Table of Contents
Chemotherapy Research and Practice
Volume 2014, Article ID 259312, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/259312
Clinical Study

Dose-Dense Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Weekly Paclitaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer

Department of Radiation & Oncology, Cancer Research Center, Shohadaye-Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Tehran, Iran

Received 28 April 2014; Revised 28 August 2014; Accepted 28 August 2014; Published 9 September 2014

Academic Editor: Vassilis Georgoulias

Copyright © 2014 Hamid Reza Mirzaei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. del Mastro, F. Perrone, L. Repetto et al., “Weekly paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in elderly advanced breast cancer patients: a phase II study of the Gruppo Italiano di Oncologia Geriatrica (GIOGer),” Annals of Oncology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 253–258, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Aguiar Bujanda, U. Bohn Sarmiento, M. Á. Cabrera Suárez, M. Pavcovich Ruiz, M. Á. Limeres González, and J. Aguiar Morales, “Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and weekly paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III breast cancer,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 332–338, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J.-M. Nabholtz, C. Falkson, D. Campos et al., “Docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 968–975, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. D. Seidman, D. Berry, C. Cirrincione et al., “Randomized phase III trial of weekly compared with every-3-weeks paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer, with trastuzumab for all HER-2 overexpressors and random assignment to trastuzumab or not in HER-2 nonoverexpressors: final results of cancer and leukemia group B protocol 9840,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1642–1649, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. A. Sparano, M. Wang, S. Martino et al., “Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 16, pp. 1663–1671, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. P. Mamounas, J. Bryant, B. Lembersky et al., “Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-28,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 3686–3696, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. C. Liu, G. D. Demetri, D. A. Berry et al., “Dose-escalation of filgrastim does not improve efficacy: clinical tolerability and long-term follow-up on CALGB study 9141 adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients using dose-intensified doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 223–230, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Polyzos, N. Malamos, I. Boukovinas et al., “FEC versus sequential docetaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with axillary node-positive early breast cancer: a randomized study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG),” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 95–104, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. L. Jones, G. Walsh, S. Ashley et al., “A randomised pilot Phase II study of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) or epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) given 2 weekly with pegfilgrastim (accelerated) vs 3 weekly (standard) for women with early breast cancer,” The British Journal of Cancer, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 305–310, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Piedbois, D. Serin, F. Priou et al., “Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer: docetaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (T/EC), or the reverse sequence (EC/T), every 2 weeks, versus docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (TEC) every 3 weeks: AERO B03 randomized phase II study,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 52–57, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. L. Citron, D. A. Berry, C. Cirrincione et al., “Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1431–1439, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. J. Coukell and D. Faulds, “Epirubicin: an updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of breast cancer,” Drugs, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 453–482, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. P. Launchbury and N. Habboubi, “Epirubicin and doxorubicin: a comparison of their characteristics, therapeutic activity and toxicity,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 197–228, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Reza Mirzaei, P. Sabet Rasekh, F. Nasrollahi et al., “Dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer,” International Journal of Breast Cancer, vol. 2013, Article ID 404396, 6 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Burnell, M. N. Levine, J. A. W. Chapman et al., “Cyclophosphamide, epirubicin , and fluorouracil versus dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, pp. 77–82, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  16. T. Ishikawa, S. Shimizu, K. Katayama et al., “Feasibility of AC/EC followed by weekly paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer in Japan,” Anticancer Research, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1515–1520, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus