Table of Contents
Advances in Software Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 468021, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/468021
Review Article

Thematic Review and Analysis of Grounded Theory Application in Software Engineering

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1N 6N5

Received 5 June 2013; Accepted 4 September 2013

Academic Editor: Phillip A. Laplante

Copyright © 2013 Omar Badreddin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, NY, USA, 1977.
  2. W. J. Orlikowski, “CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 309–340, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. Dilthey and H. Rickman, Dilthey Selected Writings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1979.
  4. H. Blumer, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, University of California Press, California, Calif, USA, 1986.
  5. L. Calloway and G. Ariav, “Developing and using a qualitative methodology to study relationships among designers and tools,” in Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, pp. 175–193, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  6. K. Toraskar, “How managerial users evaluate their decision support: a grounded theory approach,” in Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8. 2 Working Conference, pp. 195–225, Copenhagen, Denmark, December 1991.
  7. R. Baskerville and J. Pries-Heje, “Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice,” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  8. B. Fitzgerald, “The use of systems development methodologies in practice: a field study,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 201–212, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. A. Bowen, “Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  10. O. Markku and K. S. Seija, “Product focused software process improvement,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference (profes '02), Rovaniemi, Finland, December 2002.
  11. E. Edmonds, “A process for the development of software for non-technical users as an adaptive system,” General Systems, vol. 19, pp. 215–217, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  12. K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. van Bennekum et al., “Manifesto for agile software development,” Retrieved November, vol 11, pg 2004, 2001.
  13. T. Kahkonen, P. Abrahamsson, N. R. Center, and F. Espoo, “Digging into the fundamentals of extreme programming building the theoretical base for agile methods,” in Proceedings of the 29th Euromicro Conference, pp. 273–280, IEEE Computer Society, Patras, Greece, 2003.
  14. G. Coleman, “eXtreme Programming (XP) as a “minimum” software process: a grounded theory,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference on Computer Software and Applications (COMPSAC '04), pp. 30–31, IEEE Computer Society, Honk Kong, September 2004.
  15. G. Coleman and O. Connor R, Software Process in Practice: A Grounded Theory of the Irish Software Industry, vol. 4257 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2006.
  16. G. Coleman and R. O'Connor, “Investigating software process in practice: a grounded theory perspective,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 772–784, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Whitworth and R. Biddle, Motivation and Cohesion in Agile teams, vol. 4536 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2007.
  18. E. Whitworth and R. Biddle, “The social nature of agile teams,” in Proceedings of the Agile Conference (AGILE '07), vol. 3, pp. 26–36, August 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Layman, L. Williams, D. Damian, and H. Bures, “Essential communication practices for Extreme Programming in a global software development team,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 781–794, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. Ramesh, L. Cao, K. Mohan, and P. Xu, “Can distributed software development be agile?” Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 41–46, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Qureshi, M. Liu, and D. Vogel, “A grounded theory analysis of e-collaboration effects for distributed project management,” in Proceedings of 38th Annual Hawaiian International Conference on Systems Sciences, p. 264, Big Island, Hawaii, USA, January 2005. View at Scopus
  22. M. Last, “Understanding the group development process in global software teams,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference on Frontiers in Education (FIE '03), vol. 3, November 2003. View at Scopus
  23. A. Martin, R. Biddle, and J. Noble, When XP Met Outsourcing, vol. 3092 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2004.
  24. D. Damian and D. Zowghi, “Requirements Engineering challenges in multi-site software development organizations,” Requirements Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 149–160, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  25. A. Padula, “Requirements engineering process selection at Hewlett-Packard,” in Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE '04), pp. 296–300, IEEE, Palo Alto, Calif, USA, September 2004. View at Scopus
  26. G. Galal and R. Paul, “A qualitative scenario approach to managing evolving requirements,” Requirements Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 92–102, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. Oliver, G. Whymark, and C. Romm, “Researching ERP adoption: an internet-based grounded theory approach,” Online Information Review, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 585–603, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Carver, “The impact of background and experience on software inspections,” Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 259–262, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Y. Ye and K. Kishida, “Toward an understanding of the motivation of open source software developers,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 419–429, May 2003. View at Scopus
  30. J. Sillito, G. C. Murphy, and K. De Volder, “Questions programmers ask during software evolution tasks,” in Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 23–34, ACM, New York, NY, USA, November 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Dingsøyr and E. Røyrvik, “An empirical study of an informal knowledge repository in a medium-sized software consulting company,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 84–92, May 2003. View at Scopus
  32. K. Sherif and A. Vinze, “Barriers to adoption of software reuse: a qualitative study,” Information and Management, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 159–175, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. R. Murray, Discourse structure of software explanation: snapshot theory, cognitive patterns and grounded theory methods [Ph.D. thesis], University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, 2006.
  34. S. Y. Yahaya and N. Abu-Bakar, “New product development management issues and decision-making approaches,” Management Decision, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1123–1142, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. E. Tomayko and J. E. T. O. Hazaan, Human Aspects of Software Engineering, Charles River Media, Massachusetts, Mass, USA, 2004.
  36. J. Hughes and S. Jones, “Reflections on the use of grounded theory in interpretive information systems research,” Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, vol. 6, no. 1, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  37. B. H. Hansen and K. Kautz, “Grounded theory applied-studying information systems development methodologies in practice,” in Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 264, IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, Hawaii, USA, January 2005. View at Scopus
  38. C. Goulding, “Grounded theory: the missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda,” Qualitative Market Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–57, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar