Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 213817, 7 pages
Clinical Study

The Columbus Knee System: 4-Year Results of a New Deep Flexion Design Compared to the NexGen Full Flex Implant

1Orthopaedic Clinic Donaueschingen, Karlstraβe 10, 78 166 Donaueschingen, Germany
2Orthopaedic Department, University of Göttingen, Robert Koch Straβe 40, 37 075 Göttingen, Germany

Received 15 November 2011; Revised 17 December 2011; Accepted 19 December 2011

Academic Editor: Changhai Ding

Copyright © 2012 D. Goebel and W. Schultz. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [3 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Mark Yaffe, Michael Luo, Nitin Goyal, Philip Chan, Anay Patel, Max Cayo, and S. David Stulberg, “Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2013. View at Publisher ยท View at Google Scholar
  • Nadia C. Sciberras, Angela H. Deakin, and Frederic Picard, “Mid-term clinical follow-up of the Columbus® cruciate retaining total knee replacement,” Current Orthopaedic Practice, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. E1–E6, 2015. View at Publisher ยท View at Google Scholar
  • Seong Hwan Kim, Jung-Won Lim, Young-Bong Ko, Min-Gu Song, and Han-Jun Lee, “Comparison of ultra-congruent mobile- and fixed-bearing navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty with minimum 5-year follow-up,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016. View at Publisher ยท View at Google Scholar