
2.1
Selectivity (%)
(Wt%)
CO conversion (%)
5
80.9
30.5
34.7
12.5
5.4
2.5
10
75.9
51.0
18.4
7.8
3.9
5.0
15
80.0
57.3
15.2
7.5
4.3
4.5
20
82.2
40.6
27.2
10.2
4.2
5.8
25
67.5
50.0
17.5
8.0
3.7
7.8
30
60.9
49.5
16.9
8.6
3.1
9.5
(a)
(b)
(c)
3.1.6. Effect of Promoters
Alkali metals have
been used widely as promoters to improve the activity and selectivity of the
catalysts in the CO hydrogenation [47, 48]. To determine the utility of
promoters on the catalytic performance of mixed iron manganese oxide catalysts, as alkali metals promoters, a small amount (1.5 wt.%) of , , RbCl, and
were separately introduced to the resulting suspension containing 50%Fe/50%Mn/5 wt%.
Then all of these different promoted catalysts were tested at the same reaction
conditions ( and feed molar ratio of at
atmospheric pressure) for the conversion of synthesis gas to light olefins and
the results are shown in Table 10. These results indicate that the addition of
the K, Mg, Li, and Rb promoters into the catalyst texture leads to a decrease
on the selectivity of the catalyst toward light olefins. Thus taking these
results into consideration, the catalyst containing 50%Fe/50%Mn/5 wt.% without any promoter and aged for 3 hours appears to be the optimum-modified catalyst for the conversion of synthesis gas to light olefins.
Promoter
CO conversion (%)
Selectivity (%)
Rb
69.0
48.1
19.8
8.5
2.8
6.5
Mg
76.4
50.7
17.0
7.2
2.1
4.1
Li
73.2
45.9
18.5
7.4
1.7
11.8
K
75.5
46.3
15.8
6.0
1.5
15.2
3.2. Effect of FTS Reaction Conditions
The other
category of factors which have a marked effect on the catalytic performance of
a catalyst is the operating conditions. For optimizing of the reaction conditions
in this study, the effects of operating conditions such as /CO
feed molar ratios, reaction temperatures, and reactor total pressures were
examined to investigate the catalyst stability and its performance under
different Fischer-Tropsch operating conditions.
3.2.1. Effect of /CO Molar Feed Ratio
The influence of
the /CO molar feed ratio on the steady-state catalytic
performance of the iron manganese oxide catalyst containing 50%Fe/50%Mn/5 wt.% for the Fischer-Tropsch reaction at under atmospheric
pressure was investigated and the CO conversion and light olefins products
selectivity percent, present on steady-state catalytic performance, are
presented in Table 11. The results showed that with variation in /CO feed ratio from 1/1 to 3/1,
different selectivities with respect to light olefins were obtained.
However, in the case of the , the total selectivity of
light olefins products was higher and the selectivity was lower
than the other /CO
feed ratios under the same temperature and pressure condition. It is also
apparent that, for all of the /CO
feed molar ratios, the optimum catalyst shows a high selectivity toward
ethylene. Therefore, the
ratio was chosen as the optimum ratio for conversion of synthesis gas to olefins over iron manganese catalysts.
/CO
CO conversion (%)
Selectivity (%)
1/1
84.4
27.4
36.8
12.8
5.4
10.8
2/1
80.9
30.5
34.7
12.5
5.4
7.1
3/1
97.2
68.3
14.1
7.5
2.2
5.9
3.2.2. Effect of Reaction Temperature
The effect
of reaction temperature on the catalytic performance of the 50%Fe/50%Mn/5 wt.% catalyst was studied at a range of temperature between and the
results are presented in Table 12, (, ). The results show that as the operating
temperature is increased, the CO conversion is increased. In addition, for the
reaction temperature at , the total selectivity of light olefins products
was higher than the other reaction temperatures under the same reaction
conditions. In general, an increase in the reaction temperature leads to an
increase in the catalytic performance; furthermore, it has shown that the
reaction temperature should not be too low [14]. At low reaction temperatures,
the conversion percentage of CO is too low and so it causes a low-catalytic
performance. On the other hand, increasing the reaction temperature leads to
the formation of large amounts of coke as an unwanted product, as we found in
this work. Therefore, in this study,
is considered to be the optimum operating temperature because of high-CO
conversion, total selectivity of light olefins products, low , and not formation of coke.
CO conversion (%)
Selectivity (%)
280
39.2
20.6
16.5
3.1
0.9
6.3
300
49.8
23.5
17.3
3.5
1.8
5.7
320
67.4
29.7
22.1
5.7
2.2
6.9
340
84.4
27.4
36.8
12.8
5.4
5.4
360
87.4
30.5
38.0
13.1
5.5
6.9
380
87.1
34.9
32.2
9.1
2.9
5.3
400
89.4
41.3
27.0
7.9
3.2
4.2
430
80.3
40.5
24.2
8.2
3.7
5.7
450
78.0
40.2
25.1
8.5
2.0
5.1
3.2.3. Effects of Total Pressure
An increase
in total pressure would generally result in condensation of hydrocarbons, which
are normally in the gaseous state at atmospheric pressure. Higher pressures and
higher carbon monoxide conversions would probably lead to saturation of
catalyst pores by liquid reaction products [49]. A different composition of the
liquid phase in catalyst pores at high syngas pressures could affect the rate
of elementary steps and carbon monoxide and hydrogen concentrations. A series
of experiments were carried out for the 50%Fe/50%Mn/5 wt.% catalyst to investigate on the
performance of this catalyst in variation of total pressure in the range of 1–15 bar, at the
optimal conditions of and (Table 13). The results
indicate that, at the total pressure of 1 bar, the optimal catalyst showed a
total selectivity of 42.5% with respect to light
olefins and 13.8% produce the products. It is also
apparent that increasing in total pressure in the ranges of 2–15 bar
significantly increases the selectivity and leads to
an increase to 43.2% at the pressure of 15 bar. In the other hand, as it can be
seen on Table 13 at the ranges of 1–6 bar total
pressures, no significant decreasing on CO conversion was observed, however,
the light olefins selectivities were increased and the results indicate that at
the total pressure of 6 bar, the optimal catalyst containing
50%Fe/50%Mn/5 wt.% showed the highest total
selectivity of 59.2% with respect to light olefins
and also led to 20.5% total of selectivity toward the products. The results also indicate that the CO conversion and the total
selectivity with respect to light olefins were
decreased as the total pressures are increased from 6 bar to 15 bar. Hence
because of high CO conversion, low selectivity, and also higher
total selectivity with respect to olefins at the
total pressure of 6 bar, this pressure was chosen as the optimum pressure.
Selectivity (%)
Pressure (bar)
CO conversion (%)
1
84.4
29.8
29.2
11.2
2.1
13.8
2
84.0
26.5
30.7
11.9
2.6
15.6
3
84.0
25.6
34.5
12.5
3.0
16.0
4
84.1
25.1
37.2
12.8
3.2
17.5
5
84.8
23.8
38.9
13.0
3.5
18.7
6
84.0
19.8
40.1
13.2
5.9
20.5
7
83.8
19.7
31.8
12.9
5.7
27.2
8
82.2
19.5
31.2
12.1
5.3
29.6
9
82.8
19.3
30.1
11.0
5.4
30.0
10
78.2
19.0
28.0
10.3
3.5
34.4
11
78.0
18.8
27.7
10.5
2.9
35.6
12
76.6
18.0
27.1
9.2
2.7
38.0
13
71.6
17.2
24.5
7.5
2.1
39.6
14
68.2
16.7
22.2
7.2
2.0
41.7
15
64.2
16.5
21.0
6.7
1.5
43.2
Support
Specific surface area (/g)
Precursor
Calcined catalyst (before reaction)
Calcined catalyst (after reaction)
112.0
109.8
105.3
Zeolite
145.3
139.7
133.1
MgO
123.6
118.2
115.4
157.5
152.3
150.7
165.6
148.2
142.6
4. Conclusions
Many variables in the preparation of the catalyst
during the coprecipitation procedure and the subsequent calcination step are
important in controlling the catalytic performance of iron-manganese mixed
oxide catalysts for conversion of synthesis gas to light olefins. Preparation
conditions for optimum catalytic performance are : ratio at pH 8.3
and for 3 hours aging time, followed by calcination at for 6 hours.
The optimal-supported catalyst was found to be 50%Fe/50%Mn/5 wt.%. The optimal reaction conditions were
found to be with molar feed ratio of , ()
under the total pressure of 6 bar. The
characterization of both precursors and calcined catalysts by powder XRD, SEM,
BET specific surface area, and thermal analysis (TGA/DSC) methods showed that
the catalyst precursors are sensitive to the preparation conditions.
Relationships between bulk phases and catalytic performance were complex,
although the catalysts showed X-ray diffraction features which correspond to
amorphous mixed iron manganese oxide phases. The SEM results show that longer
time enhances agglomerate size growth during reaction conditions which may be
due to the formation of iron carbides as active phases for Fischer-Tropsch
synthesis. From the results presented in this study, it is clear that the
precipitation conditions used in the preparation procedure and also the
operation conditions are of crucial importance and control of these parameters
should be incorporated into the design of experimental programmers involving
precipitation as the method of catalyst preparation and design of catalytic
reactor as the method of operation conditions.
References
D. J. Duvenhage and N. J. Coville, “Fe:Co/ bimetallic catalysts for the Fischer-Tropsch reaction I. Characterization and reactor studies,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 153, no. 1-2, pp. 43–67, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Cabet, A. C. Roger, A. Kiennemann, S. Läkamp, and G. Pourroy, “Synthesis of new Fe-Co based metal/oxide composite materials: application to the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 64–73, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. González-Cortés, S. M. A. Rodulfo-Baechler, A. Oliveros et al., “Synthesis of light alkenes on manganese promoted iron and iron-cobalt Fischer-Tropsch catalysts,” Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Tihay, G. Pourroy, M. Richard-Plouet, A. C. Roger, and A. Kiennemann, “Effect of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis on the microstructure of Fe-Co-based metal/spinel composite materials,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 206, no. 1, pp. 29–42, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Tihay, A. C. Roger, A. Kiennemann, and G. Pourroy, “Fe-Co based metal/spinel to produce light olefins from syngas,” Catalysis Today, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 263–269, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. V. Reshetenko, L. B. Avdeeva, A. A. Khassin et al., “Coprecipitated iron-containing catalysts (Fe-, Fe-Co-, Fe-Ni-) for methane decomposition at moderate temperatures I. Genesis of calcined and reduced catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 268, no. 1-2, pp. 127–138, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. A. de la Peña O'Shea, N. N. Menéndez, J. D. Tornero, and J. L. G. Fierro, “Unusually high selectivity to alcohols on bimetallic CoFe catalysts during CO hydrogenation,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 88, no. 3-4, pp. 123–128, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Dry, “The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis,” in Catalysis Science and Technology, J. R. Anderson and M. E. Boudart, Eds., vol. 1, pp. 159–255, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
D. L. King, J. A. Cusumano, and R. L. Garten, “A technological perspective for catalytic processes based on synthesis gas,” Catalysis Reviews, vol. 23, no. 1-2, pp. 233–263, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Maiti, R. Malessa, and M. Baerns, “Iron/manganese oxide catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis—part I: structural and textural changes by calcination, reduction and synthesis,” Applied Catalysis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 151–170, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Malessa and M. Baerns, “Iron/manganese oxide catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. 4. Activity and selectivity,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 279–283, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kölbel and K. D. Tillmetz, “Process for the production of hydrocarbons and oxygen-containing compounds and catalysts therefor,” US patent no. 4177203, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
C. K. Das, N. S. Das, D. P. Choudhury, G. Ravichandran, and D. K. Chakrabarty, “Hydrogenation of carbon monoxide on unsupported Fe-Mn-K catalysts for the synthesis of lower alkenes: promoter effect of manganese,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 119–132, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Barrault, C. Forquy, and V. Perrichon, “Effects of manganese oxide and sulphate on olefin selectivity of iron supported catalysts in the Fischer-Tropsch reaction,” Applied Catalysis, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 119–125, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. P. Van der Laan and A. A. C. M. Beenackers, “Kinetics and selectivity of the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: a literature review,” Catalysis Reviews, vol. 41, no. 3-4, pp. 255–318, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. González-Cortés, S. M. A. Rodulfo-Baechler, A. Oliveros et al., “Synthesis of light alkenes on manganese promoted iron and iron-cobalt Fischer-Tropsch catalysts,” Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. Butt, “Carbide phases on iron-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts—part II: some reaction studies,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 7, no. 1–4, pp. 83–105, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liu, B.-T. Teng, X.-H. Guo et al., “Effect of reaction conditions on the catalytic performance of Fe-Mn catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 272, no. 1-2, pp. 182–190, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Li, Y. Yang, C. Zhang et al., “Effect of manganese on an iron-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalyst prepared from ferrous sulfate,” Fuel, vol. 86, no. 7-8, pp. 921–928, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yang, H.-W. Xiang, L. Tian et al., “Structure and Fischer-Tropsch performance of iron-manganese catalyst incorporated with ,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 284, no. 1-2, pp. 105–122, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Herranz, S. Rojas, F. J. Pérez-Alonso, M. Ojeda, P. Terreros, and J. L. G. Fierro, “Hydrogenation of carbon oxides over promoted Fe-Mn catalysts prepared by the microemulsion methodology,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 311, no. 1-2, pp. 66–75, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-H. Zhang, Y. Yang, B.-T. Teng et al., “Study of an iron-manganese Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalyst promoted with copper,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 237, no. 2, pp. 405–415, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Schultz and H. Gökcebay, “Fischer-Tropsch CO-hydrogenation as a means for linear olefins production,” in Catalysis of Organic Reactions, J. R. Kosak, Ed., pp. 153–169, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
H. Kölbel and K. D. Tillmetz, “Hydrocarbons and oxygen containing compounds,” Belgian Patent, no. 237 628, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
C. H. Bartholomew, “History of cobalt catalyst design for FTS,” in Proceedings of the National Spring Meeting of the American Institute of Chemical
Engineers (AIChE '03), New Orleans, La, USA, March-April 2003. View at: Google Scholar
N.-O. Ikenaga, H. Taniguchi, A. Watanabe, and T. Suzuki, “Sulfiding behavior of iron based coal liquefaction catalyst,” Fuel, vol. 79, no. 3-4, pp. 273–283, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Hutchings, A. A. Mirzaei, R. W. Joyner, M. R. H. Siddiqui, and S. H. Taylor, “Ambient temperature CO oxidation using copper manganese oxide catalysts prepared by coprecipitation: effect of ageing on catalyst performance,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 42, no. 1-2, pp. 21–24, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Hutchings, A. A. Mirzaei, R. W. Joyner, M. R. H. Siddiqui, and S. H. Taylor, “Effect of preparation conditions on the catalytic performance of copper manganese oxide catalysts for CO oxidation,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 143–152, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Taylor, G. J. Hutchings, and A. A. Mirzaei, “Copper zinc oxide catalysts for ambient temperature carbon monoxide oxidation,” Chemical Communications, no. 15, pp. 1373–1374, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Whittle, A. A. Mirzaei, J. S. J. Hargreaves et al., “Co-precipitated copper zinc oxide catalysts for ambient temperature carbon monoxide oxidation: effect of precipitate ageing on catalyst activity,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 4, no. 23, pp. 5915–5920, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Mirzaei, H. R. Shaterian, R. W. Joyner, M. Stockenhuber, S. H. Taylor, and G. J. Hutchings, “Ambient temperature carbon monoxide oxidation using copper manganese oxide catalysts: effect of residual acting as catalyst poison,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–20, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Mirzaei, H. R. Shaterian, M. Habibi, G. J. Hutchings, and S. H. Taylor, “Characterisation of copper-manganese oxide catalysts: effect of precipitate ageing upon the structure and morphology of precursors and catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 253, no. 2, pp. 499–508, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Mirzaei, H. R. Shaterian, S. H. Taylor, and G. J. Hutchings, “Co-precipitated copper zinc oxide catalysts for ambient temperature carbon monoxide oxidation: effect of precipitate aging atmosphere on catalyst activity,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 87, no. 3-4, pp. 103–108, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Taylor, G. J. Hutchings, and A. A. Mirzaei, “The preparation and activity of copper zinc oxide catalysts for ambient temperature carbon monoxide oxidation,” Catalysis Today, vol. 84, no. 3-4, pp. 113–119, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Mirzaei, H. R. Shaterian, and M. Kaykhaii, “The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of surface composition of aged mixed copper manganese oxide catalysts,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 239, no. 2, pp. 246–254, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Mirzaei, R. Habibpour, and E. Kashi, “Preparation and optimization of mixed iron cobalt oxide catalysts for conversion of synthesis gas to light olefins,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 296, no. 2, pp. 222–231, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Mirzaei, M. Faizi, and R. Habibpour, “Effect of preparation conditions on the catalytic performance of cobalt manganese oxide catalysts for conversion of synthesis gas to light olefins,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 306, pp. 98–107, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Mirzaei, R. Habibpour, M. Faizi, and E. Kashi, “Characterization of iron-cobalt oxide catalysts: effect of different supports and promoters upon the structure and morphology of precursors and catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 301, no. 2, pp. 272–283, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Mirzaei, M. Galavy, A. Beigbabaei, and V. Eslamimanesh, “Preparation and operating conditions for cobalt cerium oxide catalysts used in the conversion of synthesis gas into light olefins,” Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 347–363, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
A. A. Mirzaei, M. Galavy, and V. Eslamimanesh, “SEM and BET methods for investigating the structure and morphology of coCe catalysts for production of light olefins,” Australian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 144–152, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-B. Zhang and G. L. Schrader, “Characterization of a fused iron catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis by in situ laser Raman spectroscopy,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 325–332, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Shroff, D. S. Kalakkad, K. E. Coulter et al., “Activation of precipitated iron Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 185–207, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yang, H.-W. Xiang, Y.-Y. Xu, L. Bai, and Y.-W. Li, “Effect of potassium promoter on precipitated iron-manganese catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 266, no. 2, pp. 181–194, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. King, “A Fischer-Tropsch study of supported ruthenium catalysts,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 386–397, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Reuel and C. H. Bartholomew, “Effects of support and dispersion on the CO hydrogenation activity/selectivity properties of cobalt,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 78–88, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Galarraga, Heterogeneous catalyst for the synthesis of middle distillate hydrocarbons, M.S. thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, 1998.
H. A. Dirkse, P. W. Lednor, and P. C. Versloot, “Alkali metal-naphthalene adducts as reagents for neutralizing oxide surfaces, and the effect of alkali metal treated surfaces in Rh-catalysed synthesis gas (CO + ) conversion,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, no. 14, pp. 814–815, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Gaube, K. Herzog, L. König, and B. Schliebs, “Kinetische untersuchungen der Fischer-Tropsch-Synthese zur klärung der wirkung des alkali als promotor in eisen-katalysatoren,” Chemie Ingenieur Technik, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 682–683, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Griboval-Constant, A. Y. Khodakov, R. Bechara, and V. L. Zholobenko, “Support mesoporosity: a tool for better control of catalytic behavior of cobalt supported Fischer-Tropsch catalysts,” Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, vol. 144, pp. 609–616, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar