Research Article  Open Access
Space Vector Modulation Technique for 3Level NPC Converter with Constant Switching Frequency
Abstract
This paper presents a simple Space Vector Modulation (SVM) methodology for a threelevel NPC converter. Nearest three vectors (NTV) and corresponding duty cycles are deduced through simple generic mathematical expressions. Extra degrees of freedom of NPC converter are used to fully benefit from SVM advantages and to control the switching frequency. Simulation and experimental results are presented and discussed to validate the proposed methodology.
1. Introduction
Power conversion investigation attracted attention particularly in Medium Voltage/High Power ranges [1, 2]. During the three last decades, advancements in power electronics fields have led to innovative converter topologies, called multilevel converters [3, 4]. In fact, compared to classical twolevel converters, multilevel converters are an attractive solution since they support higher operation voltages, reduce common mode voltages, minimize output current and voltage distortions, and optimize output filter size and cost. One of the most widely used and investigated multilevel topologies is the neutral point clamped converter. This topology was firstly introduced by Richard Baker in the early eighties [5]. Later on, several converters based on the NPC were proposed such as the Active NPC [6–9] and the Optimized NPC [10–12]. These converters are classified as the Diode Clamped Converters [13]. The threephase level NPC converter uses () seriesconnected capacitors to divide the DC bus into a set of intermediary voltage levels as presented in Figure 1.
Simultaneously, classical modulation algorithms proposed for twolevel converters such as Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) [14], hysteresis current control [15], and selective harmonic elimination [16] have been extended to multilevel topologies. Among the proposed algorithms, the Space Vector Modulation (SVM) is the most widely used due to its better utilization of the DC bus [9] and higher harmonic performances in linear and nonlinear operating zones [17, 18] compared to conventional PWM strategies. Detecting the nearest three vectors (NTV) among the numerous available ones, selecting and fully defining the corresponding switches duty cycles with respect to possible additional criteria are the main issues of SVM technique in multilevel converter context.
In this paper, a simple approach for a 3level Space Vector Modulation technique available for the NPC converter is presented. In the proposed method, the nearest three vectors and their corresponding ontimes application are simply expressed using generic mathematical expressions. The choice of the Phase Level Sequence (PLS) is used as an extra degree of freedom in order to control the switching frequency. Simulation and experimental results are presented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed SVM strategy.
2. NPC Converter and Space Vector Modulation (SVM)
2.1. Neutral Point Clamped Converter
One phase of an level neutral point clamped inverter consists of capacitors, power switches, and clamping diodes and is able to generate ( capacitive midpoints. The output voltage is equal to the voltage of the capacitive midpoint connected to it. Hence, can take ( values asIn order to generate the output voltage , the IGBTs to and to must be ON. The current is then flowing from the diodes through the switches to to the output . It is to note that any other configuration is not permitted and each voltage level is realized by an only one configuration [19, 20]. In this paper, the triplet (), called Phase Level Sequence (PLS), is introduced for a threephase multilevel neutral point clamped inverters, where ( and , resp.) is the phase level of phase a (phase b and phase c, resp.). Threephase level NPC converters are able to generate PLS and space vectors.
Hence, 3phase 3level NPC converter presented in Figure 2 is able to generate 27 PLS and 19 space vectors.
For a single phase, phase level is equal to 0 when both commutation cells are OFFswitched and is equal to 2 when both commutation cells are ONswitched. The corresponding output voltage for phase level 0 is whereas the corresponding output voltage for phase level 2 is equal to . Intermediate level is equal to 1 and is obtained when only one commutation cell is ONswitched, in which case the output voltage is equal to 0.
Figure 3 shows the (α, β) frame of a 3phase NPC 3level converter.
2.2. Space Vector Modulation (SVM)
For a threephase twolevel converter, the aim of the Space Vector Modulation is to select the appropriate space vectors to apply and their respective application times [21, 22]. Given a voltage reference vector , the SVM strategy selects the two nearest active vectors ( and ) and the zero vectors () and () as shown in Figure 4(a). The application times for these 4 vectors are calculated using the voltsecond balance aswhere , and are space vectors, and are the application times corresponding to and , respectively, and is the SVM period. is the application time of zero voltages: during the first half of this time slot is applied and during the second half is applied if symmetrical SVPWM technique is used.
(a)
(b)
Compared to conventional PWM strategies, the Space Vector Modulation leads to better dynamic performances and a higher modulation index even if the calculation complexity is comparatively increased.
For an level converter, the increased number of space vectors and switching states further enhances the dynamic performances but needs additional calculation capabilities and introduces considerable implementation complexity.
In this paper, a simple approach to implement a threelevel SVM algorithm using mathematical analysis of the obtained frame is proposed. Active vectors to be applied, switching states, and IGBT ontimes calculation are easily deduced using the proposed method.
3. Proposed Algorithm
Figure 5 shows the block diagram of the proposed method, where the main task of each step is written in bold and criterion for each task is written in italic in the neighboring box.
3.1. Step 1: Localization of
The aim of Localization block is to identify the appropriate three vectors , to apply and consequently their corresponding PLS in order to generate an output voltage with a mean value on the switching period equal to the reference voltage. The space vectors needed for the SVM are the nearest three vectors to .
In order to localize the reference voltage vector, its module and phase, noted, respectively, as and , are used. They are calculated using basic (abcαβ) transformation.
The frame is divided into 6 sectors and 4 quadrants according to Figure 6. This sectorization represents the first step to deduce to which triangle (among the available 24 ones) the reference voltage vector belongs. Once this triangle selected, a lookup table gives the three nearest voltage vectors the inverter must generate.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Depending on the modulation depth , specific triangles are used: if , space vector crosses triangles T1, T5, T9, T13, T17, and T21 and if , the remaining triangles (T2, T3, T4, T6, T7, T8, T10, T11, T12, T14, T15, T16, T18, T19, T20, T22, T23, and T24) are used. It is to be noted that the modulation index and the maximum modulation index is obtained when .
3.2. Step 2: Primary ONTimes Calculation
The “Primary ONTimes Calculation” block aims to determine the ontime for each of the three vectors , that is, the activation time over switching period . Step 2 outputs are as follows:(i)The corresponding ontime , for the three needed vectors the converter has to perform on the next . These vectors , correspond to the localized triangle’s vertices.(ii)The PLS leading to the specified space vectors. The PLS choice affects the converter switching frequency.
To perform a rigorous ontimes calculation, fine modeling of the threelevel converter voltage vectors is needed. The proposed algorithm divides the 24 triangles among 4 families given by Figure 7. In fact, the 3 vectors of all the triangles belonging to the same family can be expressed using a unique generic form. Thus, on times are deduced as generic forms depending on the selected family.
3.2.1. Generic Expressions
Family 1 is formed by triangles 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, and 21 as shown in Figure 8. , , and are represented for each triangle belonging to this family and their expressions arewhere is the sector’s index corresponding to each triangle.
(a)
(b)
Family 2 is formed by triangles 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, and 22, as shown in Figure 9.
, , and corresponding to this family are given byFamily 3 is formed by triangles 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, and 23 as shown in Figure 10, and associated space vectors are given byThe remaining triangles labeled 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 form family 4, as shown in Figure 11.
Family 4 expressions are
3.2.2. Calculation
correspond to the application time of . They are the solutions of the threelevel voltsecond balance given byand verifyingThe resolution of (7) and (8) for given , , and can lead to a potentially complex calculation. But, thanks to the proposed families repartition described above, calculation can be easily performed. As an example, we detail this step for family 2.
The substitution of (4) in (7) leads toConsequently,where From (10) and (11) it can be deduced thatEquation (13) givesTo simplify expressions, we introduce defined asConsidering (15), final expression isAfter substituting (15) in (12) one can writeComparing (7) and (17) givesConsequentlyThe final expressions for family 2 are as follows:The same computation method is applied for the remaining 3 families. Consequently, the obtained ontimes vectors applications for the 4 families are summarized in Table 1, where

3.3. Step 3: Secondary ONTimes Calculation
As explained in Section 1, each vector can be reached by multiple PLS. The aim of Step 3 is to choose which PLS has to be activated over its corresponding ontime. Obviously, the inverter performance significantly depends on this PLS management.
The aim of the PLS management is to operate with fixed switching frequency: this is easily reachable when each IGBT switches once during a switching period. In fact, for a selected triangle, the available PLS are applied, so they are all used during a switching period and the transition from one PLS to the other requires only one commutation. For example, if is localized in triangle 4, the order of application of PLS is
3.4. Step 4: Dispatching within
According to the described PLS management strategy, each PLS is realized first by defining the appropriate space vector (, , or ). Since the previously calculated ontimes are the total application time for the space vector within , they are evenly spread over the switching period. For example, if is localized in triangle 4, (of family 4) is applied 3 times during , and and must be applied twice. Therefore, is equally divided into 3 time slots: each PLS that generates is applied during . and are also divided into 2 time slots equal to and , respectively. The resulting control signals of triangle 3 are shown in Figure 12.
4. Simulation Results
The threelevel NPC converter is simulated using PSIM software, where the converter is connected to an RL load, as shown in Figure 13. Simulation parameters are presented in Table 2.

As mentioned in Section 3.1, the triangles covered by the space vector reference depend on the modulation depth . Figure 13 shows the sectors and triangles covered by the space vector for a reference magnitude equal to 100 V. Thus, modulation depth is equal to .
For , when the space vector is circulating in sector 1 (2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, resp.), the triangle containing the space vector is T1 (T5, T9, T13, T17, and T21, resp.). It is to be noted that all of the 6 triangles are covered during 20 ms, corresponding to the reference voltage’s frequency of 50 Hz.
Similarly, Figure 14 presents the sectors and triangles covered by the space vector when the reference magnitude is equal to 250; that is, .
The lookup table implemented on PSIM generates the appropriate control signals depending on the selected sector and triangle. Figure 15 presents the converter’s control signals when the reference space vector is in triangle 3 and the resulting phase voltage. It is seen in Figure 15(b) that the proposed sequencing of the PLS ensures that the phase level (consequently voltage level) changes only once per commutation cell.
In order to validate the converter performances of the proposed scheme, the output line currents are presented in Figure 16. Maximum magnitude is equal to 28 A. Linetoline and phase leg voltages are shown in Figure 17. The expected multilevel waveforms insure the power quality improvement. This is illustrated by line a current spectrum given in Figure 18. THD value is estimated to be 0.69%. On this spectrum, the main harmonic is equal to 20 kHz which corresponds to the switching frequency .
(a)
(b)
It is to be noted that, thanks to the proposed SVM strategy, the converter’s switching frequency is constant. Moreover, when the modulation depth is greater than 0.575, is almost equal to 50% of . Thus, the analysis of the whole switching signals proves that each IGBT switches once per , during almost half of the reference period. For example, for switching signal SC1, it switches once per , if the vector belongs to triangles T2, T3, T4, T6, T7, T19, T20, T22, T23, and T24. When belongs to T8, T10, T11, T12, T14, T15, T16, and T18, SC1 does not switch.
This leads to a mean switching frequency of . Figure 19 gives the simulated switching frequency of the three converter legs. A 20 ms window is used to perform the switching frequency calculation.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Switching frequency of one leg is presented as the average of of the IGBTs in the same leg. They are calculated aswhere is the switching frequency of IGBTi. and , resp.) is leg a (leg b and leg c, resp.) switching frequency.
It is shown in Figure 18 that for each leg is a constant equal to 10.4 kHz. The additional 400 Hz compared to the SVM design (one commutation per IGBT within one ) is due to the transition from one triangle to another.
5. Experimental Results
The proposed algorithm is experimentally tested. A 4 kW threephase threelevel NPC converter laboratory prototype was conceived as shown in Figure 20. The setup parameters are listed in Table 3. The power devices are the F3L150R07W2E3_B11 from Infineon. The proposed modulation method is implemented with a TI TMS320F2809 DSP.

Figure 21 shows the triangles crossed by for different modulation depths. When , crosses 6 triangles which are T1, T5, T9, T13, T17, and T21 (Figure 21(a)). When , crosses the remaining triangles (Figure 21(b)).
(a)
(b)
Figure 22 shows the steady state waveforms of the linetoline voltages and line current.
The spectral analysis of the line current given in Figure 23 shows that first carrier harmonics appear at 20 kHz and then 40 kHz according to theoretical and simulation investigations.
Figure 24 shows the control signals of one commutation cell of leg a during two switching periods. The control signals are complementary, and the IGBTs switch once per period.
6. Conclusion
This paper proposes a Space Vector Modulation (SVM) technique for a threelevel NPC converter. The proposed method consists in dividing the space vector diagram into four categories leading to a simple nearest threevector detection and ontimes calculation. Moreover, the choice of the converter Phase Level Sequence is used as an extra degree of freedom in order to control the converter’s switching frequency. In fact, once the vectors to apply are detected, their corresponding Phase Level Sequences are dispatched among the SVM period such that they are all applied and the transition from one PLS to the following requires only one commutation. This SVM can be extended to higher levels if the space vector diagram available triangles are appropriately defined.
The proposed methodology is verified by simulation and through a 4 kW experimental test bed: the resulting output currents show a constant switching frequency and a reduced current THD. For applications such as renewable energies, this is a valuable improvement since it reduces the commutation power losses and lowers the output and grid connection filters size.
Nomenclature
NPC:  Neutral point clamped 
SVM:  Space Vector Modulation 
:  DC bus voltage 
:  Space vector output voltage 
:  Total Harmonic Distortion 
:  th cell control signal 
:  Phase level related to phase a, b, and c, respectively 
:  Phase Level Sequence 
:  Reference voltage vector 
:  Nonzero voltage space vector in the frame 
:  Application time related to 
:  SVM period 
PWM:  Pulse Width Modulation 
:  Phase of the reference voltage vector 
:  Switching frequency. 
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests related to this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by TunisianFrench Cooperation project CMCU 12G 1120, LAPLACE (University of Toulouse), and LSE (University of Tunis El Manar). Particularly, the authors gratefully acknowledge Professor Frédéric Richardeau, Professor Maria DavidPietrzak, and Engineer JeanMarc Blaquière from LAPLACEUniversity of Toulouse for their support for the experimental validation.
References
 M. Amirabadi, “A new class of highpowerdensity universal power converters,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE '15), pp. 2596–2602, Montreal, Canada, September 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Soumiah, R. P. Vengatesh, and S. E. Rajan, “Performance evaluation of single switch high frequency resonant power converter for alternative energy sources,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT '15), pp. 1–10, Nagercoil, India, March 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Mittal, B. Singh, S. P. Singh, R. Dixit, and D. Kumar, “Multilevel inverters: a literature survey on topologies and control strategies,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Power, Control and Embedded Systems (ICPCES '12), pp. 1–11, Allahabad, India, December 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Christe and D. Dujić, “Statespace modeling of modular multilevel converters including line frequency transformer,” in Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE '15), pp. 1–10, Geneva, Switzerland, September 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. H. Baker, “Bridge converter circuit,” US4270163 A, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
 L. Ma, X. Jin, T. Kerekes, M. Liserre, R. Teodorescu, and P. Rodriguez, “The PWM strategies of gridconnected distributed generation active NPC inverters,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE '09), pp. 920–927, September 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Saridakis, E. Koutroulis, and F. Blaabjerg, “Optimal design of NPC and activeNPC transformerless PV inverters,” in Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG '12), pp. 106–113, Aalborg, Denmark, June 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Li, S. Bhattacharya, and A. Q. Huang, “A new ninelevel active NPC (ANPC) converter for grid connection of large wind turbines for distributed generation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 961–972, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Bouhali, N. Rizoug, T. Mesbahi, and B. Francois, “Modeling and control of the threephase NPC multilevel converter using an equivalent matrix structure,” in Proceedings of the 7th IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD '14), pp. 1–6, April 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Wang and Y. Li, “A new balancing algorithm of neutralpoint potential in the threelevel NPC converters,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (IAS '08), pp. 1–5, Edmonton, Canada, October 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Komatsu, M. Yatsu, S. Miyashita et al., “New IGBT modules for advanced neutralpointclamped 3level power converters,” in Proceedings of the International Power Electronics ConferenceECCE Asia (IPEC '10), pp. 523–527, Sapporo, Japan, June 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. B. Soeiro and J. W. Kolar, “The new highefficiency hybrid neutralpointclamped converter,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1919–1935, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Celanovic and D. Boroyevich, “A fast space vector modulation algorithm for multilevel threephase converters,” in Proceedings of the Conference Record of the IEEE Industry Applications Conference, 34th IAS Annual Meeting, vol. 2, pp. 1173–1177, Phoenix, Ariz, USA, October 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Zhang, Q. Ge, L. Tan, X. Wang, Q. Chang, and J. Liu, “A new PWM strategy for threelevel Active NPC converter,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS '13), pp. 1792–1795, Busan, Republic of Korea, October 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Yi, F. Zhuo, F. Wang, and Z. Wang, “A digital hysteresis current controller for threelevel neuralpointclamped inverter with mixedlevels and predictionbased sampling,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 3945–3957, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Sharifzadeh, A. Sheikholeslami, H. Vahedi, H. Ghoreishy, P. Labbé, and K. AlHaddad, “Optimised harmonic elimination modulation extended to fourleg neutralpointclamped inverter,” IET Power Electronics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 441–448, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z.B. Yuan, J.J. Zhang, J. Hao, and D.Y. Lu, “Phaseshift selective harmonic elimination pulse width modulation for multilevel converter,” in Proceedings of the 34th Chinese Control Conference (CCC '15), pp. 8981–8985, Hangzhou, China, July 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Dargahi, A. K. Sadigh, and K. Corzine, “Selective harmonic elimination for extended cascaded multicell multilevel power converters,” in Proceedings of the Clemson University Power Systems Conference (PSC '15), pp. 1–8, Clemson University, March 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Nabae, I. Takahashi, and H. Akagi, “A new neutralpointclamped PWM inverter,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. IA17, no. 5, pp. 518–523, 1981. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y.H. Yu, N.J. Ku, and D.S. Hyun, “The control algorithm of threelevel NPC inverter under unbalanced input voltage conditions,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC '14), IEEE, Coimbra, Portugal, October 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Dargahi, A. K. Sadigh, and K. Corzine, “Selective harmonic elimination for extended cascaded multicell multilevel power converters,” in Proceedings of the Clemson University Power Systems Conference (PSC '15), Clemson, SC, USA, March 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Deng, Y. Wang, K. H. Teo, and R. G. Harley, “A simplified space vector modulation scheme for multilevel converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1873–1886, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Imen Ouerdani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.