Table of Contents
Advances in Software Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 5126069, 25 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5126069
Review Article

Innovation Drivers and Outputs for Software Firms: Literature Review and Concept Development

1University of Skövde, P.O. Box 408, 541 28 Skövde, Sweden
2School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands

Received 1 September 2015; Revised 21 December 2015; Accepted 13 January 2016

Academic Editor: Luigi Lavazza

Copyright © 2016 Jeremy Rose and Brent Furneaux. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Pikkarainen, W. Codenie, N. Boucart, and J. A. Heredia Alvaro, The Art of Software Innovation: Eight Practice Areas to Inspire Your Business, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2011.
  2. J. Rose, Software Innovation—Eight Work-Style Heuristics for Creative System Developers, Software Innovation, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark, 2010.
  3. A. Heirman and B. Clarysse, “Which tangible and intangible assets matter for innovation speed in start-Ups?” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 303–315, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Onetti, A. Zucchella, M. V. Jones, and P. P. McDougall-Covin, “Internationalization, innovation and entrepreneurship: business models for new technology-based firms,” Journal of Management & Governance, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 337–368, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Avital and D. Te'eni, “From generative fit to generative capacity: exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 345–367, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Carlo, K. Lyytinen, and G. Rose, “A knowledge-based model of radical innovation in small software firms,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 865–895, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Hoegl and H. G. Gemuenden, “Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence,” Organization Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 435–449, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. I. Aaen, “Essence: facilitating software innovation,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 543–553, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. J. Elam and M. Mead, “Designing for creativity: considerations for DSS development,” Information & Management, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 215–222, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Fagerberg, “Innovation: a guide to the literature,” in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, J. Fagerberg, C. Mowery, and R. Nelson, Eds., pp. 1–27, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  11. P. Quintas, “A product-process model of innovation in software development,” Journal of Information Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Christensen and M. Overdorf, “Meeting the challenge of disruptive change,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 66–76, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  13. B. Kitchenham and S. Charters, “Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature reviews in Software Engineering Version 2.3,” 2007, https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~norsaremah/2007%20Guidelines%20for%20performing%20SLR%20in%20SE%20v2.3.pdf.
  14. J. Webster and R. T. Watson, “Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 13–23, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  15. D. J. Bem, “Writing a review article for psychological bulletin,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 172–177, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Petersen, S. Vakkalanka, and L. Kuzniarz, “Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: an update,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 64, pp. 1–18, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. J. D. Novak, Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1988.
  18. D. Silverman, Interpreting Qualitative Data, SAGE, London, UK, 2001.
  19. B. Berelson, Content Analysis in Communicative Research, Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 1952.
  20. K. H. Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2004.
  21. V. K. Narayanan and D. J. Armstrong, Causal Mapping for Research in Information Technology, IGI Global, 2005.
  22. M. Laukkanen, “Comparative causal mapping and CMAP3 software in qualitative studies,” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, vol. 13, no. 2, article 13, 2012, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1846/3371. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Wilkinson, “Focus group research,” in Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, D. Silverman, Ed., SAGE Publications, London, UK, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  24. D. S. Cruzes and T. Dyba, “Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM '11), vol. 7491, pp. 275–284, IEEE, Banff, Canada, September 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. R. B. Cooper, “Information technology development creativity: a case study of attempted radical change,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 245–276, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. H. Xu, S. K. Sharma, and R. Hackney, “Web services innovation research: towards a dual-core model,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 321–334, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Kristensson, P. R. Magnusson, and J. Matthing, “Users as a hidden resource for creativity: findings from an experimental study on user involvement,” Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. S. Nambisan, R. Agarwal, and M. Tanniru, “Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 365–395, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. Oliveira and E. Von Hippel, “Users as service innovators: the case of banking services,” Research Policy, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 806–818, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. A. T. M. Aerts, J. B. M. Goossenaerts, D. K. Hammer, and J. C. Wortmann, “Architectures in context: on the evolution of business, application software, and ICT platform architectures,” Information & Management, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 781–794, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Boudreau, “Open platform strategies and innovation: granting access vs. devolving control,” Management Science, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1849–1872, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. D. Couger, “Press: measurement of the climate for creativity in IS organizations,” Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 273–279, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. K. R. Maccrimmon and C. Wagner, “Stimulating ideas through creativity software,” Management Science, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1514–1532, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. H. Romijn and M. Albaladejo, “Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England,” Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1053–1067, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. G. Cooper, “Perspective: the innovation dilemma: how to innovate when the market is mature,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 2–27, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. Florida and J. Goodnight, “Managing for creativity,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 83, no. 7-8, pp. 124–193, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. E. R. Mclean and S. J. Smits, “The I/S leader as ‘innovator’,” in Proceedings of the 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 352–358, IEEE, Wailea, Hawaii, USA, January 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. L. Gumusluoğlu and A. Ilsev, “Transformational leadership and organizational innovation: the roles of internal and external support for innovation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 264–277, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. N. P. Napier, L. Mathiassen, and D. Robey, “Building contextual ambidexterity in a software company to improve firm-level coordination,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 674–690, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. van den Ende and N. Wijnberg, “The organization of innovation and market dynamics: managing increasing returns in software firms,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 374–382, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Weterings and S. Koster, “Inheriting knowledge and sustaining relationships: what stimulates the innovative performance of small software firms in the Netherlands?” Research Policy, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 320–335, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. H.-L. Yang and S.-L. Hsiao, “Mechanisms of developing innovative IT-enabled services: a case study of Taiwanese healthcare service,” Technovation, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 327–337, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. K. Sherif, R. W. Zmud, and G. J. Browne, “Managing peer-to-peer conflicts in disruptive information technology innovations: the case of software reuse,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 339–356, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. T. Ravichandran, “Software reusability as synchronous innovation: a test of four theoretical models,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 183–199, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. B. M. Lobert and D. G. Dologite, “Measuring creativity of information system ideas: an exploratory investigation,” in Proceedings of the 27th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 392–402, Wailea, Hawaii, USA, January 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. D. L. Amoroso and J. D. Couger, “Developing information systems with creativity techniques: an exploratory study,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 720–728, Wailea, Hawaii, USA, January 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. Z. Chen, “Toward a better understanding of idea processors,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 541–553, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. Katsirikou and E. Sefertzi, “Innovation in the every day life of libraries,” Technovation, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 705–709, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. J. Shah, S. M. Smith, and N. Vargas-Hernandez, “Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness,” Design Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 111–134, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. J. West and S. Gallagher, “Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software,” R & D Management, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 319–331, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. R. J. Boland Jr., K. Lyytinen, and Y. Yoo, “Wakes of innovation in project networks: the case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction,” Organization Science, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 631–647, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. Brem and K.-I. Voigt, “Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—insights from the German software industry,” Technovation, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 351–367, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. S. F. Turner, W. Mitchell, and R. A. Bettis, “Responding to rivals and complements: how market concentration shapes generational product innovation strategy,” Organization Science, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 854–872, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. G. K. Lee and R. E. Cole, “From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: the case of the Linux kernel development,” Organization Science, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 633–649, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. O. Gassmann, P. Sandmeier, and C. H. Wecht, “Extreme customer innovation in the front-end: learning from a new software paradigm,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 46–66, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. R. L. Martin, “The innovation catalysts,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 82–87, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  57. I. Nonaka, “The knowledge-creating company,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 69, pp. 96–104, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  58. I. Tuomi, Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2003.
  59. G. Von Krogh, S. Spaeth, and K. R. Lakhani, “Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study,” Research Policy, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1217–1241, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. C. R. Lamastra, “Software innovativeness. A comparison between proprietary and Free/Open Source solutions offered by Italian SMEs,” R & D Management, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 153–169, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. E. Von Hippel and G. Von Krogh, “Open source software and the ‘private-collective’ innovation model: issues for organization science,” Organization Science, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 209–225, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. H. W. Chesbrough, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, Mass, USA, 2003.
  63. J. P. J. de Jong and E. von Hippel, “Transfers of user process innovations to process equipment producers: a study of Dutch high-tech firms,” Research Policy, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1181–1191, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. S. Spaeth, M. Stuermer, and G. von Krogh, “Enabling knowledge creation through outsiders: towards a push model of open innovation,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 52, no. 3-4, pp. 411–431, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. M. Bogers, A. Afuah, and B. Bastian, “Users as innovators: a review, critique, and future research directions,” Journal of Management, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 857–875, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. J. M. Leimeister, M. Huber, U. Bretschneider, and H. Krcmar, “Leveraging crowdsourcing: activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 197–224, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. J. Henkel, “Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux,” Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 953–969, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. P. H. Gray, P. Salvatore, and B. Iyer, “Innovation impacts of using social bookmarking systems,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 629–643, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. C. C. Snow, Ø. D. Fjeldstad, C. Lettl, and R. E. Miles, “Organizing continuous product development and commercialization: the collaborative community of firms model,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. M. Osterloh and S. Rota, “Open source software development-Just another case of collective invention?” Research Policy, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 157–171, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. G. A. Athaide, P. W. Meyers, and D. L. Wilemon, “Seller-buyer interactions during the commercialization of technological process innovations,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 406–421, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. P. D. Morrison, J. H. Roberts, and E. von Hippel, “Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market,” Management Science, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1513–1527, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. N. Franke and E. Von Hippel, “Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security software,” Research Policy, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1199–1215, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. G. Wallas, The Art of Thought, Jonathan Cape, London, UK, 1926.
  75. M. Csikszentmihalyi, Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, Harper Perennial, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  76. W. Miller, J. Couger, and L. F. Higgins, “Comparing innovation styles profile of IS personnel to other occupations,” in Proceedings of the 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 378–386, IEEE, Wailea, Hawaii, USA, January 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. E. De Bono, The Use of Lateral Thinking: A Textbook of Creativity, Penguin, 1971.
  78. J. D. Couger, “Creativity/innovation in information systems organizations,” in Proceedings of the 30th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 349–350, IEEE, Wailea, Hawaii, USA, January 1997.
  79. E. L. Santanen, R. O. Briggs, and G.-J. De Vreede, “Causal relationships in creative problem solving: comparing facilitation interventions for ideation,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 167–197, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. R. O. Briggs and B. A. Reinig, “Bounded ideation theory,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 123–144, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. G. P. Pisano and R. Verganti, “Which kind of collaboration is right for you?” Harvard Business Review, vol. 86, no. 12, p. 76, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  82. M. E. Sosa, “Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks,” Organization Science, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. S. D. Müller and F. Ulrich, “Creativity and information systems in a hypercompetitive environment: a literature review,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 32, pp. 175–200, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  84. E. B. Roberts, “Managing invention and innovation,” Research Technology Management, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 35–54, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. X. Liu, Y. Li, P. Pan, and W. Li, “Research on computer-aided creative design platform based on creativity model,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 9973–9990, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. C. Sas and C. Zhang, “Investigating emotions in creative design,” in Proceedings of the 1st DESIRE Network Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design (DESIRE '10), pp. 138–149, Aarhus, Denmark, August 2010.
  87. P. M. Leonardi, “Innovation blindness: culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts,” Organization Science, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 347–369, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. M. Hoegl and L. Proserpio, “Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects,” Research Policy, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1153–1165, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. E. W. Duggan and C. S. Thachenkary, “Integrating nominal group technique and joint application development for improved systems requirements determination,” Information & Management, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 399–411, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. E. W. Duggan, “Generating systems requirements with facilitated group techniques,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 373–394, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. K. Lyytinen and G. M. Rose, “Information system development agility as organizational learning,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 183–199, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. A. Tiwana and E. R. McLean, “Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 13–43, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. A. Hesmer, K. A. Hribernik, J. M. Baalsrud Hauge, and K.-D. Thoben, “Supporting the ideation processes by a collaborative online based toolset,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 55, no. 3-4, pp. 218–225, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. P. Hocova, J. F. E Cunha, and Z. Staníček, “Design and management of an innovative software enterprise: a case study of a spin-off from university,” in Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (PICMET '09), D. F. Kocaoglu, T. R. Anderson, and T. U. Daim, Eds., pp. 2788–2797, IEEE, Portland, Ore, USA, August 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. T. Koc, “Organizational determinants of innovation capacity in software companies,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 373–385, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. I.-Y. Lu and C.-H. Wang, “Technology innovation and knowledge management in the high-tech industry,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 39, no. 1-2, pp. 3–19, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. B. Shneiderman, “Creativity support tools: accelerating discovery and innovation,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 20–32, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. J. Couger, L. Higgins, and S. C. McIntyre, “(Un)structured creativity in information systems organizations,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 375–397, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. T. T. Hewett, “Informing the design of computer-based environments to support creativity,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 63, no. 4-5, pp. 383–409, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. B. E. N. Shneiderman, “Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 114–138, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. B. Massetti, “An empirical examination of the value of creativity support systems on idea generation,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 83–97, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. J. W. Fellers and R. P. Bostrom, “Application of group support systems to promote creativity in information systems organizations,” in Proceedings of the 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 332–341, IEEE, Wailea, Hawaii, USA, January 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. S. Greenberg, “Toolkits and interface creativity,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 139–159, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. J. Highsmith and A. Cockburn, “Agile software development: the business of innovation,” Computer, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 120–127, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. D. K. Busse, “Fast-tracking product innovation,” in Proceedings of the 25th Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), pp. 1703–1708, ACM, San Jose, Calif, USA, May 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. S. Thomke, “Enlightened experimentation. The new imperative for innovation,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 66–75, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. L. E. Holmquist, “User-driven innovation in the future applications lab,” in Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '04), pp. 1091–1092, ACM, Vienna, Austria, April 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  108. N. Maiden, C. Ncube, and S. Robertson, “Can requirements be creative? Experiences with an enhanced air space management system,” in Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '07), pp. 632–641, IEEE, Minneapolis, Minn, USA, May 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. A. Dearden and S. Howard, “Capturing user requirements and priorities for innovative interactive systems,” in Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference (OzCHI '98), pp. 160–167, IEEE, Adelaide, Australia, December 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. N. Maiden, S. Manning, S. Robertson, and J. Greenwood, “Integrating creativity workshops into structured requirements processes,” in Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '04), pp. 113–122, ACM, Cambridge, Mass, USA, August 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. H. A. Koski, “The installed base effect: some empirical evidence from the microcomputer market,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 273–310, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  112. G. H. Walker, N. A. Stanton, and M. S. Young, “Where is computing driving cars? A technology trajectory of vehicle design,” International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 203–229, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  113. P. T. Helo, “Technology trajectories in mobile telecommunications: analysis of structure and speed of development,” International Journal of Mobile Communications, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 233–246, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  114. F. Hacklin, V. Raurich, and C. Marxt, “How incremental innovation becomes disruptive: the case of technology convergence,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Engineering Management Conference: Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development (IEMC '04), vol. 1, pp. 32–36, Singapore, October 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. N. Bakkalbasi, K. Bauer, J. Glover, and L. Wang, “Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science,” Biomedical Digital Libraries, vol. 3, article 7, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  116. N. Maiden, A. Gizikis, and S. Robertson, “Provoking creativity: imagine what your requirements could be like,” IEEE Software, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 68–75, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. M. Khurum, S. Fricker, and T. Gorschek, “The contextual nature of innovation—an empirical investigation of three software intensive products,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 595–613, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. J. L. Carlo, K. Lyytinen, and G. M. Rose, “Internet computing as a disruptive information technology innovation: the role of strong order effects,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 91–122, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. C. Raasch, “The sticks and carrots of integrating users into product development,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 21–39, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  120. F. T. Igira, “The situatedness of work practices and organizational culture: implications for information systems innovation uptake,” Journal of Information Technology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 79–88, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. M. E. Adams, G. S. Day, and D. Dougherty, “Enhancing new product development performance: an organizational learning perspective,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 403–422, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. D. R. Compeau, D. R. Meister, and C. A. Higgins, “From prediction to explanation: reconceptualizing and extending the perceived characteristics of innovating,” Journal of the Association of Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 409–439, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. M. Sojer and J. Henkel, “Code reuse in open source software development: quantitative evidence, drivers, and impediments,” Journal of the Association of Information Systems, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 868–901, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. C. L. de la Barra and B. Crawford, “Fostering creativity thinking in agile software development,” in HCI and Usability for Medicine and Health Care, vol. 4799 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 415–426, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  125. G. M. Marakas and J. J. Elam, “Creativity enhancement in problem solving: through software or process?” Management Science, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1136–1146, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. Y. Huang, P. V. Singh, and K. Srinivasan, “Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning,” Management Science, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 2138–2159, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. R. Zmud, “The effectiveness of external information channels in facilitating innovation within software development groups,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 43–59, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  128. K. J. Boudreau, “Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation,” Organization Science, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1409–1427, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. A. Weterings and R. Boschma, “Does spatial proximity to customers matter for innovative performance? Evidence from the Dutch software sector,” Research Policy, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 746–755, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. S.-C. Hung and R. Whittington, “Agency in national innovation systems: institutional entrepreneurship and the professionalization of Taiwanese IT,” Research Policy, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 526–538, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  131. L. Mich, D. M. Berry, and C. Anesi, “Applying a pragmatics-based creativity-fostering technique to requirements elicitation,” Requirements Engineering, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 262–275, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. M. Sarma and T. Matheus, “‘Hybrid’ open source software virtual communities of practice—a conceptual framework,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 569–585, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. E. Carayannis and J. Coleman, “Creative system design methodologies: the case of complex technical systems,” Technovation, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 831–840, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. C. Koch, “Innovation networking between stability and political dynamics,” Technovation, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 729–739, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. M. Qin, “Determinants of information system innovation behavior in enterprises: an empirical investigation,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government (ICMECG '09), pp. 223–227, IEEE, Nanchang, China, September 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. L. F. Higgins, “A comparison of scales for assessing personal creativity in IS,” in Proceedings of 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 13–19, IEEE, Wailea, Hawaii, USA, January 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  137. J. L. Sampler and D. F. Galletta, “Individual and organizational changes necessary for the application of creativity techniques in the development of information systems,” in Proceedings of the 24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 404–411, IEEE, Kauai, Hawaii, USA, January 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  138. T. A. Snow and J. D. Couger, “Creativity improvement intervention in a system development work unit,” in Proceedings of the 24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 412–418, IEEE, Kauai, Hawaii, USA, January 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  139. N. Maiden, S. Robertson, and J. Robertson, “Creative requirements: invention and its role in requirements engineering,” in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '06), pp. 1073–1074, ACM, Shanghai, China, May 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  140. K. Conboy, X. Wang, and B. Fitzgerald, “Creativity in agile systems development: a literature review,” in Information Systems—Creativity and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: IFIP WG 8.2 International Conference, CreativeSME 2009, Guimarães, Portugal, June 21–24, 2009. Proceedings, G. Dhillon, B. C. Stahl, and R. Baskerville, Eds., vol. 301 of IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, pp. 122–134, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  141. N. Maiden and S. Robertson, “Integrating creativity into requirements processes: experiences with an air traffic management system,” in Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE '05), pp. 105–114, IEEE, September 2005. View at Scopus
  142. L. Mich, C. Anesi, and D. M. Berry, “Requirements engineering and creativity: an innovative approach based on a model of the pragmatics of communication,” in Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ '04), pp. 1–15, Riga, Latvia, June 2004.
  143. P. McBreen, “Creativity in software development,” in Proceedings of the Tools 39: Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems, Software Technology for the Age of the Internet, Q. Y. Li, R. Riehle, G. Pour, and B. Meyer, Eds., p. 390, Santa Barbara, Calif, USA, August 2001.
  144. S. Hanninen, “The ‘perfect technology syndrome’: sources, consequences and solutions,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 39, no. 1-2, pp. 20–32, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar