Anatomy Research International

Anatomy Research International / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 961459 |

D. Mandrioli, F. Ceci, T. Balbi, C. Ghimenton, G. Pierini, "SEM, TEM, and IHC Analysis of the Sinus Node and Its Implications for the Cardiac Conduction System", Anatomy Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 961459, 6 pages, 2013.

SEM, TEM, and IHC Analysis of the Sinus Node and Its Implications for the Cardiac Conduction System

Academic Editor: Nikolai Lazarov
Received09 Jul 2013
Revised12 Sep 2013
Accepted17 Sep 2013
Published27 Oct 2013


More than 100 years after the discovery of the sinus node (SN) by Keith and Flack, the function and structure of the SN have not been completely established yet. The anatomic architecture of the SN has often been described as devoid of an organized structure; the origin of the sinus impulse is still a matter of debate, and a definite description of the long postulated internodal specialized tract conducting the impulse from the SN to the atrioventricular node (AVN) is still missing. In our previously published study, we proposed a morphologically ordered structure for the SN. As a confirmation of what was presented then, we have added the results of additional observations regarding the structural particularities of the SN. We investigated the morphology of the sinus node in the human hearts of healthy individuals using histochemical, immunohistochemical, optical, and electron microscopy (SEM, TEM). Our results confirmed that the SN presents a previously unseen highly organized architecture.

1. Introduction

The first observation of the SN structure dates back to 1910, when Arthur Keith and Martin Flack introduced the world to the location of the sinus node (SN), observing that “we noted this structure, but attached no functional meaning to it” [1, 2]. A century after its discovery, the structure and function of the SN still remain a mystery which has yet to be unfolded. To the best of our knowledge, our previous published study on the architecture of the SN was the first to propose a model with a morphologically ordered structure [3].

First of all, the anatomic architecture of the SN has often been described as devoid of a definitive shape or an organized structure [410]. The results of the 3D reconstructions of the atrial elements [1114] and the mathematical [15, 16] and ultrastructural models [17] of the SN are strongly divergent. The fact that the SN presents a different shape in humans, as compared to other mammals, complicates the task of creating a reliable model of this structure even more [6].

Second, the origin of the sinus impulse is still a matter of debate: what triggers it? Research in the fields of electrophysiology [18] and molecular biology [1924] has pointed out that ion channels and intracellular Ca2 signalling are necessary for the proper setting of a pacemaker mechanism [2538]. Brain-type Na channels have also recently been discovered, but their role is still unclear [3941]. Sinus node automaticity is not fully understood, but it seems to arise from a dynamic balance between positive inward currents which favour depolarization and positive outward currents [42] which promote repolarization [43]. Depolarizing currents are indeed involved in highly stable phase-4 depolarization and pacemaking [15]. Each of these currents provides a potential target for pacemaker regulation [44]. Nevertheless, these currents are not sufficient to explain the pacemaking function of the SN; in particular, they fail to explain the synchronous depolarization mechanism of the sinoatrial cells [45, 46]. Mangoni and Nargeot have clearly synthesized this complex question in their recent complete review confirming that it is still not completely clear, for example, which ion channels are essential for generating diastolic depolarization in the SN, atrioventricular node (AVN), and the Purkinje fibers network and which mechanisms play a dominant role in the autonomic regulation of automaticity in humans [25].

Third, anatomists and pathologists are still not in agreement regarding the internodal tract conducting the impulse from the SN to the AVN. According to Anderson and Ho, “There is no evidence of morphologically specialized tracts between the sinus and the atrioventricular nodes” [4] and they proposed “preferential conduction more likely reflects the arrangement of the working internodal cells and their related cellular properties.” There has been much research carried out in vain in order to identify this “preferential conduction” cellular pathway. Cells expressing HCN4 and Cx45 [23, 46] in the atrium have recently been proposed as candidates for SN to AVN preferential conduction, but the authors also acknowledge that “There was not a continuous tract of HCN4-expressing cells between the SN and the AVN” [46].

For those reasons, the aim of the current study was to investigate the morphology of the SN in depth, integrating standard histological procedures with SEM and TEM microscopy, histochemistry, and immunohistochemistry. Moreover, together with the standard SN section technique based on orthogonal cutting on the SN artery plane, we introduced a new slicing approach, sectioning the SN parallel to the SN artery.

2. Materials and Methods

The collection technique of the SN and the procedures for the examination of the cardiac conduction system using optic and electronic microscopy are identical to those described in the previous communication [1].

Twenty-five autoptic cases in which neither pathologic modifications of the conduction system nor dysplastic modifications of the SN artery were present were chosen. The SN was examined according to the procedure suggested by Balbi et al. [3]; the specimens were sectioned perpendicular to the terminal crest and fixed in FineFix (Milestone, Bergamo, Italy) and microwave-processed (ATP1, Kaltek, Italy). The tissues were paraffin-embedded.

For histology, staining with hematoxylin-eosin and luxol fast blue was carried out; observations were conducted with direct and polarized light; for histochemistry, toluidine blue and orcein were used (all reagents from Histo-Line laboratories, Milano, Italy). For immunohistochemistry, c-kit (CD117), vimentin, S100, -tubulin, synaptophysin, neurofilaments, calretinin, desmin, calcitonin, and Ck AE1-AE3 were tested as were the following neuroendocrine markers: serotonin, somatostatin, chromogranin, and neuron specific enolase (all reagents are from NBL Int).

For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), fixed material was dehydrated in an alcohol-ascending series for preliminary drying, then critical-point-dried, and finally gold-coated (50 A thickness). A SEM Philips 505 equipped with a backscattered detector and digital image recording was used.

For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), sinoatrial tissue was carefully recovered from paraffin blocks; the samples were dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated; after fixation with 1% buffered osmium tetroxide (Histo-Line laboratories, Milano, Italy), the samples were dehydrated in alcohol and embedded in epoxy resin; 60 to 80 nm thick sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and were examined under a Philips 400T transmission electron microscope (reagents are from C.Erba, Milano, Italy).

3. Results

Our work based on new anatomical samples confirmed the evidence of the presence of regular periodic architecture in the SN. Elastic and connective fibres that surround the inner SN artery as quadrangular chambers are approximately 120 microns long. The major axis of these chambers is arranged parallel to the inner SN artery (Figure 1). The most recent data now demonstrate that, at the vertices of these polyhedrons, the connective and elastic fibres are interlaced, forming a “hook-like” closure (Figure 2). Three types of cells were confirmed to be present within the chambers: P (pale) cells, T (transitional) cells, and fibroblast-like cells. Pale cells are spherical and/or star-shaped with long cytoplasmic processes; only P cells are randomly disposed within the matrix of the cages (Figure 3). The T cells are similar to myocytes but with a reduced number of sarcomeres; T cells cover the internal perimeter of the cages, both horizontally and vertically. Fibroblast-like cells show long multipolar extensions making contact with other cells, vessels, and connective tissues forming a thin three-dimensional network (Figure 4). Immunohistochemistry showed that the three cell types of the SN expressed mesenchymal markers indicative of their embryological origin when stained with CD34 (Figure 5), a 110 KDa transmembrane glycoprotein of unknown function expressed by progenitor hemopoietic cells, interstitial Cajal cells, and myofibroblastic soft tissues. Random activated mast-cells are also present (Figure 6).

A helicoid made up of thick and firm connective tissue, always located in the middle of the cage, contains a thin capillary vessel at its centre having its own elastic ring (Figure 7). Figure 8 shows an artistic rendering of the SN chamber reconstruction according to our observations.

4. Discussion

Our results confirm that the SN has a well-organized anatomic structure. It presented unique and differentiated characteristics as compared to the rest of the atrial myocardia. The presence of numerous predominantly activated mast cells, together with their own neural innervation, could make the SN an appropriate and suitable structure to integrate the humoral and neural stimuli which regulate the heartbeat. The strong presence of mast cells in the SN is likely responsible for some of the clinical effects of histaminic dysregulation such as the presence of antihistaminic drugs and anaphylactic shock which can induce alterations of the heartbeat [4749]. Our observations could open a new perspective as how to answer Mangoni’s question concerning “which mechanism plays a dominant role in the autonomic regulation of automaticity in humans.” An ordinate and coordinate structure of the SN, as we described, could perhaps be an introduction to novel research in order to better understand this automaticity rather than the current model based on single independent cells with their own automaticity. In fact, according to this proposed model, the SN cells are supposed to undergo spontaneous depolarization; the fastest are the primary pacemaker cells of the heart which determine the heart rate [25].

Until now, this model has been considered necessary and sufficient. Anyway, even if the necessary depolarization of the SN cells in order to create the impulse is not under discussion and is strongly evidence based, the sufficiency criteria of this model, namely, that single cells can impose their rhythm due to their faster rate, seem to be challenged by both clinical evidence and our results. Is the structure itself, rather than the single cells, sufficient to generate a harmonic and coordinated heartbeat? Could it play a role in SN function, perhaps coupling the contiguous chambers electromagnetically? Could it be important in the forensic study of sudden death?

In fact, an electrical depolarization of the entire atrium constantly follows SN electrical depolarization. Otherwise, it may be worth considering that a magnetic pulse is also constantly generated with each electrical pulse; the heartbeat generates a magnetic field, which is the strongest magnetic field of the human body (100 pT) [50, 51]. Also external electromagnetic fields have been shown to markedly affect heart function in experimental animals [52].

The current work was designed to demonstrate and confirm the order in the structure of the SN. This confirmation could induce us to hypothesize an important role of this coupled and organized structure, and not exclusively of the single cells of the SN, in the generation and conduction of the electromagnetic cardiac pulse.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.


The authors thank Fiorella Belpoggi (Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Centre, Ramazzini Institute), Peter Duesberg (UC Berkeley), and David Rasnick (Berkeley) for their critical discussion and advice. The authors’ research was conducted in the years 2011 and 2012 at Department of Legal Medicine, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy, and at the Surgical Pathology Department, S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy, without grants or fundings from National Institute of Health (NIH), Wellcome Trust, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), and other public or private institutions.


  1. A. Keith and M. W. Flack, “The form and nature of the muscular connections between the primary divisions of the vertebrate heart,” Journal of Anatomy and Physiology, vol. 41, part 3, pp. 172–189, 1907. View at: Google Scholar
  2. M. E. Silverman, D. Grove, and C. B. Upshaw, “Why does the heart beat? The discovery of the electrical system of the heart,” Circulation, vol. 113, no. 23, pp. 2775–2781, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Balbi, C. Ghimenton, G. Pasquinelli, L. Foroni, M. Grillini, and G. Pierini, “Advancement in the examination of the human cardiac sinus node: an unexpected architecture and a novel cell type could interest the forensic science,” The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 112–118, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. H. Anderson and S. Y. Ho, “The architecture of the sinus node, the atrioventricular conduction axis, and the internodal atrial myocardium,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1233–1248, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  5. T. N. James, “Anatomy of the human sinus node,” The Anatomical Record, vol. 141, pp. 109–139, 1961. View at: Google Scholar
  6. T. N. James, L. Sherf, G. Fine, and A. R. Morales, “Comparative ultrastructure of the sinus node in man and dog,” Circulation, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 139–163, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  7. F. Leonelli, M. Richey, S. Beheiry, K. Rajkovich, and A. Natale, “Tridimensional mapping: guided modification of the sinus node,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1214–1217, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  8. J. E. Lowe, T. Hartwich, M. Takla, and J. Schaper, “Ultrastructure of electrophysiologically identified human sinoatrial nodes,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 401–409, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. R. Boyett, H. Honjo, and I. Kodama, “The sinoatrial node, a heterogeneous pacemaker structure,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 658–687, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. H. Anderson, “The disposition, morphology and innervation of cardiac specialized tissue in the guinea-pig,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 453–468, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  11. H. Dobrzynski, J. Li, J. Tellez et al., “Computer three-dimensional reconstruction of the sinoatrial node,” Circulation, vol. 111, no. 7, pp. 846–854, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Rentschler, D. M. Vaidya, H. Tamaddon et al., “Visualization and functional characterization of the developing murine cardiac conduction system,” Development, vol. 128, no. 10, pp. 1785–1792, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  13. A. F. M. Moorman, V. M. Christoffels, and R. H. Anderson, “Anatomic substrates for cardiac conduction,” Heart Rhythm, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 875–886, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. R. Boyett, J. Li, S. Inada et al., “Imaging the heart: computer 3-dimensional anatomic models of the heart,” Journal of Electrocardiology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 113–120, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. Wilders, “Computer modelling of the sinoatrial node,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 189–207, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Toyama, M. R. Boyett, E.-. Watanabe, H. Honjo, T. Anno, and I. Kodama, “Computer simulation of the electrotonic modulation of pacemaker activity in the sinoatrial node by atrial muscle,” Journal of Electrocardiology, vol. 28, pp. 212–215, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. B. Laskowski and L. S. D'Agrosa, “The ultrastructure of the sinu-atrial node of the bat,” Acta Anatomica, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 85–101, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M. Baruscotti and D. DiFrancesco, “Pacemaker channels,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1015, pp. 111–121, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Yamamoto, H. Dobrzynski, J. Tellez et al., “Extended atrial conduction system characterised by the expression of the HCN4 channel and connexin45,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 271–281, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Miake, E. Marbán, and H. B. Nuss, “Gene therapy: biological pacemaker created by gene transfer,” Nature, vol. 419, no. 6903, pp. 132–133, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  21. M. R. Rosen, P. R. Brink, I. S. Cohen, and R. B. Robinson, “Genes, stem cells and biological pacemakers,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 12–23, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Liu, H. Dobrzynski, J. Yanni, M. R. Boyett, and M. Lei, “Organisation of the mouse sinoatrial node: structure and expression of HCN channels,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 729–738, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. F. Tse, T. Xue, C. P. Lau et al., “Bioartificial sinus node constructed via in vivo gene transfer of an engineered pacemaker HCN channel reduces the dependence on electronic pacemaker in a sick-sinus syndrome model,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 1000–1011, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. E. Kizana, S. L. Ginn, C. M. Smyth et al., “Fibroblasts modulate cardiomyocyte excitability: implications for cardiac gene therapy,” Gene Therapy, vol. 13, no. 22, pp. 1611–1615, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. E. Mangoni and J. Nargeot, “Genesis and regulation of the heart automaticity,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 919–982, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. C. Michaels, E. P. Matyas, and J. Jalife, “Mechanisms of sinoatrial pacemaker synchronization: a new hypothesis,” Circulation Research, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 704–714, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. Miragoli, G. Gaudesius, and S. Rohr, “Electrotonic modulation of cardiac impulse conduction by myofibroblasts,” Circulation Research, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 801–810, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. Y. Bogdanov, T. M. Vinogradova, and E. G. Lakatta, “Sinoatrial nodal cell ryanodine receptor and Na+-Ca2+ exchanger: molecular partners in peacemaker regulation,” Circulation Research, vol. 88, no. 12, pp. 1254–1258, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  29. H. Honjo, S. Inada, M. K. Lancaster et al., “Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release is not a dominating factor in sinoatrial node pacemaker activity,” Circulation research, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. e41–e44, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  30. I. Kodama, M. R. Nikmaram, M. R. Boyett, R. Suzuki, H. Honjo, and J. M. Owen, “Regional differences in the role of the Ca2+ and Na+ currents in pacemaker activity in the sinoatrial node,” The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 272, no. 6, pp. H2793–H2806, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  31. J. C. Denyer and H. F. Brown, “Rabbit sino-atrial node cells: isolation and electrophysiological properties,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 428, pp. 405–424, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  32. J. Hüser, L. A. Blatter, and S. L. Lipsius, “Intracellular Ca2+ release contributes to automaticity in cat atrial pacemaker cells,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 524, no. 2, pp. 415–422, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  33. T. M. Vinogradova, A. E. Lyashkov, W. Zhu et al., “High basal protein kinase A-dependent phosphorylation drives rhythmic internal Ca2+ store oscillations and spontaneous beating of cardiac pacemaker cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 505–514, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. Irisawa, H. F. Brown, and W. Giles, “Cardiac pacemaking in the sinoatrial node,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 197–227, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  35. M. E. Mangoni, B. Couette, E. Bourinet et al., “Functional role of L-type Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels in cardiac pacemaker activity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. 5543–5548, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Stieber, S. Herrmann, S. Feil et al., “The hyperpolarization-activated channel HCN4 is required for the generation of pacemaker action potentials in the embryonic heart,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 25, pp. 15235–15240, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. Uese, N. Hagiwara, T. Miyawaki, and H. Kasanuki, “Properties of the transient outward current in rabbit sino-atrial node cells,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1975–1984, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. B. Robinson, M. Baruscotti, and D. DiFrancesco, “Autonomic modulation of heart rate: pitfalls of nonselective channel blockade,” The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 285, no. 6, pp. H2865–H2866, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  39. S. K. G. Maier, R. E. Westenbroek, T. T. Yamanushi et al., “An unexpected requirement for brain-type sodium channels for control of heart rate in the mouse sinoatrial node,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 3507–3512, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. N. Hagiwara, H. Irisawa, and M. Kameyama, “Contribution of two types of calcium currents to the pacemaker potentials of rabbit sino-atrial node cells,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 395, pp. 233–253, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  41. Y. Kurata, H. Matsuda, I. Hisatome, and T. Shibamoto, “Effects of pacemaker currents on creation and modulation of human ventricular pacemaker: theoretical study with application to biological pacemaker engineering,” The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 292, no. 1, pp. H701–H718, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. Jalife, “Synchronization of pacemaker cells in the SN,” in Atrial Arrhythmias: Current Concepts and Management, P. Touboul and A. L. Waldo, Eds., p. 69, Mosby Year Book, St Louis, Mo, USA, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  43. J. P. Boineau, T. E. Canavan, R. B. Schuessler, M. E. Cain, P. B. Corr, and J. L. Cox, “Demonstration of a widely distributed atrial pacemaker complex in the human heart,” Circulation, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1221–1237, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  44. A. Zaza, G. Maccaferri, M. Mangoni, and D. DiFrancesco, “Intracellular calcium does not directly modulate cardiac pacemaker (i(f)) channels,” Pflugers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, vol. 419, no. 6, pp. 662–664, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  45. W. K. Bleeker, A. J. C. Mackaay, M. Masson-Pevet, L. N. Bouman, and A. E. Becker, “Functional and morphological organization of the rabbit sinus node,” Circulation Research, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  46. M. Yamamoto, H. Dobrzynski, J. Tellez et al., “Extended atrial conduction system characterised by the expression of the HCN4 channel and connexin45,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 271–281, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. C. Reid, J. A. Brazin, C. Morrey, R. B. Silver, and R. Levi, “Targeting cardiac mast cells: pharmacological modulation of the local renin-angiotensin system,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 17, no. 34, pp. 3744–3752, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  48. “Cetirizine and loratadine: minimal risk of QT prolongation,” Prescrire International, vol. 19, no. 105, pp. 26–28, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  49. A. Genovese, F. W. Rossi, G. Spadaro, M. R. Galdiero, and G. Marone, “Human cardiac mast cells in anaphylaxis,” Chemical Immunology and Allergy, vol. 95, pp. 98–109, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. G. Bison, R. Wynands, and A. Weis, “Dynamical mapping of the human cardiomagnetic field with a room-temperature, laser-optical sensor,” Optics Express, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 904–909, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  51. M. Burghoff, J. Nenonen, L. Trahms, and T. Katila, “Conversion of magnetocardiographic recordings between two different multichannel SQUID devices,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 869–875, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. A. Kiray, H. Tayefi, M. Kiray et al., “The effects of exposure to electromagnetic field on rat myocardium,” Toxicology and Industrial Health, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 418–425, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 D. Mandrioli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.