Research Article  Open Access
M. S. Ballal, H. M. Suryawanshi, T. Venkateswara Reddy, "Mitigation of Voltage Dip and Voltage Flickering by Multilevel DSTATCOM", Advances in Power Electronics, vol. 2012, Article ID 871652, 11 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/871652
Mitigation of Voltage Dip and Voltage Flickering by Multilevel DSTATCOM
Abstract
The basic power quality problems in the distribution network are voltage sag (dip), voltage flickering, and the service interruptions. STATCOM is a Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS) technology device which can independently control the flow of reactive power. This paper presents the simulation and analysis of a STATCOM for voltage dip and voltage flickering mitigation. Simulations are carried out in MATLAB/Simulink to validate the performance of the STATCOM. A comparison between the sixpulse inverter and the fivelevel diodeclamped inverter is carried out for the performance of 66/11 KV distribution system.
1. Introduction
STATCOM has got a much more widely application due to the advent of the concepts of the smart grid and the microgrid and the rapid development of new energy and the distributed generation. The Distributed Static Compensator (DSTATCOM) becomes the tendency of the reactive power compensation and the power quality control in distributing networks at the present time. It is of great significance to enhance the power quality and keep the relay protection devices working normally as it can make a comprehensive compensation to voltage fluctuation, voltage flicker, and threephase unbalance. The output harmonic in DSTATCOM comes to our attention, as it is a member of the power electronic devices. The relationship between power quality and distribution system has been a subject of interest for several years.
The application of a highvoltage multilevel inverter in a 13.8 kV distribution system Static Synchronous (SSC) is examined in [1]. The capability of the multilevel inverter to limit device voltage stress makes it suitable for highvoltage power conversion. A capacitor voltage balancing controller maintains operation of the multilevel inverter SSC under conditions of phase voltage imbalance shown in EMTP simulations. The concept of power quality describes the quality of the supplier voltage in relation to the transient breaks, falling voltage, harmonics, and voltage flicker. Utility distribution networks, sensitive industrial loads, and critical commercial operations suffer from various types of power quality problems like voltage sag, voltage flickering, service interruptions, and harmonics. The various characteristics of voltage sags experienced by customers within industrial distribution systems are described in [2]. The influence of the induction motor load on the characterization of voltage sags is discussed. It came to know that during a fault, an induction motor operates as a generator for a short period of time and causes an increase in sag magnitude. A microcomputerbased voltage flicker teaching facility consists of a single and threephase voltage flicker generator, measurement devices, and a lamp test system is described in [3]. Information obtained by the facility includes understanding the causes and the influences of voltage flicker, voltage flicker measurement, and the realistic illuminating flicker phenomena.
Topologies like diodeclamped inverter (neutralpoint clamped), capacitor clamped (flying capacitor), and cascaded multicell with separate dc sources are presented in [4]. The relevant control and modulation methods are discussed with multilevel sinusoidal pulse width modulation, multilevel selective harmonic elimination, and spacevector modulation. However, only the fundamental principle of different multilevel inverters has been introduced systematically. A voltage dip is a shorttime (10 ms to 1 minute) event during which a reduction in r.m.s voltage magnitude occurs. It is often set only by two parameters, depth/magnitude, and duration. The voltage dip magnitude is ranged from 10% to 90% of nominal voltage (which corresponds to 90% to 10% remaining voltage) and with a duration from half a cycle to 1 min. In a threephase system a voltage dip is by nature a threephase phenomenon, which affects both the linetoground and linetoline voltages. A voltage dip is caused by a fault in the utility system, a fault within the customer’s facility or a large increase of the load current, like starting a motor or transformer energizing. The high current results in a voltage drop over the network impedance.
A STATCOM configuration is described in [5] that combines the advantages of the diode clamped, d.c. voltage reinjection VSC, and soft switching concepts. This scheme uses asymmetrical switches instead of diodes in a common clamping switching circuit for the three phases of the converter bridges. The theoretical analysis, backed by EMTDC simulation, is carried out. A method of modelling and control strategies for fast load voltage regulation using STATCOMs is described in [6]. Another power quality problem is voltage flicker, a phenomenon of annoying light intensity fluctuation, caused by large rapid industrial load changes. Erratic variations in reactive power demands lead to fluctuating voltage drops across the impedance of a distribution system which results in voltage flicker. Voltage flicker occurs when large industrial loads, such as electric arc furnaces, rolling mills, large mine hoists, resistance welders, and pumps operating in a weak power distribution system. The modelling strategy, similar to that used for fieldoriented control of ac machines, defines the bus voltage magnitude and reactive current input from the STATCOM on an instantaneous basis. The particular coordinate transform used also facilitates extraction of liberalized system dynamics with the help of circuit simulators having analogue behavioural modelling capabilities. In order to accurately determine the frequency response of a multilevel converter, it is necessary to consider the dc voltage polluted with ac ripple, for the duration of conduction periods. Analytical formulae for a single cell and for a generic cascade multilevel converter where the number of cells is a parameter are presented in [7]. The testing is performed in digital simulation in PSCAD. An analytical framework for minimizing losses and harmonics is presented for the cascadedtypebased multilevel static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) with squarewave control being discussed in [8]. The focus lays on low losses, lowvoltage total harmonic distortion (THD), and low dc voltage ripple. Digital simulations are used in PSCAD.
Variation on the typical MPC control scheme for a HStat Com which provides excellent current tracking performance while simultaneously trading off the voltage balancing characteristics with the switching losses is presented in [9]. The scheme consists of a deadbeat current controller that has been integrated with heuristic models of the voltage balancing and switching loss characteristics. System configuration and a control method for a multivoltage cascade converter in order to reduce power loss and volume of a 6.6kV transformer less DSTATCOM are proposed in [10]. Downscaled STATCOM model verification tests are executed restricted to rates at 220 V and 10 kVA. Some of the drawbacks of voltage flicker were explained in the literature [4–8] and the IEEE Standard 519–1992, which is referred widely, defines maximum permissible voltage flicker levels with respect to frequency as shown in Figure 1.
In this paper, two DSTATCOM controllers based on sixpulse inverter and fivelevel diodeclamped inverter are proposed. Both strategies are simulated using MATLAB/Simulink models. Simulation results confirming the effectiveness of the control schemes to impose a linear STATCOM dynamics are presented.
2. Dynamic Model of DSTATCOM
DSTATCOM is one of the most recent FACTS devices for power transmission shunt compensation. It is shuntconnected device which was developed as a static VAR compensator where a Voltage Source Converter (VSC) is used instead of controllable reactors. The STATCOM can be seen as a current source since it is connected in shunt with the distribution system and the load. By controlling the magnitude and the phase angle of the output voltage of the VSC, both active and reactive power can be exchanged between the distribution system and the STATCOM. Being a shuntconnected device, the STATCOM mainly injects reactive power to the system [3]. Radial system with STACOM is shown in Figure 2. is included to represent small losses in the switching devices of VSC. The space vector diagram for voltages and currents is shown in Figure 3, where axes represent stationary reference frame and axes represent synchronous rotating reference frame. The equivalent circuit of the tie transformer between bus voltage and is represented by and . The circuit equation in respect of stationary reference frame can be written as below:
The stationary reference frame in terms of synchronously rotating reference frame is illustrated by the following equation:
This can be elaborated with angle in respect of Figure 3 and thus it is written as
Corresponding current equation is given as
The relationship between current and voltage equation is shown by the following equation: Substituting (2), (3), and (4) into (1) and rearranging, voltage equations for real part in axis and for imaginary part in axis are where is system frequency. The magnitude of phase voltage at bus 2 () is directly proportional to the DC voltage across the capacitor and therefore can be expressed as
The value of is proportional depending on the type of VSC. If the dc current () is defined as the sum of capacitor current () and resistor current (), the power flows into VSC and is described as From (3), (7), and (8), the dc current is given as Equations (6) and (9) form a state equation for STATCOM: where , .
Linearization of (10) around the operating firing angle, , gives a set of linear equations as shown in: The characteristic equation of the system described by (11) is where .
The characteristic equation is not a function of firing angle. Hence, firing angle does not affect the position of characteristic roots on the complex plane.
2.1. Stability Test of STATCOM Model
The stability of STATCOM can be tested with RouthHurwitz criterion. By assigning , , and to represent the coefficients of , , and , respectively, (12) becomes and the Routh's Array equation can be written as Substitute , , and to determine the element in the row:
Examination of all elements in the first column of Routh's array reveals that all elements are positive, and the STATCOM is a stable system. Therefore, the values of resistors, inductors, and capacitors in the STATCOM equivalent circuit have no effect on stability.
2.2. SteadyState Analysis
Equation for the steady state operation of STATCOM can be obtained from the dynamic model by setting all derivative terms to zero. After transformation into  reference frame, voltages and current become DC quantities, that is, , , , . Rearranging and assigning for , steady state equation becomes Solving for , , and , the solutions are
The equations of direct current, quadrature current, and capacitor voltage do not contain capacitor. Hence, the size of dc capacitor does not affect STATCOM steady state performance. Especially, the quadrature current, which is reactive current (), does not depend on the size of dc capacitor. The steady state performances were calculated with the following parameters: pu, pu, pu, pu, and . The plot of active current , reactive current , and capacitor voltage as a function of firing angle is shown in Figure 4.
At steady state, the reactive current () is a linear function of firing angle within this operating range. With advanced firing angle ( is negative), the reactive current flows into the STATCOM and vice versa. The capacitor voltage () increases linearly with firing angles (from advanced angles to delayed angles). The active current () is small and varies very little with firing angle because it only furnishes the losses in the VSC.
3. Simulation Studies
Verification of the proposed control strategies was accomplished through simulation studies using a detailed model of a threephase STATCOM implemented in MATLAB/Simulink. The test data taken for simulation is given in the Appendix. For easy comparison of the performance of a STATCOM under the proposed control schemes, results concerning the sixpulse inverter are presented first.
3.1. Simulation Results for STATCOM with SixPulse Inverter
In this case, the DSTATCOM is prepared with sixpulse inverter. The complete 66/11 KV utility distribution system is shown in Figure 5(a). The circuit consists of a utility system and a step down transformer to stepdown the voltage level to distribution side. In this system, all kinds of loads like industrial, commercial, domestic, and even sensitive loads can be connected to the point of common coupling (PCC). In this paper, heavy inductive load is connected to the system for the simulation purpose. The reactive current () mentioned in (17) is injected at PCC for the mitigation of voltage dip and voltage flickering. The MATLAB Simulation model for DSTATCOM with 6pulse converter for mitigation of voltage dip and voltage flickering is shown in Figure 5(b). The ratings of the system are specified in the above section. In order to analyze the system for the power quality problems, simulation was done as described in following cases.
(a)
(b)
Case 1 (voltage dip). Initially, the DSTATCOM is not connected to the system and the load of pure inductive of 10 MVAR is applied on the system in the time interval of 0.1 sec to 0.6 sec as shown in Figures 6 and 7. The voltage got dipped from 0.9955 p.u to 0.8205 p.u. Now, the DSTATCOM is connected in the circuit; the voltage profile at PCC is maintained at 0.9652. Here, the excessive reactive power drawn by the load is supplied by the DSTATCOM than by the system. So at that instant STATCOM acts like capacitor. The response of control circuit with the sixpulse DSTATCOM is shown in Figures 8 and 9.
Case 2 (voltage flickering). The flickering circuit prepared with the help of RL load which is periodically operated on the system causes the voltage flickering at the PCC (bus1) as shown in Figure 10. The magnitude of flickering level without the DSTATCOM in the circuit is 2.09% which is above the tolerable limits. After keeping the DSTATCOM in the circuit, the flickering level comes down to 0.68% which is below the threshold of objection shown in Figure 11. The 10 MVAR DSTATCOM contains a PWM IGBT inverter, 5800 μF dc capacitor, and a control system. The PWM generator with a 3 kHz carrier frequency generates pulses for the IGBT inverter. The DSTATCOM is connected to the 11 kV bus through an 11/2 kV coupling transformer.
The instantaneous current of the DSTATCOM is obtained by abc_to_dq0 transformation. The decoupled axis component and axis component are regulated by two separate PI regulators. The instantaneous reference is obtained from the measurement of reactive current produced by the inductive load. The current corresponds to the small active power absorbed by the DSTATCOM due to the losses in the transformer and in the inverter. This is referring to (15)–(17). The DC bus voltage is also regulated to compensate for the real power losses. In this direct current control strategy, the reference values () and feedback values () are the dc signals; therefore the instantaneous current tracing control with no steadystate error can be implemented using PI control. FFT transformation of sixpulse inverter is depicted in Figure 12.
3.2. Simulation Results for STATCOM with FiveLevel Inverter
In this case, the DSTATCOM is prepared with fivelevel diodeclamped multilevel inverter. The complete 66/11 KV utility distribution system is shown in Figure 13(a). In this system, also all kind of loads like industrial, commercial, domestic, and even sensitive loads can be connected to the point of common coupling (PCC). Here again, heavy inductive load is connected to the system for the simulation purpose. The MATLAB Simulation modal for DSTATCOM with fivelevel inverter for mitigation of voltage dip and voltage flickering is shown in Figure 13(b). In order to analyze the system for the power quality problems, simulation was done as described in the previous section with similar cases.
(a)
(b)
Case 1 (voltage dip). Initially, the DSTATCOM is not connected to the system and the load of pure inductive of 10 MVAR is applied on the system in the time interval of 0.1 sec to 0.6 sec as shown in Figure 14. The voltage got dipped from 0.9955 p.u to 0.8205 p.u. Now, the DSTATCOM is connected in the circuit; the voltage profile at the point of common coupling (PCC) is maintained at same value of 0.9955 p.u. This is except some switching transients. Here, the excessive reactive power drawn by the load is supplied by the DSTATCOM than by the system. Therefore, at this instant STATCOM acts like capacitor.
Case 2 (voltage flickering). The flickering circuit is prepared with the help of RL load which is periodically operated on the system cause the voltage flickering at the bus1 (PCC). The magnitude of flickering level without the DSTATCOM in the circuit is 2.09% which is above the tolerable limits. The voltages dip mitigation is shown in Figure 15 and the comparison is shown in Figure 16 for fivelevel inverter. The reactive power and voltage flickering are shown in Figures 17 and 18, respectively. After keeping the DSTATCOM in the circuit the flickering level comes down to 0.29% which is below the threshold of objection as shown in Figure 19 and the comparison is depicted in Figure 20. The output voltage and FFT of fivelevel diodeclamped multilevel inverter are shown in Figure 21. The complete STATCOM control system scheme is implemented and the performance is checked for both types of inverters. Output voltage is mitigated by both the STATCOM circuitries and its results are depicted in relevant figures. In these cases, the voltage flicker is also mitigated and improved voltage waveform is obtained. Furthermore, it is clearly observed from Table 1 that the mitigation of the power quality problems (voltage dip and the voltage flickering), done effectively with the fivelevel diodeclamped multilevel inverter DSTATCOM than with the sixpulse inverter DSTATCOM.

4. Conclusion
Voltage dip and voltage flickering are the two major power quality problems which are frequently seen in the distribution systems. These power quality problems in 66/11 KV distribution system are investigated in this paper. The analysis and simulation of a DSTATCOM application for the mitigation of power quality problems are presented and discussed. Here, the DSTATCOM was prepared with the sixpulse inverter and the fivelevel diodeclamped multilevel inverter. A systematic approach for designing a nonlinear internal controller for the converter has been developed. For the STATCOM with fivelevel inverter, the mitigation of the power quality problems is effective. The strategy has been validated with extensive MATLAB Simulation results.
Appendix
The following test data is considered for MATLAB Simulation. Threephase source (utility): 100 MVA, 66 KV, Ω, MH. Transformer rating: 100 MVA, 66/11 kV, Ω, Ω, both , referred to the primary. Inverter rating: +/− 10 MVAR, 11 kV on secondary side of transformer. V is the rated dc bus voltage for sixpulse inverter. V is the each DC source in five level inverter without transformer. ohm. Ω referred to 11 kv side.References
 C. Hochgraf and R. H. Lasseter, “A transformerless static synchronous compensator employing a multilevel inverter,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 881–887, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Yalçinkaya, “Characterization of voltage sags in industrial distribution systems,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 682–688, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 W. N. Chang, “A flexible voltage flicker teaching facility for electric power quality education,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Rodríguez, J. S. Lai, and F. Z. Peng, “Multilevel inverters: a survey of topologies, controls, and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 724–738, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. H. Liu, J. Arrillaga, and N. R. Watson, “A new STATCOM configuration using multilevel DC voltage reinjection for high power application,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1828–1834, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. K. Jain, K. Joshi, A. Behal, and N. Mohan, “Voltage regulation with STATCOMs: modeling, control and results,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 726–735, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Jovcic and R. Sternberger, “Frequencydomain analytical model for a cascaded multilevel STATCOM,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2139–2147, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Sternberger and D. Jovcic, “Theoretical framework for minimizing converter losses and harmonics in a multilevel STATCOM,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2376–2384, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. D. Townsend, T. J. Summers, and R. E. Betz, “Multigoal heuristic model predictive control technique applied to a cascaded Hbridge statcom,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1191–1200, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Sano and M. Takasaki, “A transformer less DSTATCOM based on a multi voltage cascade converter requiring no DC sources,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2783–2795, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 M. S. Ballal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.