Table of Contents
Advances in Software Engineering
Volume 2011, Article ID 495232, 7 pages
Research Article

ReMoFP: A Tool for Counting Function Points from UML Requirement Models

1Synergia, Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-010, Brazil
2Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-010, Brazil

Received 20 December 2010; Accepted 16 February 2011

Academic Editor: Letha Hughes Etzkorn

Copyright © 2011 Vitor A. Batista et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. IFPUG, IFPUG Counting Practices Manual—Release. 4.2.1, International Function Point Users Group, Westerville, Ohio, USA, 2005.
  2. A. J. Albrecht, Function Point Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  3. B. Kitchenham, “Counterpoint: the problem with function points,” IEEE Software, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 29, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Uemura, S. Kusumoto, and K. Inoue, “Function point measurement tool for UML design specification,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Software Metrics Symposium, pp. 62–69, November 1999.
  5. D. Gupta, S. J. Kaushal, and M. Sadiq, “Software estimation tool based on three -layer model for software engineering metrics,” in Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology (ICMIT '08), pp. 623–628, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. IEEE, “IEEE std 14143.1-2000: implementation note for IEEE adoption of ISO/IEC 14143-1:1998 Information Technology—Software Measurement—Functional Size Measurement—part 1: definition of concepts,” Tech. Rep., Software Engineering, IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Ram and S. V. G. K. Raju, “Object oriented design function points,” in Proceedings of the 1st Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software (APAQS '00), pp. 121–126, 2000.
  8. OMG, Unified Modeling Language Specification, Version 2.0, Object Management Group (OMG), 2005.
  9. V. Harput, H. Kaindl, and S. Kramer, “Extending function point analysis to object-oriented requirements specifications,” in Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS '05), pp. 361–370. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. B. Pimentel, W. P. P. Filho, C. Pádua, and F. T. Machado, “Synergia: a software engineering laboratory to bridge the gap between university and industry,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Summit on Software Engineering Education, pp. 21–24, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  11. W. de Pádua, “Quality gates in use-case driven development,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Quality (WoSQ '06), pp. 33–38, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  12. W. de Pádua, Engenharia de Software: Fundamentos, Métodos e Padrões, LTC, 3rd edition, 2008.
  13. P. Kruchten, The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 3rd edition, 2003.
  14. IEEE, “IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications,” Tech. Rep. IEEE Std 830-1998, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  15. OMG, Object Constraint Language 2.0 Specification, Object Management Group (OMG), 2005.
  16. G. Caldiera, G. Antoniol, R. Fiutem, and C. Lokan, “Definition and experimental evaluation of function points for object-oriented systems,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Software Metrics Symposium, pp. 167–178, November 1998.
  17. G. Cantone, D. Pace, and G. Calavaro, “Applying function point to unified modeling language: conversion model and pilot study,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS '04), pp. 280–291, September 2004.
  18. B. W. Boehm, C. Abts, A. W. Brown et al., Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II, Prentice Hall, New York, NY, USA, 2000.