Autism Research and Treatment

Autism Research and Treatment / 2011 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 653570 |

Ryan W. Y. Lee, Elaine Tierney, "Hypothesis: The Role of Sterols in Autism Spectrum Disorder", Autism Research and Treatment, vol. 2011, Article ID 653570, 7 pages, 2011.

Hypothesis: The Role of Sterols in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Academic Editor: Roberto Canitano
Received27 Sep 2010
Revised07 Feb 2011
Accepted21 Feb 2011
Published27 Apr 2011


A possible role for sterols in the development of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has not been proven, but studies in disorders of sterol biosynthesis, chiefly Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS), enable hypotheses on a causal relationship to be discussed. Advances in genetic technology coupled with discoveries in membrane physiology have led to renewed interest for lipids in the nervous system. This paper hypothesizes on the role of sterol dysfunction in ASD through the framework of SLOS. Impaired sonic hedgehog patterning, alterations in membrane lipid rafts leading to abnormal synaptic plasticity, and impaired neurosteroid synthesis are discussed. Potential therapeutic agents include the development of neuroactive steroid-based agents and enzyme-specific drugs. Future investigations should reveal the specific mechanisms underlying sterol dysfunction in neurodevelopmental disorders by utilizing advanced imaging and molecular techniques.

1. Introduction

The autism spectrum describes a group of disorders with early childhood onset, characterized by persistent core deficits in socialization, language, and stereotypic and repetitive behavior [1]. Over 50 years has passed since Leo Kanner pioneered a description of infantile autism [2]. The definition of autism has expanded to include a wide spectrum of clinically and biologically heterogeneous disorders, each with variable degrees of core autistic feature expression, which we now describe as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [3]. The estimated prevalence of ASD in the United States is 1 in 110 children [4]. The list of well-defined genetic disorders with ASD continues to expand, with commonly studied examples including fragile X syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, untreated phenylketonuria (PKU), Rett syndrome, and Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS). Thus, studies involving relatively homogenous populations with well-described genetic disorders have begun to reveal the neurobiologic underpinnings of behavioral phenotypes such as ASD. Evidence supporting a role for sterols in the development of ASD was based on studies in disorders of sterol biosynthesis, chiefly SLOS [58]. Furthermore, a study of 100 serum samples from the Autism Genetic Resource Exchange (AGRE) demonstrated that a subset (about 20%) of unrelated children from multiplex families with ASD had mild hypocholesterolemia (i.e., lower than 100 mg/dL), which is in contrast to very low cholesterol levels (<10 mg/dL) often seen in severe SLOS cases [6]. The findings of Tierney et al. were replicated when an additional 100 AGRE subjects were tested by the same group (unpublished data), but have not as yet been replicated by other research teams.

Cholesterol serves many essential roles in the developing nervous system. It is a structural component of myelin and membrane lipid rafts, serves as a substrate for neurosteroid formation, and facilitates hedgehog signaling [9, 10]. Impaired function of these activities is likely responsible for the anatomic and neurobehavioral manifestations in SLOS. Recent advances in gene technology and membrane biology have contributed to a better understanding of the complex mechanisms underlying impaired cognition and behavior in cholesterol-deficient conditions. This paper hypothesizes on the role of sterol dysfunction in ASD and proposes future directions for targeted therapeutics. We hypothesize that cholesterol dysfunction may lead to ASD by three mechanisms working in concert during brain development: (1) impaired sonic hedgehog patterning, (2) alterations in membrane lipid raft structure and protein function resulting in abnormal synaptic plasticity, and (3) impaired neurosteroid synthesis.

2. Sonic Hedgehog and Cholesterol Dysfunction in SLOS

Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS) is an autosomal recessive disorder of cholesterol biosynthesis caused by mutations in the gene encoding 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase (DHCR7) located on chromosome 11q12-13 [11, 12] (Figure 1). SLOS has an estimated incidence among individuals of European ancestry of 1 in 15,000 to 1 in 60,000 births and a carrier frequency of 1 in 30 to 1 in 50 [1317]. Individuals with SLOS have abnormally elevated plasma 7-dehydrocholesterol (7-DHC) or its isomer 8-dehydrocholesterol (8-DHC) and often low serum total cholesterol. There is a broad range of cholesterol seen in SLOS (less than 10 mg/dL to greater than 200 mg/dL). It remains uncertain whether morphologic and behavioral manifestations of SLOS are caused by decreased cholesterol levels, increased 7-DHC, or both. SLOS is associated with ASD in 50–75% of cases [6, 18, 19]. To date, the neurobiologic relationship between SLOS and ASD has not been explained.

Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) is a morphogen involved in the patterning of the nervous system and limbs, along with other transcription factors and secreted proteins [2025]. During embryonic development, SHH is covalently modified with both palmitate and cholesterol and secreted as part of a lipoprotein complex that regulates brain morphogenesis through the patched/smoothened signaling system [2629]. SHH is secreted from the notochord and ventral floor plate cells and forms a concentration gradient along the entire dorsal-ventral axis [29]. The posttranslational effect of SHH after covalent modification by cholesterol is the establishment of a morphogenic SHH concentration gradient that moves from the ventral (high concentration) to dorsal regions (lower concentration). Variations in the SHH gradient affect intracellular cell signaling systems and ultimately determine the expression of future cell types by sequential induction of transcription factors in ventral progenitor cells [29]. The formation of discrete cell precursor domains in the neural tube as a result of the SHH morphogenic front is one determinant of the structural fate of the maturing brain [3032] (Figure 2). In animal studies, during late embryonic and postnatal brain development, neural precursor and stem cell proliferation in dorsal neocortical, hippocampal, tectal, and cerebellar regions is regulated by SHH signaling [33, 34]. In humans, failure of midline brain structures to form appropriately can result from a loss of SHH processing, as evidenced in holoprosencephaly [35]. Incomplete formation of midline structures including the corpus callosum and cerebellum is the most common neuroimaging abnormality found in individuals with SLOS [36]. Interestingly, reduction in corpus callosum size is among the most common neuroimaging abnormality in autism and supports the aberrant connectivity hypothesis that autism is a disorder of connectivity, involving inter- and intrahemispheric communications with possible alterations of intracortical connections [3739]. In both autism and SLOS, it is uncertain whether callosal hypoplasia is due to a primary patterning defect or later dysfunction of neuronal cortical connectivity and axonal migration or both.

We hypothesize that in SLOS, low cholesterol or elevated sterol precursors result in establishment of an abnormal SHH gradient, which may alter the fate of cells in the developing brain. Further studies are required to support this hypothesis. While the hypothesis may be plausible for SLOS and certain cholesterol-dependent ASD, incomplete formation of midline structures is present in numerous disorders of cognition and behavior without abnormal sterol biosynthesis. In addition, there are many individuals with ASD that do not have midline structural brain abnormalities. For these reasons, multiple mechanisms are likely to arise as etiologies of the ASD phenotype. In sum, regional differences in the establishment and advancement of the SHH gradient and its effects on transcription factors, may provide an explanation for the development of cognitive and behavioral impairment in disorders with diffuse neural abnormalities, such as autism and SLOS.

3. Membrane Lipid Rafts and ASD

Studies on cholesterol and lipid organization in disease have led to progress in understanding the molecular basis of neurologic disorders [40]. As a result, autism research involving sterols and other metabolites continues to gain popularity. For over a decade, lipid rafts or specialized membrane microdomains have been investigated for their key role in cellular communication [41, 42]. Rafts are dynamic structures enriched with cholesterol, sphingomyelin, and phosphatidylcholine [43]. The primary raft subtype called caveolae comprised of scaffolding proteins (caveolin), is distinguished by flask-shaped invaginations of the plasma membrane [44]. These platforms serve as signaling regions in clatharin-independent endocytosis, lipid homeostasis, signal transduction, and tumorigenesis [45]. Caveolae are widely expressed in brain endothelial cells, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, Schwann cells, dorsal root ganglia, and hippocampal neurons [46]. Lipid rafts play a critical role in many neurologic disorders including SLOS, Huntington disease, Alzheimer's disease, Tangier disease, and Niemann-Pick disease type C [40, 47, 48]. The essential role of cholesterol in formation of lipid rafts and membrane organization is highlighted in studies of membrane physiology. Cholesterol content is extremely important for cell membrane lateral organization and protein function [4951]. Samuli Ollila et al. [49] report that lipid membrane lateral pressure profiles were significantly altered when cholesterol was replaced with sterol precursors, desmosterol, 7-DHC, or ketosterol. Furthermore, 7-DCH and 8-DHC have been shown to accumulate in membrane lipid rafts of liver tissue in individuals with SLOS [52]. The accumulation of sterol precursors in rafts depletes cholesterol from structures such as hippocampal membranes and limits ligand-binding activity of the serotonin 1A receptor [53]. Functional changes at the cellular level may be explained by studies showing that DHCR7-deficient neuronal cell lines downregulate genes critical to lipid synthesis such as sterol-regulatory element binding protein 2 (SREB-2), SREBF chaperone, site-1 protease, fatty acid synthase, and squalene synthase [47]. Decreased DHCR7 has also been shown to alter expression of key molecules for intracellular signaling and vesicular transport such as Egr1, Snx, and Adam19 [47]. These studies support a possible role for abnormal neuronal cell membrane protein signaling in DHCR7 mutations that lead to behavioral manifestations in SLOS. More studies are needed to determine if these mechanisms are involved in the human pathophysiology of SLOS and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Rafts may represent one of the many biologic substrates that shape neuronal networks in the brain. Recent data has shown that reduction in cholesterol levels impair exocytosis of synaptic vesicles [54]. Numerous questions are surfacing about the clinical manifestations of neuronal and glial membrane alterations caused by altered lipid raft composition in humans. For example, it remains unknown whether membrane proteins important for synaptic plasticity such as AMPA kainate, GABAA, and NMDA receptors are affected by abnormal sterol levels or whether these abnormalities are present either transiently or for longer periods in regions of the developing brain for individuals with autism. Therefore, we hypothesize that neuronal or glial expression of autism candidate genes and their resulting membrane proteins may be altered in disorders of abnormal cholesterol homeostasis.

4. Neurosteroids and ASD

Neurosteroids are steroid molecules produced by the central nervous system to rapidly augment neuronal excitability through membrane-bound, ion-gated neurotransmitter receptors [55, 56]. While classic steroid hormones typically exert endocrine function on the order of hours to days, neuroactive steroids can act rapidly in a nontranscriptional mechanism to produce behavioral effects in seconds to minutes [5659]. Neuroactive steroids are synthesized from cholesterol in neurons and glia or steroid precursors from peripheral tissues [60, 61]. Expression of steroidogenic enzymes is developmentally regulated [62]. There are many different types of neurosteroids resulting in an array of functional diversity including positive allosteric modulation of GABAA and NMDA receptors, myelin formation, axonal guidance, and dendrite growth [55, 62, 63]. These molecular activities enable moment-to-moment modulation of neuroendocrine functions and behavior.

Because of their broad psychiatric characteristics, neurosteroids have been implicated in the behavioral profile of SLOS [64]. Biochemical studies have demonstrated that neurosteroids possess pharmacologic properties applicable to anesthesia and epilepsy [57, 65]. Benzodiazepines inhibit the enzymes responsible for neurosteroid metabolism, perhaps due to shared pharmacologic action at the GABAA receptor [66]. Interestingly, some antidepressant agents such as fluoxetine have been found to increase circulating neurosteroid levels [67, 68]. The molecular effects of these medications on the nervous system in SLOS have not been investigated.

Since cholesterol does not cross the blood-brain barrier, neurosteroids are synthesized with cholesterol de novo [69]. For nearly a decade, it has been proposed that increased 7-DHC levels might inhibit neurosteroid formation or lead to synthesis of an inhibitory analog in the brain [70]. Marcos et al. [64] studied urinary steroids and found that dehydrocholesterols provided the substrate for formation of allopregnanolone and dehydroallopregnanolone in patients with SLOS. While only providing evidence for extraneural synthesis of 7- and 8-dehydroallopragnanolones, there is a high likelihood that abnormal synthesis occurs in the brain given the low tissue specificity of 5α-reductase and 3α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase [64]. Currently, mouse model studies are investigating the prospect that reduced levels of neurosteroids possessing anxiolytic properties, such as allopregnanolone, impact behavior in SLOS.

5. Targeted Therapeutics and Conclusions

Current treatment of SLOS involves endogenous cholesterol supplementation in the form of crystallized purified cholesterol suspended in Ora-Plus, microencapsulated powdered purified cholesterol (brandname SLOesterol), or egg yolks. Several publications discuss the role of simvastatin therapy [7173]. Efficacy for either of these therapies remains unclear. Endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis is the primary mechanism for nervous system cholesterol homeostasis, making a role for extrinsic cholesterol in altering nervous system function questionable [47]. As we look ahead, pharmacologic agents derived from neuroactive steroids or steroid analogues may provide targeted therapy for behavioral symptoms in SLOS and ASD. Currently, clinical trials are examining the therapeutic effects of neurosteroids on mood disorders, schizophrenia, substance abuse, traumatic brain injury, and cognitive disorders. Lipids such as 7-DHC may undergo perioxidation to form bioactive products called oxysterols that have been shown to reduce proliferation of Neuro2a cells and induce cell differentiation [74]. Oxysterols have long been hypothesized in the pathology of SLOS and remain a promising area for interventional trials to reduce oxygen free radicals [7578]. Enzyme-specific candidate drugs are being investigated in SLOS. Appropriate modulation of embryonic SHH patterning and lipid rafts are not likely to be achieved until future studies elucidate the specific mechanisms and biologic substrates underlying brain development. These studies may be aided by advances in functional neuroimaging and molecular imaging techniques. Furthermore, discussion on the ethics involving embryologic or childhood neuromodulatory therapy in patients with abnormal neural patterning should be considered if technology advances toward such a therapeutic option. In conclusion, we propose that ASD in SLOS, and perhaps other disorders of cholesterol homeostasis, occurs because of impairments in sonic hedgehog patterning, altered lipid raft structure resulting in aberrant synaptic plasticity, and impaired neuroactive steroid synthesis. Future investigations to explore these hypotheses are encouraged and may enhance our understanding of sterols in autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.


The authors would like to thank Forbes D. Porter, M.D. and Richard Kelley, M.D. for their permission to adapt figures for this publication.


  1. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, USA, 4th edition, 1994.
  2. L. Kanner, “Autistic disturbances of affective contact,” Nervous Child, vol. 2, pp. 217–250, 1943. View at: Google Scholar
  3. M. L. Bauman, “Medical comorbidities in autism: challenges to diagnosis and treatment,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 320–327, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Rice, “Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, United States, 2006,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 58, no. SS-10, pp. 1–20, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  5. E. Tierney, N. A. Nwokoro, F. D. Porter, L. S. Freund, J. K. Ghuman, and R. I. Kelley, “Behavior phenotype in the RSH/Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 191–200, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. Tierney, I. Bukelis, R. E. Thompson et al., “Abnormalities of cholesterol metabolism in autism spectrum disorders,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part B, vol. 141, no. 6, pp. 666–668, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Aneja and E. Tierney, “Autism: the role of cholesterol in treatment,” International Review of Psychiatry, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 165–170, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. F. D. Porter, “Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis and management,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 535–541, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Z. Korade, A. K. Kenworthy, and K. Mirnics, “Molecular consequences of altered neuronal cholesterol biosynthesis,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 4, pp. 866–875, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. Fantini and F. J. Barrantes, “Sphingolipid/cholesterol regulation of neurotransmitter receptor conformation and function,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1788, no. 11, pp. 2345–2361, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. S. Tint, M. Irons, E. R. Elias et al., “Defective cholesterol biosynthesis associated with the Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 330, no. 2, pp. 107–113, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. A. Wassif, C. Maslen, S. Kachilele-Linjewile et al., “Mutations in the human sterol Δ-reductase gene at 11q12-13 cause Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. I. Kelley and R. C. H. Hennekam, “Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome and other disorders of cholesterol biosynthesis,” in The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease, C. R. Scriver, A. L. Beaudet, W. S. Sly, and D. Valle, Eds., chapter 249, pp. 6183–6201, McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA, 8th edition, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  14. R. B. Lowry and S. L. Yong, “Borderline normal intelligence in the Smith-Lemli-Opitz (RSH) syndrome,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 137–143, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. K. Ryan, K. Bartlett, P. Clayton et al., “Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome: a variable clinical and biochemical phenotype,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 558–565, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  16. J. M. Opitz, “RSH (so-called Smith-Lemli-Opitz) syndrome,” Current Opinion in Pediatrics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 353–362, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. V. Bzdúch, D. Behúlová, and J. Škodová, “Incidence of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome in Slovakia,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 90, no. 3, p. 260, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. J. M. Nowaczyk and J. S. Waye, “The Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome: a novel metabolic way of understanding developmental biology, embryogenesis, and dysmorphology,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 375–386, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. E. Tierney, N. A. Nwokoro, and R. I. Kelley, “Behavioral phenotype of RSH/Smith Lemli-Opitz syndrome,” Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 131–134, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. M. Sikora, K. Pettit-Kekel, J. Penfield, L. S. Merkens, and R. D. Steiner, “The near universal presence of autism spectrum disorders in children with Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, vol. 140, no. 14, pp. 1511–1518, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. D. Currie and P. W. Ingham, “Induction of a specific muscle cell type by a hedgehog-like protein in zebrafish,” Nature, vol. 382, no. 6590, pp. 452–455, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. A. Porter, K. E. Young, and P. A. Beachy, “Cholesterol modification of hedgehog signaling proteins in animal development,” Science, vol. 274, no. 5285, pp. 255–259, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. W. Herzog, X. Zeng, Z. Lele et al., “Adenohypophysis formation in the zebrafish and its dependence on Sonic hedgehog,” Developmental Biology, vol. 254, no. 1, pp. 36–49, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. E. Lewis and J. S. Eisen, “Hedgehog signaling is required for primary motoneuron induction in zebrafish,” Development, vol. 128, no. 18, pp. 3485–3495, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. Scholpp, O. Wolf, M. Brand, and A. Lumsden, “Hedgehog signalling from the zona limitans intrathalamica orchestrates patterning of the zebrafish diencephalon,” Development, vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 855–864, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. R. Dassule, P. Lewis, M. Bei, R. Maas, and A. P. McMahon, “Sonic hedgehog regulates growth and morphogenesis of the tooth,” Development, vol. 127, no. 22, pp. 4775–4785, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  27. J. J. Lee, S. C. Ekker, D. P. Von Kessler, J. A. Porter, B. I. Sun, and P. A. Beachy, “Autoproteolysis in hedgehog protein biogenesis,” Science, vol. 266, no. 5190, pp. 1528–1537, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  28. R. B. Pepinsky, C. Zeng, D. Went et al., “Identification of a palmitic acid-modified form of human Sonic hedgehog,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 22, pp. 14037–14045, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. K. Cooper, C. A. Wassif, P. A. Krakowiak et al., “A defective response to Hedgehog signaling in disorders of cholesterol biosynthesis,” Nature Genetics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 508–513, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. V. Ribes and J. Briscoe, “Establishing and interpreting graded Sonic Hedgehog signaling during vertebrate neural tube patterning: the role of negative feedback,” Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, vol. 1, no. 2, Article ID a002014, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Ericson, S. Morton, A. Kawakami, H. Roelink, and T. M. Jessell, “Two critical periods of Sonic Hedgehog signaling required for the specification of motor neuron identity,” Cell, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 661–673, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. Wilson and M. Maden, “The mechanisms of dorsoventral patterning in the vertebrate neural tube,” Developmental Biology, vol. 282, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. E. Davies and R. H. Miller, “Local sonic hedgehog signaling regulates oligodendrocyte precursor appearance in multiple ventricular zone domains in the chick metencephalon,” Developmental Biology, vol. 233, no. 2, pp. 513–525, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. V. Palma and A. Ruiz i Altaba, “Hedgehog-GLI signaling regulates the behavior of cells with stem cell properties in the developing neocortex,” Development, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 337–345, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. E. Roessler, E. Belloni, K. Gaudenz et al., “Mutations in the human Sonic Hedgehog gene cause holoprosencephaly,” Nature Genetics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 357–360, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  36. P. A. Caruso, T. Y. Poussaint, A. A. Tzika et al., “MRI and H MRS findings in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome,” Neuroradiology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. N. J. Minshew and D. L. Williams, “The new neurobiology of autism: cortex, connectivity, and neuronal organization,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 945–950, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. C. Stanfield, A. M. McIntosh, M. D. Spencer, R. Philip, S. Gaur, and S. M. Lawrie, “Towards a neuroanatomy of autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging studies,” European Psychiatry, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 289–299, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Y. Hardan, M. Pabalan, N. Gupta et al., “Corpus callosum volume in children with autism,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 57–61, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. F. R. Maxfield and I. Tabas, “Role of cholesterol and lipid organization in disease,” Nature, vol. 438, no. 7068, pp. 612–621, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. K. Simons and D. Toomre, “Lipid rafts and signal transduction,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  42. J. B. Helms and C. Zurzolo, “Lipids as targeting signals: lipid rafts and intracellular trafficking,” Traffic, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 247–254, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. K. Simons and E. Ikonen, “Functional rafts in cell membranes,” Nature, vol. 387, no. 6633, pp. 569–572, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. T. M. Williams and M. P. Lisanti, “The caveolin proteins,” Genome Biology, vol. 5, no. 3, Article ID 214, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. F. G. Quest, L. Leyton, and M. Párraga, “Caveolins, caveolae, and lipid rafts in cellular transport, signaling, and disease,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 129–144, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. P. L. Cameron, J. W. Ruffin, R. Bollag, H. Rasmussen, and R. S. Cameron, “Identification of caveolin and caveolin-related proteins in the brain,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 24, pp. 9520–9535, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  47. Z. Korade and A. K. Kenworthy, “Lipid rafts, cholesterol, and the brain,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1265–1273, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. K. Simons and R. Ehehalt, “Cholesterol, lipid rafts, and disease,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 597–603, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. O. H. Samuli Ollila, T. Róg, M. Karttunen, and I. Vattulainen, “Role of sterol type on lateral pressure profiles of lipid membranes affecting membrane protein functionality: comparison between cholesterol, desmosterol, 7-dehydrocholesterol and ketosterol,” Journal of Structural Biology, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 311–323, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. X. Xu, R. Bittman, G. Duportail, D. Heissler, C. Vilcheze, and E. London, “Effect of the structure of natural sterols and sphingolipids on the formation of ordered sphingolipid/sterol domains (rafts). Comparison of cholesterol to plant, fungal, and disease-associated sterols and comparison of sphingomyelin, cerebrosides, and ceramide,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 36, pp. 33540–33546, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. P. L. G. Chong, W. Zhu, and B. Venegas, “On the lateral structure of model membranes containing cholesterol,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1788, no. 1, pp. 2–11, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. D. Rakheja and R. L. Boriack, “Precholesterol sterols accumulate in lipid rafts of patients with Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome and X-linked dominant Chondrodysplasia punctata,” Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 128–132, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. P. Singh, Y. D. Paila, and A. Chattopadhyay, “Differential effects of cholesterol and 7-dehydrocholesterol on the ligand binding activity of the hippocampal serotonin receptor: implications in SLOS,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 358, no. 2, pp. 495–499, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. A. Linetti, A. Fratangeli, E. Taverna et al., “Cholesterol reduction impairs exocytosis of synaptic vesicles,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 595–605, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. M. Paul and R. H. Purdy, “Neuroactive steroids,” FASEB Journal, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 2311–2322, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  56. S. H. Mellon, L. D. Griffin, and N. A. Compagnone, “Biosynthesis and action of neurosteroids,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 37, no. 1–3, pp. 3–12, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. H. Selye, “Acquired adaptation to the anesthetic effect of steroid hormones,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 41, pp. 259–268, 1941. View at: Google Scholar
  58. E. E. Baulieu and M. Schumacher, “Neurosteroids, with special reference to the effect of progesterone on myelination in peripheral nerves,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 105–112, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  59. S. H. Mellon, “Neurosteroids: biochemistry, modes of action, and clinical relevance,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 1003–1008, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. R. C. Agís-Balboa, G. Pinna, A. Zhubi et al., “Characterization of brain neurons that express enzymes mediating neurosteroid biosynthesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 39, pp. 14602–14607, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. S. H. Mellon and L. D. Griffin, “Neurosteroids: biochemistry and clinical significance,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. N. A. Compagnone and S. H. Mellon, “Neurosteroids: biosynthesis and function of these novel neuromodulators,” Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–56, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. D. Majewska, “Neurosteroids: endogenous bimodal modulators of the GABA(A) receptor. Mechanism of action and physiological significance,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 379–395, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. J. Marcos, LI. W. Guo, W. K. Wilson, F. D. Porter, and C. Shackleton, “The implications of 7-dehydrosterol-7-reductase deficiency (Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome) to neurosteroid production,” Steroids, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. M. Bialer, S. I. Johannessen, R. H. Levy, E. Perucca, T. Tomson, and H. S. White, “Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the Ninth Eilat Conference (EILAT IX),” Epilepsy Research, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 1–43, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. N. Usami, T. Yamamoto, S. Shintani et al., “Substrate specificity of human 3(20)α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase for neurosteroids and its inhibition by benzodiazepines,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 441–445, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. V. Uzunova, Y. Sheline, J. M. Davis et al., “Increase in the cerebrospinal fluid content of neurosteroids in patients with unipolar major depression who are receiving fluoxetine or fluvoxamine,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 3239–3244, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. G. Pinna, E. Costa, and A. Guidotti, “Fluoxetine and norfluoxetine stereospecifically and selectively increase brain neurosteroid content at doses that are inactive on 5-HT reuptake,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 362–372, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. J. M. Dietschy and S. D. Turley, “Cholesterol metabolism in the brain,” Current Opinion in Lipidology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 105–112, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. F. D. Porter, “Malformation syndromes due to inborn errors of cholesterol synthesis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 715–724, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. P. E. Jira, R. A. Wevers, J. De Jong et al., “Simvastatin: a new therapeutic approach for Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1339–1346, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  72. L. Starck, A. Lövgren-Sandblom, and I. Björkhem, “Simvastatin treatment in the SLO syndrome: a safe approach?” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 183–189, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. Y. M. Chan, L. S. Merkens, W. E. Connor et al., “Effects of dietary cholesterol and simvastatin on cholesterol synthesis in smith-lemli-opitz syndrome,” Pediatric Research, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 681–685, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. Z. Korade, L. Xu, R. Shelton, and N. A. Porter, “Biological activities of 7-dehydrocholesterol-derived oxysterols: implications for Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 3259–3269, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. W. Gaoua, F. Chevy, C. Roux, and C. Wolf, “Oxidized derivatives of 7-dehydrocholesterol induce growth retardation in cultured rat embryos: a model for antenatal growth retardation in the Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 456–463, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  76. M. J. Richards, B. A. Nagel, and S. J. Fliesler, “Lipid hydroperoxide formation in the retina: correlation with retinal degeneration and light damage in a rat model of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 538–541, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. G. J. Schroepfer Jr., “Oxysterols: modulators of cholesterol metabolism and other processes,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 361–554, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  78. A. Valencia, A. Rajadurai, A. B. Carle, and I. E. Kochevar, “7-Dehydrocholesterol enhances ultraviolet A-induced oxidative stress in keratinocytes: roles of NADPH oxidase, mitochondria, and lipid rafts,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1704–1718, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Ryan W. Y. Lee and Elaine Tierney. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.