Conference Paper

Comparative Assessment of an Innovative Dry-Cooled CSP System

Table 2

Input data and scenarios for PT-CSP technology comparative analysis.

ScenarioCapacitySpecific capital costEfficiencyFixed O and MVariable O and MCapacity factor
MWe€/kW%€/kW/month€/MWh%

PT-CSP, water cooling, high DNI50494314.009.902.4829.10
PT-CSP, water cooling, normal DNI50494314.009.902.4822.50
PT-CSP, water cooling, low DNI50494314.009.902.4817.50
PT-CSP, dry cooling, high DNI50505912.709.902.4827.30
PT-CSP, dry cooling, normal DNI50505912.709.902.4821.50
PT-CSP, dry cooling, low DNI50505912.709.902.4816.60
PT-CSP, MACC cooling, high DNI, 12.5% efficiency50497012.509.932.4825.98
PT-CSP, MACC cooling, high DNI, 13.5% efficiency50497013.509.932.4828.06
PT-CSP, MACC cooling, high DNI, 14.5% efficiency50497014.509.932.4830.14
PT-CSP, MACC cooling, normal DNI, 12.5% efficiency50497012.509.932.4820.09
PT-CSP, MACC cooling, normal DNI, 13.5% efficiency50497013.509.932.4821.70
PT-CSP, MACC cooling, normal DNI, 14.5% efficiency50497014.509.932.4823.30
PT-CSP, MACC cooling, low DNI, 12.5% efficiency50497012.509.932.4815.63
PT-CSP, MACC cooling, low DNI, 13.5% efficiency50497013.509.932.4816.88
PT-CSP, MACC cooling, low DNI, 14.5% efficiency50497014.509.932.4818.13