Table of Contents
Advances in Statistics
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 742863, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/742863
Research Article

On Cronbach’s Alpha as the Mean of All Possible -Split Alphas

Institute of Psychology, Unit of Methodology and Statistics, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands

Received 13 July 2014; Accepted 17 September 2014; Published 30 September 2014

Academic Editor: Steve Su

Copyright © 2014 Matthijs J. Warrens. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. M. Lord and M. R. Novick, Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 1968.
  2. R. P. McDonald, Test Theory: A Unified Treatment, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1999.
  3. W. Revelle and R. E. Zinbarg, “Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: comments on Sijtsma,” Psychometrika, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 145–154, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. H. G. Osburn, “Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients,” Psychological Methods, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 343–355, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. M. Cortina, “What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 98–104, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. J. Cronbach, “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests,” Psychometrika, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297–334, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Field, Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, Sage, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 3rd edition, 2009.
  8. R. M. Furr and V. R. Bacharach, Psychometrics. An Introduction, Sage, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 2008.
  9. K. Sijtsma, “On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's alpha,” Psychometrika, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 107–120, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. M. J. Warrens, “Some relationships between Cronbach's alpha and the Spearman-Brown formula,” Journal of Classification. In press.
  11. L. Guttman, “A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability,” Psychometrika, vol. 10, pp. 255–282, 1945. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. D. Grayson, “Some myths and legends in quantitative psychology,” Understanding Statistics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 101–134, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. A. P. Keszei, M. Novak, and D. L. Streiner, “Introduction to health measurement scales,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 319–323, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Tavakol and R. Dennick, “Making sense of Cronbach's alpha,” International Journal of Medical Education, vol. 2, pp. 53–55, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  15. S. B. Green and S. L. Hershberger, “Correlated errors in true score models and their effect on coefficient alpha,” Structural Equation Modeling, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 251–270, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. B. Green and Y. Yang, “Commentary on coefficient alpha: a cautionary tale,” Psychometrika, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 121–135, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Sheng and Z. Sheng, “Is coefficient alpha robust to non-normal data?” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 3, article 34, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. S. Raju, “A generalization of coefficient alpha,” Psychometrika, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 549–565, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. J. C. Flanagan, “A proposed procedure for increasing the efficiency of objective tests,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 17–21, 1937. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. J. Rulon, “A simplified procedure for determining the reliability of a test by split-halves,” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 9, pp. 99–103, 1939. View at Google Scholar
  21. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 1970. View at MathSciNet