Review Article

A Need for Consistency in Behavioral Phenotyping for ASD: Analysis of the Valproic Acid Model

Table 2

Three-chamber sociability test.

ReferenceHabituationDuration of each testCoding methodsSociability measurementIndex used?Social behavior comparisonOutcome

Dufour-Rainfray et al. [9]Not specified3 min (only-2-stranger test)Not specifiedTime spent in each compartment and number of crosses from one compartment to anotherNoTime spent in each chamber across groupsVPA spent more time in empty chamber. VPA had increased number of chamber crosses
Gantal et al. [10]Full apparatus for 2 days before testing10 min (only one stranger)TopScanTime spent sniffing and sniffing eventsSPI = S1/(S1 + Obj)Social preference indexVPA had reduced social preference
Kim et al. [12]Center only for 5 min10 minEthoVisionTime spent in each chamber and approach sniffing timeSPI = S1/E
SPI = S2
/S1
Time spent in each chamber compared across groupsVPA mice spent more time in the empty chamber and less time in stranger chamber. VPA spent more time with familiar mouse and less time with stranger
Bambini-Junior et al. [13]Center only for 5 min10 minManual real-time by two observersTime spent in each chamber and time spent sniffingSI = (S1 − Obj)/(S1 + Obj)SNI = (S2 − S1)/(S2 + S1)Time with novel object and time with stranger ratVPA spent equal time with novel object and stranger rat. VPA did not show novelty preference, but control preferred novel over familiar
Baronio et al. [15]5 min (location not specified)10 minManual real-time observationTime spent in chamber and undefined time “spent exploring”SI-(S1 − Obj)/(S1 + Obj)SNI = (S2 − F)/(S2 + F)Time with stranger mouse and time with novel objectVPA spent equal time with novel object and stranger mouse. VPA spent equal time exploring novel and familiar mice, but control preferred novel over familiar
Kang and Kim [14]Center only 10 min, full apparatus 10 min10 minEthoVisionSniffing time and chamber timePI = (S1 − E)/(S1 + E)PI = (S2 − S1)/(S1 + S2)Time with stranger mouse and time with empty cageVPA spent more time sniffing stranger than empty, but not as large of a difference as control. No social novelty preferences for VPA or control
Campolongo et al. [16]5 minutes to full apparatus with cylinders10 min (only one stranger)Manual from recordingSniffing timeNoCompared stranger mouse sniffing time across groups and to novel objectVPA spent less time sniffing stranger mouse than saline
Bronzuoli et al. [17]Full apparatus 10 min10 min (only one stranger)Noldus Observer softwareSniffing timeNoCompared stranger sniffing time across groupsVPA spent less time sniffing stranger mouse than saline
Sgritta et al. [18]Full apparatus 10 min10 minANY maze, manual from recording (blind)Sniffing time plus time climbing on cupNoTime sniffing novel object and time sniffing stranger mouseVPA spent same time sniffing stranger and object. VPA and control spent more time sniffing stranger mouse 2 than familiar

SI, sociability index; SNI, social novelty index; SPI, social preference index; S1, stranger/novel rodent 1; S2, stranger/novel rodent 2; F, familiar rodent; Obj, novel object; E, empty chamber.