Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Archaea
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 590214, 26 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/590214
Review Article

Archaea: The First Domain of Diversified Life

1Evolutionary Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Crop Sciences, Institute for Genomic Biology and Illinois Informatics Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
2School of Science and Technology, Georgia Gwinnett College, Lawrenceville, GA 30043, USA
3Microbial Resource Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305-806, Republic of Korea

Received 30 September 2013; Revised 15 February 2014; Accepted 25 March 2014; Published 2 June 2014

Academic Editor: Celine Brochier-Armanet

Copyright © 2014 Gustavo Caetano-Anollés et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. R. Woese, “A new biology for a new century,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 173–186, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Grant, “Testing methods: the evaluation of discovery operations in evolutionary biology,” Cladistics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 94–111, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. O. Wiley, “Karl R. Popper, systematics, and classification: a reply to Walter Bock and other evolutionary taxonomists,” Systematic Zoology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 233–243, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. J. S. Farris, “Parsimony and explanatory power,” Cladistics, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 825–847, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Caetano-Anollés, K. M. Kim, and D. Caetano-Anollés, “The phylogenomic roots of modern biochemistry: origins of proteins, cofactors and protein biosynthesis,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 74, no. 1-2, pp. 1–34, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. W. Fontana, “Modeling “evo-devo” with RNA,” BioEssays, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1164–1177, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  7. W. Hennig, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill, USA, 1999.
  8. D. Fraix-Burnet, T. Chattopadhyay, A. K. Chattopadhyay, E. Davoust, and M. Thuillard, “A six-parameter space to describe galaxy diversification,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 545, article A80, 24 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. E. Sober, “The contest between parsimony and likelihood,” Systematic Biology, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 644–653, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. K. Lienau and R. DeSalle, “Is the microbial tree of life verificationist?” Cladistics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 195–201, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. S. Huxley, “Evolutionary processes and taxonomy with special reference to grades,” Uppsala Universitets Årsskrift, vol. 6, pp. 21–39, 1958. View at Google Scholar
  12. C. R. Woese and G. E. Fox, “Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 5088–5090, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Forterre, “The universal tree of life and the last universal cellular ancestor: revolution and counterrevolutions,” in Evolutionary Genomics and Systems Biology, G. Caetano-Anollés, Ed., pp. 43–62, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  14. J. P. Gogarten, H. Kibak, P. Dittrich et al., “Evolution of the vacuolar H+-ATPase: implications for the origin of eukaryotes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 17, pp. 6661–6665, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. Iwabe, K. Kuma, M. Hasegawa, S. Osawa, and T. Miyata, “Evolutionary relationship of archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes inferred from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 23, pp. 9355–9359, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. P. Gogarten and L. Olendzenski, “Orthologs, paralogs and genome comparisons,” Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 630–636, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. R. Woese, O. Kandler, and M. L. Wheelis, “Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 4576–4579, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Martijn and T. J. Ettema, “From archaeon to eukaryote: the evolutionary dark ages of the eukaryotic cell,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 451–457, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  19. C. J. Cox, P. G. Foster, R. P. Hirt, S. R. Harris, and T. M. Embley, “The archaebacterial origin of eukaryotes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 51, pp. 20356–20361, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. G. Foster, C. J. Cox, and T. M. Embley, “The primary divisions of life: a phylogenomic approach employing composition-heterogeneous methods,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 364, no. 1527, pp. 2197–2207, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. A. Williams, P. G. Foster, T. M. Nye, C. J. Cox, and T. M. Embley, “A congruent phylogenomic signal places eukaryotes within the Archaea,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 279, no. 1749, pp. 4870–4879, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. S. Gribaldo, A. M. Poole, V. Daubin, P. Forterre, and C. Brochier-Armanet, “The origin of eukaryotes and their relationship with the Archaea: are we at a phylogenomic impasse?” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 743–752, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. Philippe and P. Forterre, “The rooting of the universal tree of life is not reliable,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 509–523, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Sober and M. Steel, “Testing the hypothesis of common ancestry,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 218, no. 4, pp. 395–408, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. Forterre, “The common ancestor of Archaea and Eukarya was not an archaeon,” Archaea, vol. 2013, Article ID 372396, 18 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. P. Forterre and H. Philippe, “Where is the root of the universal tree of life?” BioEssays, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 871–879, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Gribaldo and H. Philippe, “Ancient phylogenetic relationships,” Theoretical Population Biology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 391–408, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. K. Harris, S. T. Kelley, G. B. Spiegelman, and N. R. Pace, “The genetic core of the universal ancestor,” Genome Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 407–412, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Harish and G. Caetano-Anollés, “Ribosomal history reveals origins of modern protein synthesis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID e32776, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. Caetano-Anollés and M. J. Seufferheld, “The coevolutionary roots of biochemistry and cellular organization challenge the RNA world paradigm,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 1-2, pp. 152–177, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. N. R. Pace, “Mapping the tree of life: progress and prospects,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 565–576, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. P. de Rijk, Y. van de Peer, I. van den Broeck, and R. de Wachter, “Evolution according to large ribosomal subunit RNA,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 366–375, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. Caetano-Anollés, “Tracing the evolution of RNA structure in ribosomes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 2575–2587, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Mallatt and C. J. Winchell, “Testing the new animal phylogeny: first use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 289–301, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Gerstein, “Patterns of proteinfold usage in eight microbial genomes: a comprehensive structural census,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 518–534, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. M. Gerstein and H. Hegyi, “Comparing genomes in terms of protein structure: surveys of a finite parts list,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 277–304, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. B. Snel, P. Bork, and M. A. Huynen, “Genome phylogeny based on gene content,” Nature Genetics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 108–110, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. F. Tekaia, A. Lazcano, and B. Dujon, “The genomic tree as revealed from whole proteome comparisons,” Genome Research, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 550–557, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Y. I. Wolf, S. E. Brenner, P. A. Bash, and E. V. Koonin, “Distribution of protein folds in the three superkingdoms of life,” Genome Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. O. Korbel, B. Snel, M. A. Huynen, and P. Bork, “SHOT: a web server for the construction of genome phylogenies,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 158–162, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. G. Caetano-Anollés and D. Caetano-Anollés, “An evolutionarily structural universe of protein architecture,” Genome Research, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1563–1571, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. L. Baldauf, A. J. Roger, I. Wenk-Siefert, and W. F. Doolittle, “A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data,” Science, vol. 290, no. 5493, pp. 972–977, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. R. Brown, C. J. Douady, M. J. Italia, W. E. Marshall, and M. J. Stanhope, “Universal trees based on large combined protein sequence data sets,” Nature Genetics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 281–285, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. F. D. Ciccarelli, T. Doerks, C. von Mering, C. J. Creevey, B. Snel, and P. Bork, “Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life,” Science, vol. 311, no. 5765, pp. 1283–1287, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. T. Dagan, M. Roettger, D. Bryant, and W. Martin, “Genome networks root the tree of life between prokaryotic domains,” Genome Biology and Evolution, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 379–392, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. S. Jun, G. E. Sims, G. A. Wu, and S. Kim, “Whole-proteome phylogeny of prokaryotes by feature frequency profiles: an alignment-free method with optimal feature resolution,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 133–138, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. E. A. Schultes, P. T. Hraber, and T. H. LaBean, “No molecule is an island: molecular evolution and the study of sequence space,” in Algorithmic Bioprocesses, A. Condon, D. Harel, J. N. Kok, A. Salomaa, and E. Winfree, Eds., pp. 675–704, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  48. K. M. Kim and G. Caetano-Anollés, “The proteomic complexity and rise of the primordial ancestor of diversified life,” BMC Evolutionary Biology, vol. 11, no. 1, article 140, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. V. A. Albert, Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2005.
  50. G. Caetano-Anollés, “Evolved RNA secondary structure and the rooting of the universal tree of life,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 333–345, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. A. Lake, R. G. Skophammer, C. W. Herbold, and J. A. Servin, “Genome beginnings: rooting the tree of life,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 364, no. 1527, pp. 2177–2185, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. B. Guo, M. Zou, and A. Wagner, “Pervasive indels and their evolutionary dynamics after the fish-specific genome duplication,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 3005–3022, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. M. K. Basu, I. B. Rogozin, O. Deusch, T. Dagan, W. Martin, and E. V. Koonin, “Evolutionary dynamics of introns in plastid-derived genes in plants: saturation nearly reached but slow intron gain continues,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 111–119, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. S. Farris, “Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo's Law,” Systematic Biology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 77–88, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  55. H. Fang, M. E. Oates, R. B. Pethica et al., “A daily-updated tree of (sequenced) life as a reference for genome research,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, article 2015, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. T. Cavalier-Smith, “The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 7–76, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. T. Cavalier-Smith, “Rooting the tree of life by transition analyses,” Biology Direct, vol. 1, article 19, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. H. S. Kim, J. E. Mittenthal, and G. Caetano-Anolles, “Widespread recruitment of ancient domain structures in modern enzymes during metabolic evolution,” Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics, vol. 10, no. 1, article 214, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. G. Caetano-Anollés, M. Wang, and D. Caetano-Anollés, “Structural phylogenomics retrodicts the origin of the genetic code and uncovers the evolutionary impact of protein flexibility,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 8, Article ID e72225, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. E. Bapteste and C. Brochier, “On the conceptual difficulties in rooting the tree of life,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9–13, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. A. M. Poole, “Horizontal gene transfer and the earliest stages of the evolution of life,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 160, no. 7, pp. 473–480, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. D. Raoult, “The post-Darwinist rhizome of life,” The Lancet, vol. 375, no. 9709, pp. 104–105, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. W. F. Doolittle, “Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5423, pp. 2124–2128, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. T. Dagan and W. Martin, “The tree of one percent,” Genome Biology, vol. 7, no. 10, article 118, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. W. F. Doolittle and E. Bapteste, “Pattern pluralism and the tree of life hypothesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 7, pp. 2043–2049, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. E. V. Koonin, “Towards a postmodern synthesis of evolutionary biology,” Cell Cycle, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 799–800, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. T. Kloesges, O. Popa, W. Martin, and T. Dagan, “Networks of gene sharing among 329 proteobacterial genomes reveal differences in lateral gene transfer frequency at different phylogenetic depths,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1057–1074, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. S. Halary, J. W. Leigh, B. Cheaib, P. Lopez, and E. Bapteste, “Network analyses structure genetic diversity in independent genetic worlds,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 127–132, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. S. S. Abby, E. Tannier, M. Gouy, and V. Daubin, “Lateral gene transfer as a support for the tree of life,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 13, pp. 4962–4967, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. N. Glansdorff, Y. Xu, and B. Labedan, “The conflict between horizontal gene transfer and the safeguard of identity: origin of meiotic sexuality,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 470–480, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. C. G. Kurland and O. G. Berg, “A hitchhiker's guide to evolving networks,” in Evolutionary Genomics and Systems Biology, G. Caetano-Anollés, Ed., pp. 361–396, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  72. L. P. Villarreal and G. Witzany, “The DNA habitat and its RNA inhabitants: at the dawn of RNA sociology,” Genomics Insights, vol. 6, pp. 1–12, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. S. Gribaldo and C. Brochier, “Phylogeny of prokaryotes: does it exist and why should we care?” Research in Microbiology, vol. 160, no. 7, pp. 513–521, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. B. D. Mishler, “The logic of the data matrix in phylogenetic analysis,” in Parsimony, Phylogeny and Genomics, V. A. Albert, Ed., pp. 57–69, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  75. A. Dress, V. Moulton, M. Steel, and T. Wu, “Species, clusters and the “tree of life”: a graph-theoretic perspective,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 265, no. 4, pp. 535–542, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. N. Lane and W. Martin, “The energetics of genome complexity,” Nature, vol. 467, no. 7318, pp. 928–934, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. M. C. Rivera and J. A. Lake, “The ring of life provides evidence for a genome fusion origin of eukaryotes,” Nature, vol. 431, no. 7005, pp. 152–155, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. D. Alvarez-Ponce and J. O. McInerney, “The human genome retains relics of its prokaryotic ancestry: human genes of archaebacterial and eubacterial origin exhibit remarkable differences,” Genome Biology and Evolution, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 782–790, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. A. Poole and D. Penny, “Eukaryote evolution: engulfed by speculation,” Nature, vol. 447, no. 7147, p. 913, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. E. V. Koonin and Y. I. Wolf, “The fundamental units, processes and patterns of evolution, and the tree of life conundrum,” Biology Direct, vol. 4, no. 1, article 33, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. P. Puigbò, Y. I. Wolf, and E. V. Koonin, “Search for a “tree of life” in the thicket of the phylogenetic forest,” Journal of Biology, vol. 8, no. 6, article 59, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. P. Puigbò, Y. I. Wolf, and E. V. Koonin, “Seeing the tree of life behind the phylogenetic forest,” BMC Biology, vol. 11, article 46, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. D. B. Wetlaufer, “Nucleation, rapid folding, and globular intrachain regions in proteins,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 697–701, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. J. S. Richardson, “The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure,” Advances in Protein Chemistry, vol. 34, pp. 167–339, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. M. Riley and B. Labedan, “Protein evolution viewed through Escherichia coli protein sequences: introducing the notion of a structural segment of homology, the module,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 268, no. 5, pp. 857–868, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. J. Janin and S. J. Wodak, “Structural domains in proteins and their role in the dynamics of protein function,” Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, vol. 42, pp. 21–78, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. G. Caetano-Anollés, M. Wang, D. Caetano-Anollés, and J. E. Mittenthal, “The origin, evolution and structure of the protein world,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 417, no. 3, pp. 621–637, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. J. Gough, “Convergent evolution of domain architectures (is rare),” Bioinformatics, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1464–1471, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. K. Forslund, A. Henricson, V. Hollich, and E. L. L. Sonnhammer, “Domain tree-based analysis of protein architecture evolution,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 254–264, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. S. Yang and P. E. Bourne, “The evolutionary history of protein domains viewed by species phylogeny,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 12, Article ID e8378, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. K. M. Kim and G. Caetano-Anollés, “The evolutionary history of protein fold families and proteomes confirms that the archaeal ancestor is more ancient than the ancestors of other superkingdoms,” BMC Evolutionary Biology, vol. 12, article 13, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. M. Wang and G. Caetano-Anollés, “The evolutionary mechanics of domain organization in proteomes and the rise of modularity in the protein world,” Structure, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 66–78, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. G. Caetano-Anollés and A. Nasir, “Benefits of using molecular structure and abundance in phylogenomic analysis,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 3, article 172, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. K. Brading and E. Castellani, Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003.
  95. J. A. Cotton and M. Wilkinson, “Quantifying the potential utility of phylogenetic characters,” Taxon, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 131–136, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. E. Mossel and M. Steel, “A phase transition for a random cluster model on phylogenetic trees,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 189–203, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. M. H. Bailor, X. Sun, and H. M. Al-Hashimi, “Topology links RNA secondary structure with global conformation, dynamics, and adaptation,” Science, vol. 327, no. 5962, pp. 202–206, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. K. Illergård, D. H. Ardell, and A. Elofsson, “Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence—a study of structural response in protein cores,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 499–508, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. G. Caetano-Anollés, S. K. Hee, and J. E. Mittenthal, “The origin of modern metabolic networks inferred from phylogenomic analysis of protein architecture,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 22, pp. 9358–9363, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. P. H. Weston, “Methods for rooting cladistic trees,” in Models in Phylogeny Reconstruction, D. J. Siebert, R. W. Scotland, and D. M. Williams, Eds., pp. 125–155, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  101. H. N. Bryant, “The polarization of character transformations in phylogenetic systematics: role of axiomatic and auxiliary assumptions,” Systematic Biology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 433–445, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  102. H. N. Bryant and G. Wagner, “Character polarity and the rooting of cladograms,” in The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology, G. P. Wagner, Ed., pp. 319–338, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  103. G. Nelson, “Ontogeny, phylogeny, paleontology, and the biogenetic law,” Systematic Biology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 324–345, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  104. P. H. Weston, “Indirect and direct methods in systematics,” in Ontogeny and Systematics, C. J. Humphries, Ed., pp. 27–56, New York, NY, USA, Columbia University Press edition, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  105. F.-J. Sun and G. Caetano-Anollés, “The evolutionary history of the structure of 5S ribosomal RNA,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 430–443, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. X. Fang, T. Pan, and T. R. Sosnick, “Mg2+-dependent folding of a large ribozyme without kinetic traps,” Nature Structural Biology, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1091–1095, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. F.-J. Sun and G. Caetano-Anollés, “Evolutionary patterns in the sequence and structure of transfer RNA: early origins of Archaea and viruses,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 4, no. 3, Article ID e1000018, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. F.-J. Sun and G. Caetano-Anollés, “The origin and evolution of tRNA inferred from phylogenetic analysis of structure,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 21–35, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. W. R. Ashby, An Introduction to Cybernetics, Taylor & Francis, London, UK, 1955.
  110. J. G. Lundberg, “Wagner networks and ancestors,” Systematic Biology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 398–413, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  111. P. T. Chippindale and J. J. Wiens, “Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis,” Systematic Biology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 278–287, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. J. Mittenthal, D. Caetano-Anollés, and G. Caetano-Anollés, “Biphasic patterns of diversification and the emergence of modules,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 3, article 147, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. A. G. Murzin, S. E. Brenner, T. Hubbard, and C. Chothia, “SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 247, no. 4, pp. 536–540, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. C. A. Orengo, A. Michie, S. Jones, D. T. Jones, M. Swindells, and J. M. Thornton, “CATH—a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures,” Structure, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1093–1109, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. G. Sawa, J. Dicks, and I. N. Roberts, “Current approaches to whole genome phylogenetic analysis,” Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. R. Sathyapriya, J. M. Duarte, H. Stehr, I. Filippis, and M. Lappe, “Defining an essence of structure determining residue contacts in proteins,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 5, no. 12, Article ID e1000584, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. D. Penny and L. J. Collins, “Evolutionary genomics leads the way,” in Evolutionary Genomics and Systems Biology, G. Caetano-Anollés, Ed., pp. 1–16, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  118. M. Ashburner, C. A. Ball, J. A. Blake et al., “Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology,” Nature Genetics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. A. Andreeva, D. Howorth, J. Chandonia et al., “Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 36, pp. D419–D425, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. L. S. Yafremava, M. Wielgos, S. Thomas et al., “A general framework of persistence strategies for biological systems helps explain domains of life,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 4, article 16, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  121. J. L. Friar, T. Goldman, and J. Pérez-Mercader, “Genome sizes and the Benford distribution,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 5, Article ID e36624, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  122. A. Nasir, K. M. Kim, and G. Caetano-Anollés, “Giant viruses coexisted with the cellular ancestors and represent a distinct supergroup along with superkingdoms Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya,” BMC Evolutionary Biology, vol. 12, article 156, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  123. A. Nasir and G. Caetano-Anollés, “Comparative analysis of proteomes and functionomes provides insights into origins of cellular diversification,” Archaea, vol. 2013, Article ID 648746, 13 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  124. W. Martin and M. Müller, “The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote,” Nature, vol. 392, no. 6671, pp. 37–41, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. A. Nasir, K. M. Kim, and G. Caetano-Anollés, “Global patterns of protein domain gain and loss in superkingdoms,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 10, no. 1, Article ID e1003452, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  126. M. Wang, L. S. Yafremava, D. Caetano-Anollés, J. E. Mittenthal, and G. Caetano-Anollés, “Reductive evolution of architectural repertoires in proteomes and the birth of the tripartite world,” Genome Research, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1572–1585, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. L. Guy and T. J. G. Ettema, “The archaeal “TACK” superphylum and the origin of eukaryotes,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 580–587, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. D. Schlieper, M. A. Oliva, J. M. Andreu, and J. Löwe, “Structure of bacterial tubulin BtubA/B: evidence for horizontal gene transfer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 26, pp. 9170–9175, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. M. P. Hoeppner, P. P. Gardner, and A. M. Poole, “Comparative analysis of RNA families reveals distinct repertoires for each domain of life,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e1002752, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  130. H. Xue, K. Tong, C. Marck, H. Grosjean, and J. T. Wong, “Transfer RNA paralogs: evidence for genetic code-amino acid biosynthesis coevolution and an archaeal root of life,” Gene, vol. 310, no. 1-2, pp. 59–66, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. H. Xue, S. Ng, K. Tong, and J. T. Wong, “Congruence of evidence for a Methanopyrus-proximal root of life based on transfer RNA and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase genes,” Gene, vol. 360, no. 2, pp. 120–130, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. M. Di Giulio, “Nanoarchaeum equitans is a living fossil,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 242, no. 1, pp. 257–260, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. M. Di Giulio, “The tree of life might be rooted in the branch leading to Nanoarchaeota,” Gene, vol. 401, no. 1-2, pp. 108–113, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. J. T. Wong, J. Chen, W. Mat, S. Ng, and H. Xue, “Polyphasic evidence delineating the root of life and roots of biological domains,” Gene, vol. 403, no. 1-2, pp. 39–52, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. F.-J. Sun and G. Caetano-Anollés, “The ancient history of the structure of ribonuclease P and the early origins of Archaea,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 11, article 153, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. C. Marck and H. Grosjean, “tRNomics: analysis of tRNA genes from 50 genomes of Eukarya, Archaea, and bacteria reveals anticodon-sparing strategies and domain-specific features,” RNA, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1189–1232, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. W. Mat, H. Xue, and J. T. Wong, “The genomics of LUCA,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 5605–5613, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. C. Brochier, S. Gribaldo, Y. Zivanovic, F. Confalonieri, and P. Forterre, “Nanoarchaea: representatives of a novel archaeal phylum or a fast-evolving euryarchaeal lineage related to Thermococcales?” Genome Biology, vol. 6, no. 5, article R42, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. B. Billoud, M. Guerrucci, M. Masselot, and J. S. Deutsch, “Cirripede phylogeny using a novel approach: molecular morphometrics,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1435–1445, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. L. J. Collins, V. Moulton, and D. Penny, “Use of RNA secondary structure for studying the evolution of RNase P and RNase MRP,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 194–204, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. G. Caetano-Anollés, “Novel strategies to study the role of mutation and nucleic acid structure in evolution,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 115–132, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. F.-J. Sun, S. Fleurdépine, C. Bousquet-Antonelli, G. Caetano-Anollés, and J. Deragon, “Common evolutionary trends for SINE RNA structures,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. D. Caetano-Anollés, K. M. Kim, J. E. Mittenthal, and G. Caetano-Anollés, “Proteome evolution and the metabolic origins of translation and cellular life,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 14–33, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. M. Wang, Y. Jiang, K. M. Kim et al., “A universal molecular clock of protein folds and its power in tracing the early history of aerobic metabolism and planet oxygenation,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 567–582, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. S. A. Bukhari and G. Caetano-Anollés, “Origin and evolution of protein fold designs inferred from phylogenomic analysis of CATH domain structures in proteomes,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e1003009, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  146. M. Vesteg and J. Krajčovič, “The falsifiability of the models for the origin of eukaryotes,” Current Genetics, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 367–390, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. I. N. Berezovsky and E. I. Shakhnovich, “Physics and evolution of thermophilic adaptation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 36, pp. 12742–12747, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. C. Woese, “The universal ancestor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 12, pp. 6854–6859, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. M. J. Seufferheld and G. Caetano-Anollés, “Phylogenomics supports a cellularly structured urancestor,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 1-2, pp. 178–191, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  150. O. Kandler, “Cell wall biochemistry and three-domain concept of life,” Systematic and Applied Microbiology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 501–509, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  151. C. R. Woese, “On the evolution of cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 13, pp. 8742–8747, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. S. L. Baldauf, J. D. Palmer, and W. F. Doolittle, “The root of the universal tree and the origin of eukaryotes based on elongation factor phylogeny,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 15, pp. 7749–7754, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  153. H. Leffers, J. Kjems, L. Østergaard, N. Larsen, and R. A. Garrett, “Evolutionary relationships amongst archaebacteria. A comparative study of 23 S ribosomal RNAs of a sulphur-dependent extreme thermophile, an extreme halophile and a thermophilic methanogen,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 43–61, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  154. J. Martin, D. Blackburn, and E. Wiley, “Are node-based and stem-based clades equivalent? Insights from graph theory,” PLoS Currents, vol. 2, Article ID RRN1196, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar