Case Report | Open Access
Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Associated with Adjacent Sessile Serrated Lesion of the Appendix Vermiform: A Case Report
Although the definition of sessile serrated lesion (SSL) of colon is controversial and the risk of progression to malignancy is also under investigation at present, SSL is generally described as a polyp characterized by a serrated architecture. It is estimated to represent a feature of a new cancerization pathway, coined “serrated neoplasia pathway,” particularly in right-sided colon adenocarcinomas. On the other hand, in appendix, the role of this pathway remains uncertain, probably because very few cases of appendiceal adenocarcinoma associated with SSL were reported, and furthermore, immunohistochemical examination was rarely carried out. We herein report an interesting case of invasive appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma exhibiting SSL, which was pathologically estimated as a potential precursor lesion, and performed representative immunohistochemistry for both the mucinous adenocarcinoma and SSL in the same specimen. To further elucidate the progression of the appendiceal carcinoma from SSL, both an adequate sectioning of the lesion and systematic immunohistochemical examination of a large number of appendiceal carcinoma cases containing adjacent SSL would be required.
Hyperplastic polyp (HP) of colon has been traditionally recognized as a benign lesion; however, recent studies revealed that some types of HP might have a malignant potential, and sessile serrated lesion (SSL) has been increasingly highlighted . Although it has been generally accepted that adenoma-carcinoma sequence  is an important pathway in colonic carcinogenesis, recent studies revealed that DNA hypermethylation and/or BRAF mutations also play important roles in the tumor progression especially in right-sided colon carcinomas and that SSL morphologically represents a characteristic feature of a newly postulated cancerization pathway, coined “serrated neoplasia pathway” [3, 4]. Moreover, some investigators suggested that neoplastic SSL closely associated with mucinous adenocarcinoma , and others reported that the outcome of patients with colorectal carcinomas that featured serrated architecture was worse than that of patients with nonserrated carcinomas .
In contrast to accumulative evidence for SSL of colon, SSL of appendix has not yet been fully understood, and the importance of “serrated neoplasia pathway” in appendiceal carcinomas also remains highly controversial . One possible reason is that appendiceal adenocarcinoma exhibiting SSL has been rarely described and the knowledge of immunohistochemistry is limited. Here, we present an interesting case of invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma exhibiting SSL of the appendix, which was estimated as a potential precursor lesion, and describe this case with details of representative immunohistochemical features.
2. Case Presentation
A 72-year-old Japanese woman was referred to our hospital for the treatment of a tumor of the ascending colon. The tumor was found by colonoscopy during a checkup for a rectal cancer, which had been resected 5 years earlier, finally staged as pT1 pN0 M0, according to TNM classification of Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). Computed tomography and positron emission tomography revealed that the tumor arose from the appendix and invaded the adjacent ascending colon to expose the mucosal surface. The laboratory data were within the normal range. Because the biopsy from the tumor showed malignancy, ileocecal resection with lymph node dissection was performed. The period after surgery was uneventful, and there was no evidence of recurrence at a 9-month followup, under administration of infusional 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.
Macroscopically, after formalin fixation, the resected specimen showed a clearly demarcated ulcer, measuring 28 × 20 mm maximum dimensions, in the ascending colon (Figure 1). The representative cutting surface revealed that the tumor was mainly located at the peripheral part of the appendix and invaded the adjacent ascending colon to expose the mucosal surface. Pathological findings revealed appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma showing extraluminal expansive growth, with one pericolonic metastatic lymph node, finally staged as pT4b pN1 M0, according to UICC TNM classification. The tumor contained massive mucin pools, and well-differentiated adenocarcinomas were found floating in the mucin pools. No goblet cell carcinoid or neuroendocrine cell was observed. The noticeable finding of this present case was the SSL which included serrated structure, crypt dilation, and horizontally arranged basal crypts, in the root of the appendix (Figure 2(a)). Moreover, the SSL combined with dysplastic change extended to the adjacent mucinous adenocarcinoma with an area of gradual transition (Figure 3); this SSL was pathologically regarded as a potential precursor lesion of the adjacent mucinous adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis was also performed on the formalin-fixed specimens including both mucinous adenocarcinoma and SSL. The experimental conditions, including antibody clone, vendor, and specific dilutions used, are summarized in Table 1. Four-micrometer-thick tissue sections were deparaffinized and heated in a microwave oven, and each immunohistochemistry was performed by using Ventana Benchmark automatic staining system (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland). Concerning IHC features, the expression of hMLH-1, which is a DNA mismatch-repair protein, was absent in the SSL, although its expression was inclined to be preserved in the deeper part of crypt (Figure 2(b)). On the other hand, the mucinous adenocarcinoma showed none or faint hMLH-1 expression. In particular, p53 protein expression and B-catenin nuclear localization were not observed in both mucinous adenocarcinoma and SSL. Other differences in IHC features are also showed in Table 1.
|Nuclear staining in more than 10% of the lesion was considered positive. |
bAny definitive cytoplasmic reactivity was considered positive.
cMore than 10% of positive staining cell was classified as weak, moderate, and strong, according to the staining intensity.
dAberrant nuclear localization was considered positive.
The words “serrated polyp” were first coined by Jass et al.  and were used to describe a lesion with a serrated morphology. However, the gross morphology of SSL resembles that of HP; thus, an obvious distinction between SSL and HP is not entirely easy, even for experienced gastrointestinal pathologists . In addition, whether a SSL without dysplasia can be pathologically recognized as an intraepithelial neoplasia is an unsettled problem , and these might be reasons why the definition of SSL has not yet reached consensus amongst pathologists. The current definition of SSL generally applies to a heterogeneous group of lesions characterized morphologically by a serrated architecture [1, 10]. More recently, Fujimori et al.  proposed the morphological diagnostic criteria on the basis of their computer assisted cytometrical analysis as follows: (1) crypt dilation, (2) irregularly branching crypts, and (3) horizontally arranged basal crypts (inverted T- and/or L-shaped crypts). Our present case sufficiently fulfilled the criteria above.
We performed a search of the English literature using PubMed with the keywords “appendix (or appendiceal),” “serrated,” and “carcinoma (or cancer)” to search for all case reports of appendiceal carcinoma associated with SSL. To our knowledge, only five cases [9, 12–15] have been published in the past three decades, and most of the studies did not provide IHC analysis comparing both the adenocarcinoma and SSL. Regarding the IHC profile of SSL found in colon, the loss of hMLH-1 and MGMT was reported to play an important role in the serrated neoplasia carcinogenesis pathway , and colon carcinomas with high-level microsatellite instability (MSI) have been estimated to be in at least 20% of the right-sided colon carcinomas. On the other hand, although some IHC analysis of appendiceal adenocarcinoma has been reported [14, 17, 18], very few were investigating lesions containing SSL.
A number of authors [9, 19, 20] have previously questioned the importance of DNA mismatch-repair proteins for the development of appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Taggart et al.  examined three cases of appendiceal mucinous carcinoma containing SSL and suggested that MLH1 promoter methylation was not a mechanism for MSI in their series. Likewise, Yantiss et al.  described 4 cases of invasive appendiceal adenocarcinoma associated with SSL, and of those, only 1 case showed loss of hMLH-1 expression in both the adenocarcinoma and the adjacent SSL. They suggested that molecular features of the serrated neoplastic pathway were not highly prevalent in adjacent carcinomas. Similarly, in the Japanese literature, Hayashi et al.  reviewed 19 cases of appendiceal carcinomas in their respective institutions and described only 1 case associated with SSL, which showed weak expression of hMLH-1 and MGMT in less than 50% of the lesion. Although our IHC results showed the loss of hMLH-1 expression in the accompanied SSL and none or faint hMLH-1 expression in the mucinous adenocarcinoma, the IHC features were almost similar to those in the case previously reported by Yantiss et al. . Moreover, p53 and B-catenin expressions were not observed in both mucinous adenocarcinoma and SSL in our present case. Besides, Ban et al.  observed no B-catenin expression in the colonic SSL with dysplasia in their 8 cases, whereas Fujita et al.  observed in half of their 12 cases. Concerning mucin expression, Bellizzi et al.  examined 53 noninvasive appendiceal epithelial proliferations and suggested that MUC6 expression was associated with SSL morphologic features. However, in our case, we were not able to detect any MUC6 expression in the SSL for unknown reasons.
In summary, the presented SSL pathologically extended to the adjacent mucinous carcinoma with areas of gradual transition; we believe this finding suggested that the tumor potentially arose from SSL of the appendix, and the IHC results were also compatible. This case study was the first to describe the representative immunohistochemistry of both SSL and mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix on the same resected specimen. To further elucidate the carcinogenesis and tumor progression from SSL of appendix, an adequate sectioning of the lesion should be performed, and systematic IHC examination of a large number of appendiceal carcinoma cases containing adjacent SSL is required.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
- R. D. Odze and J. L. Hornick, “Polyps of the large intestine,” in Surgical Pathology of the GI Tract, Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas, R. D. Odze and J. R. Goldblum, Eds., pp. 498–520, Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2nd edition, 2009.
- T. Muto, H. J. R. Bussey, and B. C. Morson, “The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum,” Cancer, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 2251–2270, 1975.
- H. Iino, J. R. Jass, L. A. Simms et al., “DNA microsatellite instability in hyperplastic polyps, serrated adenomas, and mixed polyps: a mild mutator pathway for colorectal cancer?” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 5–9, 1999.
- K. S. Boparai, E. Dekker, M. M. Polak, A. R. Musler, S. van Eeden, and C. J. M. van Noesel, “A serrated colorectal cancer pathway predominates over the classic WNT pathway in patients with hyperplastic polyposis syndrome,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 2700–2707, 2011.
- K. Fujita, H. Yamamoto, T. Matsumoto et al., “Sessile serrated adenoma with early neoplastic progression: a clinicopathologic and molecular study,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 295–304, 2011.
- Y. Shida, T. Fujimori, H. Tanaka et al., “Clinicopathological features of serrated adenocarcinoma defined by Mäkinen in Dukes' B colorectal carcinoma,” Pathobiology, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 169–174, 2012.
- J. R. Jass, V. L. J. Whitehall, J. Young, and B. A. Leggett, “Emerging concepts in colorectal neoplasia,” Gastroenterology, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 862–876, 2002.
- A. B. Farris, J. Misdraji, A. Srivastava et al., “Sessile serrated adenoma: challenging discrimination from other serrated colonic polyps,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 30–35, 2008.
- R. K. Yantiss, A. Panczykowski, J. Misdraji, R. D. Odze, H. Rennert, and Y. Chen, “A comprehensive study of nondysplastic and dysplastic serrated polyps of the vermiform appendix,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1742–1753, 2007.
- D. C. Snover, D. J. Ahnen, R. W. Burt et al., “Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated polyposis,” in WHO Classification of Tumours of Digestive System, F. T. Bozman, F. Carneio, R. H. Hruban, and N. Theise, Eds., pp. 160–165, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 4th edition, 2010.
- Y. Fujimori, T. Fujimori, J. Imura et al., “An assessment of the diagnostic criteria for sessile serrated adenoma/polyps: SSA/Ps using image processing software analysis for Ki67 immunohistochemistry,” Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 7, no. 1, article 59, 2012.
- F. H. Besir, R. Buyukkaya, H. Erdem, F. Ermis, I. Ozaydin, and B. Yazici, “Mucinous adenocarcinoma arising from diffuse serrated adenoma of the appendix which mimics appendicular abscess,” Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 237, 2012.
- S. Sweetser, S. O. Sanderson, and D. A. Ahlquist, “Gastrointestinal: colocolonic intussusception by adenocarcinoma arising from diffuse serrated adenoma of the appendix,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1081–1081, 2011.
- T. Hayashi, K. Hara, Y. Alkam et al., “Clinicopathologic characterization of the appendiceal carcinomas,” Stomach and Intestine, vol. 47, pp. 1975–1982, 2013.
- W. Kabbani, P. S. Houlihan, R. Luthra, S. R. Hamilton, and A. Rashid, “Mucinous and nonmucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas: different clinicopathological features but similar genetic alterations,” Modern Pathology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 599–605, 2002.
- K. Oh, M. Redston, and R. D. Odze, “Support for hMLH1 and MGMT silencing as a mechanism of tumorigenesis in the hyperplastic-adenoma-carcinoma (serrated) carcinogenic pathway in the colon,” Human Pathology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 101–111, 2005.
- S. O. Yoon, B. Kim, H. S. Lee et al., “Differential protein immunoexpression profiles in appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a special reference to classification and predictive factors,” Modern Pathology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1102–1112, 2009.
- A. M. Bellizzi, J. Rock, W. L. Marsh, and W. L. Frankel, “Serrated lesions of the appendix: a morphologic and immunohistochemical appraisal,” The American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 623–632, 2010.
- M. W. Taggart, J. Galbincea, P. F. Mansfield et al., “High-level microsatellite instability in appendiceal carcinomas,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1192–1200, 2013.
- J. Misdraji, L. J. Burgart, and G. Y. Lauwers, “Defective mismatch repair in the pathogenesis of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and adenocarcinomas,” Modern Pathology, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1447–1454, 2004.
- S. Ban, H. Mitomi, and H. Horiguchi, “Adenocarcinoma arising in small sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) of the colon: clinicopathological study of eight lesions,” Pathology International, vol. 64, pp. 123–132, 2014.
Copyright © 2014 Osamu Kinoshita et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.